Search

Introduction: Lorlatinib is a potent, brain penetrant, next-generation ALK/ROS1 TKI, with high response rates and durable responses, including the brain. However, a significant drawback is the manifestation of neurocognitive adverse events (NCAEs). Despite being generally low-grade in severity, these NCAEs can be physically and mentally disabling. Extensive neurocognitive testing in this group of patients is lacking; therefore we conducted this study., Patients and Methods: This observational prospective study was conducted across 3 Dutch university hospitals. Patients with metastatic NSCLC with an ALK- or ROS1-rearrangement and having an indication to start lorlatinib in daily clinical practice were eligible. The primary endpoints were to identify changes in neurocognitive functioning, measured through neurocognitive assessment at intervals of 2 weeks and 2 months after starting lorlatinib, in comparison to baseline. As a secondary endpoint, the correlation between neurocognitive impairment and self-reported neurocognitive dysfunction was examined., Results: Between June 2019 and October 2022, 22 patients were included. Among the various neurocognitive tests administered, only the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised parts b and c demonstrated a significant and clinically relevant decrease in scoring 2 weeks post initiation of lorlatinib (P = .036 and P = .003, respectively). However, these returned to baseline at the 2-month evaluation. The questionnaires did not result in significantly different outcomes over time., Conclusion: Lorlatinib treatment did not result in a sustained and significant decline within any of the specified neurocognitive domains., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction/background: This study was designed to describe real-world changes in biomarker testing among patients with non-squamous, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in a community oncology setting from 2015 to 2020., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study randomly selected 500 adult patients diagnosed with nonsquamous mNSCLC to undergo chart review and data extraction. Data were extracted and validated by 2 independent abstractors. Biomarker testing rates were described before and after national guideline updates and FDA approval of targeted agents., Results: At least 1 biomarker test was received by 89.4% of patients with mNSCLC. Of all patients, 46.6%, 34.6%, and 8.2% received both single-gene and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing, single-gene testing only, and NGS-based testing only, respectively. However, there were changes in testing rates at the time of drug approvals for targeted agents. Biomarker testing increased for ALK (45.0% before to 78.3% after ALK-targeted drug approval), BRAF (from 20.0% to 67.8%), EGFR (from 20.0% to 78.2%), NTRK (from 34.6% to 55.7%), and ROS1 (increased from 29.6% before approval to 74.2% after). Biomarker testing increased after changes were made to national guidelines for BRAF (from 18.8% before to 68.1% after inclusion in guidelines), NTRK (from 37.2% to 56.5%), and ROS1 (increased from 40.8% to 74.5% after guideline updates). Targeted therapy was received by 62.4% of patients with a positive biomarker., Conclusion: Increases in biomarker testing rates were observed relative to targeted agent approvals and national guideline updates. However, many patients with non-squamous mNSCLC did not receive full genotyping in accordance with national guidelines and represent an opportunity to identify reasons and solutions for barriers to care., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis (NSCLC-LM) is emerging as a new management challenge for oncologists and is associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the molecular characteristics and prognostic factors of NSCLC-LM., Methods: This retrospective study included 97 patients with NSCLC-LM between January 2015 and October 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Gene mutations were detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS)., Results: The median PFS and OS were 8.4 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 4.839-11.901) and 14.0 (95 % CI: 9.254-18.746) months, respectively. Sixty-seven patients harboured epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm): L858R (34), 19del (29), T790M (13), and G719C with L861Q (1). Other mutations included ALK (5), ROS1 (3), KRAS (1), TP53 (14), MET amplification (6). The detection rate and types of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were higher than the paired plasma samples. Patients with EGFR mutations had a longer median OS than those without mutations (19.0 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.015). Patients with gene mutations had shorter median OS than those without mutations, such as ALK (11.8 vs. 19.9 months, P = 0.014), ROS1 (12.7 vs. 19.8 months, P = 0.014), KRAS (4.0 vs. 19.0 months, P = 0.005), TP53 (15.0 vs. 19.0 months, P = 0.014), and MET amplification (6.0 vs. 19.0 months, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis indicated that MET amplification was an independent predictor of poor survival. Along with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 3, LM accompanied with brain parenchymal metastasis (BPM), extracranial disease, and seizures were independent predictors of poor survival, whereas intrathecal chemotherapy, and third-generation EGFR-TKIs were independent predictors of favorable survival., Conclusions: CSF ctDNA detected using NGS had a high sensitivity for NSCLC-LM, showing high potential in detecting driver and drug-resistant gene mutations. Genomic profiles, combined with clinically relevant prognostic factors, will guide individualised treatments and improve the outcomes of NSCLC-LM patients., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Recent advances in molecular testing and targeted therapy have improved survival among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to quantify and describe molecular testing among metastatic non-squamous NSCLC cases in selected Southeast Asian countries and describe first-line therapy chosen., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted based on incident lung cancer cases diagnosed between 2017 and 2019 in Lampang (Thailand), Penang (Malaysia), Singapore and Yogyakarta (Indonesia). Cases (n = 3413) were defined using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology third edition. In Singapore, a clinical series obtained from the National Cancer Centre was used to identify patients, while corresponding population-based cancer registries were used elsewhere. Tumor and clinical information were abstracted by chart review according to a predefined study protocol. Molecular testing of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, ROS1 gene rearrangement and BRAF V600 mutation was recorded., Results: Among 2962 cases with a specified pathological diagnosis (86.8%), most patients had non-squamous NSCLC (75.8%). For cases with staging information (92.1%), the majority presented with metastatic disease (71.3%). Overall, molecular testing rates in the 1528 patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC were 67.0% for EGFR, 42.3% for ALK, 39.1% for ROS1, 7.8% for BRAF and 36.1% for PD-L1. Among these patients, first-line systemic treatment included chemotherapy (25.9%), targeted therapy (35.6%) and immunotherapy (5.9%), with 31% of patients having no record of antitumor treatment. Molecular testing and the proportion of patients receiving treatment were highly heterogenous between the regions., Conclusions: This first analysis of data from a clinically annotated registry for lung cancer from four settings in Southeast Asia has demonstrated the feasibility of integrating clinical data within population-based cancer registries. Our study results identify areas where further development could improve patient access to optimal treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure RS is involved in advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lily, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma, Roche, Taiho, Takeda, Yuhan and has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. RK has been an advisor/speaker or received honorarium from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, MSD, BMS, J&J, Ipsen, Eisai, Amgen, Novartis, Lucence Therapeutics and Astellas. NP has consulting or advisory roles with AstraZeneca, Novartis and Roche. SP has consulting/advisory roles with AbbVie, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Illumina, Imedex, IQVIA, Incyte, iTeos, Janssen, Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, Novocure, Oncology Education, Pharma Mar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PER, Pfizer, PRIME, Regeneron, RMEI, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda and Vaccibody; has talked in organized public events for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Imedex, Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, PER, Pfizer, Prime, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi and Takeda; has been a principal investigator in trials (institutional financial support for clinical trials) sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GSK, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche/Genentech. RSt has been an invited speaker for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Novartis and Roche; has been on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Seattle Genetics and Takeda; has received institutional support (ETOP, IBCSG) from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Celgene, Ipsen, Janssen, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre and Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of 10 oncogenes, targeted gene panel testing (TGPT) of 4 oncogenes, and no tumor profiling over the lifetime for patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' perspective was conducted., Methods: A decision analytic model used 10 000 hypothetical Medicare beneficiaries with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma to simulate outcomes associated with CGP (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, MET, NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, RET, ROS1), TGPT (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ROS1), and no tumor profiling (no genes tested). First-line targeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned if actionable gene variants were detected; otherwise, nontargeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned. Model inputs were derived from randomized trials (progression-free survival, adverse events), the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare (drug costs), published studies (nondrug cancer-related management costs, health state utilities), and published databases (actionable variant prevalences). Costs (2019 US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at 3% per year. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses used 1000 Monte Carlo simulations., Results: No tumor profiling was the least costly/person ($122 613 vs $184 063 for TGPT and $188 425 for CGP) and yielded the least QALYs/person (0.53 vs 0.73 for TGPT and 0.74 for CGP). The costs per QALY gained and corresponding 95% confidence interval were $310 735 ($278 323-$347 952) for TGPT vs no tumor profiling and $445 545 ($322 297-$572 084) for CGP vs TGPT. All probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations for both comparisons surpassed the willingness-to-pay threshold ($150 000 per QALY gained)., Conclusion: Compared with no tumor profiling in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, tumor profiling (TGPT, CGP) improves quality-adjusted survival but is not cost-effective., (Copyright © 2021 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Kinase gene fusions are strong driver mutations in neoplasia; however, kinase intergenic-breakpoint rearrangements (IGRs) confound the detection of such fusions and of targeted treatments. We aim to provide an overview of kinase IGRs in a large lung cancer cohort and examine real-world survival outcomes of patients with such fusions., Methods: Mutational profiles analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing of 425 cancer-related genes between June 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographic data, clinical characteristics, and survivals were analyzed. RNA sequencing or immunohistochemical assays were carried out to verify chimeric fusion products., Results: We identified 3411 patients with kinase fusions from a cohort of 30 450 patients with lung cancer, and 624 kinase IGR events were identified in 538 of the 3411 patients. The most frequently identified kinase genes included anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), RET proto-oncogene (RET), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2/3 (ERBB2/3), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Our data showed that most (67%) kinase IGRs occurred on the same chromosome and kinase domains remained intact at the 3'-end. Approximately 3% (19/624) of the kinase IGRs had one genomic breakpoint located in gene promoter regions, including nine fusion events involving ALK, RET, ROS1, EGFR, ERBB2, or fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Among the 538 patients with kinase IGRs, 167 (31%) lacked oncogenic driver mutations, among which 28 received targeted therapies in real-world practice. Notably, three ALK IGR patients who harbored no canonical oncogenic aberrations were confirmed with an EML4-ALK chimeric fusion product by RNA sequencing and/or ALK immunohistochemical assays. One patient demonstrated a favorable clinical outcome after 14 months on crizotinib. An additional two patients who had ROS1 IGRs demonstrated a clinical benefit after 13 and 19 months on crizotinib, respectively., Conclusion: A large real-world lung cancer cohort with kinase IGRs was comprehensively analyzed for their molecular characteristics. The data indicated the potential oncogenic function of kinase IGRs and their outcomes following the administration of targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Disclosure YM, QO, and XW are employees of Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Jiangsu, China. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: ROS1-rearranged (ROS1+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a rare lung cancer with limited treatment options. Phase I-II studies with ROS1-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) included small numbers of patients and real-world data are lacking. We investigate the efficacy and safety of lorlatinib, a third-generation TKI targeting ALK and ROS1, in patients with ROS1+ NSCLC treated through an expanded access program., Methods: Consecutive patients with advanced ROS1+ NSCLC treated with lorlatinib between October 2015 and June 2019 were included. Data were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival., Results: Out of the 80 patients included, 47(59%) were female, 49(62%) never smokers (less than 100 cigarettes over the lifetime), and 68(85%) had stage IV NSCLC at diagnosis. Most frequent histology was adenocarcinoma (95%) and median age was 58.2 years. At the time of lorlatinib initiation, 51(64%) patients had brain metastases and 55(81%) were PS 0-1. Lorlatinib was administered as second/third/fourth/fifth+ line in 29%/28%/18%/26% of patients. All patients previously received at least one ROS1 TKI, and 55(69%) previously received chemotherapy. Median follow-up from lorlatinib initiation was 22.2 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival from lorlatinib initiation were 7.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-9.9 months] and 19.6 months (95% CI 12.3-27.5 months). Median duration of treatment with lorlatinib was 7.4 months (95% CI 6.5-13.1 months). Overall response and disease control rates were 45% and 82%, respectively. The central nervous system response rate was 72%. Treatment was stopped due to toxicity in 10 patients (13%). The safety profile was consistent with previously published data., Conclusions: Lorlatinib is a major treatment option for advanced refractory ROS1+ NSCLC in treatment strategy., Competing Interests: Role of the funder The funding source had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the study, or in the preparation of this manuscript. Disclosure SB reports non-financial support from Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique. BB reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Inivata, Janssen, Onxeo, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals. DMS reports grants from Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), personal fees from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Abbvie, Becton Dickinson, and non-financial support from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD. JC reports personal fees from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, and Boehringer Ingelheim. VW reports honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD and non-financial support from Roche, Pfizer. BR reports grants or contracts from Chugai, consulting fees from BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, Amgen, MSD, Roche. JB reports personal fees for advisory boards and educational symposia from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, MSD, Roche, Daichii, and Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

Our previous study demonstrated that cadmium (Cd) is an effective inducer of mitophagy, which is mainly mediated by PINK1/Parkin pathway. However, the role of other mitophagy pathways in Cd-induced mitophagy remains elusive. The present study employed HeLa cells, lacking fully functional Parkin, as a cell model to study Parkin-independent mitophagy pathway induced by Cd. Our results showed that BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3-like (Bnip3L/NIX), an outer mitochondrial membrane mitophagy receptor, could provide an alternate pathway for Cd-induced mitophagy in HeLa cells. Specifically, 10 μM Cd for 12 h induced mitophagy in GM00637 and HeLa cells which was assessed by mitochondrial fusion to lysosomes and decreased expression of mitochondrial markers such as COX-IV and HSP60. Notably, in GM00637 cells, Cd-induced mitophagy was predominantly mediated by PINK1/Parkin pathway as evinced by translocation of Parkin to mitochondria. Interestingly, in HeLa cells, significant increase in NIX expression was occurred and mitophagy was induced under Cd exposure, suggesting NIX compensates lost role of Parkin in Cd-induced mitophagy in HeLa cells. These results were verified by knocking down NIX using siRNA in HeLa cells, which lead to abolished mitophagy process. Moreover, NIX phosphorylation at serine-81 significantly increased in cells treated with Cd implying that phosphorylation of NIX plays an important role in NIX-mediated mitophagy. These findings reveal a novel mechanism of Cd toxicity and suggest a compensatory role of NIX in Cd-induced mitophagy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Bcl-2 (B cell lymphoma-2) is an anti-apoptotic member of Bcl-2 family and its overexpression causes development of several types of cancer. The BH3 domain of pro-apoptotic and BH3-only proteins is capable of binding to Bcl-2 protein to induce apoptosis. This binding is the basis for the development of novel anticancer drug which would likely antagonize Bcl-2 overexpression. In this study we have identified BH3 domain of Bax (Bax BH3) as potentially the best Bcl-2 antagonist by performing docking of BH3 peptides (peptides representing BH3 domain of pro-apoptotic and BH3-only proteins) into the Bcl-2 hydrophobic groove formed by BH3, BH1 and BH2 domains (also referred as BH3 cleft). To predict the best small antagonist for Bcl-2, three groups of small peptides (pentapeptide, tetrapeptide and tripeptide) were designed and screened against Bcl-2 which revealed the structural importance of a set of residues playing a vital role in interaction with Bcl-2. The docking and scoring function identified KRIG and KRI as specific peptides among the screened small peptides responsible for Bcl-2 neutralization and would induce apoptosis. The applied pharmacokinetic and pharmacological filters to all small peptides signify that only IGD has drug-like properties and displayed good oral bioavailability. However, the obtained binding affinity of IGD to Bcl-2 was diminutive. Hence deprotonation, amidation, acetylation, benzoylation, benzylation, and addition of phenyl, deoxyglucose and glucose fragments were performed to increase the binding affinity and to prevent its rapid degradation. Benzoylated IGD tripeptide (IGD(bzo)) was observed to have increased binding affinity than IGD with acceptable pharmacokinetic filters. In addition, stability of Bcl-2/IGD(bzo) complex was validated by Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations revealing improved binding energy, salt bridges and strong interaction energies. This study suggests a new molecule that inhibits Bcl-2 associated cancer/tumor regression., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The study was aimed at evaluating the combination of a traditional anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) with a suppressor of antiapoptotic cellular defense--synthetic peptide corresponding to the minimal sequence of BCL-2 homology 3 (BH3) domain. BH3 peptide was delivered into cells by fusion with a peptide corresponding to the Antennapedia (Ant) internalization sequence. The cytotoxicity of DOX, Ant-BH3 and Ant-BH3 mixed in with DOX, mitochondrial transmembrane potential, expression of genes encoding pro- and antiapoptotic members of BCL-2 protein family and caspases, caspases activity, apoptosis induction were assessed in human ovarian carcinoma cells. It was found that the combination in one drug formulation of DOX and Ant-BH3 produced two main effects: (1) enhancing the apoptosis induction by an anticancer drug, and (2) preventing the development of antiapoptotic cellular drug resistance. The results confirmed that anticancer drug-BH3 combination might form the basis for a new advanced anticancer proapoptotic drug delivery systems.

Background: Pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) is a potent stimulator of megakaryocyte colony formation and platelet production. It is likely to be useful in the management of severe thrombocytopenia. To determine its clinical activity and safety, we gave it to patients with advanced cancer before chemotherapy., Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either PEG-rHuMGDF or placebo in a three to one ratio. PEG-rHuMGDF was given at a dose of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 microgram/kg body weight. The study drug or placebo were administered daily by subcutaneous injection for up to 10 days or until a target platelet count was reached., Findings: 17 patients, median age 59 years, received either PEG-rHuMGDF (13 patients) or placebo (four patients). PEG-rHuMGDF produced a dose-dependent increase in platelet counts. Patients given placebo. 0.03, and 0.1 microgram/kg of PEG-rHuMGDF had median increases in platelet counts of 16%, 12%, and 39%. Those receiving 0.3 and 1.0 microgram/kg of PEG-rHuMGDF had an increase in blood platelets of between 51% and 584%. Platelets rose from day 6 of PEG-rHuMGDF administration and continued to rise after stopping the drug. The platelet count peaked between days 12 and 18 and remained above 450 x 10(9)/L for up to 21 days. There were no alterations in white-blood-cell count or haematocrit, and low toxicity. Platelets taken from patients during PEG-rHuMGDF administration and at the time of peak platelet count were morphologically and functionally normal., Interpretation: The potency with which PEG-rHuMGDF stimulates platelet production and its low toxicity indicate that this is likely to be a useful agent for the management of thrombocytopenia.