Search

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the current recommended option for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Resistance to first-generation TKIs led to the development of second- and third-generation TKIs with improved clinical outcomes. However, sequential administration of TKIs has led to the emergence of new EGFR resistance mutations and persistent tumor cell survival. This evidence highlights the potential role of EGFR in transducing growth signals in NSCLC tumor cells. Therefore, dual inhibition of EGFR using combinations of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and EGFR-TKIs may offer a unique treatment strategy to suppress tumor cell growth. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the benefits of dual blockade of EGFR using anti-EGFR mAbs coupled with EGFR-TKIs in overcoming treatment resistance in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, a single treatment option may not result in the same clinical benefits in all patients with acquired resistance. Biomarkers, including EGFR overexpression, EGFR gene copy number, EGFR and KRAS mutations, and circulating tumor DNA, have been associated with improved clinical efficacy with anti-EGFR mAbs in patients with NSCLC and acquired resistance. Further investigation of biomarkers may allow patient selection for those who could benefit from anti-EGFR mAbs in combination with EGFR-TKIs. This review summarizes findings of recent studies of anti-EGFR mAbs in combination with EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, as well as clinical evidence for potential biomarkers towards personalized targeted medicine., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) offers the potential for cure after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients may not benefit and may experience severe toxicity. There are no validated molecular tools to allow better patient selection., Materials and Methods: The LACE-Bio (LACE [Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation]) project includes 4 trials (International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial [IALT], Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA], JBR10, and Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)-9633). Immunohistochemistry biomarkers shown in one trial to have a prognostic/predictive effect on overall survival were tested., Results: The majority of the promising biomarkers could not be validated; the prognostic effect of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and β-tubulin was confirmed. Potential causes include tissue fixation, storage, the use of tissue microarrays, and varying reagent/antibody batches., Conclusions: Immunohistochemistry assays from single trials may be misleading and require validation before being used for patient selection. LACE-Bio-2 is evaluating potential genomic biomarkers that may allow more precise selection of patients with NSCLC for adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer undergo surgery with curative intent. Many of these patients relapse and, therefore, adjuvant therapies are important for improving survival of these patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been established and increases the 5-year survival rate. Here, we discuss systemic treatment strategies for further improving outcome of patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We assessed the prognostic value of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma., Patients and Methods: PD-1 and PD-L1 expression was determined using immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens and correlated with the clinicopathologic features and survival of 161 patients with lung adenocarcinoma., Results: PD-1 expression on immune cells was observed in 71 of 159 evaluable tumor samples (45%) and was not significantly associated with the clinicopathologic features. Multivariate analyses identified PD-1 expression as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.95; P = .03) and death (adjusted HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.86; P = 0.01). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was seen in 59 of 161 cases (37%) and correlated with KRAS mutation status (P = .02) and type of surgery (P = .01). PD-L1 expression was not associated with recurrence-free survival in the patients (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.55-1.48; P = .68) but correlated with longer overall survival (adjusted HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97; P = .04)., Conclusion: PD-1 and PD-L1 expression was associated with favorable overall survival in patients with completely resected adenocarcinoma of the lung., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The isolation and analysis of circulating cell-free tumor DNA in plasma is a powerful tool with considerable potential to improve clinical outcomes across multiple cancer types, including NSCLC. Assays of this nature that use blood as opposed to tumor samples are frequently referred to as liquid biopsies. An increasing number of innovative platforms have been recently developed that improve not only the fidelity of the molecular analysis but also the number of tests performed on a single specimen. Circulating tumor DNA assays for detection of both EGFR sensitizing and resistance mutations have already entered clinical practice and many other molecular tests - such as detection of resistance mutations for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) receptor tyrosine kinase rearrangements - are likely to do so in the near future. Due to an abundance of new evidence, an appraisal was warranted to review strengths and weaknesses, to describe what is already in clinical practice and what has yet to be implemented, and to highlight areas in need of further investigation. A multidisciplinary panel of experts in the field of thoracic oncology with interest and expertise in liquid biopsy and molecular pathology was convened by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer to evaluate current available evidence with the aim of producing a set of recommendations for the use of liquid biopsy for molecular analysis in guiding the clinical management of advanced NSCLC patients as well as identifying unmet needs. In summary, the panel concluded that liquid biopsy approaches have significant potential to improve patient care, and immediate implementation in the clinic is justified in a number of therapeutic settings relevant to NSCLC., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Osimertinib is standard treatment for patients with advanced EGFR T790M-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who have been pre-treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We studied whether cell-free plasma DNA for T790M detection can be used to select patients for osimertinib treatment in the clinical routine., Methods: From April 2015 to November 2016, we included 119 patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who had progressed under treatment with an EGFR-TKI. The T790M mutation status was assessed in cell-free plasma DNA by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction in all patients and by tissue analyses in selected patients., Results: T790M mutations were detected in 85 (93%) patients by analyses of cell-free plasma DNA and in 6 (7%) plasma-negative patients by tumor re-biopsy. Eighty-nine of 91 T790M-positive patients received osimertinib. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1-12.1). Median survival was not reached and the 1-year survival was 64%. The response rate was 70% in T790M-positive patients (n = 91) in the intention-to-treat population. PFS trended to be shorter in patients with high T790M copy number (≥10 copies/mL) compared to those with low T790M copy number (<10 copies/mL) (hazard ratio for PFS = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.92-3.2, p = 0.09). A comparable trend was observed for overall survival (hazard ratio for overall survival = 2.16, 95% CI: 0.89-5.25, p = 0.09). No difference in response rate was observed based on T790M copy numbers., Conclusion: Plasma genotyping using digital polymerase chain reaction is clinically useful for the selection of patients who had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy for treatment with osimertinib., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The expression of programmed death (PD) ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been correlated with response and survival benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy of several agents appears correlated with PD-L1 expression. It remains controversial whether PD-L1 is prognostic in NSCLC. We assessed the prognostic value of PD-L1 IHC and its predictive role for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Tumor sections from three pivotal adjuvant chemotherapy trials (IALT, JBR.10, CALGB 9633) using the E1L3N antibody were studied in this pooled analysis. PD-L1 staining intensity and percentage in both tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) were scored by two pathologists. The average or consensus PD-L1 expression levels across intensities and/or percent cells stained were correlated with clinicopathological and molecular features, patient survivals and potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy., Results: Results from 982 patients were available for analysis. Considering staining at any intensities for overall PD-L1 expression, 314 (32.0%), 204 (20.8%) and 141 (14.3%) tumor samples were positive for PD-L1 staining on TCs using cut-offs at ≥1%, ≥10% and ≥25%, respectively. For PD-L1 expressing ICs, 380 (38.7%), 308 (31.4%) and 148 (15.1%) were positive at ≥ 1%, ≥10% and 25% cut-offs, respectively. Positive PD-L1 was correlated with squamous histology, intense lymphocytic infiltrate, and KRAS but not with TP53 mutation. EGFR mutated tumors showed statistically non-significant lower PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic with these cut-offs nor other exploratory cut-offs, nor were predictive for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusions: PD-L1 IHC is not a prognostic factor in early stage NSCLC patients. It is also not predictive for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in these patients., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Despite the efficacy of a number of first-line treatments, most patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience disease progression that warrants further treatment. In this review, we examine the role of novel active agents for patients who progress after first-line therapy and who are not candidates for targeted therapies. More therapeutic options are needed for the management of patients with NSCLC after failure of first-line chemotherapy. A PubMed search was performed for articles from January 2012 to May 2015 using the keywords NSCLC, antiangiogenic, immunotherapy, second-line, novel therapies and English language articles only. Relevant papers were reviewed; papers outside that period were considered on a case-by-case basis. A search of oncology congresses was performed to identify relevant abstracts over this period. In recent years, antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been added to our armamentarium to treat patients with advanced NSCLC who have progressed on first-line chemotherapy. These include nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor; ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody; and nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, just three of a growing list of antibodies targeting the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD ligand-1 pathway. Predictive and prognostic factors in NSCLC treatment will help to optimise treatment with these novel agents. The approval of new treatments for patients with NSCLC after the failure of first-line chemotherapy has increased options after a decade of few advances, and holds promise for future evolution of the management of NSCLC., Competing Interests: Competing interests: FC has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Clovis Oncology. LC has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. RD has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis and Clovis Oncology. DE is a consultant for ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Golden Biotech, Helsinn Therapeutics and Sandoz. DF has received consultant fees from Eli Lilly and speaker bureau fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb. KK has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Clovis Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Sharpe & Dohme. TLC has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and Synta. NL is a researcher for the University Health Network, which received a research grant from Novartis. CM has received honoraria for expert study advice and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. MP has received research grants from Novartis and honoraria from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer and Clovis Oncology. LP-A has given scientific advice to Pfizer, Clovis Oncology, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Bristol-Myers Squibb. MP has received honoraria for advisory boards from Eli Lilly, Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. RP has received speaker's fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, and honoraria for data safety monitoring board membership from Synta Pharmaceuticals, and Merck Sharpe & Dohme. EQ participated in clinical trials involving nivolumab, pembrolizumab, nintedanib, ramucirumab and ganetespib. MR has received compensated consultant fees from Hoffmann-La Roche, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Samsung, and honoraria for lectures from Hoffmann-La Roche, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim. ES has received honoraria for participating in advisory boards and lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. EV has received consultant/advisory fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GeneCentric, Genentech, Merck, Synta, Transgene and VentiRx. CZ has received honoraria from Hoffmann-La Roche, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca.

Background: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been designed to stratify the therapeutic benefit of a certain drug registered for the treatment of cancer. However, though internally validated, this tool has not yet been evaluated for its feasibility in the daily practice of a major center of medical oncology., Methods: The practicability of the MCBS for advanced oncological diseases at the Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, which constitutes one of the largest oncological centres in Europe, was analysed in a three-step approach. First, retrospectively collected data were analysed to gain an overview of treatments in regular use. Second, data were scored by using the MCBS. Third, the ensuing results were evaluated within corresponding programme directorships to assess feasibility in a real-life clinical context., Results: In the majority of tumour entities, the MCBS results reported earlier are consistent with daily clinical practice. Thus, in metastatic breast cancer or advanced lung cancer, there was a high level of clinical benefit for first-line treatment standards, and these results reflected well real-life experience. However, analyses based on the first version of the MCBS are limited if it comes to salvage treatment in tumour entities in which optimal sequencing of potential treatment options is of major importance, as in metastatic colorectal or renal cell cancer. In contrast to this, it is remarkable that certain novel therapies such as nivolumab assessed for heavily pretreated advanced renal cancer reached the highest level of clinical benefit due to prolongation in survival and a favourable toxicity profile. The MCBS clearly underlines the potential benefit of these compounds., Conclusions: The MCBS is an excellent tool for daily clinical practice of a tertiary referral centre. It supports treatment decisions based on the clinical benefit to be expected from a novel approach such as immunotherapy in as yet untested indications., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GP has received honoraria for lectures by Merck Serono, Amgen, Bayer, Servier, Lilly, Celgene, Roche and Sanofi Aventis. RP has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards by AstraZeneca, Böhringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and Synta. MP has received research support by Böhringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Roche and honoraria by BMS, Novartis, CMC Contrast, GSK, Mundipharma and Roche. MS has received honoraria for lectures by Pfizer, BMS, Novartis, Roche and Astellas. CCZ has received honoraria for advisory boards by Bristol Myers-Squibb, AstraZeneca, Imugene and Roche. All remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Introduction: Tumor protein p53 gene (TP53) mutations are common in stage I through III non-small cell lung cancer, but clinical trials have shown inconsistent results regarding their relationship to the effects of adjuvant therapy. The objective is to clarify their putative prognostic and predictive effects., Methods: A pooled analysis of TP53 mutations (exons 5-8) was conducted in four randomized trials (the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial, J BRonchus 10, Cancer and Leukemia Group B-9633, and Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association trial) of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) versus observation (OBS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of mutant versus wild-type (WT) TP53 for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using a multivariable Cox model stratified on trial and adjusted on sex, age, and clinicopathological variables. Predictive value was evaluated with an interaction between treatment and TP53., Results: A total of 1209 patients (median follow-up 5.5 years) were included. There were 573 deaths (47%) and 653 DFS events (54%). Mutations (434 [36%]) had no prognostic effect (OBS HROS = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.77-1.28, p = 0.95; HRDFS = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.78-1.25, p = 0.92) but were marginally predictive of benefit from ACT for OS (test for interaction: OS, p = 0.06; DFS, p = 0.11). Patients with WT TP53 had a tendency toward better outcomes with ACT than did those in the OBS group (HROS = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.62-0.95, p = 0.02; HRDFS = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.92, p = 0.005). In the ACT arm, a deleterious effect of mutant versus WT TP53 was observed (HROS = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.10-1.78, p = 0.006; HRDFS = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.04-1.64, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: TP53 mutation had no prognostic effect but was marginally predictive for survival from ACT. In patients who received ACT, TP53 mutation tended to be associated with shorter survival than wild-type TP53., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lung cancer continues to be a major global health problem; the disease is diagnosed in more than 1.6 million new patients each year. However, significant progress is underway in both the prevention and treatment of lung cancer. Lung cancer therapy has now emerged as a "role model" for precision cancer medicine, with several important therapeutic breakthroughs occurring during 2015. These advances have occurred primarily in the immunotherapy field and in treatments directed against tumors harboring specific oncogenic drivers. Our knowledge about molecular mechanisms for oncogene-driven tumors and about resistance to targeted therapies has increased quickly over the past year. As a result, several regulatory approvals of new agents that significantly improve survival and quality of life for patients with lung cancer who have advanced disease have occurred. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer has gathered experts in different areas of lung cancer research and management to summarize the most significant scientific advancements related to prevention and therapy of lung cancer during the past year., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The ImplementatioN of perSonalized medicine In NSCLC in Central Europe: EGFR testing, Histopathology, and clinical feaTures (INSIGHT) observational study assessed both implementation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing and treatment of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting in Central Europe. A total of 1785 patients from 14 cancer centers of six Central European countries were enrolled. EGFR mutations were detected in tumors of 13.8% of the patients. More than 70% of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy. The INSIGHT study demonstrated the establishment of EGFR mutation testing, a mutation rate consistent with other Caucasian patients populations, and adherence to current guidelines regarding treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors in Central Europe.

Introduction: The phase III FLEX study (NCT00148798) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer indicated that the survival benefit associated with the addition of cetuximab to cisplatin and vinorelbine was limited to patients whose tumors expressed high levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (immunohistochemistry score of ≥200; scale 0-300). We assessed whether the treatment effect was also modulated in FLEX study patients by tumor EGFR mutation status., Methods: A tumor mutation screen of EGFR exons 18 to 21 included 971 of 1125 (86%) FLEX study patients. Treatment outcome in low and high EGFR expression groups was analyzed across efficacy endpoints according to tumor EGFR mutation status., Results: Mutations in EGFR exons 18 to 21 were detected in 133 of 971 tumors (14%), 970 of which were also evaluable for EGFR expression level. The most common mutations were exon 19 deletions and L858R (124 of 133 patients; 93%). In the high EGFR expression group (immunohistochemistry score of ≥200), a survival benefit for the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy was demonstrated in patients with EGFR wild-type (including T790M mutant) tumors. Although patient numbers were small, those in the high EGFR expression group whose tumors carried EGFR mutations may also have derived a survival benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy. Response data suggested a cetuximab benefit in the high EGFR expression group regardless of EGFR mutation status., Conclusions: The survival benefit associated with the addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer expressing high levels of EGFR is not limited by EGFR mutation status.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths. Most patients present with advanced-stage disease, and the prognosis is generally poor. However, with the understanding of lung cancer biology, and development of molecular targeted agents, there have been improvements in treatment outcomes for selected subsets of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated significantly improved tumor responses and progression-free survival in subsets of patients with advanced NSCLC, particularly those with tumors harboring activating EGFR mutations. Testing for EGFR mutations is a standard procedure for identification of patients who will benefit from first-line EGFR TKIs. For patients with advanced NSCLC and no activating EGFR mutations (EGFR wild-type) or no other driving oncogenes such as ALK-gene rearrangement, chemotherapy is still the standard of care. A new generation of EGFR TKIs, targeting multiple receptors and with irreversible bindings to the receptors, are in clinical trials and have shown encouraging effects. Research on primary and acquired resistant mechanisms to EGFR TKIs are ongoing. Monoclonal antibodies (e.g. cetuximab), in combination with chemotherapy, have demonstrated improved outcomes, particularly for subsets of NSCLC patients, but further validations are needed. Novel monoclonal antibodies are combined with chemotherapy, and randomized comparative studies are ongoing. This review summarizes the current status of EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC in 2012 and some of the major challenges we are facing.

Background: Most non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy though clinical response is restricted to a subset of patients. DNA repair protein levels are possible surrogates for cisplatin-induced DNA adduct (and subsequent cell death) repair efficiency and thus molecular determinants of therapeutic efficacy. The International Adjuvant Lung Trial (IALT)-Bio study previously suggested ERCC1 and MSH2 as predictive of cisplatin-based therapeutic benefit., Patients and Methods: DNA repair protein expression (XPF, BRCA1, ERCC1, MSH2, p53, PARP1, and ATM) was assessed by immunohistochemistry on a large subset of patients (N = 769) from the IALT trial. Tissue Microarray slides were digitally scanned and signal quantified by user-defined macros. Statistical analyses (univariate and multivariate) of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival used binary cut-offs (H score low/high expression)., Results: In patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), ATM, p53, PARP1, ERCC1, and MSH2 displayed significant (borderline) predictive values, mainly on DFS with chemotherapy efficacy limited to low marker levels. Adenocarcinoma (ADC) results were not significant. BRCA1 and XPF were not significant for predictive modeling in either SCC or ADCs., Conclusion: Here predictive utility of DNA repair enzymes co-segregates with SCC histology, focusing their predictive value to this histological subclass of NSCLC. Distinct mechanisms of chemotherapeutic response or resistance might exist among histological subclasses of solid tumors.

The current third consensus on the systemic treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) builds upon and updates similar publications on the subject by the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG), which has published such consensus statements in the years 2002 and 2005 (Zielinski CC, Beinert T, Crawford J et al. Consensus on medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer--update 2004. Lung Cancer 2005; 50: 129-137). The principle of all CECOG consensus is such that evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment are given upon which all participants and authors of the manuscript have to agree (Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al. Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20 (11): 1771-1785). This is of particular importance in diseases in which treatment options depend on very particular clinical and biologic variables (Zielinski CC, Beinert T, Crawford J et al. Consensus on medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer--update 2004. Lung Cancer 2005; 50: 129-137; Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al. Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20 (11): 1771-1785). Since the publication of the last CECOG consensus on the medical treatment of NSCLC, a series of diagnostic tools for the characterization of biomarkers for personalized therapy for NSCLC as well as therapeutic options including adjuvant treatment, targeted therapy, and maintenance treatment have emerged and strongly influenced the field. Thus, the present third consensus was generated that not only readdresses previous disease-related issues but also expands toward recent developments in the management of NSCLC. It is the aim of the present consensus to summarize minimal quality-oriented requirements for individual patients with NSCLC in its various stages based upon levels of evidence in the light of a rapidly expanding array of individual therapeutic options.

Background: We recently demonstrated that excision repair cross-complementing group 1 protein (ERCC1) is predictive of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy benefit in resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-squamous cell carcinomas (non-SCCs) carry an increased risk of brain metastases (BMs). We hypothesised that there might be an increased incidence of BMs in ERCC1-negative non-SCCs when treated with adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Incidence of BMs and histoclinical parameters were analysed in a population of 761 patients enrolled in the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial. A subgroup analysis was carried out in patients with ERCC1-negative non-SCCs., Results: Of 761 patients, 98 developed BMs alone or in association with other metastatic sites, with a 5-year incidence rate of 18.0% (14.7%-21.8%). In the multivariate analysis, the clinical parameters associated with the occurrence of BMs were the nodal status (P = 0.02) and histological type [give hazard ratio (HR) for non-squamous to quantify introduction assertion, P = 0.002]. Chemotherapy had no effect on BMs [HR = 1.4 (0.90-2.1), P = 0.14]. In patients with non-SCC histology (n = 335), adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of BMs [HR = 2.1 (1.01-4.3), P = 0.04] for ERCC1-negative tumours, whereas there was no evidence of an effect on BMs for ERCC1-positive tumours [HR = 1.1 (0.38-3.0), P = 0.90]. Nevertheless, these two effects are not different (P = 0.30 for interaction) possibly due to a lack of power in this subgroup., Conclusions: This study suggests that adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with an increased risk of BMs in patients with resected chemosensitive non-SCCs. If confirmed, these data could provide a rationale for new follow-up and/or prophylactic strategies.

The excision repair cross completing group 1 gene product (ERCC1) and the regulatory subunit of ribonucleotide reductase (RRM1) have been reported as being prognostic of outcome and predictive of therapeutic efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Routinely processed surgical specimens from 784 patients from the International Adjuvant Lung Trial were arrayed as tissue microarrays. In situ protein levels were scored with an automated, quantitative analysis system, dichotomized into high and low marker categories, and analyzed for associations with patients' characteristics, survival, and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Scores for both markers were significantly associated with contributing center (P < 0.001) and skewed, with the bulk of scores being low. High scores were more frequent in women for ERCC1 and RRM1 and in older patients and those with adenocarcinoma for RRM1. Low ERCC1 scores indicated significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73 for chemotherapy versus control, P = 0.02]. Although all other survival associations were not statistically significant, low RRM1 scores trended to indicate benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.84, P = 0.25), and ERCC1 scores were marginally prognostic of survival (HR = 0.77 for high versus low scores, P = 0.10). We conclude that contributing center and specimen quality substantially affect the levels of both markers. Future trials should incorporate the collection and processing of tumor specimens prospectively on standardized protocols to better reveal the impact of biomarkers on clinically relevant outcomes., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This randomized phase II study investigated pemetrexed in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting monoclonal antibody matuzumab compared with pemetrexed alone as second-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer., Methods: Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m every 3 weeks either alone (n = 50) or in combination with matuzumab at either 800 mg weekly (n = 51) or 1600 mg every 3 weeks (n = 47). The primary end point was objective response, as assessed by an independent review committee., Results: Tumor EGFR expression was detected in 87% of randomized patients. The objective response rate for the pooled matuzumab-treated arms was 11% compared with 5% for pemetrexed alone (p = 0.332). Apart from one patient in the pemetrexed alone group, all responses occurred in patients whose tumors expressed EGFR. The objective response rate for patients receiving weekly matuzumab was 16% compared with 2% for those receiving matuzumab every 3 weeks. There was also a trend for improved overall survival in patients receiving matuzumab weekly versus every 3 weeks (12.4 months versus 5.9 months, respectively, versus 7.9 months for pemetrexed alone). The combination of pemetrexed and matuzumab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, with the most common grade 3/4 adverse event being neutropenia., Conclusion: Although the analysis on the pooled matuzumab-treated arms did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in objective response for the addition of matuzumab to pemetrexed compared with pemetrexed alone, the trends for improvement in objective response and overall survival for pemetrexed plus weekly matuzumab compared with pemetrexed alone warrant confirmation in additional clinical trials.

Background: Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA; methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) is a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent with a prolonged half-life. The objective of this study was to select a starting dose of CERA for the treatment of anemia in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Patients and Methods: The study was an open-label randomized phase II trial containing four treatment groups of patients with anemia and stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. The fourth treatment group was a reference group of patients treated with darbepoetin alfa administered at either 6.75 μg/kg s.c. every 3 weeks or 2.25 μg/kg weekly. Due to observed imbalances in death across treatment arms, this study was prematurely terminated., Results: The primary efficacy parameter of the mean hemoglobin (Hb) change from baseline during weeks 5-13 was +0.03 g/dl, +0.50 g/dl, and -0.02 g/dl in the CERA 6.3, 9, and 12 μg/kg dose groups, respectively, and +0.26 g/dl in the darbepoetin alfa dose group (P value not significant for all three study arms). Eight (21%), 12 (32%), 9 (24%), and 4 (10%) patients in the CERA 6.3, 9, and 12 μg/kg and darbepoetin groups, respectively, died., Conclusion: In this phase II study in patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC receiving chemotherapy, none of the four treatment arms showed an adequate increase in mean Hb level.

Introduction: Activating somatic mutations of the tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have recently been characterized in a subset of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients harboring these mutations in their tumors show excellent response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The EGFR-TKI gefitinib has been approved in Europe for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with activating mutations of the EGFR TK. Because EGFR mutation testing is not yet well established across Europe, biomarker-directed therapy only slowly emerges for the subset of NSCLC patients most likely to benefit: those with EGFR mutations., Methods: The "EGFR testing in NSCLC: from biology to clinical practice" International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer-European Thoracic Oncology Platform multidisciplinary workshop aimed at facilitating the implementation of EGFR mutation testing. Recommendations for high-quality EGFR mutation testing were formulated based on the opinion of the workshop expert group., Results: Co-operation and communication flow between the various disciplines was considered to be of most importance. Participants agreed that the decision to request EGFR mutation testing should be made by the treating physician, and results should be available within 7 working days. There was agreement on the importance of appropriate sampling techniques and the necessity for the standardization of tumor specimen handling including fixation. Although there was no consensus on which laboratory test should be preferred for clinical decision making, all stressed the importance of standardization and validation of these tests., Conclusion: The recommendations of the workshop will help implement EGFR mutation testing in Europe and, thereby, optimize the use of EGFR-TKIs in clinical practice.

Background: Use of cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has the potential to increase survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We therefore compared chemotherapy plus cetuximab with chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer., Methods: In a multinational, multicentre, open-label, phase III trial, chemotherapy-naive patients (>or=18 years) with advanced EGFR-expressing histologically or cytologically proven stage wet IIIB or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to chemotherapy plus cetuximab or just chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 of every 3-week cycle) for up to six cycles. Cetuximab-at a starting dose of 400 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion over 2 h on day 1, and from day 8 onwards at 250 mg/m(2) over 1 h per week-was continued after the end of chemotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity had occurred. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00148798., Findings: Between October, 2004, and January, 2006, 1125 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy plus cetuximab (n=557) or chemotherapy alone (n=568). Patients given chemotherapy plus cetuximab survived longer than those in the chemotherapy-alone group (median 11.3 months vs 10.1 months; hazard ratio for death 0.871 [95% CI 0.762-0.996]; p=0.044). The main cetuximab-related adverse event was acne-like rash (57 [10%] of 548, grade 3)., Interpretation: Addition of cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy represents a new treatment option for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer., Funding: Merck KGaA.

Background: The Lung Cancer Cetuximab Study is an open-label, randomized phase II pilot study of cisplatin and vinorelbine combined with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted monoclonal antibody cetuximab versus cisplatin and vinorelbine alone, in patients with advanced EGFR-expressing, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). End points of the study are activity, safety and pharmacokinetics., Patients and Methods: Following randomization, for a maximum of eight cycles, patients received three-weekly cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) alone or following cetuximab treatment (initial dose 400 mg/m(2), followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly thereafter)., Results: Eighty-six patients were randomly allocated to the study (43 per arm). Confirmed response rates were 28% in the cisplatin/vinorelbine arm (A) and 35% in the cetuximab plus cisplatin/vinorelbine arm (B). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months in arm A and 5.0 months in arm B, with PFS rates at 12 months of 0% and 15%, respectively. Median survival was 7.3 months in arm A and 8.3 months in arm B. The 24-month survival rates were 0% and 16%, respectively. The cetuximab combination was well tolerated., Conclusion: In the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, the combination of cetuximab plus cisplatin/vinorelbine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and the potential to improve activity over cisplatin/vinorelbine alone.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has reached a plateau, but further improvements are expected with integration of targeted therapies. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed therapies are of particular interest because the EGFR is frequently expressed in tumors and associated with poorer outcome. Thus, blockade of the EGFR should improve outcome. Blockade can be achieved by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). Both approaches have been evaluated in advanced NSCLC. As single agents, EGFR-directed TKIs have demonstrated efficacy in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. When combined with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, TKIs failed to improve the outcome. In contrast, MoAbs in combination with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy showed promising efficacy in phase II trials. Two phase III trials with chemotherapy with or without cetuximab have been performed in patients with advanced NSCLC. Other EGFR-directed MoAbs and TKIs are in earlier stages of clinical development.

A method is developed for the simultaneous extraction of gentisic (GA), salicyluric (SUA) and salicylic acid (SA) in human plasma from Willow Bark extract, by solid phase extraction (SPE) using Waters Oasis HLB (divinylbenzene-n-vinylpyrrolidone copolymer) cartridges. Also, a method is optimized comprising of reversed-phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in connection with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), fluorescence detection (FLD) and photo diode array detection (DAD) to identify and quantify GA, SUA and SA in the SPE effluents. An improved sensitivity regarding the lower detection limit (LOD) of < 7 ng/ml, the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 20 ng/ml and short analysis times of < 15 min is required. The validated SPE method shows linearity in the range of 9.0-58.2 ng/ml for GA, 9.4-191.5 ng/ml for SUA and 12.8-1101.6 ng/ml for SA. The correlation coefficient values are > 0.9994 and 0.99 for fluorescence detection (FLD) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), respectively. The recoveries are from 91.3-102.1% for gentisic acid (GA), 86.8-100.5% for salicyluric acid (SUA) and 75.8-81.4% for salicylic acid (SA) depending on the starting concentrations. RP-LC-ESI-MS/MS studies using collision induced dissociation (CID) confirm that the investigated analytes are not artifacts and facilitate further specific identification in addition to the determination of the parent ion mass even in the presence of co-eluting peaks. The established method is also used to analyze gentisic (GA), salicyluric (SUA) and salicylic acid (SA), not only after intake of Willow Bark capsules (Assalix, BNO 1455) but also as naturally occurring constituents in human plasma after the intake of salicylic acid containing foods., (Copyright 2004 Elsevier B.V.)

Anemia has a high prevalence in patients with lung cancer. Its frequency and severity depend on tumor stage, duration of disease, and previous and current treatment. Anemia affects the health-related quality of life and impacts prognosis and outcome of therapy. Despite this clinical relevance, anemia is often underrecognized and undertreated. Treatment options include the administration of hematopoietic growth factors and red blood cell transfusions. Blood transfusions result in rapid but often transient improvement of anemia. Administration of epoetin or darbepoetin alfa increases hemoglobin levels, decreases blood transfusions, and improves quality of life in patients with lung cancer. Trials determining the exact association of anemia with response to chemotherapy/radiation therapy and survival are ongoing. Oncologists must be aware of the clinical relevance of anemia and offer adequate treatment options to their patients.

Background: The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin has significant activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase III study of chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC patients was designed to assess whether response rate in patients receiving a paclitaxel/carboplatin combination was similar to that in patients receiving a paclitaxel/cisplatin combination. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) (3-h intravenous infusion) followed by either carboplatin at an AUC of 6 or cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m(2), all repeated every 3 weeks. Survival, toxicity and quality of life were also compared., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomised to receive one of the two combinations, stratified according to centre, performance status, disease stage and histology. The primary analyses of response rate and survival were carried out on response-evaluable patients. Survival was also analysed for all randomised patients. Toxicity analyses were carried out on all treated patients., Results: A total of 618 patients were randomised. The two treatment arms were well balanced with regard to gender (83% male), age (median 58 years), performance status (83% ECOG 0-1), stage (68% IV, 32% IIIB) and histology (38% squamous cell carcinoma). In the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, 306 patients received a total of 1311 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses) while in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, 302 patients received a total of 1321 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses). In only 76% of courses, carboplatin was administered as planned at an AUC of 6, while in 96% of courses, cisplatin was given at the planned dose of 80 mg/m(2). The response rate was 25% (70 of 279) in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 28% (80 of 284) in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (P = 0.45). Responses were reviewed by an independent radiological committee. For all randomised patients, median survival was 8.5 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm [hazard ratio 1.20, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.40]; the 1-year survival rates were 33% and 38%, respectively. On the same dataset, a survival update after 22 months of additional follow-up yielded a median survival of 8.2 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 90% CI 1.06-1.40; P = 0.019); the 2-year survival rates were 9% and 15%, respectively. Excluding neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, and nausea/vomiting and nephrotoxicity, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, the rate of severe toxicities was generally low and comparable between the two arms. Overall quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13) was also similar between the two arms., Conclusions: This is the first trial comparing carboplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Although paclitaxel/carboplatin yielded a similar response rate, the significantly longer median survival obtained with paclitaxel/cisplatin indicates that cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be the first treatment option.

A method for the simultaneous extraction of hypericin and hyperforin from a St. John's Wort extract, which is used in case of moderate depressions and skin injuries, from human plasma and serum by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with n-hexane-ethylacetate (70:30, w/w) was developed. A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method with UV, fluorescence (FLD) and mass spectrometric (MS) detection using electrospray ionization (ESI) was used to identify and quantify hypericin and hyperforin in the extracts from blood samples. Linearity was obtained in the ranges 8.4-28.7 ng/ml (hypericin) and 21.6-242.6 ng/ml (hyperforin). Recoveries were between 32.2 and 35.6% for hypericin and 100.1 and 89.9% for hyperforin. Intra-day accuracy and precision for this method ranged between 3.2 and 4.3% and 2.6 and 2.8%, respectively. After validation of the LLE, the method was tested on real plasma samples which were obtained by ingestion of St. John's Wort extract capsules. Blood samples were taken 2, 4, and 6 h after ingestion. Finally, this method proved to be highly suitable for clinical and pharmacologically relevant studies.

Purpose: The purpose of the present phase 11 trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine-gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: From December 1997 to February 1999, 78 chemotherapy-naive patients (median age 60 years, Karnofsky performance status of 100, 90, 80 and 70 present in 5%, 41%, 36% and 18% of the patients, respectively) with stage IIIB (17%) or IV (83%) NSCLC (65% adenocarcinomas, 22% squamous-cell carcinomas, 10% large-cell carcinomas, 3% mixed-cell carcinomas) received 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine and 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15 of a four-week cycle., Results: In an intent-to-treat analysis, partial responses were seen in 19% of the patients. The median duration of response was 4.4 months. The median survival time was seven months and the one-year survival rate was 32%. Myelosuppression was the main side effect with WHO grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 35% and 11% of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were usually mild to moderate., Conclusions: Vinorelbine-gemcitabine is active, well tolerated and easy to administer on an outpatient basis in advanced NSCLC. Thus a randomized comparison of this combination with platinum-based protocols is warranted in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Background: To evaluate the activity of MTA plus cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Thirty-six chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC received 500 mg/m2 MTA plus 75 mg/m2 cisplatin every 21 days, with 4 mg dexamethasone orally twice daily on the day before, of, and after MTA administration., Results: Median age was 58 years. WHO performance status was 0-2. Eighteen patients each had stage IIIB and IV disease. Seventeen patients each had squamous-cell and adenocarcinoma; two had undifferentiated disease. Fourteen patients (39%; 95% confidence interval: 23%-57%) showed partial response; seventeen (47%) had stable disease. Median survival was 10.9 months. Twenty-one patients (59%) experienced grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia without fever or infection. Five (14%) and six (17%) patients experienced grade 3 anemia and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Nonhematological toxicities included grade 3 nausea in two patients (6%), and grade 3 and 4 diarrhea in one patient (3%) each. One patient each experienced grade 4 ALT and grade 3 bilirubin and AST elevations., Conclusions: MTA plus cisplatin is well tolerated and active against NSCLC. Further studies of this combination are warranted.

About 25%-30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer can be resected with curative intent. However, systemic relapses occur in up to 70% of these patients. Thus, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated in several randomised trials but the results of these trials were inconclusive with a survival benefit only in some trials. Shortcomings of these trials included low number of patients, poor patient compliance and inadequate chemotherapy protocols. A recent meta-analysis suggested an absolute survival benefit of 5% at five years for postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy as compared to surgery alone. Thus adjuvant chemotherapy with both improved chemotherapy protocols and improved anti-emetics is currently re-evaluated in several randomised trials on large patient populations.

Small cell lung cancers, comprising approximately 20% of lung cancers, are rapidly growing and disseminating carcinomas which are initially chemosensitive but acquire drug resistance during the course of disease. Thus, outcome is poor with median survival of 10-16 months for patients with limited and 7-11 months for patients with extensive disease. Polychemotherapy with established drugs (platins, etoposide, anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and Vinca alkaloids) plays the major role in the treatment of this disease and results in overall response rates between 80%-95% for limited disease and 60%-80% for extensive disease. Dose-intensified chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell support were tested in several trials but their exact impact on outcome remains to be determined. New drugs including the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), the topoisomerase I inhibitors (topotecan, irinotecan), vinorelbine and gemcitabine are currently evaluated in clinical trials. In limited disease, thoracic radiotherapy improves survival and prophylactic cranial irradiation should be administered to those with a reasonable chance of cure.

The 110-kD lung resistance protein (LRP) is overexpressed in P-glycoprotein-negative multidrug-resistant cell lines and most likely involved in the multidrug resistance (MDR) of these cell lines. To determine the clinical significance of LRP, we have studied LRP expression of leukemic blasts and its association with clinical outcome in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). LRP expression of leukemic blasts obtained from peripheral blood or bone marrow of previously untreated patients (n = 86) was determined by immunocytochemistry by means of monoclonal antibody LRP-56. LRP expression at diagnosis was detected in 31 (36%) patients. LRP expression was independent of age and sex of the patients, French-American-British subtype, cytogenetic abnormalities, and lactate dehydrogenase levels, but correlated with white blood cell count (P = .01). Eighty-two patients received standard induction chemotherapy that included cytarabine and MDR drugs (daunorubicin in most patients, additional etoposide in the majority of patients). The complete remission rate of induction chemotherapy was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 61% to 82%) for the total study population. The complete remission rate was 81% (95% CI = 67% to 91%) for patients without LRP expression but only 55% (95% CI = 36% to 74%) for patients with LRP expression (P = .01). Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier in 82 and 59 patients, respectively. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients without LRP expression than in patients with LRP expression. At a median follow-up of 16 months, median overall survival was 17 months (95% CI = 12 to 38 months) for LRP-negative patients but only 8 months (95% CI = 4 to 12 months) for -positive patients (P = .006). Disease-free survival was 9 months (95% CI = 7 to 11 months) for LRP-negative patients and 6 months (95% CI = 5 to 8 months) for -positive patients (P = .078). Outcome was best in patients lacking both LRP and P-glycoprotein expression. In conclusion, LRP predicts for poor outcome and thus the LRP gene appears to be another clinically relevant drug resistance gene in AML.

Background: Paclitaxel (Taxol) as single agent has shown promising activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because paclitaxel lends itself to combination with other anticancer drugs, we have determined the efficacy of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC in a phase II trial., Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) as a 3-hour infusion after standard premedication on day 1 and cisplatin (50 mg/m2 daily) on days 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks., Results: All 20 patients were evaluable for response and toxic effects. Partial responses were seen in 7 (35%) patients and no change in 9 (45%) patients. Major side effects included leukopenia, anemia, alopecia and dose-limiting neurotoxicity., Conclusions: Paclitaxel/cisplatin has shown good antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC and should be further evaluated in this disease. Because neurotoxicity has been dose-limiting, methods for its prevention or early detection should further enhance the clinical value of this combination chemotherapy.