Search

The transplantation is an important method for the restoration of degraded ecosystem. However, it is unclear how the choice of species and transplantation mode affects the community dynamics during recovery from a disaster, particularly for long-lived organisms such as corals. To address this issue, we study a population dynamic model of multiple species in multiple habitats connected by larval dispersal. We first consider two species showing the trade-off relationship between growth rate and mortality and examine three restoration goals to evaluate the effectiveness of transplantation: (1) total coverage; (2) species diversity; (3) spatial heterogeneity of species composition. To promote the rapid development of total coverage, the transplantation of fast-growing species should be adopted. To maintain a high level of regional species diversity, the transplantation of slow-growing species or short-dispersal species is effective. Next, we suppose four genera of corals - Acropora, Pocillopora, Porites, and Favites - as an example of coral community in Okinawa where Pocillopora is facing to local extinction. In addition to three indexes; (4) recovery of locally endangered species is evaluated as a restoration goal. Results show that to promote the recovery of Pocillopora, the transplantation of the same species is clearly the most effective choice. In contrast, the transplantations of Acropora and Porites led to undesirable results. In summary, these results indicate that both the restoration goal and the transplanted species must be carefully selected before conducting transplantation operations., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Transplantation of sessile organisms living in a planned destruction site to a safe site is an important means of restoration to mitigate biodiversity loss following anthropogenic developments. In particular, corals, which play fundamental roles in the coral reef ecosystem and contribute to biodiversity, are good candidates for transplantation. In this study, we investigate the optimal choice of species and size class to be used for coral transplantation. We first studied a case in which the objective function to evaluate the success of transplantation is the maximum total coverage. The optimal strategy is to choose the species and size class with higher net coverage gain per unit handling effort. It is often recommended to transplant only one or a few species and neglect others, even if the original community consists of many species. This may achieve high coverage in the restored coral community but cause loss of species diversity. To overcome this problem, we next study a case in which the objective of the transplantation operation is to maximize the "prosperity index", defined as the product of total coverage and species diversity. In this case, the optimal strategy depends on the species property, population size, and the limitation of total cost allowed for transplantation, but it tends to recommend more species to be transplanted than what is recommended by the coverage maximization criterion. We conclude that maximization of the prosperity index is a better criterion for transplantation than simple coverage maximization., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Both spatial heterogeneity and temporal fluctuation of the environment are important mechanisms promoting species coexistence, but they work in different manners. We consider many pairs of species with randomly generated survivorship and fertility in the lottery model, and examine how the variability in demographic processes affects the outcome of competition. The results are: [corrected] (1) Coexistence is easier if habitat difference in mortality is greater, or if year-to-year variation in reproductive rate is larger. But neither habitat [corrected] difference in fertility nor temporal variation in mortality promotes coexistence. [corrected] (2) Mean fertility does not affect the outcome if the coefficient of variation [corrected] remains constant. In contrast, enhanced mean mortality decreases the fraction of coexisting pairs if the environment fluctuates temporally. [corrected] (3) We also investigate the effect of limited dispersal of propagules between habitats. Compared with the complete mixing case, the fraction of coexisting pairs is clearly enhanced if the spatial heterogeneity is the major source of environmental variation, but shows slight increase if the temporal fluctuation is dominant. We conclude that spatial heterogeneity is likely to work more effectively in promoting species coexistence than temporal fluctuation, especially when the species suffer relatively high mortality, and disperse their propagules in a limited spatial scale.