Search

Objectives: To identify and describe threats to informed decision-making at key junctures of the Down syndrome (DS) determination experience., Methods: We conducted 32 narrative interviews with 42 participants (10 couples and 22 individuals). Participants relayed their stories of receiving their child's or a prospective child's DS determination. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically., Results: We identified the following 5 threats to informed decision-making: routinization of screening, screening for reassurance's sake, equating an openness to screening with an openness to testing and termination, misunderstanding and miscommunicating about probability, and a lack of up-to-date, accurate, neutral information., Conclusions: The results contribute to an existing body of literature on the DS determination experience with a uniquely Canadian lens. The threats outline how well-intended counselling can ultimately undermine reproductive autonomy and informed decision-making. With knowledge of how these seemingly harmless behaviours threaten informed decision-making and reproductive autonomy, care providers can modify their counselling to lessen their impact., (Copyright © 2023 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Infertility is an issue of current concern across North America. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada advocates for public education regarding infertility issues. Public education is supposed to be a fundamental objective of news media. However, it is uncertain whether the media are acting as good partners to the medical profession in this objective of educating the public, and young women in particular. Recent findings suggest that print news tends to present infertility using high-alarm framing strategies; however, the impact of this framing on news consumers is unknown. The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of high- versus low-alarm frames on consumers of infertility-related news., Methods: In this experiment, 131 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to read infertility-focused news articles judged to employ either high- or low-alarm framing strategies in presenting infertility. Participants subsequently completed various psychological, emotional, and knowledge measures to gauge the impact of the news exposure., Results: The participants exposed to the high-alarm framing showed higher levels of perceived personal susceptibility to infertility, marginally higher levels of worry about infertility, and significantly lower levels of infertility-related knowledge than those exposed to the low-alarm framing., Conclusion: The manner in which the news media report on infertility has repercussions on how individuals think and feel about infertility. The findings of this study can inform health care providers about how the media are shaping perceptions of infertility, and can assist professional bodies interested in undertaking public education initiatives.