Search

Objectives: This trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) when administered on a once-every-2-week schedule., Patients and Methods: CPT-11 was administered to successive cohorts of patients at progressively increasing starting doses ranging from 125 to 350 mg/m2. The MTD and DLTs were determined both for CPT-11 alone and for CPT-11 followed by filgrastim (G-CSF). Plasma samples were obtained during the first 24 hours after initial dosing to determine the total concentrations (lactone + carboxylate forms) of CPT-11; of the active metabolite SN-38; and of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G)., Results: Neutropenic fever was the DLT for CPT-11 at the 300 mg/m2 dose level. When G-CSF was added, dose escalation beyond 350 mg/m2 could not be achieved due to grade 2-3 toxicities that prevented on-time retreatment with CPT-11. Severe, late diarrhea was uncommon on this schedule. Peak plasma concentrations of SN-38 and SN-38G were approximately 2.5% and 4.2% of the corresponding peak plasma concentration for CPT-II, respectively The harmonic mean terminal half-lives for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were 7.1 hours, 13.4 hours, and 12.7 hours, respectively. No predictive correlation was observed between CPT-11 or SN-38 peak concentration or AUC and first-cycle diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, or vomiting. Across the range of doses studied, mean CPT-11 clearance was 14.0 +/- 4.0 l/h/m2 and volume of distribution was 146 +/- 45.9 l/m2., Conclusions: When administered every two weeks, the recommended phase II starting dose of CPT-11 is 250 mg/m2 when given alone and 300 mg/m2 when supported by G-CSF. This every-two-week regimen offers a tolerable and active alternative to weekly or every-three-week single-agent CPT-11 therapy.

Purpose: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine possess broad spectra of clinical activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity, and are differentially affected by mutations in cell-cycle regulatory proteins, such as bcl-2. This phase I trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of paclitaxel and gemcitabine when both drugs were given together on a once-every-two-week schedule in patients with solid tumors., Patients and Methods: A total of 37 patients were treated at nine different dose levels ranging from paclitaxel 75-175 mg/m2 administered over three hours followed by gemcitabinc 1500-3500 mg/m2 administered over 30-60 minutes. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Dose escalation was performed in a stepwise manner in which the dose of one drug was escalated while the dose of the other drug was kept constant., Results: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at dose level 9: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2 in the form of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for > or = 5 days (one patient) and grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (AST/SGPT) (one patient). An analysis of delivered dose intensity (DI) over the first three cycles revealed that higher dosages of both drugs were delivered at dose level 7, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2 dose level, than at the MTD, dose level 8, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2. Partial responses were confirmed in two patients with transitional cell carcinoma (one of the bladder, one of the renal pelvis) and in one patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary., Conclusions: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is a promising drug combination that can be administered safely and repetitively on an every-other-week schedule. Using this drug administration schedule, the recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2.

Despite the widespread usage of hydroxyurea in the treatment of both malignant and nonmalignant diseases and a recent expansion in the recognition of its potential therapeutic applications, there have been few detailed studies of hydroxyurea's pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior and oral bioavailability. Parenteral administration schedules have been evaluated because of concerns about the possibility for significant interindividual variability in the PK behavior and bioavailability of hydroxyurea after oral administration. In this PK and bioavailability study, 29 patients with advanced solid malignancies were randomized to treatment with 2, 000 mg hydroxyurea administered either orally or as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion accompanied by extensive plasma and urine sampling for PK studies. After 3 weeks of treatment with hydroxyurea (80 mg/kg orally every 3 days followed by a 1-week washout period), patients were crossed over to the alternate route of administration, at which time extensive PK studies were repeated. Three days later, patients continued treatment with 80 mg/kg hydroxyurea orally every 3 days for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period. Thereafter, 80 mg/kg hydroxyurea was administered orally every 3 days. Twenty-two of 29 patients had extensive plasma and urine sampling performed after treatment with both oral and IV hydroxyurea. Oral bioavailability (F) averaged 108%. Moreover, interindividual variability in F was low, as indicated by 19 of 22 individual F values within a narrow range of 85% to 127% and a modest coefficient of variation of 17%. The time in which maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were achieved averaged 1.22 hours with an average lag time of 0.22 hours after oral administration. Except for Cmax, which was 19. 5% higher after IV drug administration, the PK profiles of oral and IV hydroxyurea were very similar. The plasma disposition of hydroxyurea was well described by a linear two-compartment model. The initial harmonic mean half-lives for oral and IV hydroxyurea were 1.78 and 0.63 hours, respectively, and the harmonic mean terminal half-lives were 3.32 and 3.39 hours, respectively. For IV hydroxyurea, systemic clearance averaged 76.16 mL/min/m2 and the mean volume of distribution at steady-state was 19.71 L/m2, whereas Cloral/F and Voral/F averaged 73.16 mL/min/m2 and 19.65 L/m2, respectively, after oral administration. The percentage of the administered dose of hydroxyurea that was excreted unchanged into the urine was nearly identical after oral and IV administration-36. 84% and 35.82%, respectively. Additionally, the acute toxic effects of hydroxyurea after treatment on both routes were similar. Relationships between pertinent PK parameters and the principal toxicity, neutropenia, were sought, but no pharmacodynamic relationships were evident. From PK, bioavailability, and toxicologic standpoints, these results indicate that there are no clear advantages for administering hydroxyurea by the IV route except in situations when oral administration is not possible and/or in the case of severe gastrointestinal impairment.