1. On Behalf of the SFGM-TC: Retrospective Comparison of Reduced and Higher Intensity Conditioning for High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treated With Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation.
- Author
-
Campidelli A, Robin M, Remen T, Luc A, Labussière-Wallet H, Dulery R, Srour M, Ceballos P, Forcade E, Nguyen-Quoc S, Furst S, Turlure P, Bay JO, Simand C, Marçais A, Daguindau E, Rubio MT, and D'Aveni M
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myelodysplastic Syndromes mortality, Myelodysplastic Syndromes pathology, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Myelodysplastic Syndromes therapy, Transplantation Conditioning methods, Transplantation, Homologous methods
- Abstract
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the best curative option for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome . We retrospectively compared patient outcomes after allo-HSCT according to the intensity of the conditioning regimen., Patients and Methods: Three conditioning regimens were compared in 427 patients allografted for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), fludarabine (150-160 mg/m
2 ) and busulfan (6.4 mg/kg); sequential FLAMSA-RIC, fludarabine, amsacrine, and aracytine followed by RIC; and myeloablative with reduced toxicity (RTC), fludarabine and busulfan (9.6 mg/kg or 12.8 mg/kg)., Results: The patients in the 3 conditioning groups were different in regards to the number of treatment lines (P< .001), percentage of blasts in bone marrow (P< .001), and disease status at transplantation (P< .001). No significant differences in outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, and graft versus host disease relapse-free survival) were observed between the 3 groups. Using propensity score analysis to overcome baseline imbalances, we compared 70 patients receiving FLAMSA-RIC to 260 patients receiving RIC, and compared 83 patients receiving RTC to 252 patients receiving RIC. The only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was cytogenetic risk at transplantation. After the covariate adjustment using propensity score to reduce baseline imbalances, the only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was still cytogenetic risk at transplantation., Conclusion: Overall survival appears to be similar with the 3 conditioning regimens. The only factor influencing survival is cytogenetic risk at transplantation, suggesting that new promising drugs in the conditioning and/or early interventions after transplantation are needed to improve outcomes in these patients., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF