Search

Background: The INMUNOSUN trial had the objective of prospectively evaluating the efficacy and safety of sunitinib as a pure second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who have progressed to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies., Patients and Methods: A multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open-label study was carried out in patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC with a clear-cell component who had progressed to a first-line regimen of ICI-based therapies. All patients received sunitinib 50 mg once daily orally for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period following package insert instructions. The primary outcome was the objective response rate., Results: Twenty-one assessable patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. Four patients [19.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3% to 35.8%] showed an objective response (OR), and all of them had partial responses. Additionally, 14 (67%) patients showed a stable response, leading to clinical benefit in 18 patients (85.7%, 95% CI 70.7% to 100%). Among the four assessable patients who showed an OR, the median duration of the response was 7.1 months (interquartile range 4.2-12.0 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.1-8.0 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 23.5 months (95% CI 6.3-40.7 months). Patients who had better antitumor response to first-line ICI-based treatment showed a longer PFS and OS with sunitinib. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (n = 11, 52%), dysgeusia (n = 8, 38%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n = 8, 38%), and hypertension (n = 8, 38%). There was 1 patient who exhibited grade 5 pancytopenia, and 11 patients experienced grade 3 adverse events. Eight (38%) patients had serious adverse events, four of which were considered to be related to sunitinib., Conclusion: Although the INMUNOSUN trial did not reach the pre-specified endpoint, it demonstrated that sunitinib is active and can be safely used as a second-line option in patients with mRCC who progress to new standard ICI-based regimens., Competing Interests: Disclosure EG has received honoraria for speaker engagements, advisory roles, or funding of continuous medical education from Adacap, AMGEN, Angelini, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Caris Life Sciences, Celgene, Clovis-Oncology, Eisai, Eusa Pharma, Genetracer, GSK, Guardant Health, HRA-Pharma, IPSEN, ITM-Radiopharma, Janssen, Lexicon, Lilly, Merck KGaA, MSD, Nanostring Technologies, Natera, Novartis, ONCODNA (Biosequence), Palex, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Servier, Taiho, Thermo Fisher Scientific. TAG has received support for the present manuscript (protocol review and manuscript review); has received research grants from Pfizer, Roche, and Ipsen; has received consulting fees from Ipsen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Bayer, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, BMS, and EISAI; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen, Pfizer, Eisai, and Merck; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer, Sanofi, BMS, and IPSEN. OR has received personal payment from Eusapharma, BMS, Pfizer, and Ipsen; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Ipsen and Pfizer; has participated in the Advisory Board of BMS and Bayer. XGdM has received consulting fees from Roche, Pharmamar, BMS, Ipsen, Lilly, Eusapharma, Pfizer, Merck, and Astellas; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Astellas, Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, and EusaPharma; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer and Roche; and has received research funding from AstraZeneca. MJM has received payment or honoraria as invited speaker from Janssen-Cilag, Bayer Healthcare, Sanofi Aventis, Astellas Medivation, Roche, Ipsen, EISAI, Norvartis, Pfizer, and MSD; has received travel support from Roche and Ipsen; has participated on Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Janssen-Cilag, Bayer Healthcare, Sanofi Aventis, Astellas Medivation, Roche, Ipsen, EISAI, Novartis, Pfizer, and MSD. JGD has received grants or contracts from Eusapharma, Bristol Myers, Novartis, GSK, Merck, MSD, Sanofi, Janssen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, and Ipsen; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Pfizer and Pharmamar. MGR has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche; has received support for attending meetings and/travel from Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Jansen. JAAA has received grants or contracts from Bristol-Myers Squibb (grant to Spanish GU Oncology Group for research in prostate cancer); has received consulting fees from Janssen, Cilag, Pfizer, MSD, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas, Pfizer, and MSD; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Astra Zeneca. PLC has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD and Bristol; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Sanofi and Roche. JMC has received support for the present manuscript (protocol review and manuscript review); has received grants or contracts from Pfizer and Ipsen; has received consulting fees from Ipsen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Astellas, Janssen Cilag, BMS, and EISAI; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen, Pfizer, and BMS; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer, BMS, and Ipsen. BM has received research grant/funding (self) from Jansen, Roche, Astellas, Sanofi, and Bayer; has received payment or honoraria for speaker bureau from Pfizer, Ipsen, Jansen, Roche, Astellas, Sanofi, BMS, and Bayer; has received support for travel accommodation from Pfizer, Ipsen, Janssen, and Roche; other financial or non-financial interests: advisory and speaker bureau rom Pfizer, Ipsen, Jansen, Roche, Astellas, Sanofi, BMS, and Bayer; travel accommodation from Pfizer, Ipsen, Jansen, and Roche; and research grant/funding (self) from Roche, Astellas, Sanofi Jansen, BMS, and Bayer. CAF has received consulting fees from Ipsen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Astra Zeneca; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Pfizer, and Astellas. GDV has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Merk, MSD, Bayer, Eusapharma, Astellas, and Ipsen; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, MSD, Bayer, and Astellas. JFRM has received support for the present manuscript from Pfizer; has received grants or contracts from HM Hospitales; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, BMS, Novartis, and MSD; has received support for attending meetings from Pfizer, BMS, Novartis, and MSD; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from BMS and Novartis; and has participated in corporate-sponsored research in his institution from AstraZeneca, BMS, Amgen, Roche, Novartis, MSD, Janssen, Pfizer, Astellas, GSK, PharmaMar, Ipsen, Tesaro, Abbvie, Aprea Therapeutics, Eisai, Bayer, and Merck. CSR has received grants or contracts from AB Science, Aragon Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Astra Zeneca AB, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim España SA, BMS, Clovis Oncology, Exelixix Inc F, Genentech Inc, GlaxoSmithKline SA, Hoffman-La Roche LTD, Novartis Farmaceutica SA, Pfizer SLU, and Sanofi-Aventis; has received payment or honoraria for speakers’ bureau from Astellas Pharma, BMS, Hoffmann-La Roche LTD, Ipsen, Pfizer SLU; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, BMS, Eusapharma, Hoffmann-La Roche LTD, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis E. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Data sharing The clinical trial data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this work was to compare the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in the PM10 and the actual PM10 emission from agricultural soils and unpaved roads, located inside and outside farm fields. To determine the actual PM10 emission by wind erosion, the actual wind erosion was estimated using the Wind Erosion Equation, and the PM10 emission efficiency was measured with the Easy Dust Generator. PM10 was collected in an electrostatic precipitator coupled to the Easy Dust Generator. Actual PM10 emission was 11.5 g ha -1  year -1 in agricultural soils and 4711.4 g ha -1  year -1 in unpaved roads. The high value of actual PM10 emission in unpaved roads was due to their high actual wind erosion and the high PM10 emission efficiency, while the low value in agricultural soils was due to their low actual wind erosion. Content of glyphosate in the PM10 ranged from 59 to 359 μg kg -1 in agricultural soils, from 382 to 454 μg kg -1 in unpaved roads inside farm fields, and from 39 to 639 μg kg -1 in unpaved roads outside farm fields. Content of AMPA in the PM10 ranged from 387 to 7228 μg kg -1 in agricultural soils, from 900 to 4138 μg kg -1 in unpaved roads inside farm fields, and 98 to 500 μg kg -1 in unpaved roads outside farm fields. AMPA concentration in PM10 was higher than that of glyphosate due to the longer persistence of AMPA than glyphosate. Glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in PM10 were higher than in soil, which is an additional risk that should be considered when the effect of PM10 emitted by agricultural soils and unpaved roads on human health are evaluated. Our results show that the amount and chemical composition of PM10 emitted by wind erosion from unpaved roads should be studied in other regions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This article presents novel results about glyphosate and AMPA concentration in PM10 emitted by rural unpaved roads and agricultural soils. The amount of glyphosate and AMPA carried in the PM10 emitted by wind erosion of unpaved roads and agricultural soils was also studied. This information is useful to understand potential contamination with glyphosate and AMPA of the respirable dust emitted by wind erosion and others process like traffic and tillage. All this information is useful to understand the environmental fate of glyphosate and their potential health effects., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Skin rash is an adverse event which might be associated with longer survival in patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The aim of this nonrandomised phase II clinical trial is to prospectively evaluate the relationship between skin rash and overall survival (OS) in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with erlotinib plus gemcitabine., Patients and Methods: Patients were given gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2/week, 3 weeks every 4 weeks) plus erlotinib (100 mg/day orally continuously) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was OS., Results: A total of 153 eligible patients were enrolled (grade≥2 rash, 25%; grade<2 rash, 75%). OS was longer in patients with grade≥2 rash versus grade<2 (11 versus 5 months; P<0.001). Progression-free survival was longer in patients with grade≥2 rash versus grade<2 (6 versus 3 months; P<0.001) and shorter in those without rash versus grade 1 (2 versus 4 months; P=0.005) or grade≥2 (2 versus 6 months; P<0.001). Patients with grade≥2 rash showed higher rates of overall response (21% versus 7%; P<0.05) and disease control (84% versus 43%; P<0.05) versus grade<2., Conclusions: This study prospectively confirms the relationship between rash and longer OS in unresectable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with erlotinib plus gemcitabine.

Ferroportin is a multipass membrane protein that serves as an iron exporter in many vertebrate cell types. Ferroportin-mediated iron export is controlled by the hormone hepcidin, which binds ferroportin, causing its internalization and degradation. Mutations in ferroportin cause a form of the iron overload hereditary disease hemochromatosis. Relatively little is known about ferroportin's properties or the mechanism by which mutations cause disease. In this study, we expressed and purified human ferroportin to characterize its biochemical/biophysical properties in solution and conducted cell biological studies in mammalian cells. We found that purified detergent-solubilized ferroportin is a well-folded monomer that binds hepcidin. In cell membranes, the N- and C-termini were both cytosolic, implying an even number of transmembrane regions, and ferroportin was mainly localized to the plasma membrane. Hepcidin addition resulted in a redistribution of ferroportin to intracellular compartments that labeled with early endosomal and lysosomal, but not Golgi, markers and that trafficked along microtubules. An analysis of 16 disease-related ferroportin mutants revealed that all were expressed and trafficked to the plasma membrane but that some were resistant to hepcidin-induced internalization. The characterizations reported here form a basis upon which models for ferroportin's role in regulating iron homeostasis in health and disease can be interpreted.