Search

Breast cancer is diagnosed through a patient's Breast Self-Examination (BSE), Clinical Breast Examination (CBE), or para-clinical methods. False negativity of PCM in breast cancer diagnostics leads to a persisting problem associated with breast tumors diagnosed only in advanced stages. As the tumor volume/size at which it becomes invasive is not clear, BSE and CBE play an exceedingly important role in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. The quality and effectiveness of BSE and CBE depend on several factors, among which breast stiffness is the most important one. In this study, the authors present four methods for evaluating breast stiffness pathology during mammography examination based on the outputs obtained during the breast compression process, id est, without exposing the patient to X-Ray radiation. Based on the subjective assessment of breast stiffness by experienced medical examiners, a novel breast stiffness classification was designed, and the best method of its objective measurement was calibrated to fit the scale. Hence, this study provides an objective tool for the identification of patients who, being unable to perform valid BSE, could benefit from an increased frequency of mammography screening. Dum vivimus servimus., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 HCFMUSP. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

A 69-year-old man while being treated for type B aortic dissection was also found to have acute myocardial infarction. The patient initially was treated conservatively. Prophylactic anticoagulant treatment of potential thrombosis was not given because of aortic dissection. Stent-graft implantation to the thoracic aorta was considered at the time. Unexpectedly, elective computer tomography (CT), revealed 2 large thrombi at the bifurcation of the pulmonary trunk. The patient did not show any symptoms of pulmonary embolism. Heparin therapy was initiated immediately. The patient responded well to the therapy and on transesophageal echocardiography and subsequent CT no embolic material was found. Since that time, the patient is receiving oral anticoagulation. The case we present raises the question of anticoagulation prophylaxis in the presence of aortic dissection in bedridden patients. Failure to use such therapy in our patient could have resulted in an unfavorable clinical outcome.

Purpose: Adiponectin is a fat derived hormone, which enhances insulin sensitivity. In experimental studies adiponectin was shown to have antiatherogenic properties by suppressing endothelial expression of adhesion molecules. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate plasma adiponectin and E-selectin concentrations in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired glucose metabolism and evaluation of their relationship with selected anthropometric, biochemical and clinical parameters., Material and Methods: The study group consisted of 62 patients with coronary heart disease, without previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (mean age 48.6 +/- 6.0 years; mean BMI 28.6 +/- 3.13 kg/m2). In the studied group the OGTT with glucose and insulin estimation was performed and insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) was calculated. In the fasting state, the plasma adiponectin, soluble form of E-selectin, HbA1c and lipid parameters were estimated., Results: Adiponectin concentration was not different in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance (n = 36) in comparison to the group with normal glucose tolerance (n = 26). There was also no difference in adiponectin concentration in relation to atherosclerosis progression. There was no significant correlation between adiponectin and calculated insulin resistance index, while there was marked inverse correlation between adiponectin and BMI (r = -0.30; p = 0.018), body weight (r = -0.33; p = 0.008), E-selectin (r = -0.263; p = 0.039), TG concentration (r = -0.27; p = 0.036), duration of coronary heart disease (r = -0.33; p = 0.009) and borderline significance with ejection fraction (r = -0.268; p = 0.06)., Conclusions: Our study supports the hypothesis that adiponectin could be recognised as a protective protein for the development of atherosclerosis.