1. Smaller panel, similar results: genomic profiling and molecularly informed therapy in pancreatic cancer.
- Author
-
Reissig TM, Tzianopoulos I, Liffers ST, Rosery VK, Guyot M, Ting S, Wiesweg M, Kasper S, Meister P, Herold T, Schmidt HH, Schumacher B, Albers D, Markus P, Treckmann J, Schuler M, Schildhaus HU, and Siveke JT
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Genomics, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) genetics, Pancreatic Neoplasms drug therapy, Pancreatic Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis. One reason is resistance to cytotoxic drugs. Molecularly matched therapies might overcome this resistance but the best approach to identify those patients who may benefit is unknown. Therefore, we sought to evaluate a molecularly guided treatment approach., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome and mutational status of patients with pancreatic cancer who received molecular profiling at the West German Cancer Center Essen from 2016 to 2021. We carried out a 47-gene DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Furthermore, we assessed microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) status and, sequentially and only in case of KRAS wild-type, gene fusions via RNA-based NGS. Patient data and treatment were retrieved from the electronic medical records., Results: Of 190 included patients, 171 had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (90%). One hundred and three patients had stage IV pancreatic cancer at diagnosis (54%). MMR analysis in 94 patients (94/190, 49.5%) identified 3 patients with dMMR (3/94, 3.2%). Notably, we identified 32 patients with KRAS wild-type status (16.8%). To identify driver alterations in these patients, we conducted an RNA-based fusion assay on 13 assessable samples and identified 5 potentially actionable fusions (5/13, 38.5%). Overall, we identified 34 patients with potentially actionable alterations (34/190, 17.9%). Of these 34 patients, 10 patients (10/34, 29.4%) finally received at least one molecularly targeted treatment and 4 patients had an exceptional response (>9 months on treatment)., Conclusions: Here, we show that a small-sized gene panel can suffice to identify relevant therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer patients. Informally comparing with previous large-scale studies, this approach yields a similar detection rate of actionable targets. We propose molecular sequencing of pancreatic cancer as standard of care to identify KRAS wild-type and rare molecular subsets for targeted treatment strategies., Competing Interests: Disclosure MW: honoraria and advisory role: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; research funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda. SK: discloses honoraria (self) from Amgen, Merck, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier and Lilly; honoraria (institution) from Amgen, Merck, Roche and Lilly; advisory/consultancy roles with Amgen, Merck, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Novartis and Lilly; research grants/funding (self) from Merck, BMS, Roche and Lilly; research grants/funding (institution) from BMS, Roche, Merck and Lilly. MS: consultant (compensated): Amgen, AstraZeneca, BIOCAD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda; stock ownership: none; honoraries for CME presentations: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis; research funding to institution: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb. HUS: Targos Molecular Pathology, Inc. (employment); Roche, Novartis Oncology, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, ZytoVision, Zytomed (honoraria); AstraZeneca, Agilent, Molecular Health, MSD (advisory boards); Novartis Oncology (research funding—outside of this study). JTS: honoraria (consultant or for continuing medical education presentations): AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Immunocore, MSD Sharp Dohme, Novartis, Roche/Genentech and Servier; institutional research funding: Abalos Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisbach Bio and Roche/Genentech; he holds ownership and serves on the Board of Directors of Pharma15, all outside the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Data sharing The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author JTS. The data are not publicly available due to information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF