Search

Introduction: ProGlide is a suture-mediated vascular closure device (VCD) indicated for retrograde access closure at the common femoral artery (CFA). However, its off-label use for antegrade and/or superficial femoral artery (SFA) access has become common in many practices. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ProGlide for femoral artery access closure in patients undergoing antegrade infrainguinal endovascular procedures., Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed data from patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) who underwent peripheral angioplasty between January 2017 and December 2023. The inclusion criteria were infrainguinal PAD disease, Rutherford classification 3 to 6, the use of an endovascular approach, and access performed through the ipsilateral antegrade femoral artery. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and technical success of the Perclose ProGlide closure device during antegrade percutaneous endovascular procedures. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative and postoperative inguinal and vascular complications., Results: A total of 301 participants were included in the study. All patients were classified according to the clinical categories of chronic limb ischemia: 111 patients (37%) had severe claudication (class 3) with walking distances of less than 20 meters, 42 patients (14%) had at least one limb with ischemic rest pain (class 4), and 148 patients (49%) had at least one limb with ischemic tissue loss (class 5 or 6). A 6 Fr introducer was used in the majority of cases (88%), with a mean hospital stay of 1.5 ± 0.5 days. Technical success was achieved in 298 patients (99%), and there were no early deaths. A total of 33 hematomas were identified, with 5 patients had major complications. One of these was treated with conservative management while four patients required further interventions., Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of using the ProGlide single vascular closure device for antegrade femoral puncture during infrainguinal endovascular interventions. The safety of its deployment can be further optimized by routinely utilizing ultrasound guidance., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (He-ePTFE) conduit is an option for patients requiring infrainguinal revascularization (iIR), but the risk of failure may be unpredictable, especially in cases with poor run-off. Intraoperative transit-time flow (TTF) provides an automated and quantitative analysis of flow and may serve as an adjunct evaluation during surgical revascularization. The aim of this study was to assess TTF in patients undergoing iIR with He-PTFE at 3 referral hospitals and to establish a predictive flow threshold for graft occlusion., Methods: A prospective registry initiated in 2020 enrolled patients undergoing iIR using He-PTFE for critical limb ischemia or severe claudication, and TTF measurement was analyzed. Preoperative assessments of anatomical and clinical characteristics were available for all patients. The HT353 Optima Meter (Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA) was used in all procedures according to a standardized protocol. The institutional ethics committee approved the study. A predictive model using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was utilized to establish the threshold of flow, and variables were compared. Anatomical and clinical evaluation were reported according to Rutherford grade, Global Limb Anatomic System and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification. The main outcome considered was the correlation between TTF and graft occlusion. Secondary outcomes included survival, other predictors of graft occlusion, freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events, and freedom from major amputation., Results: Among 68 patients, 55.8% had Rutherford 5-6, 45.6% had Global Limb Anatomic System 3 and 73.5% had Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection 3-4. Distal anastomosis was at tibial level in 23.5% and mean diameter of conduit was 6.4 mm. Basal and postoperative TTF were 27.8 ± 15.6 ml/min and 109.0 ± 53.0 ml/min, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 18 ± 13 months, 7 (10.9%) patients presented graft occlusion and 5 (7.8%) required major amputation. TTF threshold = 80 ml/min revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% (95% confidence interval 48.2-97.7) and 80.7% (95% confidence interval 68.1-90.0) respectively, and it was selected as cut-off for graft occlusion. Freedom from graft occlusion in patients with TTF >80 ml/min vs. TTF ≤80 ml/min at 6, 12, and 24 months was 95.7% (standard error (SE) = 0.030) vs. 65.5% (SE = 0.115), 95.7% (SE = 0.030) vs. 58.9% (SE = 0.120) and 90.9% (SE = 0.054) vs. 51.6% (SE = 0.126), P = 0.0003. No statistical difference in primary patency, secondary patency and limb salvage was observed. At multivariate analysis, distal anastomosis at tibial vessel (odds ratio 8.50) and TTF ≤80 ml/min (odds ratio 9.39) were independent predictors of graft occlusion., Conclusions: These results suggest that TTF may serve as a valuable tool in the management of iIR. A TTF measurement of ≤80 ml/min should be regarded as a predictor of graft occlusion, prompting consideration of additional intraoperative maneuvers to enhance arterial flow. Caution should be exercised in patients requiring direct tibial artery revascularization, as it represents a predictor of failure independent of TTF levels. Larger cohorts of patients and longer follow-up periods are necessary to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this multicenter national study was to compare the outcomes of primary open surgery by aorto-bifemoral bypass (ABFB) with those performed after a failed endovascular treatment (EVT) by kissing stent technique for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) lesions (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus [TASC] II C and D)., Methods: All consecutive ABFB cases carried out at 12 vascular surgery centers between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Data included patients' baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, procedural details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up results (survival, patency, amputation). The study cohort was divided into two groups based on indications for ABFB: primary treatment vs secondary treatment after EVT failure., Results: Overall, 329 patients underwent ABFB during the study period (71% males; mean age, 64 years), of which 285 were primary treatment and 44 were after prior EVT. At baseline, no significant differences were found between study groups in demographics and clinical characteristics. TASC C and D lesions were similarly represented in the study groups (TASC C: 22% vs 78%; TASC D: 16% vs 84%). No major differences were found between study groups in terms of procedural details, early mortality, and perioperative complications. At 5 years, primary patency rates were significantly higher for primary ABFB (88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93.2%-84%) as compared with ABFB after prior EVT (69%; 95% CI 84.9%-55%; log rank P value < .001); however, the 5-year rates of secondary patency (100% vs 95%; 95% CI, 100%-86%) and limb salvage (97%; 95% CI, 99%-96 vs 97%; 95% CI, 100%-94%) were similar between study groups., Conclusions: Surgical treatment of TASC C/D AIOD with ABFB seems to be equally safe and effective when performed after prior EVT, although primary ABFB seemed to have higher primary patency rates. Despite the need for more frequent reinterventions, secondary patency and limb salvage rates were similar. However, future large prospective trials are required to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The aims of this study were: i) to assess fragility indices (FIs) of individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared paclitaxel-based drug-coated balloons (DCBs) or drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus standard endovascular devices, and ii) to meta-analyze mid-term and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes from available RCT data while also estimating the FI of pooled results., Methods: This systematic review has been registered in the PROSPERO public database (CRD42022304326 http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO). A query of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE (Excerpta Medical Database), Scopus, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases was performed to identify eligible RCTs. Rates of primary patency (PP) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were assessed as efficacy outcomes, while lower limb amputation (LLA) consisting of major amputation that is. below or above the knee and all-cause mortality were estimated as safety outcomes. All outcomes were pooled with a random effects model to account for any clinical and study design heterogeneity. The analyses were performed by dividing the RCTs according to their maximal follow-up length (mid-term was defined as results up to 2-3 years, while long-term was defined as results up to 4-5 years). For each individual outcome, the FI and reverse fragility index (RFI) were calculated according to whether the outcome results were statistically significant or not, respectively. The fragility quotient (FQ) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ), which are the FI or RFI divided by the sample size, were also calculated., Results: A total of 2,337 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. There were 2 RCTs examining DES devices and 14 RCTs evaluating different DCBs. For efficacy outcomes, there was evidence that paclitaxel-based endovascular therapy increased the PP rate and reduced the TLR rate at mid-term, with a calculated pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.66 for patency (95% CI, 1.55-1.86; P < 0.001), with a corresponding number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 3 patients (95% CI, 2.9-3.8) and RR of 0.44 for TLR (95% CI, 0.35-0.54; P = 0.027), respectively. Similarly, there was evidence that paclitaxel-based endovascular therapy both increased PP and decreased TLR rates at long-term, with calculated pooled RR values of 1.73 (95% CI, 1.12-2.61; P = 0.004) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.45-0.62; P = 0.82), respectively. For safety outcomes, there was evidence that paclitaxel-based endovascular therapy increased all-cause mortality at mid-term, with a calculated pooled RR of 2.05 (95% CI, 1.21-3.24). However, there was no difference between treatment arms in LLA at mid-term (95% CI, 0.1-2.7; P = 0.68). Similarly, neither all-cause mortality nor LLA at long-term differed between treatment arms, with a calculated pooled RR of 0.66, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.31-3.42) and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.30-5.21; P = 0.22), respectively. The pooled estimates of PP at mid-term were robust (FI = 28 and FQ = 1.9%) as were pooled rates of TLR (FI = 18 and FQ = 0.9%). However, when safety outcomes were analyzed, the robustness of the meta-analysis decreased significantly. In fact, the relationship between the use of paclitaxel-coated devices and all-cause mortality at mid-term showed very low robustness (FI = 4 and FQ = 0.2%). At 5 years, only the benefit of paclitaxel-based devices to reduce TLR remained robust, with an FI of 32 and an FQ of 3.1%., Conclusions: The data supporting clinical efficacy endpoints of RCTs that examined paclitaxel-based devices in the treatment of femoral-popliteal arterial occlusive disease were robust; however, the pooled safety endpoints were highly fragile and prone to bias due to loss of patient follow-up in the original studies. These findings should be considered in the ongoing debate concerning the safety of paclitaxel-based devices., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this multicentric study was to assess the "REsults of iliac branch deviceS for hypogastriC salvage after previoUs aortic rEpair (RESCUE).", Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs) after previous open aortic repair (OAR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) at seven centers were captured. The study cohort was divided into two groups according to the type of repair originally performed. Early outcomes included immediate technical success and perioperative adverse events. Late outcomes included survival, side branch (SB) primary patency, SB instability, and new onset buttock claudication., Results: A total of 94 patients (82 male) were included in the study, 10 of them received bilateral implantation of IBDs. This resulted in a total of 104 devices included in the final analysis. Indication for treatment were endoleak 1b or progressive iliac aneurysmal degeneration or distal para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms; 73 were implanted after previous EVAR and 31 after previous OAR. Technical success was 100% in both groups. The 3-year rate of freedom from SB instability was 90.1% after previous EVAR and 85.4% after previous OAR, respectively (P = .05). The 3-year estimates of SB primary patency were significantly lower in patients who had received OAR as compared with those that had received EVAR (89.8% vs 94.9%; P = .05)., Conclusions: Endovascular treatment with IBDs following previous OAR or EVAR is safe and effective up to 3 years. Freedom from SB instability during follow-up was lower in patients who had previously undergone OAR than EVAR., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a risk prediction model for the prediction of long-term mortality for patients with severe asymptomatic de novo carotid stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (PREMY 2 SE-CEA)., Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from a dedicated database of consecutive patients who had undergone elective CEA for severe (>70% using the NASCET [North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial] criteria) asymptomatic carotid stenosis at two Italian University Hospitals from 2008 through 2016. Internal validation of the score was performed after random sampling in a 3:1 fashion. The primary end point of the PREMY 2 SE-CEA risk score was the 5-year mortality., Results: Of the 1214 patients, 901 were included in the derivation cohort and 313 in the validation cohort. Using multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination, a parsimonious model was derived. A risk score incorporating eight risk factors was generated and found to be highly predictive of long-term mortality in the derivation (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.41; P < .001) and validation (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.21-1.37; P <.001) cohorts. The discrimination power in the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was C = 0.775 (95% CI, 0.74-.80), and the optimism-corrected area under the curve in the bootstrapped samples was 0.761 (P < .001). A strong correlation was found between the predicted and actual mortality rates in the validation cohort (r = 0.71; P < .001)., Conclusions: In the present study, we have described the development, evaluation, and validation of a risk prediction model (PREMY 2 SE-CEA) for long-term mortality after CEA in asymptomatic patients. Physicians could use the PREMY 2 SE-CEA risk scoring tool to complement their estimates of life expectancy and prompt selective consideration of prophylactic CEA to improve the long-term benefits of interventions., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the scrupulous hygiene rules and the restriction of contacts during the lockdown owing to the COVID-19 pandemic affected the rate and severity of surgical site infections (SSI) after vascular exposure in the groin at two Italian University Hospitals., Methods: Starting from March 2020, strict hygiene measures for protection of health care workers (HCW) and patients from COVID-19 infection were implemented, and partly lifted in July 2020. The main exposure for analysis purposes was the period in which patients were operated. Accordingly, study subjects were divided into two groups for subsequent comparisons (preCOVID-19 era: March-June 2018-2019 versus COVID-19 era: March-June 2020). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of superficial and/or deep SSI within 30 days after surgery. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions were used to classify superficial and deep SSI., Results: A total of 194 consecutive patients who underwent vascular exposure in the groin were retrospectively analyzed. Of those, 60 underwent surgery from April 1, 2018 to June 30 of the same year; 83 from April 1, 2019 to June 30 of the same year; and 51 from April 1, 2020 to June 30 of the same year. The mean age of the study cohort was 75 years and 140 (72%) were males. Patients who were operated in the COVID-19 era were less likely to develop SSI (10% vs. 28%; P = 0.008), including both deep SSI (4% vs. 13%; P = 0.04) and superficial SSI (6% vs. 15%; P = 0.05). After multivariate adjustments, being operated in the COVID-19 era was found to be a negative predictor for development of an SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.09-0.76; P < 0.001) or deep SSI (OR = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.03-0.98; P < 0.001). Operative time was also found as independent predictor for the development of deep SSI (OR = 1.21; 95%CI = 1.21-1.52; P = 0.02). Using binary logistic regression, there were no independent predictors of superficial SSI that could be identified., Conclusions: Vascular exposure in the groin carries a non-negligible risk of SSI. In this study, we provided important insights that are simple and easily viable precautions (such as the universal use of surgical masks both for patients and health care professionals during wound care, the widespread diffusion of hand sanitizers, and the reduction of the number of visitors in the surgical wards) could be promising and safe tools for SSI risk reduction., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The primary objectives of our scoping review were to evaluate the methods used by research groups to assess the incidence of sarcopenia in patients with aortic disease and the extent of the evidence base that links sarcopenia to the survival of patients undergoing elective endovascular aortic repair and to identify the recurring themes or gaps in the literature to guide future research., Methods: A scoping review in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) protocols extension for scoping reviews was performed. The available studies included those fully reported in English (last query, April 30, 2022). The following PICO question was used to build the search equation: "in patients with aortic disease [population] undergoing endovascular repair [intervention], what was the prevalence and prognosis of radiologically defined sarcopenia [comparison] on the short- and long-term outcomes?", Results: A total of 31 studies were considered relevant, and 18 were included in the present scoping review. In brief, 12 studies had focused on standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), 2 on thoracic EVAR, and 4 on complex EVAR. All but two studies were retrospective in design, and only one study had included patients from a multicenter database. Sarcopenia had generally been defined using the computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings of the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle at L3 or L4, sometimes with normalization against the height. Overall, despite the heterogeneity in the methods used for its definition, sarcopenia was highly prevalent (range, 12.5%-67.6%). The patients with sarcopenia had had higher rates of mortality (ratio ranged from 2.28 [95% confidence interval, 1.35-3.84] to 6.34 [95% confidence interval, 3.37-10.0]) and adverse events (41% vs 16%; P = .020)., Conclusions: Sarcopenia, as identified using computed tomography angiography-based measurements of the skeletal muscle mass, was prevalent among patients undergoing elective EVAR, thoracic EVAR, or complex EVAR. The presence of sarcopenia has been shown to have a negative prognostic impact, increasing the operative risk and has been linked to poorer long-term survival., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since the first cases of a novel respiratory disease were reported in December 2019, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Emergency State (Cov-ES) caused a worldwide outbreak requiring a complete reorganization of the healthcare system and new management of its personnel; aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and financial impact of Cov-ES in the Department of Vascular Surgery at a Tertiary University "Hub" Hospital in northeast Italy., Methods: Differences in clinical practice according to Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Related Health Problems and the financial impact of Cov-ES were considered. Vascular procedures performed between March 2019 and December 2019 (Prepandemic) were compared to those performed in the period March-December 2020 (Pandemic). Prepandemic and pandemic reimbursements of all vascular activities and the top 3 vascular diagnoses were evaluated., Results: Prepandemic versus pandemic era documented a decrease of vascular consultations performed (2,882 vs. 2,270, -21.2%). The number of total vascular procedures decreased from 997 to 797 (-20.1%) with a higher reduction observed in outpatient surgical activities (247 to 136, -45.0%, P = 0.0005) rather than inpatient surgical activities (750 vs. 661, 11.9%, P = 0.02). Length of hospital stay (LOS) increased from 3.3 ± 2.7 days in prepandemic to 5.3 ± 3.9 in the pandemic era (P = 0.004). Among patients with limb-threatening ischemia, the rate of major limb amputation was higher in the pandemic (3.3% vs. 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.02), and a higher rate of elective hospitalization procedures was performed as urgent/emerging setting after clinical deterioration (2.8 % vs. 6.4%, P = 0.0002). According to DRG classification, an increase of "complicated" limb-threatening ischemia (DRG 554) and aortic aneurysm (DRG 110) was observed prepandemic to pandemic (+84.2% and +25.0%, respectively). Total reimbursement for vascular activities between pandemic versus prepandemic was 4,646,108€ vs. 5,054,398€, respectively (-8.0%). Management of "complicated" limb-threatening ischemia (DRG 554) and aortic aneurysm (DRG 110) required a higher clinical and financial support that was translated into higher economic reimbursement during the pandemic (273,035€ vs. 150,005€, +82.0% and 749,250€ vs. 603,680€, +24.1%, respectively)., Conclusions: During the pandemic, the main resources were employed for the treatment of limb-threatening ischemia, aortic aneurysm, and carotid stenosis. Inpatient activities documented an increase in major limb amputation and LOS. An increased reimbursement for each vascular procedure and for all "complicated" diagnoses revealed that the more serious and resource-demanding pathology occurred in this period., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of present study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score for patients who had undergone acute carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and assess the clinical and morphologic factors that could predict for worse outcomes., Methods: The data from 183 consecutive patients who had undergone CEA after ischemic stroke were analyzed from January 2015 to January 2021. The patients were divided into two groups using the NIHSS score cutoff of 4. Functional dependence was assessed at hospital discharge and 90 days after discharge., Results: Of the 183 patients, 102 (55.7%) had had a minor stroke (group A; NIHSS score of ≤4) and 81 (44.3%) had had a moderate to major stroke (group B; NIHSS score >4). Groups A and B showed significant differences in their intracranial anatomic features, including the presence of an incomplete circle of Willis (7.8% vs 17.3%; P = .05), cerebral ischemic lesion volume ≥4000 mm 3 (5.9% vs 24.7%; P ≤ .001), and a high Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score of 8 to 10 (75.5% vs 44.4%; P ≤ .001). The overall rate of combined perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death was 1.1%, with no strokes recorded during the interval to CEA. Patients in group A had a lower rate of functional dependence at discharge (4.9% vs 35.8%; P ≤ .001) and at 90 days after the index stroke event (2.5% vs 19.6%; P ≤ .001) compared with those in group B. Using multivariate binary logistic regression, an admission NIHSS score >4 was significantly associated with higher odds of functional dependence at discharge (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-18.5; P ≤ .001) and at 90 days (odds ratio, 10.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-19.3; P = .002)., Conclusions: An NIHSS score >4 at admission increased the risk of a higher modified Rankin scale score at both hospital discharge and 90 days after the index stroke event. Acute CEA was safe and feasible for patients with ischemic stroke, even if they had previously undergone intravenous thrombolysis., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term and mid-term technical and clinical outcomes of the Bolton Treo endograft in subjects with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requiring endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and assess if presence of hostile proximal neck would represent a risk factor for increased failure rates., Methods: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who had undergone elective or non-elective EVAR with the Bolton Treo endograft at 5 institutions located in the North-East of Italy (January 2016-December 2020) was performed. The main exposure variable for this study was presence of hostile (HAN) or friendly (FAN) aortic neck., Results: A total of 137 consecutive patients were treated with the Bolton Treo endograft at participating institutions; of these 63 (46%) presented HAN while 74 (54%) had FAN. At baseline, no significant differences were observed in the distribution of demographics and comorbidities between study groups. Two type Ia endoleaks (EL) were detected at completion angiography, all in patients with HAN but none in patients with FAN (3% vs. 0%, P = 0.04), but no type III EL were identified in the whole cohort. The median duration of follow-up in the study cohort was 30 months (IQR 22-34 months) and was similar between study groups (P = 0.87). At 3-years, survival estimates were 89% and 91% (P= 0.82) in patients with HAN and FAN, respectively. At three years, patients with HAN had significantly lower freedom from type IA endoleak as compared with patients with FAN (87% vs. 94%, P= 0.02). No significant differences were found between study groups in the three-year estimates of freedom from reinterventions (80% vs. 86%, P= 0.28). Using cox proportional hazards, presence of type II EL (HR 3.15, 95%CI 1.18-8.5, P= 0.02) and presence of type IA EL (HR 4.22, 95%CI 1.39-12.85, P= 0.01) were found as independent predictors for reinterventions in univariate analysis, although they were no longer significant in the multivariate model. Freedom from sac increase >5mm at three years were not significantly different between study groups (92% vs 91%, P= 0.95)., Conclusions: Within a contemporary multicentric real-world experience, EVAR with the Bolton Treo endograft shows a satisfactory safety profile in the immediate postoperative phase and acceptable outcomes during mid-term follow-up. Presence of HAN is correlated with development of type Ia EL (either early following stent-graft implantation or late after EVAR) which, in turn, may represent a significant factor leading to reinterventions., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: To describe a bailout technique to advance and precisely deploy thoracic endograft in the ascending aorta in case of difficulty crossing the aortic arch., Case Reports: A 73-year-old man presented with a large ruptured aneurysms in the descending aorta. During the TEVAR, stent-graft passage through the aortic arch was impossible due to the severe tortuosity of the aorta. The problem has been resolved using the sheath-anchoring rail guidewire (SARG) technique., Results: Through an axillary access, a snare was used to capture the stiff wire from the femoral access. A sheath was advanced over the stiff wire to the ascending aorta and placed there. By exploiting the grip of the sheath on the stiff in the ascending aorta, it was possible to handle the tension, move the delivery system through the arch and carefully deploy the graft., Conclusion: The SARG is a simple and quick learning technique which can be useful for Physicians dealing with complex aortic arch anatomy., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: At our institution, we adopted routinely ultrasound guided approach for all percutaneous procedures. The objective of this study was to describe the predictors of access site failures (ASFs) in patients undergoing percutaneous aorto iliac revascularization and to also evaluate whether other factors such as time period or different vascular devices may influence outcomes in terms of ASFs., Methods: We reviewed all consecutive percutaneous revascularizations performed for aortoiliac occlusion or stenosis at our institution from 2011 to 2020. All procedure were performed using an ultrasound (US) guided common femoral access. The primary outcome was ASFs, defined as bleeding or groin hematomas that required transfusions; pseduoaneurysm (diagnosed by US); retroperitoneal hematoma; artery laceration or ruptured (diagnosed intraoperatively); and thrombosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of ASFs., Results: A total of 502 femoral arteries were accessed under DUS guidance with no failure in sheath placement. Technical success was achieved in 498 of 502 procedures (99.2%). ASFs occurred in 21 patients (7%); but year of procedure appear to be associated with an excess of ASFs as rates were different between the first and second period of the study (10.9% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.04). Results of multivariable logistic regression model indicated that independent predictors of ASFs were common femoral artery (CFA) calcification peripheral artery calcium scoring system (PACCS) grade (odds ratio [OR], 8.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5-13.7), and CFA diameter (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85). Compared to patients with successful percutaneous access, ASFs resulted in longer post-op lengths of stay (P = < 0.001)., Conclusion: Percutaneous US guided access can be safely performed in patients undergoing endovascular procedures for aorto iliac revascularization with TASC C and D lesions. CFA calcification PACCS grade greater than 3 and smaller femoral vessel diameter are independent risk factors for ASFs., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To report the early outcomes of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using last generation 3D C-arm in patients undergone advanced endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (AdEVAR) and to identify risk factors that may predict any un-planned procedures., Methods: Patients undergone AdEVAR between December 2017 and December 2018 were enrolled. Final CBCT was performed in all patients after digital subtraction angiography. Primary end points were the incidence of any positive findings and the following unplanned procedures intended as any endovascular manoeuvre performed to fix such technical defect. The secondary endpoints were comparison of outcomes between patients with positive findings undergone unplanned procedure (Group A) versus patients without findings (Group B)., Results: 132 patients underwent endovascular treatment for aortic aneurysm. Of these, 22 (33%) fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repairs (F-BEVAR), 21 (29%) EVAR with iliac branch devices, 19 (26%) abdominal and 10 (14%) thoracic EVAR were included in the study. Unplanned procedures after CBCT were necessary in 22 patients (31%). Patients in both groups were similar excepted for BMI >25 kg/m 2 (55% vs. 26%), hostile iliac anatomy (64% vs. 32%) and previous aortic treatment (73% vs. 32%) (P < 0.05). The odds ratios for unplanned procedure in case of previous aortic treatment was 6.76 (95% CI, 1.97-23.16; P = 0.002)., Conclusion: The use of CBCT, especially in challenging scenarios, can reveal technical defects and may potentially limit the need for late reintervention. Patients undergone previous aortic surgery should be carefully evaluated and routine CBCT should be performed., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Aortic graft infection remains a considerable clinical challenge, and it is unclear which variables are associated with adverse outcomes among patients undergoing partial resection., Methods: A retrospective, multi-institutional study of patients who underwent partial resection of infected aortic grafts from 2002 to 2014 was performed using a standard database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, operative, and postoperative variables were recorded. The primary outcome was mortality. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis, and Cox regression analysis were performed., Results: One hundred fourteen patients at 22 medical centers in 6 countries underwent partial resection of an infected aortic graft. Seventy percent were men with median age 70 years. Ninety-seven percent had a history of open aortic bypass graft: 88 (77%) patients had infected aortobifemoral bypass, 18 (16%) had infected aortobiiliac bypass, and 1 (0.8%) had an infected thoracic graft. Infection was diagnosed at a median 4.3 years post-implant. All patients underwent partial resection followed by either extra-anatomic (47%) or in situ (53%) vascular reconstruction. Median follow-up period was 17 months (IQR 1, 50 months). Thirty-day mortality was 17.5%. The KM-estimated median survival from time of partial resection was 3.6 years. There was no significant survival difference between those undergoing in situ reconstruction or extra-anatomic bypass (P = 0.6). During follow up, 72% of repairs remained patent and 11% of patients underwent major amputation. On univariate Cox regression analysis, Candida infection was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 2.4; P = 0.01) as well as aortoenteric fistula (HR 1.9, P = 0.03). Resection of a single graft limb only to resection of abdominal (graft main body) infection was associated with decreased risk of mortality (HR 0.57, P = 0.04), as well as those with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification less than 3 (HR 0.35, P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis did not reveal any factors significantly associated with mortality. Persistent early infection was noted in 26% of patients within 30 days postoperatively, and 39% of patients were found to have any post-repair infection during the follow-up period. Two patients (1.8%) were found to have a late reinfection without early persistent postoperative infection. Patients with any post-repair infection were older (67 vs. 60 years, P = 0.01) and less likely to have patent repairs during follow up (59% vs. 32%, P = 0.01). Patients with aortoenteric fistula had a higher rate of any post-repair infection (63% vs. 29%, P < 0.01) CONCLUSION: This large multi-center study suggests that patients who have undergone partial resection of infected aortic grafts may be at high risk of death or post-repair infection, especially older patients with abdominal infection not isolated to a single graft limb, or with Candida infection or aortoenteric fistula. Late reinfection correlated strongly with early persistent postoperative infection, raising concern for occult retained infected graft material., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has a wide range of approaches based on personal expertise and preference. We evaluated our outcome with CEA with modified eversion technique (meCEA) under local anesthesia and whether the surgeon's experience could influence it., Methods: at our Institution, 837 patients underwent CEA across 8 years. Although the surgical technique was standardized, 2 groups were considered further: meCEA performed by a single Senior Operator (Group A) and meCEA performed by 4 young Consultants (Group B)., Results: A selective shunting policy was needed in 5.1%, together with general anesthesia. Overall operative time was 63.9 ± 15.1 minutes (61.4 ± 12.5 and 66 ± 16.9 minutes in Group A and Group B respectively; P < 0.001) and cross-clamp time 19.3 ± 2.9 minutes (19.0 ± 3.2 vs. 19.5 ± 2.8, P = 0.009). At 30 days, 0.7% TIA and 0.8% strokes were recorded. No differences (p = N.S.) between the 2 study groups in terms of postoperative neurological complications, with postoperative ipsilateral strokes always < 1%. At a median imaging follow-up of 22.5 months, the overall percentage of restenosis was 3.7%, with no difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.954). Twenty-two patients (2.6%) underwent reintervention for significant restenosis, and none of them had an ipsilateral stroke or TIA. Freedom from reintervention for restenosis at 24 months was 97.9% in Group A and 95.9% in Group B, with no between-group difference (P = 0.14). At the median survival follow-up of 37 months, the overall survival rate at 24 months was 97.9%in Group A, and 97.9% in Group B, with no between-group difference (P = 0.070)., Conclusions: In our experience, CEA with a modified technique is safe and achieves comparable outcomes to those of other established techniques. The reported short cross-clamp time, also in less experienced hands, is an additional strength., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The aim of the study is to report the early and midterm outcomes of late open conversion (LOC) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) using the "new aortic carrefour technique" (NACT) for preservation of the stent-graft iliac limbs. Late conversions were defined as explants >6 months after previous EVAR., Methods: Patients treated for elective or urgent LOC after EVAR with the NACT at a single center (2009-2019), and with ≥6 months of follow-up, were included. Briefly, after completing the proximal aortic anastomosis, the endograft iliac limbs were truncated and sutured together to create a "new aortic carrefour" (Veraldi's technique). A Dacron-knitted straight graft was therefore sutured to the newly created aortic bifurcation. Outcomes of interest were as follows: immediate technical success, intraoperative characteristics, and reinterventions. Results are reported as the number (and percentages) or median (and interquartile range [IQR])., Results: During the study period, 433 patients underwent standard EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm and 20 underwent LOC. Of these, 9 consecutive patients were deemed suitable and treated with NACT. The indication for conversion was endoleak in 6 (type IA n = 1, type II n = 4, type III n = 1), complete graft thrombosis (n = 2), and one case of sac enlargement without any clear signs of endoleak at computed tomography angiography. Of these cases, six were treated electively, while three were treated in urgent setting including one case of rupture. The median procedure, aortic cross-clamping, and distal anastomosis times were 280 minutes (IQR: 225-290), 24 minutes (IQR: 22-29), and 15 minutes (IQR: 14-18), respectively. The median blood loss was 1,600 mL (IQR: 700-1,900), and the median hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 7-12). None of the patients died and neither required unplanned reintervention within 30 days. At a median imaging follow-up of 13 months (IQR 8-43), there were no reinterventions due to residual leaks or technical defects. One patient died during follow-up, and the recorded cause of death was heart failure., Conclusions: The use of the NACT with preservation of the original endograft iliac limbs for LOC after EVAR is a safe and feasible technique, which results in a low perioperative morbidity and mortality rate in selected patients. The technique is effective during midterm follow-up and might represent a valuable tool to expand the armamentarium of vascular surgeons for surgical regrafting after EVAR., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study is to report the early and late outcomes of ultrasound-guided direct transabdominal embolization (UGDTE) of isolated type 2 endoleak (T2EL) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)., Methods: Forty-two consecutive T2EL patients were treated between February 2000 and September 2017 by UGDTE after previous EVAR. During the study period, UGDTE was the firs-line technique implemented for treatment of T2EL. All procedures were carried out using the same predefined technique. Aneurysm sac size change from the index treatment, freedom from recurrent endoleak after treatment, demographics, risk factors, and procedural factors were analyzed with univariate analysis., Results: During the study interval, 612 patients underwent standard EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment and 111 (18.2%) developed an isolated T2EL. Of these, 42 (6.8%) consecutive patients were deemed suitable and treated with UDGT. Median imaging follow-up duration was 18.7 months. Median fluoroscopic and procedure times were 7 and 58 minutes, respectively. The rate of immediate technical success was 100%. Ten patients (23.8%) underwent reintervention for recurrent T2EL. Freedom from reintervention for T2EL at 1, 2, and 4 years was 81%, 78%, and 71%. No aneurysm-related mortality occurred during the follow-up period., Conclusions: The use of UGDTE for treatment of isolated T2EL after EVAR is a safe and feasible technique when performed by experienced operators, resulting in high technical success and low complication rates in selected patients. Although being effective in obtaining T2EL exclusion, up to one-third of the patients may require repeat intervention during long-term follow-up. Therefore, lifelong surveillance after the procedure is recommended., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of our article was to describe the complementary role of different technical solutions for secondary endovascular repair of recurring lesions and perioperative complications after open aortic repair (OAR)., Methods: We describe our clinical experience of secondary endovascular repair after OAR. We included in the analysis all consecutive patients who presented recurring lesions and perioperative complications after OAR and underwent secondary endovascular repair between January 1, 2015 and June 31, 2018. Both elective and nonelective cases were captured. Early end points were technical success, 30-day mortality, 30-day major adverse events, and 30-day vascular access complications. Late end points were survival and freedom from secondary interventions., Results: Three different techniques were used in 6 patients: 2 cases of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR), 2 cases of parallel-graft EVAR (pg-EVAR), and 2 cases of off-label use of standard devices. Technical success was 100%. One patient died within 30 days from acute pulmonary embolism. One patient developed acute kidney injury not requiring renal replacement therapy, whereas the remaining 4 patients were free from 30-day major adverse events. The cumulative rate of 30-day vascular access complications was 0%. All the 5 patients who survived the index hospitalization had ≥12 months of clinical and imaging follow-up. At the longest individual follow-up, they all were alive and free from secondary interventions. Computed tomography angiography showed in all cases sustained clinical success., Conclusions: Secondary endovascular repair of recurring lesions and perioperative complications after OAR is safe and feasible and offers a minimally invasive effective treatment option when a redo surgical operation would be associated with a considerable risk to the patient. Different solutions are available (including F-BEVAR, pg-EVAR, and off-label use of standard devices) and are complementary rather than competitive. Careful preoperative assessment and familiarity with advanced techniques are essential to achieve satisfactory outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Endoleaks (ELs), defined as continued perfusion of the aneurysm sac despite stent-graft deployment, are the most common adverse event after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and account for most of the reinterventions. Type 2 EL (T2EL), caused by backflow of collateral arteries into the aneurysm sac, are the most frequently encountered and may account for the need for secondary interventions after EVAR in up to 40% of the cases. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging may be better able to quantify and characterize low-flow T2EL as compared with computed tomography angiography. Support for conservative management of T2EL derives from the relatively high percentage of T2EL that will resolve spontaneously over a variable period (more than 30%) and the estimated low risk of post-EVAR rupture secondary to isolated T2EL (less than 1%). Current guidelines are that a conservative approach is appropriate for isolated T2EL without sac expansion while intervention is recommended when sac enlargement of ≥10 mm as compared with pre-EVAR is detected. Although generally safe, secondary interventions for T2EL are often unsatisfactory since persistence and recurrence are commonly encountered problems and long-term follow-up is mandatory. Further investigation is required to determine the factors associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm progression in the presence of isolated T2EL and the most cost-effective technique to manage this complication., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aortoaortic concept for endovascular repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is nearly forgotten but may constitute a valuable option for focal pathologies. Herein, we describe our experience using custom-made (CM) unibody conical endografts for saccular AAAs with narrow (≤20 mm wide) aortic bifurcation (AB) in three patients. Given the narrow AB, the option for a bifurcated stent graft was reputed not optimal. Therefore, we decided to further suggest the construction of a CM unibody conical stent graft with respect to unique anatomical characteristics of the patients. Technical success rate was 100%, and computed tomography angiography at first-month follow-up showed complete sealing proximally and distally with excellent conformability of the endografts in all the cases. All the patients were free from any-type endoleak (EL) and had no evidence of any endograft-related complication (i.e., fracture, thrombosis, or migration) or required any reintervention at their longest follow-up. We conclude that in the proper anatomic setting, the use of CM unibody conical endografts for elective EVAR of saccular AAAs with narrow AB is technically feasible with excellent short-term safety regarding ELs or migration., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)