Search

Background: The distal radial approach (DRA) has been proposed as an alternative approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients have not been well studied in detail. We aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of coronary intervention with the DRA for HD patients., Methods: We performed CAG or PCI with the DRA in 2500 consecutive patients between October 2018 and February 2020. The patients included 98 HD patients (HD group) and 2402 non-HD patients (non-HD group). The primary endpoints were the rates of procedural success and puncture site-related complications. The secondary endpoints were puncture site-related complications one year after the procedure. As a subanalysis, we also compared the outcomes on the basis of CAG and PCI., Results: The procedural success rates were similar in the HD and non-HD groups (80.6% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.61 for the entire cohort; 78.3% vs. 80.9%, p = 0.58 for CAG; and 86.2% vs. 88.0%, p = 0.78 for PCI). The bleeding complications rates were low and there was no difference between groups (6.1% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.33 for the entire cohort; 0% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.21 for CAG; and 20.7% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.079 for PCI). Radial artery occlusion occurred in only one patient in the HD group after the procedure., Conclusions: Although modified hemostasis methods could be necessary for HD patients undergoing PCI, coronary intervention with the DRA is feasible and safe for both HD and non-HD patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflicts of interest are declared., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) defined high bleeding risk (HBR) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We have reported a simplified HBR (S-HBR), excluding six items with prevalences under 1% from ARC-HBR. The Japanese Circulation Society developed an HBR specific to Japanese (J-HBR), adding three items to ARC-HBR in consideration of ethnicity. Data comparing each HBR are scarce., Methods: Patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents between January 2010 and December 2013 were enrolled, in whom all items of ARC-HBR, and the incidences of major bleeding and ischemic events were examined. Also, the diagnostic values of ARC-HBR, S-HBR, and J-HBR at 1 and 7 years post procedure were compared by using receiver-operating characteristic curves., Results: The study sample consisted of 3430 patients. Mean follow-up period was 2299 ± 904 days. The incidence of major bleeding at 1 and 7 years in each definition was as follows: ARC-HBC, 3.3% and 10.6%; S-HBR, 3.3% and 10.7%; and J-HBR, 2.9% and 10.0%. The diagnostic value of J-HBR for major bleeding at 1 year was lower than that of ARC-HBR (C statistics 0.64 vs. 0.68, p < 0.001). Other diagnostic values of S-HBR and J-HBR were comparable to those of ARC-HBR., Conclusions: S-HBR was as useful as ARC-HBR in predicting both short- and long-term HBR, and J-HBR is useful for predicting long-term HBR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the impact of the guidewire route on severe dissection after balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions using a new intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessed classification scheme corresponding to a conventional angiographic classification scheme., Methods: Images for 21 femoropopliteal CTO lesions treated endovascularly between May 2018 and December 2019 were used for analysis. IVUS images after guidewire passage and those after balloon angioplasty were evaluated at 1 cm intervals. Cross sectional images were obtained (n = 219) and divided into two groups by the guidewire route: those in which the guidewire passed through the inner half of the luminal radius (central wiring group, 139 cross sectional images) and those in which the guidewire passed through the outer half of the luminal radius (eccentric wiring group, 80 cross sectional images). Angiographically severe dissection was defined as Type C or greater according to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute classification, to which six dissection morphology patterns were applied based on IVUS images (Types A - E2)., Results: Central wiring was achieved in an average of 69.6 ± 28.0% of the CTO length from per limb analysis. Among the IVUS assessed dissection morphology patterns, Types D - E2 were more frequently correlated with angiographically severe dissection than were Types A - C (57.5% vs. 13.7%, p < .001). Multivariable analysis showed that soft plaque was a predictive factor for (odds ratio [OR] 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.007 - 4.72; p = .048) and central wiring was a protective factor (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.14 - 0.49; p < .001) against Type D - E2 dissection patterns assessed by IVUS after balloon angioplasty., Conclusion: Lesions with Type D - E2 dissection patterns assessed by IVUS were correlated with angiographically severe dissection. Central wiring may be useful for preventing severe dissection after balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal CTO lesions., (Copyright © 2021 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background The current guidelines have recommended to shorten the dual antiplatelet therapy duration in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) to minimize the bleeding complications. The impact of ischemic risk factors (IRF) on long-term ischemic events in patients with and without HBR after percutaneous coronary intervention remains unclear. Methods The study population comprised 1219 patients who were treated with everolimus-eluting stents between 2010 and 2011. The mean follow-up period was 2996 ± 433 days. HBR was defined as set by the Academic Research Consortium. IRF was defined as high-risk features of stent-driven recurrent ischemic events endorsed in the 2017 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. Major bleeding was defined as the occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding. Primary ischemic events included myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, and cardiac death. Results The 1219 patients were divided into two groups: 614 patients at HBR (HBR group) and 605 patients at no HBR (non-HBR group). The rate of IRF patients was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the non-HBR group (81.4% versus 47.6%, P < 0.001). The cumulative rate of ischemic events in the HBR group was significantly higher in IRF patients than in non-IRF patients (21.0% versus 7.0%, log rank P < 0.001), whereas that in the non-HBR group was not significantly different between IRF and non-IRF patients (10.1% versus 6.3%, log rank P = 0.09). Conclusions More than 80% of HBR patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents were at IRF. A combination of HBR and IRF may increase the risk of long-term ischemic events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)