Search

Background: In 2002 there were estimated to be 357,000 new cases of bladder cancer worldwide and 145,000 deaths making bladder cancer the 9th most common malignancy globally. At diagnosis, 60-80% of tumours are superficial and endoscopic resection is the initial treatment for this disease. In patients with low, medium or high risk disease, about 20%, 40% and 90%, respectively, will develop tumour recurrence. To delay or prevent recurrence, intravesical therapy is routinely used. Commonly used intravesical agents include immunotherapy with BCG and chemotherapy with cytotoxics such as Mitomycin C, Adriamycin, Epirubicin and Gemcitabine. However, controversy exists as to which agent and schedule should be used., Methods: An overarching search of the literature was used to identify relevant studies to assess the clinical benefit of intravesical therapy and provide clinical guidance in a comprehensive systematic review of randomised trials and meta-analyses of intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer. Findings and interpretation the search identified over 80 randomised trials and 11 meta-analyses. The extensive evidence suggests that an immediate post-operative instillation of a chemotherapeutic agent, such as Mitomycin C or Epirubicin, is effective in reducing tumour recurrence. In intermediate or high risk patients, further intravesical induction and maintenance therapy with BCG is recommended., Conclusion: Intravesical chemotherapy with either Mitomycin C or Epirubicin would be an option for those patients failing or who are unsuitable for BCG therapy. Intravesical BCG is superior to chemotherapy in terms of complete response and disease-free survival. However, there is no conclusive evidence that one agent is superior in terms of overall survival., (Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) following radiotherapy or surgery is a treatment option frequently offered to men with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer. We performed a systematic review of published randomised trials to assess the effectiveness of AHT., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, SCI, LILACS and SIGLE for randomised trials comparing AHT plus primary therapy (radiotherapy or prostatectomy) with primary therapy alone. Data on study design, participants interventions and outcomes were extracted from relevant studies and where possible pooled for meta-analysis., Findings: AHT following radiotherapy improved overall survival (at 5 years OR fixed effect model 1.29, 95% CI 1.07-1.56, p=0.007), disease-specific survival (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.53-2.88, p<0.00001) and disease-free survival (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.16-2.23, p<0.00001). A random effect model favoured adjuvant hormone therapy but did not reach significance. After prostatectomy, there was no significant overall survival advantage with AHT, although one study reported a significant improvement in disease-specific survival (HR 4.09, p=0.0004). Disease-free survival was also better with AHT (OR 3.73, 95% CI 2.30-6.03, p<0.00001). AHT-induced toxicities included gynaecomastia, impotence, gastrointestinal and haematological., Conclusions: There are significant clinical benefits associated with the use of AHT for early prostate cancer. Patients should make an informed decision to accept AHT based on its effectiveness and side-effects.

Background: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) in localised and locally advanced prostate cancer to assess the effectiveness of this therapy., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, LILACS and SIGLE for randomised trials comparing NHT plus primary therapy (radiotherapy or prostatectomy) with primary therapy alone. Data included information on study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes. Comparable data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled for meta-analysis with intention to treat principle., Findings: NHT prior to prostatectomy did not improve overall or disease-free survival, but did significantly reduce positive margin rates (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.56, p<0.00001), organ confinement (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.37-1.95, p<0.0001) and lymph node invasion (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.56, p<0.02). In one study NHT before radiotherapy significantly improved overall survival for men with Gleason 2-6 (p=0.015). In addition, there was a significant improvement in both clinical disease-free survival (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.24-1.71, p<0.00001) and biochemical disease-free survival (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00-2.55, p=0.05). Toxicities included hot flushes, gastrointestinal, hepatic and miscellaneous adverse events., Conclusions: NHT is associated with significant clinical benefit when given with radiotherapy and improves pathological outcome prior to prostatectomy but is of minimal value prior to radical prostatectomy. The decision to use hormone therapy should be discussed between the patient, the clinician and policy maker based on the benefits, toxicity and cost.

Testicular germ-cell cancer is relatively rare, affecting less than 6 men per 100,000 in the UK, nevertheless, it is the most common cancer in men under 45 years. The two main types of tumours, seminomas and non-seminomas, respond to treatment differently. The standard treatment for stage I seminomas following orchidectomy is infradiaphragmatic lymph node irradiation with response rates approaching 100%, although surveillance is also a management option. The majority of early stage non-seminomas are cured by orchidedctomy alone. Bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin, (BEP) is the most widely used chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic germ cell tumours. In patients with 'good prognosis' the current focus is to reduce the drug-related toxicity but maintain the cure potential. Most attempts using dose reduction or alternative regimens have not proved superior to BEP. In patients with 'poor prognosis' the aim has been to increase the efficacy of treatment using high-dose chemotherapy and investigate new regimens. This article comprehensively reviews the treatment of testicular germ cell cancer with emphasis on high-grade evidence from randomised controlled trials.