Search

Background: Unmet dental need shares many risk factors with unmet health-related social needs (HRSN) such as housing and food security and are a common cause for seeking treatment at the emergency department (ED)., Methods: The authors recruited a purposive sample of English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients, ED clinicians at 3 urban EDs, and dentists from nearby communities to participate in qualitative interviews to explore barriers to and facilitators of screening for HRSN and unmet dental needs in the ED. Themes were identified from transcripts using a modified grounded theory approach., Results: Interviews were conducted with 25 ED patients, 19 ED clinicians, and 4 dentists. Four themes were identified: (1) a preference for formalized resources, which more frequently exist for HRSN than for oral health; (2) frequent use of ad hoc resources that are less reliable or structured, particularly for dental referral information; (3) limited knowledge of oral health care resources in the community; and (4) desire for more assistance with identifying and addressing resource needs for both HRSN and oral health. Patients were amenable to screening through a variety of modalities and felt it would be helpful, but clinicians emphasized the need for easier referral processes because of frequent failure to connect patients to oral health care., Conclusions: More robust infrastructure and clinician support are needed to ensure successful referral and screening without undue provider burden for both medical and dental clinicians., Practical Implications: Patients are amenable to screening for unmet oral health needs and HRSN in the ED, which may improve access to care., Competing Interests: Disclosures None of the authors reported any disclosures., (Copyright © 2023 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Trauma center certifications across the United States (U.S.) are not unified. Participation in the national trauma certification program established through the American College of Surgeons (ACS) is not universal, and many states maintain unique trauma certification systems with varying criteria. We investigated degree of similarity between the ACS national trauma certification program and state trauma certifications, then combined these distinct certifications into a unified national trauma center database., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of all non-specialty, non-federal emergency U.S. departments (EDs) open in 2018 to determine availability and levels of trauma centers. We created a "Standard" definition of trauma levels using ACS criteria as a benchmark. ACS similar trauma levels were then assigned to state levels I-III by comparing trauma receiving protocol, maximum response times, and general surgical coverage; through this process, levels across distinct systems established through different criteria were standardized., Results: In 2018, ACS certifications spanned 47 states and DC; 3 states did not participate in ACS (Mississippi, Pennsylvania, and Washington). A distinct, non-ACS state certification system was present in 47 states and DC; 3 states had no ongoing state certification system in 2018 (Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont). Among 5,514 US EDs open in 2018, we identified 2,132 associated with adult and pediatric trauma centers (39%) holding certification (ACS, state, or both); 1,083 (51%) were certified levels I-III, and the rest (1,049, 49%) were levels IV-V. Of the 1,083 centers with any level I-III certification, 498 (46%) held ACS certification, and 1,059 (98%) held state certification. Applying ACS-similar criteria to centers with state levels I-III (n=1,059) resulted in a level change for 124 centers (12%). Using our "Standard" definition of a trauma level based on ACS criteria, our unified level I-III database included 959 (89%) adult and pediatric centers, with 24 (3%) ACS-certified only, 461 (48%) state-certified only, and 474 (49%) certified by both., Conclusions: Discrepancies exist between ACS and state trauma certification systems. The differences in level I-III state criteria confirm discrepant standards for a given trauma "level" across the U.S. We combined these certifications into a unified national trauma center database available to researchers and the public., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no declarations or conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background/objective: Access to a firearm is a significant risk for completed suicide or homicide. We sought to increase the rate of screening for access to firearms in patients who presented to the emergency department with suicidal or homicidal ideation or suicide attempt through the use of quality improvement methodology., Methods: Patient records were eligible for inclusion if the child was under the age of 19 and presented to the emergency room of our tertiary medical center with a diagnosis of suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, or suicide attempt. Records were manually reviewed for demographic information and documentation of screening for access to firearms. A baseline survey of the pediatric residents was completed to identify perceived barriers to screening for access to firearms. Subsequently, three "Plan, Do, Study, Act" (PDSA) cycles consisting of a noon conference, a dedicated grand rounds, and an electronic health record template were completed., Results: During the baseline and study period, 501 patients met inclusion criteria. Forty-one of sixty-six (62.1%) residents completed a baseline survey and identified barriers to screening. There was no significant increase in screening following the first or second PDSA cycles. Following the third PDSA cycle, screening rates increased from 4% to 34%., Conclusions: Quality improvement methodology can be used to increase the rates of screening for access to firearms in high-risk patients. Further work is necessary to identify additional strategies to further increase screening rates., (Copyright © 2021 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Adult patients are increasingly receiving care in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs), but little is known about the epidemiology of these visits. The goals of this study were to examine the characteristics of adult patients (≥21 years) treated in PEDs and to describe the variation in resource utilization across centers., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study examining visits to 30 PEDs (2012-2016) using the Pediatric Health Information System. Visits were categorized using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups and compared between age cohorts. We used multivariable logistic models to examine variation in demographics, utilization, testing, treatment, and disposition., Results: There were 12,958,626 visits to the 30 PEDs over 5 years; 70,636 (0.6%) were by adults. Compared with children, adult patients had more laboratory testing (49% vs 34%), diagnostic imaging (32% vs 29%), and procedures (48% vs 31%), and they were more often admitted (17% vs 11%) or transferred (21% vs 0.7%) (P < .001 for all). In multivariable analysis, older age, black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and private insurance were associated with decreased odds of admission in adults seen in PEDs. Across PEDs, the admission rates (7%-25%) and transfer rates (6%-46%) for adults varied., Conclusions: Adult patients cared for at PEDs have higher rates of testing, diagnostic imaging, procedures, and admission or transfer. There is wide variation in the care of adults in PEDs, highlighting the importance of further work to identify the optimal approach to adults who present for care in pediatric centers., (Copyright © 2019 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Interventions to reduce frequent emergency department (ED) use in children are often limited by the inability to predict future risk. We sought to develop a population-based model for predicting Medicaid-insured children at risk for high frequency (HF) of low-resource-intensity (LRI) ED visits., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of Medicaid-insured children (aged 1-18 years) included in the MarketScan Medicaid database with ≥1 ED visit in 2013. LRI visits were defined as ED encounters with no laboratory testing, imaging, procedures, or hospitalization; and HF as ≥3 LRI ED visits within 365 days of the initial encounter. A generalized linear regression model was derived and validated using a split-sample approach. Validity testing was conducted examining model performance using 3 alternative definitions of LRI., Results: Among 743,016 children with ≥1 ED visit in 2013, 5% experienced high-frequency LRI ED use, accounting for 21% of all LRI visits. Prior LRI ED use (2 visits: adjusted odds ratio = 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.3, 3.7; and ≥3 visits: adjusted odds ratio = 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 7.3, 8.1) and presence of ≥3 chronic conditions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6, 1.8) were strongly associated with future HF-LRI ED use. A model incorporating patient characteristics and prior ED use predicted future HF-LRI ED utilization with an area under the curve of 0.74., Conclusions: Demographic characteristics and patterns of prior ED use can predict future risk of HF-LRI ED use in the following year. Interventions for reducing low-value ED use in these high-risk children should be considered., (Copyright © 2018 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Teach-back may improve communication, but has not been well studied in the emergency setting. The goal of this study was to characterize perceptions of teach-back in the emergency department (ED) by health literacy., Methods: We conducted an in-depth interview study on the ED discharge process examining teach-back techniques in two tertiary care centers (adult and pediatric), using asthma as a model system for health communication. Participants were screened for health literacy, and purposive sampling was used to balance the sample between literacy groups. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached for each literacy group at each site; audiotaped, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach., Results: Fifty-one interviews were completed (31 parents; 20 patients). Across all groups, participants felt that teach-back would help them confirm learning, avoid forgetting key information, and improve doctor-patient communication. Participants with limited health literacy raised concerns about teach-back being condescending, but suggested techniques for introducing the technique to avoid this perception., Conclusion: Most participants were supportive of teach-back techniques, but many were concerned about perceived judgment from providers., Practice Implications: Future investigations should focus on feasibility and efficacy of teach-back in the ED and using participant generated wording to introduce teach-back., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope (Verathon, Bothell, WA) is a video laryngoscopy system that can be used for routine intubation, but is also commonly used as an alternative for difficult or failed airways. Previous reports have identified a very high incidence of grade 1 and grade 2 Cormack-Lehane glottic views, but despite these high-grade views, intubation is sometimes difficult due to the angle of insertion and shape of the endotracheal tube. Several maneuvers have been reported to increase the likelihood of successful endotracheal tube placement in these uncommon cases of failure., Case Report: We report the case of a patient who could not be intubated with the GlideScope despite an easily obtained grade 1 laryngoscopic view. The impediment to intubation was identified as a sharp angulation of the trachea with respect to the larynx, such that the trachea formed a steep posterior angle with the laryngeal/glottic axis. Intubation was achieved using a previously unreported maneuver, in which the endotracheal tube with a sharply curved malleable stylet was inserted through the glottis, and then rotated 180 degrees to permit passage down the trachea., Discussion and Conclusion: We believe that this maneuver may be useful in other cases of failed GlideScope intubation, when a high-grade laryngeal view is obtained but tube passage is not possible due to a sharp posterior angulation of the trachea., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)