1. Psammomatoid ossifying fibromas: immunohistochemical analysis and differential diagnosis with psammomatous meningiomas of craniofacial bones.
- Author
-
Granados R, Carrillo R, Nájera L, García-Villanueva M, and Patrón M
- Subjects
- Actins analysis, Adolescent, Adult, Antigens, CD34 analysis, Bone Neoplasms chemistry, Cementoma chemistry, Cementoma diagnosis, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Fibroma, Ossifying chemistry, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Jaw Neoplasms chemistry, Jaw Neoplasms diagnosis, Male, Meningeal Neoplasms chemistry, Meningeal Neoplasms diagnosis, Meningioma chemistry, Meningioma diagnosis, Middle Aged, Mucin-1 analysis, Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms chemistry, Vimentin analysis, Bone Neoplasms pathology, Ethmoid Sinus pathology, Fibroma, Ossifying pathology, Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms pathology, Sphenoid Sinus pathology
- Abstract
Objective: To clarify the role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of psammomatoid ossifying fibroma (PSOF), conventional cemento-ossifying fibroma (COF), and psammomatous meningioma (PM) of the craniofacial skeleton., Study Design: The histology and immunohistochemistry of 4 PSOFs, 6 COFs, and 7 PMs was studied. Antibodies included EMA, cytokeratins, smooth muscle actin (SMA), desmin, vimentin, CD34, CD10, S-100 protein, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)., Results: All PSOFs showed multiple round ossicles homogeneously distributed within a fibroblastic stroma. Psammomatous meningiomas had meningothelial features. All tumors, except 1 COF, were positive for EMA. All of them expressed vimentin, and none showed cytokeratins. Staining for SMA and S-100 protein was variable. CD10 was positive in all cases except 2 meningiomas. CD34 and GFAP stained only 1 case of meningioma each., Conclusions: The diagnosis of PSOF should rest on histologic features. An incorrect diagnosis of meningioma based on the expression of EMA should be avoided.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF