Search

The methodology described here presents the procedures for determining physical soil properties of undisturbed soil samples. Besides describing the methods for determining bulk and particle density, moisture content and porosity of the soil in detail, it also offers a way of determining soil's water holding properties when there is no pressure membrane apparatus available. This method is based on a capillary water saturation experiment and gravimetric measurements performed in different time intervals after the saturation (30 minutes, 2 hours, and 24 hours). With a few, simple to follow steps, and not using complicated and space-consuming equipment, it can be replicated in almost any laboratory, and the results are easily interpreted. The method was, and still is, widely used in the Czech Republic, and some parts of it are used as standard soil testing methods. To a lesser or greater detail, this method is described in Rejšek (1999), Valla et al. (2011), Pospíšilová et al. (2016) and ÚKZÚZ (2016), and this methodology is compiled from those publications, mainly focusing (and using the same abbreviations) on the procedures described by Valla et al. (2011). The methodology described does not essentially differ from the original, but the steps here have been described to a greater detail, based on the practical experiences obtained over the years, in order to make some common mistakes less likely to happen. The methodology is further complemented with graphical illustrations for each step described in the process, making it clearer, more easily understood, and easier to replicate. Since this methodology has not been available in English so far, this guide offers a great opportunity of its replication on an international level. • Simple, cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for determining physical soil properties • Easy replication and results interpretation • Results can be obtained even in non-highly specialized soil laboratories

ABSTRACT: The study aimed to assess laying performance, growth rate, and bone quality properties of tibia and femur bones of various genotypes of laying hens, including determining essential element composition at the end of the laying cycle in smallholder conditions. The study included three genotypes of laying hens; Czech golden spotted (CGS), White Leghorn (LE) and Dominant Partridge D300 (D300) hens. In total, 180 hens (60/genotype) were used in 3 replications (20 hens/replication). The eggs were collected to determine egg lay and hen-day egg production. Additionally, feed consumption was recorded to determine feed consumption per day or egg, resp. The mortality rate was recorded. Hens were individually weighed every 10 wk to analyze the growth performance and body weight changes during the laying cycle. The differences in performance characteristics were observed as significant in all studied parameters. The bone quality analysis consisted of the determination of bone weight, length, width, and fracture toughness. Furthermore, dry matter, ash, and selected elements, which included boron (B), calcium (Ca), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), phosphorus (P), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) were assessed. Regarding the results of tibia and femur bones, the effect of genotype was determined as significant in all evaluated properties. In terms of element composition, all evaluated elements significantly differed among the genotypes in the tibia (with one exception of Cu) and in the femur (with one exception of Cd). In conclusion, our results showed that hens’ performance, production quality, mortality and bone properties significantly differed among genotypes under smallholder conditions. Thus, every genotype needs to be carefully considered, when the rearing conditions are set.