Search

Objective: To describe differences in the frequency of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) driven by different birth weight curves in assisted reproductive technology (ART)–conceived pregnancies. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single academic medical center. Patients: Singleton live births between the gestational ages of 36 weeks and 0 days and 42 weeks and 6 days from fresh or frozen embryo transfer (ET). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): SGA (90th percentile) classified by Fenton, INTERGROWTH-21, World Health Organization, Duryea, and Oken curves. Results: The median birth weight and gestational age at birth among fresh ET pregnancies were 3,289g (interquartile range [IQR], 2,977–3,600g) and 39.4 (IQR, 38.6–40.3) weeks, respectively, and those among frozen ET pregnancies were 3,399g (IQR, 3,065–3,685g) and 39.4 (IQR, 38.7–40.1) weeks, respectively. The frequencies of SGA neonates using each birth weight standard ranged from 5.8% to 13.4% for fresh ET and from 3.5% to 8.7% for frozen ET. Those of LGA neonates ranged from 5.3% to 14.3% for fresh ET and from 6.6% to 21.2% for frozen ET. Conclusion: The frequency of SGA and LGA neonates among ART-conceived gestations is partially driven by the birth weight standard. Selecting an appropriate standard that best reflects the patient population is critical to quantifying the risk of ART-conceived pregnancies.

Background: Cervical insufficiency can lead to preterm birth and neonatal mortality. Emergency cervical cerclage is a surgical intervention aimed at preventing preterm birth in patients with cervical insufficiency. However, some patients may experience cerclage failure. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with cerclage failure and develop a predictive nomogram model for patients with cervical insufficiency undergoing emergency cervical cerclage. Methods: Data of 200 patients who underwent emergency cervical cerclage for cervical insufficiency were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into successful and failed groups based on their ability to take the infant home. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for cerclage failure. A nomogram model was developed based on multivariate logistic regression results, and its performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Univariate logistic regression analysis identified 11 potential risk factors for cerclage failure, including the presence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), vaginitis, cervical dilation, preoperative C-reactive protein, routine vaginal lavage after cervical cerclage, delivery, gestational age, extended days, chorioamnionitis, intrauterine infection, cervical laceration, and premature rupture of membranes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PCOS, cervical dilation after cervical cerclage were independent risk factors for cerclage failure while routine vaginal lavage was a protective factor against failure. The nomogram predictive model demonstrated an area under the curve value of 0.975, indicating excellent discriminatory ability. The calibration plot showed good consistency between the nomogram predictions and actual observations. DCA demonstrated the strong clinical applicability of the nomogram. Conclusions: This study successfully identified risk factors associated with emergency cervical cerclage failure in patients with cervical insufficiency and developed a predictive nomogram model. This model can assist clinicians in making informed decisions and accurately predicting the risk of cerclage failure in these patients.

Aims: To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had scheduled delivery at full term (≥ 39 0/7 weeks) compared to early term (37 0/7 – 38 6/7 weeks) for T2DM indications. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included all singletons with T2DM with a scheduled delivery at a single tertiary care center between January 2008 and March 2022. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: 107 singleton pregnancies were included. There was no significant difference in primary cesarean delivery between the two groups. The early term group had significantly higher rates of NICU admission compared to the term group (52% vs 32%, p = 0.05, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.0), a finding that remained statistically significant on adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.04–7.58). Conclusions: In singleton pregnancies undergoing scheduled delivery for T2DM-specific indications, early term deliveries were associated with significantly increased odds of NICU admission when compared to term deliveries, even after adjusting for surrogate markers of glycemic control. These findings suggest that early term delivery contributes to risk of NICU admission, rather than the indication for delivery itself. These findings should be replicated in a larger cohort.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of birth weight discordant twins (BWDT) who were premature and appropriate-for-gestational-age or large-for-gestational-age. Additionally, it assessed the impact of birth weight discordance on the prognosis of appropriately grown premature twins, and investigated the effect of maternal factors on neonatal outcomes. Study design: This retrospective cohort study included twins who were born alive after preterm labor at the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021, along with their mothers. Twins were arranged into discordant and concordant groups according to intertwin birth weight discordance, followed by the analysis of the clinical characteristics of mothers and the prognosis of neonates. Results: A total of 585 mothers and 1170 neonates were included, with 47 mothers and 94 neonates in the discordant group. The incidence of birth weight discordance was 8.0% (94/1,170) in appropriately grown premature twins. The incidence of complications (43.2% vs. 21.8%) and transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (53.2% vs. 29.2%) was higher in the discordant group than in the concordant group (p

Background: As an increasing number of women with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) choose to become pregnant, outcomes in newborns have become a priority. The main purpose of this study was to compare the neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with PAH associated with heart disease. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was performed. Pregnancy with heart disease is divided into three groups: no PAH, mild PAH and severe PAH. Neonatal outcomes of pregnant women were compared among groups. Meanwhile, multivariable analyses were used to investigate the association between maternal PAH and adverse neonatal events. Results: A total of 127 pregnant women with heart disease were enrolled. Of these, 82 (64.6%) had no PAH, 19 (15%) had mild PAH and 26 (20.4%) had severe PAH. The offspring of women with severe PAH had a higher risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and recurrence of congenital heart disease (CHD). Compared to the women without PAH, only the risk of preterm delivery (32–36 weeks) and NICU admission were slightly higher in mothers with mild PAH; other neonatal events were similar. Multivariate regression analyses showed that the risk of preterm delivery (

BACKGROUND: The use of epidural analgesia represents the gold standard for pain management during labor, but the influence of the use of epidural analgesia on delivery mode is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the impact of epidural analgesia on the delivery mode, namely, cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, and operative vaginal delivery rates, in Robson class 1 women. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all Robson class 1 women who delivered from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, in the University Hospital of Modena. The primary outcome was the delivery mode (cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery, and operative vaginal delivery rates), and the secondary outcomes were maternal, anesthesiologic, and neonatal effects of epidural analgesia (duration of labor, duration of the second stage of labor, Apgar score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission). RESULTS: A total of 744 women were included in the final analysis, of which 198 (26.6%) underwent epidural analgesia on request and 546 (73.4%) did not. In women with and without epidural analgesia, the cesarean delivery rate was 8.1% vs 7%, the vaginal delivery rate was 79.3% vs 81.1%, and the operative vaginal delivery rate was 12.6% vs 11.9%, respectively. A significant increase in both the first stage of labor (66.3±38.5 vs 43.8±38.8 minutes; P4 cm). No significant difference in Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission was found. CONCLUSION: The use of epidural analgesia was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery in Robson class 1 women. Further investigations are needed to evaluate its impact on the duration of labor, namely the duration of the first stage of labor, and on the possible advantages of starting epidural analgesia at an early stage.

Objective: Characterize the risk for adverse pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes among different advanced maternal ages (AMA). Study design: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample to characterize adverse pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes among different AMA groups. Patients aged 44–45 (n = 19,476), 46–49 (n = 7528) and 50–54 years (n = 1100) were compared to patients aged 38–43 years (n = 499,655). A multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for statistically significant confounding variables. Results: With advancing age, rates of chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, thyroid disease and multiple gestation increased (p

Abstract Objective: To describe the placental characteristics and neonatal outcomes of Central Australian Aboriginal women based on maternal self‐report of tobacco use. Methods: Placental and neonatal variables were collected from a prospective maternal cohort of 19 smokeless tobacco chewers, 23 smokers and 31 no‐tobacco users. Results: Chewers had the lowest placental weight (460 g) while the no‐tobacco group had the heaviest placental weight (565 g). Chewers and the no‐tobacco group had placental areas of similar size (285 cm2 and 288 cm2, respectively) while the placentas of smokers were at least 13 cm2 smaller (272 cm2). There were two stillbirths in the study and more than one‐third (36%) of neonates (newborns) were admitted to the Special Care Nursery, with the chewers’ neonates having a higher admission rate compared with smokers’ neonates (44% vs. 23%). The cohort mean birthweight (3348 g) was not significantly different between the groups. When stratified for elevated maternal glucose, the chewers’ neonates had the lowest mean birthweight (2906 g) compared to the neonates of the no‐tobacco group (3242 g) and smokers (3398 g). Conclusions: This research is the first to demonstrate that the maternal use of Australian Nicotiana spp. (pituri) as smokeless tobacco may negatively impact placental and neonatal outcomes. Implications for public health: Maternal smokeless tobacco use is a potential source of placental and foetal nicotine exposure. Maternal antenatal screening should be expanded to capture a broader range of tobacco and nicotine products, and appropriate cessation support is required.

Introduction: Placental abruption (PA) is a major obstetric complication associated with worse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Though ultrasound findings may support the diagnosis of PA, the association of such findings to the severity of PA and maternal and neonatal outcomes is not yet clear. We aimed to assess the maternal and neonatal outcomes of PA cases with vs. without related sonographic findings., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all deliveries complicated by PA between 2009 and 2022 were included. Placental histopathology, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes were compared between cases of PA with vs. without supporting sonographic findings. A composite of severe neonatal morbidity was compared between the groups, including ≥1 of the following: seizures, intraventricular hemorrhage, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, periventricular leukomalacia, respiratory-distress syndrome, sepsis, anemia, blood transfusion or death., Results: Of the 420 cases with PA eligible for the study, 50 patients (12 %) were in the PA with sonographic features group and 370 (88 %) were in the PA without sonographic features group. The PA with sonographic features group was characterized by significantly higher rates of prematurity (p < 0.001), severe composite adverse neonatal outcome (p < 0.01), and a composite maternal vascular malperfusion lesions in placental histopathology (p = 0.001) In multivariable regression analyses, preterm birth was independently associated with the presence of sonographic features (aOR = 8.79, 95 % CI 2.41-31.93, p < 0.001)., Discussion: PA with supporting sonographic features is associated with higher rates of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes and placental lesions. These findings emphasize the importance of sonographic evaluation for every case of PA before deciding upon management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In early 2023, when Omicron was the variant of concern, we showed that vaccinating pregnant women decreased the risk for severe COVID-19-related complications and maternal morbidity and mortality., Objective: This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy on newborns and the effects of maternal COVID-19 vaccination on neonatal outcomes when Omicron was the variant of concern., Study Design: INTERCOVID-2022 was a large, prospective, observational study, conducted in 40 hospitals across 18 countries, from November 27, 2021 (the day after the World Health Organization declared Omicron the variant of concern) to June 30, 2022, to assess the effect of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes and to assess vaccine effectiveness. Women diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy were compared with 2 nondiagnosed, unmatched women recruited concomitantly and consecutively during pregnancy or at delivery. Mother-newborn dyads were followed until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were a neonatal positive test for COVID-19, severe neonatal morbidity index, severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index, preterm birth, neonatal death, referral to neonatal intensive care unit, and diseases during the neonatal period. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with adjustment for maternal risk profile., Results: We enrolled 4707 neonates born to 1577 (33.5%) mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and 3130 (66.5%) nondiagnosed mothers. Among the diagnosed mothers, 642 (40.7%) were not vaccinated, 147 (9.3%) were partially vaccinated, 551 (34.9%) were completely vaccinated, and 237 (15.0%) also had a booster vaccine. Neonates of booster-vaccinated mothers had less than half (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.91) the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 when compared with those of unvaccinated mothers; they also had the lowest rates of preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, respiratory distress syndrome, and number of days in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborns of unvaccinated mothers had double the risk for neonatal death (relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.00) when compared with those of nondiagnosed mothers. Vaccination was not associated with any congenital malformations. Although all vaccines provided protection against neonatal test positivity, newborns of booster-vaccinated mothers had the highest vaccine effectiveness (64%; 95% confidence interval, 10%-86%). Vaccine effectiveness was not as high for messenger RNA vaccines only. Vaccine effectiveness against moderate or severe neonatal outcomes was much lower, namely 13% in the booster-vaccinated group (all vaccines) and 25% and 28% in the completely and booster-vaccinated groups, respectively (messenger RNA vaccines only). Vaccines were fairly effective in protecting neonates when given to pregnant women ≤100 days (14 weeks) before birth; thereafter, the risk increased and was much higher after 200 days (29 weeks). Finally, none of the neonatal practices studied, including skin-to-skin contact and direct breastfeeding, increased the risk for infecting newborns., Conclusion: When Omicron was the variant of concern, newborns of unvaccinated mothers had an increased risk for neonatal death. Neonates of vaccinated mothers had a decreased risk for preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Because the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination decreases with time, to ensure that newborns are maximally protected against COVID-19, mothers should receive a vaccine or booster dose no more than 14 weeks before the expected date of delivery., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Evidence exists that maternal antenatal depression may have adverse impacts on perinatal outcomes. However, the results of those studies are inconsistent and mainly focus on maternal depressive symptoms in the second or third trimester., Methods: This prospective cohort study used a sub-sample of participants from the Sino-Canadian Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative trial. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used to screen for depressive symptoms in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Infant growth indicator measurements were conducted in the first year of life. Logistic regression, Spearman correlation analyses and Generalized estimation equation (GEE) models were used to test the hypotheses., Results: 2053 participants were recruited in this study, 326 of whom had at least one EPDS score ≥ 10 during pregnancy. A higher EPDS score in the first (aOR=1.053, 95 % CI: 1.004-1.103) or in the second trimester (aOR=1.060, 95 % CI: 1.007-1.115) was associated with greater risk of macrosomia. A higher EPDS score in the third trimester was associated with higher risks of preterm birth (aOR=1.079, 95 % CI: 1.006-1.157) and the infant being small for gestational age (aOR=1.097, 95 % CI: 1.015-1.185). GEE models showed that a greater EPDS score in the third trimester was associated with higher infant subscapular skinfold thickness (adjusted β=0.026, 95 % CI: 0.003-0.050)., Conclusion: Maternal depressive symptoms in different trimesters were differentially associated with infant weight and growth parameters at birth and postnatally. The present study further highlights the importance of depression screening in all trimesters of pregnancy, including the first trimester., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors of this article declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is associated with adverse somatic and psychological effects. The impact of HG on neonatal outcomes is debatable given that disagreeing research results have appeared. The objective of this study was to systematically review, according to the PRISMA guidelines, and synthesize the available evidence from observational studies on the relationship between HG and neonatal outcomes. The PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct databases were systematically reviewed, with the last search carried out in April 2020. The quality of the studies was estimated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomized studies. The databases search yielded 516 studies 15 of which (n = 112.372 HG cases) matched eligibility criteria while the majority of the studies were of moderate quality (n = 12). We observed heterogeneity among the studies regarding the definition of HG and characteristics of the samples. The results of this systematic review suggest that it is still uncertain whether HG has an adverse impact on neonatal outcomes, fact that requires more studies to be conducted.

The effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester on the pregnant woman and the fetus remain unclear. We describe the complete follow-up of a pregnant woman with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester. The woman tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in nasopharyngeal swabs in her seventh week of gestation and was admitted to a local hospital for treatment. Although the woman had a BMI above 28 and a total gestational weight gain of 21 kg, no pregnancy complications or severe complications related to SARS-CoV-2 were reported. An ultrasound scan identified no fetal abnormalities at 22 weeks. The pregnancy ended at term (37 weeks), and the newborn's birth weight was 3100 g. Placental insufficiency was revealed by placental histology examination but this appeared not to be related to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In-situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical tests for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, spike protein 1, and nucleocapsid proteins were negative. However, ACE-2 was positive in samples of the placenta, umbilical cord and fetal membrane. The baby was followed up through to 10 days after birth and grew normally. Our results suggest that asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester of pregnancy might not have significant harmful effects on the mother and the developing fetus. This finding may be of interest to the general public, midwives and general practitioners. However, large population studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Background: Birthing people with de novo postpartum hypertensive disorders continue to be among the populations at highest risk for severe maternal morbidity. Randomized controlled trials demonstrate a benefit of oral loop diuretics in decreasing postpartum hypertensive morbidity in patients with an antenatal diagnosis of preeclampsia. It is not known whether this same therapy benefits patients at risk for new-onset postpartum hypertension., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether oral furosemide can reduce the risk for de novo postpartum hypertension among high-risk birthing people by reducing postdelivery blood pressure., Study Design: From October 2021 to April 2022, we conducted a randomized triple-masked placebo-controlled clinical trial of individuals at high risk for de novo postpartum hypertension at a single university-based tertiary care medical center. A total of 82 postpartum patients with no antenatal diagnosis of chronic hypertension or a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy who were at high risk for the development of de novo postpartum hypertension based on a prespecified risk factor algorithm were enrolled after childbirth. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a 5-day course of 20-mg oral furosemide daily or identical-appearing placebo starting within 8 hours of delivery. Participants were followed for 6 weeks postpartum using Bluetooth-enabled remote blood pressure monitoring and electronic surveys. The primary outcome was mean arterial pressure averaged over the 24 hours before discharge or the 24 hours before antihypertensive therapy initiation. The study was powered to detect a 5 mm Hg difference in average mean arterial pressure (standard deviation, 6.4 mm Hg) with 90% power at an alpha of 0.05, requiring a sample size of 41 per group. Secondary outcomes included the rate of de novo postpartum hypertension, readmission data, other measures of hypertensive and maternal morbidity, breastfeeding data, and drug-related neonatal outcomes., Results: The primary outcome was assessed in 80 of the 82 participants. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. There was no significant difference in average mean arterial pressure in the 24 hours before discharge (or antihypertensive initiation) in the furosemide group (88.9±7.4 mm Hg) compared with the placebo group (86.8±7.1 mm Hg; absolute difference, 2.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -1.2 to 5.3). Of the 79 participants for whom secondary outcomes were assessed, 10% (n=8) developed de novo postpartum hypertension and 9% (n=7) were initiated on antihypertensive therapy. Rates were not significantly different between the groups (P=.71 and P>.99, respectively)., Conclusion: De novo postpartum hypertension is a common phenomenon among at-risk patients, warranting close monitoring for severe hypertension and other maternal morbidity. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that furosemide reduces average mean arterial pressure in the 24 hours before discharge from the delivery hospitalization (or antihypertensive medication initiation) compared with placebo., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Standardization of procedures improves outcomes. Though systematic reviews have summarized the evidence-based steps (EBS) of cesarean delivery (CD), their bundled implementation has not been investigated., Objective: In this pre- and post-implementation trial, we sought to ascertain if bundled EBS of CD, compared to surgeon's preference, improves outcomes., Study Design: A StaRI (Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies) compliant, multi-center pre- and post-implementation trial at 4 teaching hospitals was conducted. The pre-implementation period consisted of CD done based on the physicians' preferences for 3 months; educational intervention (e.g., didactics, badge cards, posters, video) occurred at the 4 th month. CDs in post-implementation period employed the bundled EBS. A pre-planned 10% randomized audit of both groups assessed adherence and uptake of EBS. The primary outcome was a composite maternal morbidity (CMM), which included estimated blood loss > 1,000 mL, blood transfusion, endometritis, post-partum fever, wound complications, sepsis, thrombosis, ICU admission, hysterectomy, or death. The secondary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity (CNM) and some of its components were 5-min Apgar score < 7, positive pressure oxygen use, hypoglycemia, or sepsis. A priori Bayesian sample size calculation indicated 700 CD in each group was needed to demonstrate 20% relative reduction (from 15% to 12%) of CMM with 75% certainty. Bayesian logistic regression with neutral priors was used to calculate likelihood of net-improvement in adjusted relative risk (aRR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI)., Results: A total of 1,425 consecutive CD (721 in pre- and 704 in post-implementation group) were examined. Audited data indicated that the baseline EBS utilization rate during the pre-implementation period was 79%; after the implementation bundled EBS of CD the audited adherence was 89%-an uptake of 10.0% of the EBS. In four aspects, the maternal characteristics differed significantly in the pre- and post-implementation periods: race/ethnicity, hypertensive disorder, and the relative contribution of the 4 centers to the cohorts and the gestational age at delivery, but the indications for CD and whether its duration was < versus > 60 min did not. The rates of CMM in the pre- and post-implementation groups were 26% and 22%, respectively (aRR, 0.88; 95% CrI, 0.73-1.04), with a 94 % Bayesian probability of a reduction in CMM. The CNM occurred in 37% of the pre- and in 41% of the post-implementation group (aRR, 1.12; 95% CrI 0.98-1.39), with a 95% Bayesian probability of worsening in CNM. When CMM were segregated by preterm (<37 wks) and term (> 37 weeks) CD, the improvement in maternal outcomes persisted; when CNM were segregated by gestational age subgroupsthe potential for worsening neonatal outcomes persisted as well., Conclusions: Standardization of the evidence-based bundled steps of cesarean delivery resulted in a modest reduction of the composite maternal outcome; however, a paradoxical increase in neonatal composite morbidity was noted. Although individual evidence-based steps may be of value, while awaiting additional intervention trials a formal bundling of such steps is currently not recommended., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: We aimed to assess neonatal and maternal outcomes in appropriate-for-gestational-weight (AGA) neonates of mothers with both gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PET)., Methods: Medical records of women diagnosed with GDM or PET were reviewed. Women with AGA neonates were divided into three groups- GDM, PET, and GDM + PET and maternal neonatal and placental outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, including intensive care unit admission (NICU), neurological morbidity, hypoglycemia, ventilation, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), phototherapy, sepsis, blood transfusion, and neonatal death. Post-hoc analysis was performed to determine between-group significance., Results: Composite adverse neonatal outcomes are significantly lower in women with multiple morbidities compared to women with confined PET (p = 0.015), and a similar trend is observed when comparing neonatal outcomes between women with GDM to those with GDM + PET, yet these results are underpowered (18.9 % vs. 12.8 % respectively, p = 0.243). Placentas of women with GDM + PET were larger, with a lower rate of placentas below the 10th percentile as compared to placentas of women with isolated PET (p < 0.001), but with similar rates of MVM lesions., Discussion: While maternal and placental outcomes in patients of the GDM + PET group resemble the characteristics of the PET group, surprisingly, the neonatal outcomes in this group are significantly better compared to isolated morbidities. The paradoxical benefit attributed to the coexistence of GDM + PET may be explained by a balance of the opposing trends characterizing these morbidities-the reduced blood and nutrient supply characterizing PET vs. chronic overflow and abundance typical of GDM., Clinical Trial Registration: approval of local ethics committee WOMC-19-0152., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) exerts a great impact on the placenta and reflects changes on placentas both morphological and functionally. The aims of this study are to evaluate the prevalence of placental histopathological lesions in pregnancies complicated by GDM compared to gestational age-matched controls, and their association with maternal and fetal complications., Methods: Fifty-four singleton GDM-complicated pregnancies were recruited and compared to 33 consecutive normal pregnancies. Two pathologists, blinded to all clinical data, reviewed and evaluated all histological samples of the placentas in accordance with Amsterdam criteria. Relevant demographic, clinical data and primary birth outcomes were recorded., Results: A myriad of histomorphological abnormalities, including chronic inflammation (n = 9/54, p = 0.031), histological chorioamnionitis (n = 23/54, p < 0.001), umbilical/chorionic vasculitis (n = 9/54, p = 0.031), changes related to maternal vascular malperfusion (n = 22/54, p = 0.003), chorangiosis (n = 10/54, p = 0.046) and villous dysmaturity (n = 9/54, p = 0.012) were observed more frequently in the GDM placentas compared to the controls. Additionally, GDM significantly increased the risk of fetal complications, including macrosomia/fetal growth restriction (n = 13/54, p = 0.004)., Discussion: Histoarchitectural abnormalities were observed more frequently in placentas of GDM pregnancies compared to the controls. Our findings support the hypothesis that diabetic-induced damage in the placental function may be associated with the increased in fetal growth disorders in GDM-complicated pregnancies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Isolated oligohydramnios is defined as an amniotic fluid index below five centimeter with no other coexisting condition. There are still controversies about the management and pregnancy outcomes. A marker predicting these is crucial. Low pregnancy associated plasma protein-A levels were reported to be related with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to determine the role of first trimester pregnancy associated plasma protein-A for poor outcomes in preterm isolated oligohydramnios cases. Material and Methods: Fifty-one patients with singleton pregnancies diagnosed as isolated oligohydramnios at 28/0–36/6 weeks of gestation and 110 gestational age matched healthy controls between January and December 2015 were included. Maternal age, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, indication for cesarean section, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission and mortality were recorded. Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A levels were compared between groups and its role in adverse perinatal outcomes was evaluated. Results: Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A levels and pregnancy outcomes were similar in two groups (p > 0.050) except birth weight, gestational age at delivery and presence of fetal distress. Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A levels did not differ in terms of delivery mode, presence of fetal distress, first and fifth minutes Apgar scores and neonatal intensive care unit admission (p = 0.323,0.650,0.990,0.112,0.853). Also, it was not determined as a risk factor for cesarean section, presence of fetal distress, low Apgar scores and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusion: Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A, a well-known prognostic factor for some of high risk pregnancy conditions, may not be used as a marker in preterm isolated oligohydramnios cases.

The Mediterranean diet is a global, well-known healthy dietary pattern. This review aims to synthesize the existing evidence on the relationship between the maternal Mediterranean diet during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 10 March, 2023, supplemented by manual screening. A random-effect model was used to estimate pooled sizes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for specific outcomes of interest. Data from 5 RCTs and 18 cohort studies with 107,355 pregnant participants were synthesized. In RCTs, it was observed that the maternal Mediterranean diet significantly reduced the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus [odds ratio (OR), 0.56; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.93], as well as small for gestational age (0.55; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.88). In cohort studies, the highest adherence score to the maternal Mediterranean diet was inversely associated with a lower risk of various adverse pregnancy outcomes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.00), pregnancy-induced hypertension (0.73; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.89), pre-eclampsia (0.77; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.93), preterm delivery (0.67; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.91), low birth weight (0.70; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.78), intrauterine growth restriction (0.46; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.91), and increased gestational age at delivery (weighted mean difference, 0.11 wk; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.20). Meta-regression analyses did not identify the adjustment for confounders and geographical location as predictive factors for heterogeneity. The results suggest that adherence to the Mediterranean diet during pregnancy appears to be beneficial for perinatal outcomes. Future, larger, and higher-quality RCTs and cohort studies are warranted to confirm the present findings. PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42023406317., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing is associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing., Data Sources: Entries between January 1990 and August 2022 were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar., Study Eligibility Criteria: Publications comparing the outcomes of pregnancies after preimplantation genetic testing using trophectoderm biopsy and in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were included. Only human studies with a cohort or case-control design or randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion., Methods: The study selection process was performed independently by 2 investigators. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 was used to grade the level of bias in randomized controlled trials. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model when substantial heterogeneity occurred (indicated by I 2 of >50% and P<.1). Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used., Results: This meta-analysis included 13 studies involving 11,469 live births after preimplantation genetic testing treatment with trophectoderm biopsy before embryo transfer and 20,438 live births after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection only. The odds ratio of preterm delivery was higher in the trophectoderm-biopsied group than in the routine in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection group (pooled odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21); however, the difference did not exist after sensitivity analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.11). The risk of low birthweight did not increase among the biopsied pregnancies (pooled odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.20). No marked difference was observed in the risk of other obstetrical or neonatal outcomes between the biopsy and control groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted in the perinatal outcomes between trophectoderm-biopsied and nonbiopsied groups in the subgroup analyses by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, frozen-thawed transfer, or single embryo transfer., Conclusion: Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing treatment did not alter the risk of obstetrical or neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. However, this study was limited by the large observational evidence base, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) is a histopathological lesion associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. We seek to define the obscure relationship between the severity and distribution of VUE and adverse neonatal outcomes., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of pathologic findings from singleton placentas diagnosed with VUE between 2013 and 2019. Control placentas were matched 1:1 for gestational age and presence/absence of fetal IUGR. Neonatal outcomes of interest included: newborn resuscitation, NICU admission, Apgar scores and cord blood acidosis. Odds ratio and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated with controls as the reference., Results: 452 placentas were included. 35 % of pregnancies were complicated by IUGR. When analyzed by severity (low-grade: OR = 4.75 [2.86-8.14]; high-grade: OR = 4.76 [2.71-8.79]) and distribution (focal: OR = 5.24 [2.87-10.17]; multifocal: OR = 4.90 [2.90-8.59]), VUE was significantly associated with need for newborn resuscitation. No other neonatal outcomes of interest were significantly associated with VUE diagnosis., Discussion: We determined a statistically significant association between VUE severity and distribution and the need for newborn resuscitation. VUE lesions were not associated with any additional neonatal outcomes of interest. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these associations for obstetric and neonatal case management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Research Question: What is the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model for embryo selection in a prospective clinical trial?, Design: This single-centre prospective cohort study was carried out from October 2021 to March 2022. A total of 330 eligible patients were assigned to their preferred groups, with 250 patients undergoing a fresh single-blastocyst transfer cycle after the exclusion criteria had been applied. For the AI-assisted group (AAG), embryologists selected the embryos for transfer based on the ranking recommendations provided by an interpretable AI system, while with the manual group, embryologists used the Gardner grading system to make their decisions., Results: The implantation rate was significantly higher in the AAG than the manual group (80.87% versus 68.15%, P = 0.022). No significant difference was found in terms of monozygotic twin rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between the groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in terms of neonatal outcomes, including gestational weeks, premature birth rate, birth height, birthweight, sex ratio at birth and newborn malformation rate. The consensus rate between the AI and retrospective analysis by the embryologists was significantly higher for good-quality embryos (i.e. grade 4BB or higher) versus poor-quality embryos (i.e. less than 4BB) (84.71% versus 25%, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: These prospective trial results suggest that the proposed AI system could effectively help embryologists to improve the implantation rate with single-blastocyst transfer compared with traditional manual evaluation methods., (Copyright © 2023 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This study compared the current trend in survival rates and morbidity for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in five Medical Training Centers of Prematurity for the Premature Baby Foundation of Taiwan (PBFT), with the outcomes from the USA, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NICHD NRN), the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN), and the Neonatal Research Network of Japan (NRNJ). Methods: The survival rates of VLBW infants according to gestational age (GA) and major morbidities were compared between networks (Taiwan, USA, Canada, and Japan). Taiwanese data for VLBW infants of GA ≤28 weeks between 2007 and 2012 were obtained from the “PBFT Annual Conferences of Premature Care” reports defining survival rate as neonates that survived to the time of discharge. Major morbidities included severe neurological injury (Grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, and patent ductus arteriosus. Results: The survival rates of VLBW infants of GA ≤28 weeks from the PBFT (Taiwan), NICHD NRN (USA), CNN (Canada), and NRNJ (Japan) were 77% (1323/1718), 72% (6859/9575), 82% (2353/2872), and 89% (4489/5069), respectively. The annual survival rates in Taiwan from 2007 to 2012 were 72%, 76%, 76%, 74%, 77%, and 78%, respectively. When GA from ≤23 weeks to 28 weeks was assessed in Taiwan, the survival rates of VLBW infants according to each week were 22%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 88%, and 92%, respectively. The survival rate, especially at lower GAs, was highest in the NRNJ (Japan). The major difference between Taiwan and Japan was attributed to the lower survival rates at lower GA (≤26 weeks) in Taiwan. Japan had the lowest rates of major morbidities among the four countries. Conclusion: The survival rate of VLBW infants has improved over the past 6 years in Taiwan. It is higher than the USA, but lower than Canada and Japan. However, the results from Taiwan are from five Medical Training Centers for the PBFT rather than from a population-based study. It is crucial to have a nationwide neonatal research network to develop new practical approaches for VLBW infants in Taiwan.

Objective: To analyze the neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by aplastic anemia (AA) and to investigate the underlying risk factors., Methods: A single-center retrospective study was performed. Thirty singleton gravidas with AA (AA group) and another thirty singleton gravidas (control group) without immune or blood system disorders who gave birth around the same time were selected. Neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, multivariable analyses were utilized to investigate the association between underlying risk factors and adverse neonatal events., Results: No neonatal deaths occurred. Compared to the control group, the offspring of women with AA had a smaller gestational age (36 ± 1.9 vs. 39.1 ± 0.9 weeks; P < 0.001) and birth weight (2683.7 ± 479.9 vs. 3324.3 ± 394.1 g; P < 0.001). Newborns of women with AA had a higher risk of premature delivery (53.3 % vs. 3.3 %; P < 0.001), low birth weight (23.3 % vs. 0 %; P < 0.001) and NICU admission (53.3 % vs. 16.7 %; P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia as risk factors for premature delivery and admission to NICU. Anemia was independently associated with low birth weight (OR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.9-0.98, P = 0.01)., Conclusions: Neonatal complications such as premature delivery, low birth weight and NICU admission are more common in pregnant women with AA. Newborn babies' s hematopoietic system did not appear to have been affected. Maintaining a certain level of neutrophils, hemoglobin, and platelets in the mother can improve newborn outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Research Question: Does blastocyst storage time have an impact on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following the first single vitrified/warmed high-quality blastocyst transfer cycle for young women?, Design: Retrospective cohort study in a university-affiliated reproductive medical centre., Results: A total of 2938 patients undergoing their first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle with a single high-quality blastocyst (Day 5: 3BB and above; Day 6: 4BB and above) transferred were divided into five groups: Group A with storage time ≤3 months (n = 1621), Group B with storage time of 4-6 months (n = 657), Group C with storage time of 7-12 months (n = 225), Group D with storage time of 13-24 months (n = 104), and Group E with storage time of 25-98 months (n = 331). After adjusting for confounding factors by multivariate logistic regression, there were no significant differences in live birth rate [Group A as reference; Group B: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.954 (95% CI 0.791- 1.151); Group C: aOR 0.905 (95% CI 0.674-1.214); Group D: aOR 0.727 (95% CI 0.474-1.114); Group E: aOR 1.185 (955 CI 0.873-1.608)], β-human-chorionic-gonadotropin-positive rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate between Group A and the other groups. Among all singletons born after FET, there were no significant differences with regards to gestational age, preterm birth, birthweight, low birthweight, high birthweight and macrosomia., Conclusion: Long-term cryostorage of human vitrified high-quality blastocysts does not affect pregnancy or neonatal outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gestational diabetes (GDM) complicates 10% of pregnancies in the US. First-line treatment is medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and exercise. Second line is pharmacotherapy. The definition of what constitutes an unsuccessful trial of MNT and exercise has not been established. Tight glycemic control has been demonstrated to reduce GDM-related neonatal and maternal clinical complications. However, it could also increase rates of small-for-gestational age and carry negative effects on patient-reported outcomes such as anxiety and stress. We will study the effect of earlier and stricter pharmacotherapy in GDM on clinical and patient-reported outcomes., Methods: GDM and pharmacotherapy (GAP) study is a two-arm parallel, pragmatic randomized controlled trial, where 416 participants with GDM are randomized 1:1 to: 1) Intervention group - insulin initiation at 20% elevated glucose values on a weekly glucose log following MNT and exercise trial and insulin titration to keep elevated glucose values <20%; or 2) Active control group - insulin initiation at 40% elevated glucose values on a weekly log following MNT and exercise and insulin titration to keep elevated glucose values <40%. The primary outcome is a composite neonatal outcome of large-for-gestational-age, macrosomia, birth trauma, preterm birth, hypoglycemia, and hyperbilirubinemia. Secondary outcomes include preeclampsia, cesarean birth, small-for-gestational-age, maternal hypoglycemia, and patient-reported outcomes of anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and diabetes self-efficacy., Conclusions: The GAP study will investigate the optimal glycemic threshold for pharmacotherapy addition to MNT and exercise in GDM. The GAP study will promote standardization in GDM management and will have direct relevance for clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: As an increasing number of women with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) choose to become pregnant, outcomes in newborns have become a priority. The main purpose of this study was to compare the neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with PAH associated with heart disease., Methods: A single-center retrospective study was performed. Pregnancy with heart disease is divided into three groups: no PAH, mild PAH and severe PAH. Neonatal outcomes of pregnant women were compared among groups. Meanwhile, multivariable analyses were used to investigate the association between maternal PAH and adverse neonatal events., Results: A total of 127 pregnant women with heart disease were enrolled. Of these, 82 (64.6%) had no PAH, 19 (15%) had mild PAH and 26 (20.4%) had severe PAH. The offspring of women with severe PAH had a higher risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and recurrence of congenital heart disease (CHD). Compared to the women without PAH, only the risk of preterm delivery (32-36 weeks) and NICU admission were slightly higher in mothers with mild PAH; other neonatal events were similar. Multivariate regression analyses showed that the risk of preterm delivery (<37 weeks) increased with the increasing severity of maternal PAH, with an OR of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.1-8.8) for mild and 21.9 (95%CI, 4.8-99.4) for severe PAH. The same pattern was observed for NICU admission. Mothers with severe PAH were independently associated with low birth weight (OR 13, 95%CI 4.3-39, P < 0.001), NRDS (OR 17.9, 95%CI 5.5-58.9, P < 0.001) and recurrence of CHD (OR 4.47, 95%CI 1.7-11.6, P = 0.002)., Conclusion: Pregnancy in women with severe PAH can significantly increase the risks of neonatal events. While neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with mild PAH were considered optimistic in the present study, a multidisciplinary management of PAH in pregnancy would be necessary to have consistently good outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Taiwan Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adenomyosis is a benign gynecologic condition arising from the uterine junctional zone. Recent studies suggest a relationship between adenomyosis and adverse obstetrical outcomes, but evidence remains conflicting. There is no large-scale study investigating obstetrical outcomes in women with adenomyosis using the gold standard of histopathologic diagnosis., Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women with histopathologic adenomyosis and that of the general (Dutch) population., Study Design: This retrospective population-based study used 2 Dutch national databases (Perined, the perinatal registry, and the nationwide pathology databank [Pathologisch Anatomisch Landelijk Geautomiseerd Archief], from 1995 to 2018) to compare obstetrical outcomes in women before histopathologic adenomyosis diagnosis to the general Dutch population without registered histopathologic adenomyosis. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were calculated for adverse obstetrical outcomes. The outcomes were adjusted for maternal age, parity, ethnicity, year of registered birth, induction of labor, hypertensive disorders in previous pregnancies, multiple gestation, and low socioeconomic status., Results: The pregnancy outcomes of 7925 women with histopathologic adenomyosis were compared with that of 4,615,803 women without registered adenomyosis. When adjusted for confounders, women with adenomyosis had adjusted odds ratios of 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.50) for hypertensive disorders, 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.51) for preeclampsia, 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.25) for small-for-gestational-age infants, 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.68) for emergency cesarean delivery, 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.37) for failure to progress, 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.48) for placental retention, and 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.38) for postpartum hemorrhage. No increased risk of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome, placental abruption, or operative vaginal delivery or need for oxytocin stimulation was found., Conclusion: Women with a histopathologic diagnosis of adenomyosis showed an increased prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and small-for-gestational-age infants, failure to progress in labor, and placental retention compared with the general population in previous pregnancies. This suggests that uterine (contractile) function in labor and during pregnancy is impaired in women with adenomyosis., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics of the pregnant women who were hospitalized in a tertiary referral hospital with pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 virus infection and neonatal outcomes from October 2009 to December 2009 during which the pandemic influenza cases peaked in Turkey. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five pregnant women who were hospitalized with influenza-like illness and who had laboratory confirmation for pandemic influenza H1N1 virus infection were evaluated prospectively. Results: Of the 25 patients, 4 (16%) were in the first trimester, 8 (32%) were in the second trimester, and 13 (52%) were in the third trimester. The median time from the onset of symptoms to the initiation of antiviral therapy was 1 day (range 1–9 days). Nineteen (76%) patients received oseltamivir treatment. It took 1.6 days on the average for the fever defervescence after the initiation of treatment or hospitalization. Of the 14 patients who underwent chest radiography, three had findings consistent with pneumonia. The mean duration of hospitalization was 4.8 days. Four women (16%) were admitted to an intensive care unit, but there were no maternal or neonatal deaths in this series. At the time of their H1N1 hospitalization, seven women delivered by cesarean at 33–40 weeks gestation, two vaginally at 38 weeks gestation, and two had an abortion at 10 weeks and 16 weeks of gestation, respectively. None of the infants had any evidence of influenza infection. Conclusion: Pregnant women are at increased risk for complications from pandemic influenza H1N1 virus infection. Timely medical attention with early recourse to antiviral therapy is associated with a better outcome in H1N1-affected pregnant women.

The intrapartum period is a crucial time in the continuum of pregnancy and parenting. Events during this time are shaped by individuals' unique sociocultural and health characteristics and by their healthcare providers, practice protocols, and the physical environment in which care is delivered. Childbearing people in the United States have less opportunity for midwifery care than in other high-income countries. In the United States, there are 4 midwives for every 1000 live births, whereas, in most other high-income countries, there are between 30 and 70 midwives. Furthermore, these countries have lower maternal and neonatal mortality rates and have consistently lower costs of care. National and international evidences consistently report that births attended by midwives have fewer interventions, cesarean deliveries, preterm births, inductions of labor, and more vaginal births after cesarean delivery. In addition, midwifery care is consistently associated with respectful care and high patient satisfaction. Midwife-physician collaboration exists along a continuum, including births attended independently by midwives, births managed in consultation with a physician, and births attended primarily by a physician with a midwife acting as consultant on the normal aspects of care. This expert review defined midwifery care and provided an overview of midwifery in the United States with an emphasis on the intrapartum setting. Health outcomes associated with midwifery care, specific models of intrapartum care, and workforce issues have been presented within national and international contexts. Recommendations that align with the integration of midwifery have been suggested to improve national outcomes and reduce pregnancy-related disparities., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Initially developed from hospital feasibility data from the 1980s, the "30-minute rule" has perpetuated the belief that the decision-to-incision time in an emergency cesarean delivery should be <30 minutes to preserve favorable neonatal outcomes. Through a review of the history, available data on delivery timing and associated outcomes, and consideration of feasibility across several hospital systems, the use and applicability of this "rule" are explored, and its reconsideration is called for. Moreover, we have advocated for balanced consideration of maternal safety with rapidity of delivery, encouraged process-based approaches, and proposed standardization of terminology regarding delivery urgency. Furthermore, a standardized 4-tier classification system for delivery urgency, from class I, for a perceived threat to maternal or fetal life, to class IV, a scheduled delivery, and a call for further research with a standardized structure to facilitate comparison have been proposed., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Providing pain relief during labour is a fundamental human right and can benefit both mother and foetus. Epidural analgesia remains the 'gold standard', providing excellent pain relief, as well as the facility to convert to anaesthesia should operative intervention be required. While maternal well-being remains the primary focus, epidural analgesia may also have implications for the foetus. Data from meta-analyses finds that epidural compared with systemic opioids in labour is associated with reduced neonatal respiratory depression. Clinically relevant neonatal outcomes such as Apgar score <7 at 5 min, neonatal resuscitation and need for admission to a neonatal unit are reassuring, with the benefits of epidural analgesia for both mother and neonate outweighing any potential risks. Recent concerns regarding an association of epidural with the development of autism spectrum disorder in childhood appear to be unfounded, with several large observational studies refuting this association. This review discusses the evidence relating to maternal neuraxial analgesia in labour, implications for the foetus in utero, and childhood outcomes both in the immediate peripartum period and longer term., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest DNL is President-elect of the Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effect of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal outcomes and its association with preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus have been reported; however, a detailed understanding of the effects of maternal positivity, delivery mode, and perinatal practices on fetal and neonatal outcomes is urgently needed., Objective: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on fetal and neonatal outcomes and the role of mode of delivery, breastfeeding, and early neonatal care practices on the risk of mother-to-child transmission., Study Design: In this cohort study that took place from March 2020 to March 2021, involving 43 institutions in 18 countries, 2 unmatched, consecutive, unexposed women were concomitantly enrolled immediately after each infected woman was identified, at any stage of pregnancy or delivery, and at the same level of care to minimize bias. Women and neonates were followed up until hospital discharge. COVID-19 in pregnancy was determined by laboratory confirmation and/or radiological pulmonary findings or ≥2 predefined COVID-19 symptoms. The outcome measures were indices of neonatal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, neonatal positivity and its correlation with mode of delivery, breastfeeding, and hospital neonatal care practices., Results: A total of 586 neonates born to women with COVID-19 diagnosis and 1535 neonates born to women without COVID-19 diagnosis were enrolled. Women with COVID-19 diagnosis had a higher rate of cesarean delivery (52.8% vs 38.5% for those without COVID-19 diagnosis, P<.01) and pregnancy-related complications, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal distress (all with P<.001), than women without COVID-19 diagnosis. Maternal diagnosis of COVID-19 carried an increased rate of preterm birth (P≤.001) and lower neonatal weight (P≤.001), length, and head circumference at birth. In mothers with COVID-19 diagnosis, the length of in utero exposure was significantly correlated to the risk of the neonate testing positive (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-9.4 for length of in utero exposure >14 days). Among neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 diagnosis, birth via cesarean delivery was a risk factor for testing positive for COVID-19 (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.7), even when severity of maternal conditions was considered and after multivariable logistic analysis. In the subgroup of neonates born to women with COVID-19 diagnosis, the outcomes worsened when the neonate also tested positive, with higher rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission, fever, gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms, and death, even after adjusting for prematurity. Breastfeeding by mothers with COVID-19 diagnosis and hospital neonatal care practices, including immediate skin-to-skin contact and rooming-in, were not associated with an increased risk of newborn positivity., Conclusion: In this multinational cohort study, COVID-19 in pregnancy was associated with increased maternal and neonatal complications. Cesarean delivery was significantly associated with newborn COVID-19 diagnosis. Vaginal delivery should be considered the safest mode of delivery if obstetrical and health conditions allow it. Mother-to-child skin-to-skin contact, rooming-in, and direct breastfeeding were not risk factors for newborn COVID-19 diagnosis, thus well-established best practices can be continued among women with COVID-19 diagnosis., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 infections in pregnancy have been associated with maternal morbidity, admission to intensive care, and adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, stillbirth, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. It is unclear whether medically assisted reproduction additionally affects maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with COVID-19., Objective: To evaluate the effect of medically assisted reproduction on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with COVID-19 in pregnancy., Study Design: A total of 1485 women with COVID-19 registered in the COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (a multicentric, prospective, observational cohort study) were included. The maternal and neonatal outcomes in 65 pregnancies achieved with medically assisted reproduction and in 1420 spontaneously conceived pregnancies were compared. We used univariate und multivariate (multinomial) logistic regressions to estimate the (un)adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for adverse outcomes., Results: The incidence of COVID-19-associated adverse outcomes (eg, pneumonia, admission to intensive care, and death) was not different in women after conceptions with COVID-19 than in women after medically assisted reproduction pregnancies. Yet, the risk of obstetrical and neonatal complications was higher in pregnancies achieved through medically assisted reproduction. However, medically assisted reproduction was not the primary risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes including pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes mellitus, cervical insufficiency, peripartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, or admission to neonatal intensive care. Maternal age, multiple pregnancies, nulliparity, body mass index >30 (before pregnancy) and multiple gestation contributed differently to the increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with COVID-19 independent of medically assisted reproduction., Conclusion: Although women with COVID-19 who conceived through fertility treatment experienced a higher incidence of adverse obstetrical and neonatal complications than women with spontaneous conceptions, medically assisted reproduction was not the primary risk factor., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The ideal time for birth in pregnancies diagnosed with vasa previa remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review aiming to identify the gestational age at delivery that best balances the risks for prematurity with that of pregnancy prolongation in cases with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa., Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022., Study Eligibility Criteria: The intervention analyzed was delivery at various gestational ages in pregnancies prenatally diagnosed with vasa previa. Cohort studies, case series, and case reports were included in the qualitative synthesis. When summary figures could not be obtained directly from the studies for the quantitative synthesis, authors were contacted and asked to provide a breakdown of perinatal outcomes by gestational age at birth., Methods: Study appraisal was completed using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for the respective study types. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions., Results: The search identified 3435 studies of which 1264 were duplicates. After screening 2171 titles and abstracts, 140 studies proceeded to the full-text screen. A total of 37 studies were included for analysis, 14 of which were included in a quantitative synthesis. Among 490 neonates, there were 2 perinatal deaths (0.4%), both of which were neonatal deaths before 32 weeks' gestation. In general, the rate of neonatal complications decreased steadily from <32 weeks' gestation (4.6% rate of perinatal death, 91.2% respiratory distress, 11.4% 5-minute Apgar score <7, 23.3% neonatal blood transfusion, 100% neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 100% low birthweight) to 36 weeks' gestation (0% perinatal death, 5.3% respiratory distress, 0% 5-minute Apgar score <7, 2.9% neonatal blood transfusion, 29.2% neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 30.9% low birthweight). Complications then increased slightly at 37 weeks' gestation before decreasing again at 38 weeks' gestation., Conclusion: Prolonging pregnancies until 36 weeks' gestation seems to be safe and beneficial in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies with antenatally diagnosed vasa previa., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Pregnancy hypertension is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Between 34 +0 and 36 +6 weeks gestation, it is uncertain whether planned delivery could reduce maternal complications without serious neonatal consequences. In this individual participant data meta-analysis, we aimed to compare planned delivery to expectant management, focusing specifically on women with preeclampsia., Data Sources: We performed an electronic database search using a prespecified search strategy, including trials published between January 1, 2000 and December 18, 2021. We sought individual participant-level data from all eligible trials., Study Eligibility Criteria: We included women with singleton or multifetal pregnancies with preeclampsia from 34 weeks gestation onward., Methods: The primary maternal outcome was a composite of maternal mortality or morbidity. The primary perinatal outcome was a composite of perinatal mortality or morbidity. We analyzed all the available data for each prespecified outcome on an intention-to-treat basis. For primary individual patient data analyses, we used a 1-stage fixed effects model., Results: We included 1790 participants from 6 trials in our analysis. Planned delivery from 34 weeks gestation onward significantly reduced the risk of maternal morbidity (2.6% vs 4.4%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.98) compared with expectant management. The primary composite perinatal outcome was increased by planned delivery (20.9% vs 17.1%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.47), driven by short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. However, infants in the expectant management group were more likely to be born small for gestational age (7.8% vs 10.6%; risk ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.99)., Conclusion: Planned early delivery in women with late preterm preeclampsia provides clear maternal benefits and may reduce the risk of the infant being born small for gestational age, with a possible increase in short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. The potential benefits and risks of prolonging a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia should be discussed with women as part of a shared decision-making process., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)