Search

Background & Aims: Survodutide is a glucagon/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor dual agonist in development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). We investigated the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of survodutide in people with cirrhosis., Methods: This multinational, non-randomized, open-label, phase I clinical trial initially evaluated a single subcutaneous dose of survodutide 0.3 mg in people with Child-Pugh class A, B or C cirrhosis and healthy individuals with or without overweight/obesity matched for age, sex, and weight; the primary endpoints were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ) and maximal plasma concentration (C max ). Subsequently, people with overweight/obesity with or without cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A or B) received once-weekly subcutaneous doses escalated from 0.3 mg to 6.0 mg over 24 weeks then maintained for 4 weeks; the primary endpoint was drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events, with MASH/cirrhosis-related endpoints explored., Results: In the single-dose cohorts (n = 41), mean AUC 0-∞ and C max were similar in those with cirrhosis compared with healthy individuals (90% CIs for adjusted geometric mean ratios spanned 1). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 25.0% of healthy individuals and ≤25.0% of those with cirrhosis after single doses, and 82.4% and 87.5%, respectively, of the multiple-dose cohorts (n = 41) over 28 weeks. Liver fat content, liver stiffness, liver volume, body weight, and other hepatic and metabolic disease markers were generally reduced after 28 weeks of survodutide treatment., Conclusions: Survodutide is generally tolerable in people with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, does not require pharmacokinetic-related dose adjustment, and may improve liver-related non-invasive tests, supporting its investigation for MASH-related cirrhosis., Impact and Implications: Survodutide is a glucagon receptor/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor dual agonist in development for treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), which causes cirrhosis in ∼20% of cases. This trial delineates the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of survodutide in people with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, and revealed associated reductions in liver fat content, markers of liver fibrosis and body weight. These findings have potential relevance for people with MASH-including those with decompensated cirrhosis, who are usually excluded from clinical trials of investigational drugs. Based on this study, further investigation of survodutide for MASH-related cirrhosis is warranted., Gov Identifier: NCT05296733., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Frailty increases the vulnerability to internal and external stressors and may therefore be an indicator of a higher frequency of cirrhosis complications. We aimed to investigate the association of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) with covert (CHE) and overt HE (OHE) development in patients with cirrhosis., Methods: This study analyzed data of 228 patients with cirrhosis. Frailty was assessed using CFS. Patients were examined for the presence of CHE (using PHES) at study inclusion and followed for OHE., Results: Median CFS was 3 and 26 (11 %) patients were at least pre-frail (CFS>3). In multivariable logistic regression analysis in patients without a history of OHE (n = 195), a higher CFS was associated with the presence of CHE at baseline (OR 1.6, p = 0.039). During follow-up, 42 (18 %) patients developed an episode of OHE. In multivariable competing risk regression analyses, a higher CFS was independently associated with the development of an OHE episode in the total cohort (sHR 1.97, p < 0.001) and in the subcohort of patients without a history of OHE (sHR 1.88, p = 0.008)., Conclusion: CFS appears to be a reliable tool to identify patients at higher risk of HE in whom intensified monitoring and treatment may be justified., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Leonard Kaps reports travel support from Gilead Sciences. Jörn M. Schattenberg reports consultancy to BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal, Nordic Bioscience, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Siemens Healthcare GmbH and research funding from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Siemens Healthcare GmbH, all unrelated to this research. Simon Gairing reports receiving travel and accommodation expenses from Ipsen. Christian Labenz reports travel expenses and consulting honoraria from Norgine and Merz Pharmaceuticals, lecture fee from Norgine, Intercept Pharmaceuticals/Advanz Pharma, Gilead Sciences and Merz Pharmaceuticals, and research grants from Norgine and Merz Pharmaceuticals, all unrelated to this research. The other authors disclose no potential financial or non-financial conflict of interests regarding this study., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Given the increasing burden of liver cancer in Europe, it is crucial to investigate how social determinants of health (SDoH) affect liver cancer risk factors and access to care in order to improve health outcomes equitably. This paper summarises the available evidence on the differential distribution of liver cancer risk factors, incidence, and health outcomes in the European Economic Area and the United Kingdom from an SDoH perspective. Vulnerable and marginalised populations have low socio-economic and educational levels and are the most affected by liver cancer risk factors. Reasons for this include varied access to hepatitis B virus vaccination and limited access to viral hepatitis B and C screening, harm reduction, and treatment. Additionally, alcohol-related liver disease remains highly prevalent among individuals with low education, insecure employment, economic instability, migrants, and deprived populations. Moreover, significant variation exists across Europe in the proportion of adults with steatotic liver disease, overweight/obesity, and diabetes, based on geographical area, gender, socio-economic and educational background, and density of ultra-processed food outlets. Inequities in cirrhosis mortality rates have been reported, with the highest death rates among individuals living in socio-economically disadvantaged areas and those with lower educational levels. Furthermore, insufficient healthcare access for key populations with primary liver cancer is influenced by complex healthcare systems, stigmatisation, discrimination, low education, language barriers, and fear of disclosure. These challenges contribute to inequities in liver cancer care pathways. Future studies are needed to explore the different SDoH-interlinked effects on liver cancer incidence and outcomes in European countries. The ultimate goal is to develop evidence-based multilevel public health interventions that reduce the SDoH impact in precipitating and perpetuating the disproportionate burden of liver cancer in specific populations., (Copyright © 2024 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Patients with fatty liver disease may experience stigma from the disease or comorbidities. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to understand stigma among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and healthcare providers., Methods: Members of the Global NASH Council created two surveys about experiences/attitudes toward NAFLD and related diagnostic terms: a 68-item patient and a 41-item provider survey., Results: Surveys were completed by 1,976 patients with NAFLD across 23 countries (51% Middle East/North Africa [MENA], 19% Europe, 17% USA, 8% Southeast Asia, 5% South Asia) and 825 healthcare providers (67% gastroenterologists/hepatologists) across 25 countries (39% MENA, 28% Southeast Asia, 22% USA, 6% South Asia, 3% Europe). Of all patients, 48% ever disclosed having NAFLD/NASH to family/friends; the most commonly used term was "fatty liver" (88% at least sometimes); "metabolic disease" or "MAFLD" were rarely used (never by >84%). Regarding various perceptions of diagnostic terms by patients, there were no substantial differences between "NAFLD", "fatty liver disease (FLD)", "NASH", or "MAFLD". The most popular response was being neither comfortable nor uncomfortable with either term (56%-71%), with slightly greater discomfort with "FLD" among the US and South Asian patients (47-52% uncomfortable). Although 26% of patients reported stigma related to overweight/obesity, only 8% reported a history of stigmatization or discrimination due to NAFLD. Among providers, 38% believed that the term "fatty" was stigmatizing, while 34% believed that "nonalcoholic" was stigmatizing, more commonly in MENA (43%); 42% providers (gastroenterologists/hepatologists 45% vs. 37% other specialties, p = 0.03) believed that the name change to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (or MASLD) might reduce stigma. Regarding the new nomenclature, the percentage of providers reporting "steatotic liver disease" as stigmatizing was low (14%)., Conclusions: The perception of NAFLD stigma varies among patients, providers, geographic locations and sub-specialties., Impact and Implications: Over the past decades, efforts have been made to change the nomenclature of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to better align with its underlying pathogenetic pathways and remove any potential stigma associated with the name. Given the paucity of data related to stigma in NAFLD, we undertook this global comprehensive survey to assess stigma in NAFLD among patients and providers from around the world. We found there is a disconnect between physicians and patients related to stigma and related nomenclature. With this knowledge, educational programs can be developed to better target stigma in NAFLD among all stakeholders and to provide a better opportunity for the new nomenclature to address the issues of stigma., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest ZMY: research funding or consultation fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cymabay, GlaxoSmithKline, Intercept, Novo Nordisk, Siemens, Madrigal, Merck; VWSW: served as a consultant or advisory board member for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, Visirna, speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk, Unilab, received a research grant from Gilead Sciences, co-founder of Illuminatio Medical Technology Limited; AMA: grant funding from NIH, Novo Nordisk, Target Pharma, consulting/advisory board for Novo Nordisk; JMS: consultant for Astra Zeneca, Apollo Endosurgery, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Siemens Healthineers, receives research funding from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, has stock options of AGED diagnostics, Hepta Bio, received speaker honorarium from Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, MedPublico GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex, MedPublico GmbH; CWS: speaker bureau fees from Gilead Sciences, Abbott; RL: receives funding support from NCATS, NIDDK, NHLBI, serves as a consultant to Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Amgen, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Glympse bio, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Madrigal, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, Theratechnologies, 89 bio, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics. In addition, his institution received research grants from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Astrazeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead, Intercept, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes, Terns Pharmaceuticals, co-founder of LipoNexus Inc; PC: received research grants by MSD and Intercept. Other coauthors report no conflicts of interest related to this study. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2023 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the liver manifestation of the metabolic syndrome with global prevalence reaching epidemic levels. Despite the high disease burden in the population only a small proportion of those with NAFLD will develop progressive liver disease, for which there is currently no approved pharmacotherapy. Identifying those who are at risk of progressive NAFLD currently requires a liver biopsy which is problematic. Firstly, liver biopsy is invasive and therefore not appropriate for use in a condition like NAFLD that affects a large proportion of the population. Secondly, biopsy is limited by sampling and observer dependent variability which can lead to misclassification of disease severity. Non-invasive biomarkers are therefore needed to replace liver biopsy in the assessment of NAFLD. Our study addresses this unmet need. The LITMUS Imaging Study is a prospectively recruited multi-centre cohort study evaluating magnetic resonance imaging and elastography, and ultrasound elastography against liver histology as the reference standard. Imaging biomarkers and biopsy are acquired within a 100-day window. The study employs standardised processes for imaging data collection and analysis as well as a real time central monitoring and quality control process for all the data submitted for analysis. It is anticipated that the high-quality data generated from this study will underpin changes in clinical practice for the benefit of people with NAFLD. Study Registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05479721., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest FEM, SA, KW, JC, MA, EMG, SF, MRG, JC, IFL, RA, RSG, JMP, JB, VR, MW, SP, MA, RF, LM, ET, ME, PL, ATH, GP, HYJ, KP and PMB declare no conflicts of interest. MP is a shareholder in Perspectum Ltd. EMT is a shareholder in Perspectum Ltd. SA is currently employed by Boehringer Ingelheim (but was not during his participation in the project). GPA has served as a consultant and an advisory board member for Pfizer Inc., Inventiva Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline and KaNDy Therapeutics; he has been a consultant to BerGenBio ASA, Median Technologies, FRACTYL, Amryt Pharmaceuticals and AstraZeneca; and has given presentations on behalf of Roche Diagnostics and Medscape all through the University of Nottingham contract. CA declares the following potential conflicts of interest: Hologic: Support of study and expert; Guerbet: Member of board, PI of study; Siemens: Expert. EB has served as a consultant or advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, ProSciento; and a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer. She has also received a research grant from Gilead Sciences for fatty liver research. AG served as a speaker and consultant for AbbVie, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, CSL Behring, Eisai, Falk, Gilead, Heel, Intercept, Ipsen, Merz, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Sequana; received research funding from Intercept, Falk, Novartis. JMS reports consultancy for BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi; received research funding from Gilead Sciences and was on the speaker's bureau for Falk Foundation MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH. MJS and PH are employed by Antaros Medical AB, Mölndal, Sweden. ES is employed by Perspectum Ltd., Oxford, UK. RB is a shareholder and employed (CEO) by Perspectum Ltd., Oxford, UK. KP and MK are employed by Resoundant Inc., Rochester, MN, USA. RLE and the Mayo Clinic have intellectual property rights and a financial interest in magnetic resonance elastography technology. AT is employed by ADVANZPHARMA, Capital House, 1st Floor, 85 King William Street, London, EC4N 7BL, United Kingdom. HC is employed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. MM is employed by Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland. CY is employed by Pfizer Inc., Lake Mary, FL, USA. TT was employed by Pfizer at the time of her involvement with the project. QMA is coordinator of the EU IMI-2 LITMUS consortium, which is funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme and EFPIA. This multistakeholder consortium includes industry partners. QMA has received research grant funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; has served as a consultant on behalf of Newcastle University for Alimentiv, Akero, AstraZeneca, Axcella, 89bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed, Genfit, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Hanmi, HistoIndex, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Poxel, Resolution Therapeutics, Roche, Ridgeline Therapeutics, RTI, Shionogi, and Terns; has served as a speaker for Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare; and receives royalties from Elsevier Ltd. SN is a shareholder in Perspectum Ltd. SAH has research grants from Akero, Altimmune, Axcella-Cirius, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet, Viking. He has received consulting fees from Akero, Altimmune, Alentis, Arrowhead, Axcella, Echosens, Enyo, Foresite Labs, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion, HIghtide, HistoIndex, Intercept, Kowa, Madrigal, Metacrine, NeuroBo, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Perspectum, Sagimet, Terns, and Viking., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Liver cirrhosis is a major cause of death worldwide. Cirrhosis develops after a long asymptomatic period of fibrosis progression, with the diagnosis frequently occurring late, when major complications or cancer develop. Few reliable tools exist for timely identification of individuals at risk of cirrhosis to allow for early intervention. We aimed to develop a novel score to identify individuals at risk for future liver-related outcomes., Methods: We derived the LiverRisk score from an international prospective cohort of individuals from six countries without known liver disease from the general population, who underwent liver fibrosis assessment by transient elastography. The score included age, sex, and six standard laboratory variables. We created four groups: minimal risk, low risk, medium risk, and high risk according to selected cutoff values of the LiverRisk score (6, 10, and 15). The model's discriminatory accuracy and calibration were externally validated in two prospective cohorts from the general population. Moreover, we ascertained the prognostic value of the score in the prediction of liver-related outcomes in participants without known liver disease with median follow-up of 12 years (UK Biobank cohort)., Findings: We included 14 726 participants: 6357 (43·2%) in the derivation cohort, 4370 (29·7%) in the first external validation cohort, and 3999 (27·2%) in the second external validation cohort. The score accurately predicted liver stiffness in the development and external validation cohorts, and was superior to conventional serum biomarkers of fibrosis, as measured by area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC; 0·83 [95% CI [0·78-0·89]) versus the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4; 0·68 [0·61-0·75] at 10 kPa). The score was effective in identifying individuals at risk of liver-related mortality, liver-related hospitalisation, and liver cancer, thereby allowing stratification to different risk groups for liver-related outcomes. The hazard ratio for liver-related mortality in the high-risk group was 471 (95% CI 347-641) compared with the minimal risk group, and the overall AUC of the score in predicting 10-year liver-related mortality was 0·90 (0·88-0·91) versus 0.84 (0·82-0·86) for FIB-4., Interpretation: The LiverRisk score, based on simple parameters, predicted liver fibrosis and future development of liver-related outcomes in the general population. The score might allow for stratification of individuals according to liver risk and thus guide preventive care., Funding: European Commission under the H20/20 programme; Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria de Salud; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness; the European Regional Development Fund; and the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PN reports grants from Novo Nordisk and has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, Poxel Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Madrigal and GSK. He also reports honoraria as a speaker for Novo Nordisk and AiCME; upport for attending meetings from for Novo Nordisk; and participation on an advisory board for Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, Poxel Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Madrigal, and GSK. AK reports grants from EU Horizon 2020, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Danish National Research Foundation, Region of Southern Denmark; royalties or licenses from Gyldendal; has served as speaker for Norgine, Siemens and Nordic Bioscience; patents from Region of Southern Denmark and University of Southern Denmark; has participated in advisory boards for Norgine and Siemens; has been Vice Secretary European Association for the Study of The Liver (EASL); and received other services from Norgine, Siemens and Echosens. LC has served as speaker for Echosens and Nordic Bioscience; and received consulting fees from Echosens, Madrigal, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sagimet. LaC reports a grant from Gilead, has received consulting fees from Echosens, Madrigal, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sagimet; and payment as a speaker for Echosens and Novo Nordisk. AMA reports a grant from Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Target Pharma; and has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk. RJdK reports a grant from GSK, Gilead, Janssen, Inventiva, and Echosens; has served as speaker for Abbvie, Gilead, and Echosens; and has received consulting fees from Abbvie and Gilead. NF has received consulting fees from Gilead. PGa has served as speaker for Bayer, Adaptimmune, Sirtex, Lilly, Roche and Ipsen; and received consulting fees from Bayer, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Adaptimmune, BMS, Eisai, MSD, Sirtex, Lilly, Roche, Guerbet, and Ipsen. IGr participated in advisory boards for GE healthcare; and has served as speaker for Roche and Siemens. ING reports a grant from Gilead. RuH served as speaker for the American Gastroenterological Association and was a manuscript reviewer for GUT; reports support for lectures at the University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; and was an external advisor for LiverHope 2020. He also participated in the Steering committee of AASLD-ACLF Special interest Group and Practice Guidelines Committee of AGA. PK reports a grant from Sequana; royalty for UpToDate; honorarium as an Associate Editor for Gastroenterology; and support for attending meeting of EASL and INASL. TK served as speaker for Gilead; has received consulting fees from Albireo and MSD; was a board member at Biomed Alliance; and reports a relationship of stock or stock option with Ultimovacs. JMP reports grants from the European Commission (EFPIA IMI2 853966-2 ISCIII PI19/01898, EFPIA IMI2 777377 ISCIII PI22/01770, and H2020 847989) and Ajuntament de Barcelona-Fundació La Caixa; served as speaker for Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and FLS; and received consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, and Novo Nordisk. He also received support from Rubió and NovoNordisk. SP reports a grant from the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the Italian Ministry of Health; received consulting fees from Protein Plasma Therapeutics Assocation and Resolution Therapeutics; and served as speaker for Grifols. He participated in an advisory board of Mallinckrodt. JS reports grants from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Siemens Healthcare; served as speaker for Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, MedPublico GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex, and MedPublico; received consulting fees from Apollo Endosurgery, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Siemens Healthineers; and reports stock or stock options with AGED diagnostics and Hepta Bio. MSB reports a grant from LiverRisk score. MTh is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF20OC0059393); and served as speaker for Echosens, Siemens Healthcare, Tillotts Pharma, and Norgine; received consulting fees from Ge Healthcare; reports scientific advisory board membership for ID-LIVER (research project); and is a board member of Alcohol & Society (non-governmental organisation, Denmark). VW-SW reports a grant from Gilead Sciences served as speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk, and Unilab; reports support from Gilead Sciences; has stock options from Illuminatio Medical Technology; and has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions. MGR reports a grant from Gliead Sciences; served as speaker for Gilead, Abbvie, and Advanz; and reports support from Gilead and Abbvie. DR received honoraria as speaker from Gilead and Abbvie; and received support for meetings and travel from Gilead and AbbVie. PG has received research funding from Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Grifols, and Ferring. PG has consulted or attended advisory boards for Grifols SA, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Intercept, Martin Pharmaceuticals, Promethera, Sequana, RallyBio, SeaBeLife Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD), and Behring; and received speaking fees from Pfizer. RMM has received honoraria as speaker from Gilead, Abbvie, and Advanz; reports support from Gilead, Abbvie, and Advanz and participated in an advisory board of Advanz. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The current document has been developed by the Liver Forum who mandated the NAFLD-Associated Comorbidities Working Group - a multistakeholder group comprised of experts from academic medicine, industry and patient associations - to identify aspects of diverse comorbidities frequently associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) that can interfere with the conduct of therapeutic trials and, in particular, impact efficacy and safety results. The objective of this paper is to propose guidance for the management of relevant comorbidities in both candidates and actual participants in NASH therapeutic trials. We relied on specific guidelines from scientific societies, when available, but adapted them to the particulars of NASH trials with the aim of addressing multiple interacting requirements such as maintaining patient safety, reaching holistic therapeutic objectives, minimising confounding effects on efficacy and safety of investigational agents and allowing for trial completion. We divided the field of action into: first, analysis and stabilisation of the patient's condition before inclusion in the trial and, second, management of comorbidities during trial conduct. For the former, we discussed the concept of acceptable vs. optimal control of comorbidities, defined metabolic and ponderal stability prior to randomisation and weighed the pros and cons of a run-in period. For the latter, we analysed non-hepatological comorbid conditions for changes or acute events possibly occurring during the trial, including changes in alcohol consumption, in order to detail when specific interventions are necessary and how best to manage concomitant drug intake in line with methodological constraints. These recommendations are intended to act as a guide for clinical trialists and are open to further refinement when additional data become available., (Copyright © 2023 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: An estimated 38% of adults worldwide have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). From individual impacts to widespread public health and economic consequences, the implications of this disease are profound. This study aimed to develop an aligned, prioritised fatty liver disease research agenda for the global health community., Methods: Nine co-chairs drafted initial research priorities, subsequently reviewed by 40 core authors and debated during a three-day in-person meeting. Following a Delphi methodology, over two rounds, a large panel (R1 n = 344, R2 n = 288) reviewed the priorities, via Qualtrics XM, indicating agreement using a four-point Likert-scale and providing written feedback. The core group revised the draft priorities between rounds. In R2, panellists also ranked the priorities within six domains: epidemiology, models of care, treatment and care, education and awareness, patient and community perspectives, and leadership and public health policy., Results: The consensus-built fatty liver disease research agenda encompasses 28 priorities. The mean percentage of 'agree' responses increased from 78.3 in R1 to 81.1 in R2. Five priorities received unanimous combined agreement ('agree' + 'somewhat agree'); the remaining 23 priorities had >90% combined agreement. While all but one of the priorities exhibited at least a super-majority of agreement (>66.7% 'agree'), 13 priorities had <80% 'agree', with greater reliance on 'somewhat agree' to achieve >90% combined agreement., Conclusions: Adopting this multidisciplinary consensus-built research priorities agenda can deliver a step-change in addressing fatty liver disease, mitigating against its individual and societal harms and proactively altering its natural history through prevention, identification, treatment, and care. This agenda should catalyse the global health community's efforts to advance and accelerate responses to this widespread and fast-growing public health threat., Impact and Implications: An estimated 38% of adults and 13% of children and adolescents worldwide have fatty liver disease, making it the most prevalent liver disease in history. Despite substantial scientific progress in the past three decades, the burden continues to grow, with an urgent need to advance understanding of how to prevent, manage, and treat the disease. Through a global consensus process, a multidisciplinary group agreed on 28 research priorities covering a broad range of themes, from disease burden, treatment, and health system responses to awareness and policy. The findings have relevance for clinical and non-clinical researchers as well as funders working on fatty liver disease and non-communicable diseases more broadly, setting out a prioritised, ranked research agenda for turning the tide on this fast-growing public health threat., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are limited. This study evaluated the persistence of NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs for up to 5 years after the end of treatment (EOT)., Methods: We included samples from 678 individuals with an HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 3 infection and virologic DAA treatment failure collected in the European Resistance Database. NS3, NS5A, and NS5B were sequenced, and clinical parameters were evaluated., Results: A total of 242 individuals with HCV GT1a (36%), 237 with GT1b (35%), and 199 (29%) with GT3 and a DAA failure were included. After protease inhibitor failure, the frequencies of NS3 RASs were 40-90% after the EOT. NS3 RASs disappeared rapidly in GT1b and GT3 after follow-up month 3 but were stable (≥60%) in GT1a owing to Q80K. The SOF-resistant NS5B RAS S282T was only found in individuals with GT3a. Non-nucleoside NS5B RASs were frequent in GT1 (56-80%) and decreased to 30% in GT1a but persisted in GT1b. NS5A RASs were very common in all GTs after NS5A inhibitor failure (88-95%), and even after follow-up month 24, their frequency was 65% and higher. However, RASs in GT1b had a stable course, whereas RASs in GT1a and GT3 declined slightly after follow-up month 24 (GT1a, 68%; GT1b, 95%; and GT3, 65%), mainly because of the slow decline of high-level resistant Y93H., Conclusions: We found that low-to medium-level RASs persisted, whereas high-level resistant RASs disappeared over time. Different patterns of RAS persistence according to HCV subtype could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals., Impact and Implications: There are little data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after DAA treatment failure, and RASs could have an impact on the efficacy of a rescue treatment. Especially in countries with limited availability of VOX/VEL/SOF or G/P/SOF, different patterns of RAS persistence could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals. The different patterns of RAS persistence identified in this study can be used to derive general rules regarding the persistence of RASs after DAA failure that could be applied by physicians in less developed countries to plan individualized HCV retreatment., (Copyright © 2022 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Obesity-associated inflammation is a key player in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the role of macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1, CD204) remains incompletely understood., Methods: A total of 170 NAFLD liver biopsies were processed for transcriptomic analysis and correlated with clinicopathological features. Msr1 -/- and wild-type mice were subjected to a 16-week high-fat and high-cholesterol diet. Mice and ex vivo human liver slices were treated with a monoclonal antibody against MSR1. Genetic susceptibility was assessed using genome-wide association study data from 1,483 patients with NAFLD and 430,101 participants of the UK Biobank., Results: MSR1 expression was associated with the occurrence of hepatic lipid-laden foamy macrophages and correlated with the degree of steatosis and steatohepatitis in patients with NAFLD. Mice lacking Msr1 were protected against diet-induced metabolic disorder, showing fewer hepatic foamy macrophages, less hepatic inflammation, improved dyslipidaemia and glucose tolerance, and altered hepatic lipid metabolism. Upon induction by saturated fatty acids, MSR1 induced a pro-inflammatory response via the JNK signalling pathway. In vitro blockade of the receptor prevented the accumulation of lipids in primary macrophages which inhibited the switch towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype and the release of cytokines such as TNF-ɑ. Targeting MSR1 using monoclonal antibody therapy in an obesity-associated NAFLD mouse model and human liver slices resulted in the prevention of foamy macrophage formation and inflammation. Moreover, we identified that rs41505344, a polymorphism in the upstream transcriptional region of MSR1, was associated with altered serum triglycerides and aspartate aminotransferase levels in a cohort of over 400,000 patients., Conclusions: Taken together, our data suggest that MSR1 plays a critical role in lipid-induced inflammation and could thus be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of NAFLD., Lay Summary: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic disease primarily caused by excessive consumption of fat and sugar combined with a lack of exercise or a sedentary lifestyle. Herein, we show that the macrophage scavenger receptor MSR1, an innate immune receptor, mediates lipid uptake and accumulation in Kupffer cells, resulting in liver inflammation and thereby promoting the progression of NAFLD in humans and mice., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no potential conflicts (financial, professional or personal) directly relevant to the manuscript. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who have an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid remain at risk of disease progression. We investigated the safety and efficacy of elafibranor, a dual PPARα/δ agonist, in patients with PBC., Methods: This 12-week, double-blind phase II trial enrolled 45 adults with PBC who had incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (alkaline phosphatase levels ≥1.67-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients were randomly assigned to elafibranor 80 mg, elafibranor 120 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the relative change of ALP at 12 weeks (NCT03124108)., Results: At 12 weeks, ALP was reduced by -48.3±14.8% in the elafibranor 80 mg group (p <0.001 vs. placebo) and by -40.6±17.4% in the elafibranor 120 mg group (p <0.001) compared to a +3.2±14.8% increase in the placebo group. The composite endpoint of ALP ≤1.67-fold the ULN, decrease of ALP >15% and total bilirubin below the ULN was achieved in 67% patients in the elafibranor 80 mg group and 79% patients in the elafibranor 120 mg group, vs. 6.7% patients in the placebo group. Levels of gamma-glutamyltransferase decreased by 37.0±25.5% in the elafibranor 80 mg group (p <0.001) and 40.0±24.1% in the elafibranor 120 mg group (p <0.01) compared to no change (+0.2±26.0%) in the placebo group. Levels of disease markers such as IgM, 5'-nucleotidase or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were likewise reduced by elafibranor. Pruritus was not induced or exacerbated by elafibranor and patients with pruritus at baseline reported less pruritic symptoms at the end of treatment. All possibly drug-related non-serious adverse events were mild to moderate., Conclusion: In this randomized phase II trial, elafibranor was generally safe and well tolerated and significantly reduced levels of ALP, composite endpoints of bilirubin and ALP, as well as other markers of disease activity in patients with PBC and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid., Lay Summary: Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (a rare chronic liver disease) that do not respond to standard therapy remain at risk of disease progression toward cirrhosis and impaired quality of life. Elafibranor is a nuclear receptor agonist that we tested in a randomized clinical trial over 12 weeks. It successfully decreased levels of disease activity markers, including alkaline phosphatase. Thus, this study is the foundation for a larger prospective study that will determine the efficacy and safety of this drug as a second-line therapy., Clinical Trial Registration Number: Clinical Trials.gov NCT03124108., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest JMS reports consultancy: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal, Nordic Bioscience, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Zydus. Research Funding: Gilead Sciences. AP has received grant funding, personal fees, and advisory board fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals; advisory board fees and fees for teaching from Novartis; and personal fees from CymaBay Therapeutics and Inova Diagnostics. KVK: serves as consultant to or an advisory boards for Conatus, CymaBay, Gilead, Intercept, La Jolla, Merck and Novartis. He receives research support from Genfit, Gilead, High Tide, Intercept, NGM Biopharma and Novartis and serves as a speaker for Abbvie, Gilead Sciences and Intercept. MAH: Consultancy for Roche, Novartis, Falk and Intercept. SC received research support from Genfit, Gilead and Zydus. DP: nothing to disclose. AB: nothing to disclose. GMH has consulted for Intercept, Genfit, Novartis, GSK, Cymabay and Gilead. CL reports research grants: Gilead, Intercept, CymaBay, Genfit, Genkyotex, Enanta, GSK, Novartis, NGM, High Tide, Durect, Alnylam, Zydus, Cara Therapeutics, Target PharmaSolutions; Consulting fees/Advisory boards: CymaBay, GSK, Shire, Pliant, Target PharmaSolutions, Flashlight Therapeutics, Cara Therapeutics; Royalties: Up-to-date; other: Editorial board Liver Transplantation. JV Research Grants: Allergan, Arena, CymaBay, Enanta, Genkyotex, Intercept, Lilly, NGM Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, TaiwanJ, Scientific Advisor: Arena, BioIncept, Blade, CymaBay, Enanta, Genkyotex, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Intercept, Lilly, Novartis, TaiwanJ, Authorship: Up-to-Date Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation; AASLD Writing Committee AIH Guidance In Press, 2019. DJ reports consultancy and grant funding from Intercept and Consultancy from Novartis. AT has nothing to disclose. BS is consultant and president of the SAB of Genfit SA. SM was a former Genfit employee and has currently no COI. RH, DM and PB are Genfit employees. VL reports consultancy for Genfit., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. All rights reserved.)

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), a progressive liver disease that is closely associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, represents an increasing global public health challenge. There is significant variability in the disease course: the majority exhibit only fat accumulation in the liver but a significant minority develop a necroinflammatory form of the disease (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH) that may progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. At present our understanding of pathogenesis, disease natural history and long-term outcomes remain incomplete. There is a need for large, well characterised patient cohorts that may be used to address these knowledge gaps and to support the development of better biomarkers and novel therapies. The European NAFLD Registry is an international, prospectively recruited observational cohort study that aims to establish a large, highly-phenotyped patient cohort and linked bioresource. Here we describe the infrastructure, data management and monitoring plans, and the standard operating procedures implemented to ensure the timely and systematic collection of high-quality data and samples. Already recruiting subjects at secondary/tertiary care centres across Europe, the Registry is supporting the European Union IMI2-funded LITMUS 'Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis' consortium, which is a major international effort to robustly validate biomarkers that diagnose, risk stratify and/or monitor NAFLD progression and liver fibrosis stage. The European NAFLD Registry has the demonstrable capacity to support research and biomarker development at scale and pace., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Genetic factors associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remain incompletely understood. To date, most genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have adopted radiologically assessed hepatic triglyceride content as the reference phenotype and so cannot address steatohepatitis or fibrosis. We describe a GWAS encompassing the full spectrum of histologically characterised NAFLD., Methods: The GWAS involved 1,483 European NAFLD cases and 17,781 genetically matched controls. A replication cohort of 559 NAFLD cases and 945 controls was genotyped to confirm signals showing genome-wide or close to genome-wide significance., Results: Case-control analysis identified signals showing p values ≤5 × 10 -8 at 4 locations (chromosome [chr] 2 GCKR/C2ORF16; chr4 HSD17B13; chr19 TM6SF2; chr22 PNPLA3) together with 2 other signals with p <1 × 10 -7 (chr1 near LEPR and chr8 near IDO2/TC1). Case-only analysis of quantitative traits showed that the PNPLA3 signal (rs738409) had genome-wide significance for steatosis, fibrosis and NAFLD activity score and a new signal (PYGO1 rs62021874) had close to genome-wide significance for steatosis (p = 8.2 × 10 -8 ). Subgroup case-control analysis for NASH confirmed the PNPLA3 signal. The chr1 LEPR single nucleotide polymorphism also showed genome-wide significance for this phenotype. Considering the subgroup with advanced fibrosis (≥F3), the signals on chr2, chr19 and chr22 maintained their genome-wide significance. Except for GCKR/C2ORF16, the genome-wide significance signals were replicated., Conclusions: This study confirms PNPLA3 as a risk factor for the full histological spectrum of NAFLD at genome-wide significance levels, with important contributions from TM6SF2 and HSD17B13. PYGO1 is a novel steatosis modifier, suggesting that Wnt signalling pathways may be relevant in NAFLD pathogenesis., Lay Summary: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a common disease where excessive fat accumulates in the liver and may result in cirrhosis. To understand who is at risk of developing this disease and suffering liver damage, we undertook a genetic study to compare the genetic profiles of people suffering from fatty liver disease with genetic profiles seen in the general population. We found that particular sequences in 4 different areas of the human genome were seen at different frequencies in the fatty liver disease cases. These sequences may help predict an individual's risk of developing advanced disease. Some genes where these sequences are located may also be good targets for future drug treatments., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Quentin Anstee reports grants from European Commission during the conduct of the study; other from Acuitas Medical, grants, personal fees and other from Allergan/Tobira, other from E3Bio, other from Eli Lilly & Company Ltd, other from Galmed, grants, personal fees and other from Genfit SA, personal fees and other from Gilead, other from Grunthal, other from Imperial Innovations, grants and other from Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd, other from Inventiva, other from Janssen, personal fees from Kenes, other from MedImmune, other from NewGene, grants and other from Pfizer Ltd, other from Raptor Pharma, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants and other from Novartis Pharma AG, grants from AbbVie, personal fees from BMS, grants from GSK, other from NGMBio, other from Madrigal, other from Servier, outside the submitted work; Dina Tiniakos reports consultation fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc, Allergan, Cirius Therapeutics and an educational grant from Histoindex Pte Ltd; Guruprasad P. Aithal reports institutional consultancy income outside the scope of this study from GSK and Pfizer; Michael Allison reports consultancy/advisory with MedImmune/Astra Zeneca, E3Bio, honoraria from Intercept, Grant support from GSK, Takeda; Jean-Francois Dufour reports advisory committees with AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Science, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, Novartis and speaking and teaching with Bayer, BMS, Intercept, Genfit, Gilead Science, Novartis; Pietro Invernizzi reports grants from Intercept, Gilead and Bruschettini; Mattias Ekstedt reports personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Albireo, Diapharma, Gilead and non-financial support from Echosens (through LITMUS IMI project); Karine Clement has no personal honoraria but has consultancy and scientific collaboration activity for LNC therapeutics, Confotherapeutics and Danone Research; Jörn M. Schattenberg reports grants from Gilead and Boehringer Ingelheim and fees from Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galmed, Genfit, Intercept, Novartis, Pfizer and AbbVie outside the submitted work. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Lifestyle modification is the foundation of treatment recommendations for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The design of clinical trials in NASH may be impeded by the lack of a systematic approach to identify and evaluate how lifestyle changes and/or modifications influence clinical trial outcomes and associated endpoints. Furthermore, there are additional uncertainties regarding the methods that can be utilised to better characterise and quantify lifestyle variables - which can influence disease activity and alter trial endpoints - to allow for comparisons of trial outcomes across different phases of research and/or within drug-classes. This summary by the Liver Forum's Standard of Care Working Group reviews currently available clinical data, identifies the barriers and challenges associated with the standard of care in NAFLD/NASH clinical trials, defines available assessments of lifestyle changes, and proposes approaches to better understand and define the influence of diet and exercise on NASH treatment in the context of different pharmacologic interventions. The ultimate objective is to propose tangible solutions which enable investigators, sponsors, and regulatory authorities to meaningfully interpret clinical trial outcomes and the impact of lifestyle modification on such outcomes as they pertain to phase I-IV clinical trials., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest SF: Consultancy and/or speaker for Gilead, MSD, BMS, Roche, Bayer, Aktelion, Janssen, Intercept, Genfit, Inventiva, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galmed, Genentech, Galapagos, Aligos, MedImmune, Novartis, Novo Nordisk. CF: Employee of Covance. MN: Advisory board or a speaker for Allergan, Gilead, Intercept, Pfizer, Novartis, Blade, EchoSens North America, OWL, Simply Speaking, and Abbott; Research support from Allergan, BMS, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Conatus, Enanta, Novartis, Shire and Zydus; Minor shareholder or has stocks in Anaetos and Viking. MBH: Employee of Zealand Pharma, former employee of Novo-Nordisk. JS. Consultancy AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, BBN Cardio, BMS, Echosens Galamed, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, IQVIA, MedImmune, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer; Research Funding: Gilead Sciences, Yakult Europe B.V.; Travel Support: Janssen; Lecture: Falk Foundation, Takeda, Merck, Norgine. MFA: Consultancy and/or speaker for BMS, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Allergan, TaiwanJ, NGM Bio, Pfizer Research, Prometic. Research support from Conatus, Intercept, Allergan, Novartis, Genfit, Galmed, Galactin, Madrigal, BMS, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Durect, Inventiva, Enyo, and Enanta. All other authors declare no conflict of interest. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The exclusion of other chronic liver diseases including "excess" alcohol intake has until now been necessary to establish a diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). However, given our current understanding of the pathogenesis of MAFLD and its rising prevalence, "positive criteria" to diagnose the disease are required. In this work, a panel of international experts from 22 countries propose a new definition for the diagnosis of MAFLD that is both comprehensive and simple, and is independent of other liver diseases. The criteria are based on evidence of hepatic steatosis, in addition to one of the following three criteria, namely overweight/obesity, presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, or evidence of metabolic dysregulation. We propose that disease assessment and stratification of severity should extend beyond a simple dichotomous classification to steatohepatitis vs. non-steatohepatitis. The group also suggests a set of criteria to define MAFLD-associated cirrhosis and proposes a conceptual framework to consider other causes of fatty liver disease. Finally, we bring clarity to the distinction between diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria for research studies and clinical trials. Reaching consensus on the criteria for MAFLD will help unify the terminology (e.g. for ICD-coding), enhance the legitimacy of clinical practice and clinical trials, improve clinical care and move the clinical and scientific field of liver research forward., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest that pertain to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by hepatocyte steatosis, ballooning, and lobular inflammation which may lead to fibrosis. Lipotoxicity activates caspases, which cause apoptosis and inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β and IL-18) production. Emricasan is a pan-caspase inhibitor that decreases serum aminotransferases and caspase activation in patients with NASH. This study postulated that 72 weeks of emricasan treatment would improve liver fibrosis without worsening of NASH., Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study 318 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to twice-daily treatment with emricasan (5 mg or 50 mg) or matching placebo for 72 weeks. Patients had definite NASH and NASH CRN fibrosis stage F1-F3, as determined by a central reader, on a liver biopsy obtained within 6 months of randomization., Results: Emricasan treatment did not achieve the primary objective of fibrosis improvement without worsening of NASH (emricasan 5 mg: 11.2%; emricasan 50 mg: 12.3%; placebo: 19.0%; odds ratios vs. placebo 0.530 and 0.588, with p = 0.972 and 0.972, respectively) or the secondary objective of NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (emricasan 5 mg: 3.7%; emricasan 50 mg: 6.6%; placebo: 10.5%; odds ratios vs. placebo 0.334 and 0.613, with p = 0.070 and 0.335, respectively). In the small subset of patients with consistent normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase over 72 weeks, emricasan may have improved histologic outcomes., Conclusions: Emricasan treatment did not improve liver histology in patients with NASH fibrosis despite target engagement and may have worsened fibrosis and ballooning. Caspase inhibition lowered serum alanine aminotransferase in the short-term but may have directed cells to alternative mechanisms of cell death, resulting in more liver fibrosis and hepatocyte ballooning., Clinical Trial Number: Clinical Trials.gov #NCT02686762., Lay Summary: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by fat accumulation in liver cells, which leads to inflammation and fibrosis. Emricasan was previously shown to inhibit some of the liver enzymes which lead to liver inflammation and fibrosis. In this study, emricasan did not improve liver inflammation or fibrosis in patients with NASH and pre-existing liver fibrosis., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Chronic Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is associated with extrahepatic manifestations and an increased prevalence in cardiovascular disease. New direct acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized HCV treatment with high rates of sustained virological response (SVR). Recently it was demonstrated, that SVR reduces morbidity and overall mortality more than can be solely explained by hepatic effects, suggesting that treatment with DAA also affects cardiovascular disease. The aim of this pilot study was to identify possible underlying mechanisms behind the HCV-associated cardiovascular mortality reported by others., Methods and Results: 20 HCV patients (10 genotype GT1, 10 GT3) were treated with interferon (IFN)- and ribavirin (RBV)-free DAA regimens for 12 weeks (SVR12). Primary endpoint was an improvement in endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation, FMD) at SVR12 compared to baseline. Patient demographics, FMD, markers for endothelial function and inflammation, coagulation and oxidative stress were measured at baseline, end of treatment and SVR12. All patients achieved SVR12. There was a significant increase in FMD from 9.4 ± 5.2% at baseline to 11.9 ± 4.5% at SVR12 (p = 0.04). Concomitantly, there were significant reductions in levels of endothelium-derived adhesion molecules E-selectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1. While APRI values were also significantly lower, liver stiffness did not change significantly. There were no relevant changes in systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, insulin resistance or coagulation pathways., Conclusions: Successful DAA therapy was associated with improvements in endothelial function and a reduction of soluble adhesion molecules. Our findings indicate that HCV infection affects the endothelium and that DAA-treatment reverses these effects and enhances endothelial function., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are increasingly a cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma globally. This burden is expected to increase as epidemics of obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome continue to grow. The goal of this analysis was to use a Markov model to forecast NAFLD disease burden using currently available data., Methods: A model was used to estimate NAFLD and NASH disease progression in eight countries based on data for adult prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Published estimates and expert consensus were used to build and validate the model projections., Results: If obesity and DM level off in the future, we project a modest growth in total NAFLD cases (0-30%), between 2016-2030, with the highest growth in China as a result of urbanization and the lowest growth in Japan as a result of a shrinking population. However, at the same time, NASH prevalence will increase 15-56%, while liver mortality and advanced liver disease will more than double as a result of an aging/increasing population., Conclusions: NAFLD and NASH represent a large and growing public health problem and efforts to understand this epidemic and to mitigate the disease burden are needed. If obesity and DM continue to increase at current and historical rates, both NAFLD and NASH prevalence are expected to increase. Since both are reversible, public health campaigns to increase awareness and diagnosis, and to promote diet and exercise can help manage the growth in future disease burden., Lay Summary: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis can lead to advanced liver disease. Both conditions are becoming increasingly prevalent as the epidemics of obesity and diabetes continue to increase. A mathematical model was built to understand how the disease burden associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis will change over time. Results suggest increasing cases of advanced liver disease and liver-related mortality in the coming years., (Copyright © 2018 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Interleukin (IL)-1-type cytokines including IL-1α, IL-1β and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) are among the most potent molecules of the innate immune system and exert biological activities through the ubiquitously expressed interleukin-1 receptor type 1 (IL-1R1). The role of IL-1R1 in hepatocytes during acute liver failure (ALF) remains undetermined., Methods: The role of IL-1R1 during ALF was investigated using a novel transgenic mouse model exhibiting deletion of all signaling-capable IL-1R isoforms in hepatocytes (Il1r1 Hep-/- )., Results: ALF induced by D-galactosamine (D-GalN) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was significantly attenuated in Il1r1 Hep-/- mice leading to reduced mortality. Conditional deletion of Il1r1 decreased activation of injurious c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK)/c-Jun signaling, activated nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) p65, inhibited extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and prevented caspase 3-mediated apoptosis. Moreover, Il1r1 Hep-/- mice exhibited reduced local and systemic inflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels, especially TNF-α, IL-1α/β, IL-6, CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), C-X-C motif ligand 1 (CXCL-1) and CXCL-2, and a reduced neutrophil recruitment into the hepatic tissue in response to injury. NLRP3 inflammasome expression and caspase 1 activation were suppressed in the absence of the hepatocellular IL-1R1. Inhibition of IL-1R1 using IL-1ra (anakinra) attenuated the severity of liver injury, while IL-1α administration exaggerated it. These effects were lost ex vivo and at later time points, supporting a role of IL-1R1 in inflammatory signal amplification during acute liver injury., Conclusion: IL-1R1 in hepatocytes plays a pivotal role in an IL-1-driven auto-amplification of cell death and inflammation in the onset of ALF., Lay Summary: Acute liver injury which can cause lethal liver failure is medicated by a class of proteins called cytokines. Among these, interleukin-1 (IL-1) and the corresponding receptor IL-1R1 play a prominent role in the immune system, but their role in the liver is undetermined. In the current study, a novel mouse model with defective IL-1R1 in liver cells was studied. Mice lacking this receptor in liver cells were protected from cell death to a certain extent. This protection occurred only in the presence of other, neighboring cells, arguing for the involvement of proteins derived from these cells. This effect is called paracrine signaling and the current study has for the first time shown that the IL-1R1 receptor on hepatocytes is involved in acute liver failure in this context. The approved drug anakinra - which blocks IL-1R1 - had the same effect, supporting the proposed mechanism of action. The findings of this study suggest new treatment options for patients with acute liver failure by blocking defined signals of the immune system., (Copyright © 2018 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The PNPLA3 p.I148M, TM6SF2 p.E167K, and MBOAT7 rs641738 variants represent genetic risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Here we investigate if these polymorphisms modulate both steatosis and fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. We recruited 515 patients with NAFLD (age 16-88 years, 280 female patients). Liver biopsies were performed in 320 patients. PCR-based assays were used to genotype the PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and MBOAT7 variants. Carriers of the PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 risk alleles showed increased serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase activities (P < 0.05). The PNPLA3 genotype was associated with steatosis grades S2-S3 (P < 0.001) and fibrosis stages F2-F4 (P < 0.001). The TM6SF2 genotype was associated with steatosis (P = 0.003) but not with fibrosis (P > 0.05). The MBOAT7 variant was solely associated with increased fibrosis (P = 0.046). In the multivariate model, variants PNPLA3 (P = 0.004) and TM6SF2 (P = 0.038) were associated with steatosis. Fibrosis stages were affected by the PNPLA3 (P = 0.042) and MBOAT7 (P = 0.021) but not by the TM6SF2 polymorphism (P > 0.05). The PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and MBOAT7 variants are associated with increased liver injury. The TM6SF2 variant seems to modulate predominantly hepatic fat accumulation, whereas the MBOAT7 polymorphism is linked to fibrosis. The PNPLA3 polymorphism confers risk of both increased steatosis and fibrosis., (Copyright © 2017 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

Background & Aims: The pathomechanisms underlying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the involved molecular regulators are incompletely explored. The nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)-cofactor gene B cell leukemia-3 (Bcl-3) plays a critical role in altering the transcriptional capacity of NF-κB - a key inducer of inflammation - but also of genes involved in cellular energy metabolism., Methods: To define the role of Bcl-3 in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), we developed a novel transgenic mouse model with hepatocyte-specific overexpression of Bcl-3 (Bcl-3 Hep ) and employed a high-fat, high-carbohydrate dietary feeding model. To characterize the transgenic model, deep RNA sequencing was performed. The relevance of the findings was confirmed in human liver samples., Results: Hepatocyte-specific overexpression of Bcl-3 led to pronounced metabolic derangement, characterized by enhanced hepatic steatosis from increased de novo lipogenesis and uptake, as well as decreased hydrolysis and export of fatty acids. Steatosis in Bcl-3 Hep mice was accompanied by an augmented inflammatory milieu and liver cell injury. Moreover, Bcl-3 expression decreased insulin sensitivity and resulted in compensatory regulation of insulin-signaling pathways. Based on in vivo and in vitro studies we identified the transcription factors PPARα, PPARγ and PGC-1α as critical regulators of hepatic metabolism and inflammation downstream of Bcl-3. Metformin treatment improved the metabolic and inflammatory phenotype in Bcl-3 Hep mice through modulation of PPARα and PGC-1α. Remarkably, these findings were recapitulated in human NASH, which exhibited increased expression and nuclear localization of Bcl-3., Conclusions: In summary, Bcl-3 emerges as a novel regulator of hepatic steatosis, insulin sensitivity and inflammation in NASH., Lay Summary: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the most prevalent liver disease worldwide. Patients can develop end-stage liver disease resulting in liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma, but also develop complications unrelated to liver disease, e.g., cardiovascular disease. Still there is no full understanding of the mechanisms that cause NAFLD. In this study, genetically engineered mice were employed to examine the role of a specific protein in the liver that is involved in inflammation and the metabolism, namely Bcl-3. By this approach, a better understanding of the mechanisms contributing to disease progression was established. This can help to develop novel therapeutic and diagnostic options for patients with NAFLD., (Copyright © 2016 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-associated mortality caused by decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. With the approval of sofosbuvir, therapeutic efficacy has markedly increased. Early changes in non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis under effective antiviral therapy are widely unknown., Aim: To evaluate early changes of fibrosis markers determined by enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) scores and liver stiffness measurement (FibroScan(®)) in patients treated with sofosbuvir., Methods: A total of 32 hepatitis C patients treated prospectively with sofosbuvir were included. The ELF-panel and FibroScan measurements were performed at baseline, week 4, end-of-treatment and 12 weeks thereafter., Results: Antiviral therapy resulted in a biochemical and virological response within 4 weeks. Sustained virological response rate at 12-week follow-up (SVR12) was 93.8%; there was a significantly decrease from baseline to 12-week post-treatment follow-up in ELF (10.00 vs. 9.37; p=0.007) and FibroScan (8.0 vs. 6.8 kPa; p=0.016) measurements, indicating improvement of the dynamics of liver fibrosis., Conclusion: We observed a rapid decrease in non-invasive fibrosis markers measured by ELF-scores and FibroScan in hepatitis C-infected patients receiving sofosbuvir treatment. These initial results need to be histologically confirmed by liver biopsy in the future., (Copyright © 2015 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Apoptosis is crucially involved in acute and chronic liver injury, including viral, cholestatic, toxic, and metabolic liver disease. Additionally, dysregulation of apoptosis signaling pathways has been implicated in hepatocarcinogenesis. The most prominent members of the apoptosis-mediating tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily are the TNF-R1 (CD120a) and the CD95 (Apo-1/Fas) receptor. Although extensively studied, the intracellular signaling events in hepatocytes are only incompletely understood., Methods: To examine the role of the caspase-8 homolog cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) in liver injury, we generated mice with hepatocyte specific deletion of c-FLIP. Three models of acute liver injury were employed: the agonistic anti-CD95 antibody Jo2, d-galactosamine and LPS (GalN/LPS), and concanavalin A., Results: Conditional ablation of c-FLIP in hepatocytes augmented liver injury and cell death in all three models of liver injury. CD95- and GalN/LPS-induced liver injury was ameliorated by a pancaspase inhibitor, while ConA-induced injury was unaffected by caspase inhibition. Augmented activation of the MAPK JNK was observed in parallel to liver injury in c-FLIP knockout mice in all injury models; however, inhibition of JNK only affected TNF- and ConA-mediated injury., Conclusions: In summary, c-FLIP is a central regulator of cell death in hepatocytes, involving increased activation of caspases and the MAPK JNK., (Copyright © 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)