Search

Introduction: Oxygen guidelines recommend a target saturation range (SpO 2 range) of 88-92 % for patients at risk of hypercapnia. Saturations <88 % and saturations >92 % whilst using supplemental oxygen are associated with increased mortality., Methods: We audited SpO 2 observations of all patients with a prescribed target range of 88-92 % at one hospital over a four-year period., Results: Of 1,045,958 observations from patients with an oxygen prescription, 107,724 (10.3 %) had a target range of 88-92 % (at risk of hypercapnia). 26,668 of these observations (24.8 %) involved oxygen use. 89.6 % of the SpO 2 observations with target SpO 2 range 88-92 % were satisfactory with SpO 2 ≥88 % breathing air or SpO 2 88-92 % breathing oxygen. However, 1.2 % of SpO 2 observations for these patients were too low (<88 %). This was commoner in observations involving use of supplemental oxygen (2.2 %) compared with observations on air (0.9 %). Of the SpO 2 observations with target SpO 2 range 88-92 % which were recorded whilst the patient was receiving supplemental oxygen therapy, 9870 had SpO 2 >92 % (over-oxygenated). This represented 9.2 % of all observations for patients with a target range of 88-92 % and 37.0 % of the 26,668 observations involving use of oxygen for these patients. Compared with nasal cannulae, SpO 2 observations involving use of simple masks, Venturi masks and humidified oxygen were more commonly outside of the target range., Summary: We found that excessive oxygen administration was much commoner than insufficient oxygen therapy for hospital patients at risk of hypercapnia. Excessive oxygen use implies an increased risk of harm to these patients, increased cost, and potentially delayed discharges., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Anthracofibrosis, which was recently defined as bronchial stenosis with overlying anthracotic mucosa, has been infrequently reported in Asia as a complication of tuberculosis (TB). It has not been reported in the United Kingdom or the United States, or, to our knowledge, in non-Asian patients. We have identified seven cases of patients presenting to a single teaching hospital in the northwest of England over a 13-year period. Only one patient had a history of TB, but six of the seven patients had a history of occupational dust exposure, including one patient with pneumoconiosis. It is possible that anthracofibrosis is an exaggerated endobronchial form of the much more common condition of anthracosis in coal miners and other workers who have been exposed to mineral dusts. Our study suggests that this is essentially a benign condition, although it may progress very slowly, leading to gradually progressive bronchial stenosis. The diagnosis is important because most patients have clinical, radiologic, and bronchoscopic changes that are highly suspicious of malignancy.

Background: The optimal duration of oral steroid treatment in the management of acute adult asthma is unclear. We prospectively studied the effect of 5 vs. 10 days of oral prednisolone in patients with acute asthma requiring hospital admission., Methods: Each patient received 40 mg of enteric-coated prednisolone daily for 5 days, followed by 5 days of 40 mg prednisolone daily (n=24) or placebo (n=20). All were given their usual inhaled asthma therapy including inhaled corticosteroids. Patients kept PEF and symptom diaries for 21 days., Results: For the 5-day treatment group mean (95% CI) early morning PEF was 6 (-47,+36) l/min lower to day 21 (P=0.78). There was no evidence of differences in other PEF measures (morning post-bronchodilator, evening or worst of day). One patient in each group had an exacerbation requiring further oral steroids during the 21-day observation period. Asthma symptom scores were worse in the 5-day group on days 6-21 but the significance of this finding was uncertain, as a difference had emerged by day 5 (prior to trial entry)., Conclusions: It may be possible to reduce the standard steroid course to 5 days in acute adult asthma, provided all patients receive inhaled steroids and a personal asthma management plan.

There is still disagreement as to the value and reliability of wash and brush cytology, in comparison with histology, for the diagnosis of malignancy at flexible bronchoscopy. The present study compares the yield and concordance of findings from the two modalities for visible tumours at flexible bronchoscopy. A single-centre study of 514 consecutive flexible bronchoscopy procedures, in which a lesion suspicious of cancer was seen and bronchial wash cytology, brush cytology and forceps biopsy samples were taken. All equivocal or suspicious results were taken as negative. An overall yield of 89.3% was achieved using a combination of all three tests. This was greater for endobronchial than submucosal (95% vs. 86%) tumours. Cytology alone diagnosed 17.7% of cases. Use of all three modalities allowed tumours to be differentiated between small and non-small cell types in all but 5/459 positive cases (98.9%). There were only 3/313 cases in which there was a difference in cell type (small cell vs. non-small cell) between the two modalities. We conclude that wash and brush cytology are valuable tools, in addition to forceps biopsy, at flexible bronchoscopy. All three tests should be performed routinely in cases of suspected malignancy.

Objectives: To compare the systemic bioavailability (assessed by cortisol suppression) of high-dose budesonide when given by four inhaler devices and orally. Also studied are the relative systemic potencies of three inhaled steroids (budesonide, fluticasone propionate, and beclomethasone dipropionate) when given by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a large volume spacer., Design: Double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial., Participants: Sixteen healthy, steroid-naive adult volunteers., Methods: On separate occasions, each subjects took 4 mg of budesonide through the following devices: MDI alone, MDI with 750-mL. spacer, dry-powder inhaler and nebulizer; 4 mg of budesonide was also taken orally to assess the effects of GI absorption. For the drug comparison, each subject took 4 mg of budesonide, fluticasone, and beclomethasone, and 2 mg of budesonide and fluticasone by MDI and spacer., Results: Greatest percent suppression (95% confidence interval) of 9:00 AM cortisol with budesonide was observed with MDI alone (73% [57 to 90]) and turbohaler (72% [58 to 86]) compared with MDI spacer (42% [22 to 64]) and oral administration (14% [+6- to -34]). Nebulized budesonide produced an insignificant rise in 9:00 AM cortisol level. The most suppressive drug (given by MDI spacer) was fluticasone at 4 mg (86% [82 to 91]) and at 2 mg (72% [59 to 85]). The least suppressive drug was budesonide at 4 mg (43% [22 to 64]) and at 2 mg (25% [3 to 47]). The effects of 4 mg of beclomethasone were intermediate (66% [49 to 82%])., Conclusions: The choice of delivery device for administration of budesonide can lead to important differences in systemic bioavailability. Fluticasone has greater systemic potency than budesonide or beclomethasone when given at microgram equivalent dosage. The systemic potency ratio of fluticasone propionate to budesonide in normal human volunteers in the present study is similar to the therapeutic potency ratio of the drug in asthmatic patients (approximately 2:1).

Although home nebulizers are widely used to deliver bronchodilator medication to patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the long-term benefits and hazards are unknown. The present authors have previously reported a prospective 12-month study of home nebulizer use involving 49 patients (15 asthma, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) 1.3/2.1 1; 34 COPD, mean FEV1/FVC 0.7/1.8 1). Thirty-two of these patients were treated with long-term domiciliary nebulized bronchodilator treatment, the other 17 patients chose metered dose inhaler (MDI) therapy. The present paper reports the progress of these patients over 5 yr. Five-year survival was similar in both groups (nebulizer users 56%, MDI users 53%). Most deaths were due to respiratory failure (14 deaths) or lung cancer (four deaths). Survival was determined mainly by FEV1 (R = 0.54, P = 0.0001) and age (R = -0.47, P = 0.0007). Laboratory lung function tests (16 nebulizer users) showed that FEV1 and FVC were still higher than pre-nebulizer baseline measurements after 36 months of nebulizer use, but PEFR had fallen by 7%. Twenty-one of 23 surviving nebulizer users completed a questionnaire after 36 months of treatment. All used their nebulizer at least once per day and 20 of 21 patients reported that they still obtained full benefit from each nebulized treatment. The morning peak flow response to nebulized treatment was the same at baseline and at 36 months (48 1 min-1). All patients remained breathless (mean subjective score 4.8 on seven-point scale) but the subjective response to nebulized treatment was unchanged at 36 months. Tachyphylaxis did not develop among 13 patients who underwent repeated reversibility studies using 200 micrograms of salbutamol at 6, 12 and 36 months. It is concluded that home nebulizer therapy is safe and effective for a small number of carefully selected patients with severe asthma or COPD, who have been evaluated by a rigorous home nebulizer assessment protocol prior to commencing home nebulizer therapy.

Previously, we have reported in 1990 that 35% of carmustine treated patients (6 of 17) who survived childhood brain tumors died of pulmonary fibrosis between 2 and 13 years after treatment. In addition, 8 patients studied in 1989 (13 to 17 years post treatment), had physiologic and biopsy or radiologic evidence of pulmonary fibrosis. We now report 3 more years of follow-up on these patients. Between 1989 and 1992, two more patients have died of pulmonary fibrosis, giving an overall mortality of 47%. Of the eight patients who died of pulmonary fibrosis, the median age at treatment was 2.5 years, whereas the nine long-term survivors had a median age at treatment of 10 years. All five patients treated below the age of 5 years have died of lung fibrosis. Analysis by the standard survival curve method indicated that patients treated at an age less than 6 years were more likely to die than those treated at an age older than 7 years (p = 0.03). Of the nine survivors, seven were observed over 3 more years. There was a gradual decline in mean forced vital capacity from 55% predicted (range, 44 to 81) to 51% predicted (range, 41 to 72) and total lung capacity fell from 65% predicted (range, 51 to 89) to 57% predicted (range, 47 to 77).

It is customary to tail off the dose of oral steroids after treatment of an acute exacerbation of asthma; the main reason for this practice is to avoid rebound asthma. We have carried out a randomised double-blind study to find out whether a tapering course of oral prednisolone has any advantage over an abruptly terminated course of prednisolone for an episode of acute asthma requiring hospital admission. We studied 35 patients admitted to hospital with acute asthma; their mean peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) on admission was 173 L/min and their mean age was 32 years (range 18-55); all were using inhaled steroids on discharge (mean dose 908 micrograms daily). Each patient received 40 mg enteric-coated prednisolone daily for 10 days followed by a tapering course of either prednisolone 5 mg tablets (active taper) or identical placebo tablets (placebo taper), reducing from 7 tablets on day 11 to no tablets by day 18. The primary outcome measure was the PEFR on waking. Both groups responded well to treatment by day 10 (mean morning PEFR: active taper group 396 L/min, placebo taper group 391 L/min). There was no further significant change in PEFR in either group during the 7 days of active or placebo tapering or during the following 10 days (repeated measures analysis of variance, active vs placebo, p = 0.82). The groups were also similar in terms of secondary outcome measures--symptom scores, PEFR after morning bronchodilator treatment, evening PEFR, and treatment failures. This study suggests that steroid tapering is unnecessary in acute asthma; a personal asthma management plan with a reserve course of prednisolone may be more appropriate.

Forty-nine patients (15 asthma, mean FEV1/FVC 1.3/2.1; 34 COPD, mean FEV1/FVC 0.7/1.8) were referred for consideration of home nebulizer treatment. All were monitored for 2 weeks while using their usual inhaled treatment followed by 2 weeks using a 'Nebuhaler' spacer to deliver 1 mg of terbutaline and 80 micrograms of ipratoropium bromide (IB) four times daily. They then borrowed a System 22 nebulizer to self-administer salbutamol nebulizer solution (5 mg), IB unit dose vials (0.5 mg) or a mixture of these drugs four times daily for 1 month each. Both asthmatic and bronchitic patients had a significant rise in their mean daily peak flow rate (PFR) during home nebulizer treatment (P < 0.03) and the COPD patients also had a significant PFR rise during Nebuhaler treatment (P = 0.0004). The mean daily peak flow rates (PFR 1 min-1 were: baseline 179, Nebuhaler 195, salbutamol nebulizer 200, IB nebulizer 198, mixed nebulizer 216). Four patients failed to respond subjectively or objectively to either Nebuhaler or nebulizer treatment. Five patients responded well to Nebuhaler treatment and did not proceed to a home nebulizer trial. Eight further patients preferred Nebuhaler to nebulizer treatment or could not tolerate nebulizer treatment (two cases). Thirty-two patients requested home nebulizer treatment for long-term use (nine salbutamol, five IB, 18 mixture). Twenty-seven of these patients had an increased mean daily PFR (compared to their usual therapy) while using their chosen nebulized treatment. The mean increase in PFR for all 32 patients was 191 min-1 (11%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twenty patients (six severe asthma, 14 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD) were referred for consideration of domiciliary nebulized treatment. A double blind laboratory assessment demonstrated similar subjective and objective responses to nebulized salbutamol (5 mg), ipratropium bromide (IB) (0.5 mg) or a mixture of these medications in both groups of patients. The patients subsequently self-administered each treatment four times daily for one month. Fourteen patients requested long-term home nebulizer treatment (three salbutamol, four ipratropium bromide, seven mixture), and nine of these had their highest domiciliary peak flow recordings during home nebulizer treatment. However, subjective and objective laboratory assessments did not clearly predict the patients long-term choice of therapy in any case. There was little overall correlation between the laboratory response and the domiciliary response to treatment (Spearman correlation coefficient; subjective score, laboratory vs. home, r = 0.27, P = 0.03; peak flow response 30 min after treatment, laboratory vs. home, r = 0.31, P less than 0.02). The hospital study was also unreliable in predicting side effects during domiciliary nebulizer use. We conclude that prospective laboratory studies are of little value in the assessment of patients for home nebulizer therapy; these assessments must be made by carefully supervised domiciliary trials of nebulized treatment.

103 patients with acute airflow obstruction (56 asthma, 47 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) completed a double-blind trial of nebulised bronchodilator treatment in a hospital accident and emergency department. Each patient was randomised to receive either 10 mg of salbutamol nebuliser solution in 2 ml of saline or 10 mg of salbutamol in 2 ml (0.5 mg) of preservative-free ipratropium bromide. Peak flow rate (PFR) was recorded before treatment and 1 hour after beginning nebulised treatment. In 23 asthmatic patients given salbutamol alone PFR rose by a mean 31% 1 hour after treatment whereas in 33 such patients given combined treatment it rose by a mean 77% (95% confidence interval for the difference 8-84%). Patients whose PFR was below 140 l/min at entry gained maximum benefit from the combined treatment. For COPD patients the PFR rise was almost identical for both treatments. In acute asthma the immediate PFR response to a mixture of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide was better than the response to nebulised salbutamol alone. For COPD patients, the two treatments were of equal benefit.