1. Determinants of passive antibody efficacy in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Stadler, E, Chai, KL, Schlub, TE, Cromer, D, Khan, SR, Polizzotto, MN, Kent, SJ, Beecher, C, White, H, Turner, T, Skoetz, N, Estcourt, L, McQuilten, ZK, Wood, EM, Khoury, DS, Davenport, MP, Stadler, E, Chai, KL, Schlub, TE, Cromer, D, Khan, SR, Polizzotto, MN, Kent, SJ, Beecher, C, White, H, Turner, T, Skoetz, N, Estcourt, L, McQuilten, ZK, Wood, EM, Khoury, DS, and Davenport, MP
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials of passive antibodies as treatment and prophylaxis for COVID-19 have reported variable efficacy. However, the determinants of efficacy have not been identified. We aimed to assess how the dose and timing of administration affect treatment outcome. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we extracted data from published studies of passive antibody treatment from Jan 1, 2019, to Jan 31, 2023, that were identified by searching multiple databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included only randomised controlled trials of passive antibody administration for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. To compare administered antibody dose between different treatments, we used data on in-vitro neutralisation titres to normalise dose by antibody potency. We used mixed-effects regression and model fitting to analyse the relationship between timing, dose and efficacy. FINDINGS: We found 58 randomised controlled trials that investigated passive antibody therapies for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19. Earlier clinical stage at treatment initiation was highly predictive of the efficacy of both monoclonal antibodies (p<0·0001) and convalescent plasma therapy (p=0·030) in preventing progression to subsequent stages, with either prophylaxis or treatment in outpatients showing the greatest effects. For the treatment of outpatients with COVID-19, we found a significant association between the dose administered and efficacy in preventing hospitalisation (relative risk 0·77; p<0·0001). Using this relationship, we predicted that no approved monoclonal antibody was expected to provide more than 30% efficacy against some omicron (B.1.1.529) subvariants, such as BQ.1.1. INTERPRETATION: Early administration before hospitalisation and sufficient doses of passive antibody therapy are crucial to achieving high efficacy in preventing clinical progression. The relationship between dose and efficacy provides a fra
- Published
- 2023