Search

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide dorsal somatosensory system functional and localizing information, and complement motor evoked potentials. Correct application and interpretation require in-depth knowledge of relevant anatomy, electrophysiology, and techniques. It is advisable to facilitate cortical SEPs with total intravenous propofol-opioid or similarly favorable anesthesia. Moreover, SEP optimization is recommended to enhance surgical feedback speed and accuracy by maximizing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); it consists of selecting highest-SNR peripheral and cortical derivations while omitting low-SNR channels. Confounding factors causing non-surgical SEP reduction should be excluded before issuing a warning. It is advisable to facilitate their identification with peripheral SEP controls and cortical SEP systemic controls whenever possible. Warning criteria should adjust for baseline drift and reproducibility. The recommended adaptive warning criterion is visually obvious amplitude reduction from recent pre-change values and clearly exceeding trial-to-trial variability, particularly when abrupt and focal. Acquisition and interpretation should be done by qualified technical and professional level personnel. Indications for SEP monitoring include intracranial, posterior fossa, and spinal neurosurgery, as well as orthopedic spine, cerebrovascular, and descending aortic surgery. Indications for SEP mapping include sensorimotor cortex and dorsal column midline identification. Future advances could modify current recommendations., (Copyright © 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the after-effects of low frequency, sub-threshold repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) of primary motor cortex, on the excitability of Blink Reflex (BR) in healthy subjects., Methods: The BR recovery cycle was carried out in 10 healthy volunteers in basal conditions, immediately after rTMS (30s), 15 and 60min later. A paired electric supraorbital stimulus paradigm with inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) of 100-600-1000-1500ms was used. The "real" rTMS consisted of a 200 stimuli long train delivered at 1Hz and intensity 80% of rest Motor Threshold of the FDI muscle, using a focal coil applied over the primary motor cortex region. The basal BR recovery cycle was also compared with that obtained after a "sham" rTMS., Results: The recovery of the R2 component of the BR was significantly suppressed 30s after rTMS. This effect was also observed at 15min, though of lower magnitude and only at long ISIs (1000-1500ms). No significant effect on R2 recovery was observed 60min after real rTMS as well as after sham rTMS., Conclusions: rTMS of motor cortex modulates the excitability of BR through its action on cortical excitability and on the cortical facilitatory drive to the brainstem reflex pathways., Significance: Slow (1Hz), sub-threshold rTMS of motor cortex determines a long-lasting reduction of excitability of BR.

Objective: To test the variations in cerebral motor excitability in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) by using electrophysiological techniques. In RLS patients periodic legs movements (PLMs) in sleep and wake have been described and it is hypothesised that PLMs result from a sleep-related disinhibition of descending central motor inhibitory pathways. Moreover, in primary RLS, these modifications are still debated., Methods: In 15 patients with primary RLS, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was carried out using several paradigms, particularly paired pulse TMS with short interstimulus intervals (ISI) in abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles., Results: Short ISI paired TMS showed a significant decrease in inhibition and increase in facilitation in ADM muscles. This result was even more evident in TA muscles of patients as compared to the controls and these modifications were more evident in the limbs which were more affected by PLM. Moreover, intracortical (corticocortical) inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) unchanged their biphasic time course., Conclusions: In our study the changes in short paired-pulse ICI and ICF revealed the presence of an altered excitability of central motor pathways, with good correlation with asymmetric distribution of symptoms.

Objective: To evaluate the differences in the recovery cycle of the masseter inhibitory reflex (MIR) obtained with electrical and magnetic stimulation., Methods: In 31 healthy subjects we studied the MIR evoked by electrical or magnetic stimulation of the mental territory and the recovery cycle of this reflex with the paired stimuli technique at different interstimulus intervals (ISI), between 100 and 600 ms., Results: Latency and area of the early and late silent periods (SPs) of the MIR were similar after electrical and magnetic stimulation. The recovery cycle of the test late SP was similar with the two kinds of stimulation, except for short ISIs. The main difference between the two kinds of stimulation was in the painful quality of the stimulus: the magnetic stimuli were always below pain threshold., Conclusions: As with electrical stimulation, it is possible to obtain a MIR with magnetic peripheral stimulation. The magnetic paired stimuli are equally effective in the evaluation of the recovery cycle of the MIR. The results demonstrate that magnetic stimulation is a useful tool in the evaluation of excitability of the trigeminal motoneuronal system, with little discomfort for the patient. They also confirm the unlikelihood of nociceptive afferences involvement.

Objectives: Botulinum neurotoxin serotype A (BoNT/A) is a valid therapy for dystonia but repeated BoNT/A injections may induce a clinical immuno-resistance that could be overcome by using other BoNT serotypes. In vitro experiments and our preliminary investigations in vivo, indicate that botulinum neurotoxin serotype C (BoNT/C) could be an effective alternative to BoNT/A. Moreover, in cultured neurons 'in vitro' BoNT/C has been reported to be more toxic than BoNT/A., Methods: To verify this possibility, we compare the effect of BoNT/C and BoNT/A on the motor units count in humans by using the electrophysiological motor unit number estimation (MUNE) technique ('multiple point nerve stimulation'). Preliminarily, BoNT/C and BoNT/A dosage was calibrated in a mouse hemidiaphragm neuromuscular junction preparation. Subsequently, 8 volunteers were treated with 3IU of BoNT/C in the extensor digitorum brevis muscle of one foot and 3IU of BoNT/A in the contralateral one. Other 4 subjects were similarly injected at higher doses (10IU of BoNT/C or BoNT/A) to detect a possible dose-toxic effect., Results: In both groups, no statistically significant variations in MUNE counting or single motor unit potential size were detected after 4 months from injections, when it was evident a recovery from the BoNTs blockade., Conclusions: We conclude that BoNT/C, similarly to BoNT/A, is safe and effective in humans and it could be proposed for a clinical use.

We evaluated cortical excitability in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using paired magnetic stimulation. This recent technique allows to study the cortical inhibition after motor evoked potential (MEP) and its modulation at different intensities of stimulation and interstimulus intervals (ISIs). At low stimulus intensity and at ISIs of 40-75 ms we observed, in PD patients, a greater test MEP inhibition, which might be due to a lower facilitatory effect of conditioning MEP on the motor cortex. At high stimulus intensity, in PD patients, a consistent inhibition of test MEP persisted and, at ISIs of 75-150 ms, it did not reach the amplitude of conditioning MEP as in normal subjects. Some clinical and neurophysiological features, like a silent period of shorter duration, demonstrated in PD patients a decrease of the inhibitory input to the motor cortex. On the contrary, the persistence of test-MEP inhibition at high stimulus intensity could also suggest a prevalence of inhibitory activity when an effective and phasic activation of the corticospinal system is required.

The changes in motor pathway excitability, induced by pairs or trains of transcranial magnetic stimuli, were studied. The motor evoked potential (MEP) pattern depended on the interstimulus interval (ISI), the stimulus intensity and the type of coil employed. At low intensity, using either an 8-shaped or a circular coil, there was a test MEP inhibition at ISIs of 50-150 msec. During trains of stimuli, this inhibition showed a periodic trend with an interval of 250-300 msec. At high stimulus intensity we observed a progressive disappearance of test MEP inhibition which was incomplete with an 8-shaped coil and complete, reaching an MEP facilitation, with a circular coil. The inhibition observed at low intensity might be due to cortical inhibitory mechanisms. The effect found at high intensity and with the circular coil could depend on the activation of deeper and at higher threshold cortico-spinal structures. This hypothesis, however, does not explain the simultaneous delay of the test MEP latency which might depend on the activation of different cortico-spinal pathways.