Search

Previously excesses in incident cases of leukaemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma have been observed amongst young people born or resident in Seascale, Cumbria. These excesses have not been seen more recently. It is postulated that the former apparent increased risk was related to 'unusual population mixing', which is not present in recent years. This study investigated changes in measures of population mixing from 1951-2001. Comparisons were made between three specified areas. Area-based measures were calculated (migration, commuting, deprivation, population density). All areas have become more affluent, although Seascale was consistently the most affluent. Seascale has become less densely populated, with less migration into the ward and less diversity with respect to migrants' origin. There have been marked changes in patterns of population mixing throughout Cumbria. Lesser population mixing has been observed in Seascale in recent decades. Changes in pattern and nature of population mixing may explain the lack of recent excesses., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Previous research from developed countries has shown a marked increase in the incidence of testicular cancer in the past 50 years. This has also been demonstrated in northern England, along with improving 5-year survival. The present study aims to determine if socioeconomic factors may play a role in both etiology and survival from non-seminoma testicular cancer., Materials and Methods: We extracted all 214 cases of non-seminoma testicular cancer diagnosed in teenage and young adult men aged between 15 and 24 years during 1968 to 2006 from the Northern Region Young Persons' Malignant Disease Registry, which is a population-based specialist regional registry. Negative binomial regression was used to examine the relationship between incidence and both the Townsend deprivation score (and component variables) and small-area population density. Cox regression was used to analyze the relationship between survival and both deprivation and population density., Results: Decreased incidence was associated with living in areas of higher household overcrowding for young adults aged between 20 and 24 years (relative risk per 1% increase in household overcrowding = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94) but no association was detected for young people aged between 15 and 19 years. Community-level household unemployment was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio per 1% increase in household unemployment = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00-1.08)., Conclusions: This study has shown that increased risk of non-seminoma testicular cancer in teenage and young adult men may be associated with some aspect of more advantaged living. In contrast, greater deprivation is linked with worse survival prospects. The study was ecological by design and so these area-based results may not necessarily apply to individuals., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previous studies have found marked increases in melanoma incidence. The increase among young people in northern England was especially apparent among females. However, overall 5-year survival has greatly improved. The present study aimed to determine whether socioeconomic factors may be involved in both etiology and survival. All 224 cases of malignant melanoma diagnosed in patients aged 10-24 years during 1968-2003 were extracted from a specialist population-based regional registry. Negative binomial regression was used to examine the relationship between incidence and area-based measures of socioeconomic deprivation and small-area population density. Cox regression was used to analyze the relationship between survival and deprivation and population density. There was significantly decreased risk associated with living in areas of higher unemployment (relative risk per 1% increase in unemployment=0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.96, P<0.001). Survival was better in less deprived areas (hazard ratio (HR) per tertile of household overcrowding=1.52; 95% CI 1.05-2.20; P=0.026), but this effect was reduced in the period 1986-2003 (HR=0.61; 95% CI 0.40-0.92; P=0.018). This study found that increased risk of melanoma was linked with some aspects of greater affluence. In contrast, worse survival was associated with living in a more deprived area.