1. Redefining Cut-Points for High Symptom Burden of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Classification in 18,577 Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
- Author
-
Smid DE, Franssen FME, Gonik M, Miravitlles M, Casanova C, Cosio BG, de Lucas-Ramos P, Marin JM, Martinez C, Mir I, Soriano JB, de Torres JP, Agusti A, Atalay NB, Billington J, Boutou AK, Brighenti-Zogg S, Chaplin E, Coster S, Dodd JW, Dürr S, Fernandez-Villar A, Groenen MTJ, Guimarães M, Hejduk K, Higgins V, Hopkinson NS, Horita N, Houben-Wilke S, Janssen DJA, Jehn M, Joerres R, Karch A, Kelly JL, Kim YI, Kimura H, Koblizek V, Kocks JH, Kon SSC, Kwon N, Ladeira I, Lee SD, Leuppi JD, Locantore N, Lopez-Campos JL, D-C Man W, Maricic L, Mendoza L, Miedinger D, Mihaltan F, Minami S, van der Molen T, Murrells TJ, Nakken N, Nishijima Y, Norman IJ, Novotna B, O'Donnell DE, Ogata Y, Pereira ED, Piercy J, Price D, Pothirat C, Raghavan N, Ringbaek T, Sajkov D, Sigari N, Singh S, Small M, da Silva GF, Tanner RJ, Tsiligianni IG, Tulek B, Tzanakis N, Vanfleteren LEGW, Watz H, Webb KA, Wouters EFM, Xie GG, Yoshikawa M, and Spruit MA
- Subjects
- Age Factors, Aged, Evidence-Based Medicine, Female, Global Health, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Sickness Impact Profile, Disease Progression, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive classification, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive therapy, Symptom Assessment methods
- Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be classified into groups A/C or B/D based on symptom intensity. Different threshold values for symptom questionnaires can result in misclassification and, in turn, different treatment recommendations. The primary aim was to find the best fitting cut-points for Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) symptom measures, with an modified Medical Research Council dyspnea grade of 2 or higher as point of reference., Methods: After a computerized search, data from 41 cohorts and whose authors agreed to provide data were pooled. COPD studies were eligible for analyses if they included, at least age, sex, postbronchodilator spirometry, modified Medical Research Council, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) total scores., Main Outcomes: Receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index were used to determine the best calibration threshold for CAT, COPD Clinical Questionnaire, and St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total scores. Following, GOLD A/B/C/D frequencies were calculated based on current cut-points and the newly derived cut-points., Findings: A total of 18,577 patients with COPD [72.0% male; mean age: 66.3 years (standard deviation 9.6)] were analyzed. Most patients had a moderate or severe degree of airflow limitation (GOLD spirometric grade 1, 10.9%; grade 2, 46.6%; grade 3, 32.4%; and grade 4, 10.3%). The best calibration threshold for CAT total score was 18 points, for COPD Clinical Questionnaire total score 1.9 points, and for St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score 46.0 points., Conclusions: The application of these new cut-points would reclassify about one-third of the patients with COPD and, thus, would impact on individual disease management. Further validation in prospective studies of these new values are needed., (Copyright © 2017 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF