Search

Introduction: BV is an antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD30 and is safe and effective in relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Most patients with r/r cHL respond well to BV monotherapy; however, the large of majority of them eventually progress on this drug, and BV-resistant HL remains an unmet need. Preclinical data suggest that BV resistance is mediated at least in part by increased drug efflux associated with increased expression of multidrug resistance pump 1 (MDR1) while CD30 expression appears to be preserved in BV resistant cell lines and patient samples. We conducted a phase 1 study evaluating BV + cyclosporine (CsA) in BV-refractory HL and previous reported results in the dose finding cohort. Here we report the final results from the phase 1 study., Methods: This was a phase I trial of BV + CsA in patients with r/r HL with dose-finding and dose escalation cohorts. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years with r/r HL after at least 1 prior line of therapy. Treatment consisted of 1.8 mg/kg BV intravenously on day 1 and CsA 5 to 7.5 mg/kg PO twice daily on days 1 to 5; cycles were 21 days long. Patients in the expansion cohort had to have cHL refractory to BV. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine MTD of BV + CsA; the secondary objective was to determine efficacy of this combination., Results: 29 patients were enrolled onto the study, 14 in the dose finding cohort and 15 in the dose expansion BV refractory cohort. Study accrual was terminated before target accrual due to unacceptable toxicity. 62% of patients were male, and the median age was 36 years (range: 20-69). The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range: 3-12); all patients had prior BV, and 93% had PD-1 directed therapy, and 93% were BV-refractory. Of 22 evaluable patients, CR rate was 27% and ORR 64%; median DOR 4.9 months. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 3 patients, and another patient died during cycle 1 due to cardiac arrest deemed unlikely related to be protocol therapy. All grade GI toxicity was seen in 90% of patients (G3+ in 24%); other common adverse events were nausea (90%), hypertension (90%), nausea (90%), hypertension (90%), anemia (86%), fatigue (76%), neutropenia (76%), leukopenia (76%), hypomagnesemia (76%), anorexia (66%), and hyponatremia (66%)., Discussion: BV + CsA demonstrated modest activity in BV-refractory r/r HL; however, toxicity is substantial., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In patients with treatment-naive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the POLARIX study (A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin With Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone [R-CHP] Versus Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone [R-CHOP] in Participants With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma) reported a 6.5% improvement in the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), with no difference in overall survival (OS) or safety using polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) compared with standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pola-R-CHP for DLBCL. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with treatment-naive DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. Progression rates and OS were estimated from POLARIX. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year PFS of 69.6% with pola-R-CHP and 62.7% with R-CHOP, pola-R-CHP was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $84 308/QALY). pola-R-CHP was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year PFS was 66.1% or lower. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that pola-R-CHP is cost-effective up to a cost of $276 312 at a WTP of $150 000. pola-R-CHP was the cost-effective strategy in 56.6% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in PFS is maintained over time, pola-R-CHP is cost-effective compared with R-CHOP at a WTP of $150 000/QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on its long-term outcomes and costs of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Routine usage of pola-R-CHP would add significantly to health care expenditures. Price reductions or identification of subgroups that have maximal benefit would improve cost-effectiveness., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The ZUMA-7 (Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Compared to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma) study showed that axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) improved event-free survival (EFS) compared with standard of care (SOC) salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory/early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); this led to its recent US Food and Drug Administration approval in this setting. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with primary refractory/early relapsed DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of second-line axi-cel compared with SOC using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. EFS and OS were estimated from ZUMA-7. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year EFS of 35% with second-line axi-cel and 10% with SOC, axi-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY ($93 547 per QALY). axi-cel was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year EFS was ≤26.4% or if it cost more than $972 061 at a WTP of $150 000. Second-line axi-cel was the cost-effective strategy in 73% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in EFS is maintained over time, second-line axi-cel for aggressive relapsed/refractory DLBCL is cost-effective compared with SOC at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on long-term outcomes. Routine use of second-line chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy would add significantly to health care expenditures in the United States (more than $1 billion each year), even when used in a high-risk subpopulation. Further reductions in the cost of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are needed to be affordable in many regions of the world., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Anti-PD-1 directed therapy is safe and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) cHL and is currently being studied in the frontline setting. There are currently little data regarding the safety and efficacy of PD-1 blockade after prior PD-L1 blockade with agents such as avelumab., Methods: This is a retrospective case series evaluating r/r cHL patients treated with avelumab who subsequently received at least 1 dose of PD-1 blockade. Primary objective is efficacy as measured by overall response rate. Secondary objectives include duration of response and time to progression on PD-1 blockade as well as safety as evaluated by incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAE) with PD-1 blockade., Results: There were 7 patients treated with PD-1 blockade after avelumab, of whom 4 were re-treated. The median follow-up was 46.8 months. At the time of PD-1 blockade initiation median age was 36.6 years, all patients had advanced stage, 1 patient had B symptoms, and 4 patients had extranodal disease. Patients received median 7 prior lines of therapy including avelumab. Median duration on anti-PD-1 treatment was 15.9 months. A response was observed in 86% of patients with median duration of response of 26.4 months and median time to progression of 22.2 months. Only 1 patient experienced an irAE (grade 2 pneumonitis)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that PD-1 blockade after PD-L1 blockade in r/r cHL appears safe and may be effective with durable responses observed in a subset of patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This phase 2 trial evaluated PET-adapted nivolumab alone or in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (NICE) as first salvage therapy and bridge to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in relapsed/refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Patients with RR cHL received 240 mg nivolumab every 2 weeks for up to 6 cycles (C). Patients in complete response (CR) after C6 proceeded to AHCT, whereas patients with progressive disease at any point or not in CR after C6 received NICE for 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR rate per the 2014 Lugano classification at completion of protocol therapy. Forty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity; 42 were evaluable for response. Thirty-four patients received nivolumab alone, and 9 patients received nivolumab+NICE. No unexpected toxicities were observed after nivolumab or NICE. After nivolumab, the overall response rate (ORR) was 81%, and the CR rate was 71%. Among 9 patients who received NICE, all responded, with 8 (89%) achieving CR. At the end of protocol therapy, the ORR and CR rates were 93% and 91%. Thirty-three patients were bridged directly to AHCT, including 26 after Nivo alone. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in all treated patients (n = 43) were 72% and 95%, respectively. Among 33 patients who bridged directly to AHCT, the 2-year PFS was 94% (95% CI: 78-98). PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with nivolumab/nivolumab+NICE was well tolerated and effective, resulting in a high CR rate and bridging most patients to AHCT without chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03016871., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)