Search

Background: Predicted heart mass ratio (PHMr) has become the standard donor-recipient size matching method in heart transplantation. While utilization of small PHMr hearts is associated with increased one-year mortality, the underlying mechanisms and time horizon of mortality remain uncertain., Methods: A single institution analysis of isolated heart transplant recipients (01/2019-7/2022) was performed (N=334). Patients were stratified by PHMr: undersized (<0.86) (n=106), matched (0.86-1.15) (n=175), and oversized (>1.15) (n=53). Survival within PHMr groups was further stratified: complex transplant group (preoperative LVAD, adult congenital, or preoperative ECMO) and non-complex transplant group (all others)., Results: Donor and recipient variables were similar. However, undersized patients were more likely to have a durable LVAD (P=0.022). While postoperative PGD and inotrope score were similar between groups, there was a trend toward increased postoperative dialysis need with undersized hearts (P=0.056). Overall, thirty-day (P=0.012) and one-year survival (P=0.002) was significantly worse in the undersized group compared to matched or oversized groups. However, on subset analysis, these differences only remained among the complex transplant recipients (P=0.013), but not the non-complex transplant recipients (P=0.428). Median mixed venous oxygen saturations at serial time-points were maintained between 65-70% in all heart size groups, with cardiac indices between 2.4-2.8 LPM/m2., Conclusions: Small PHMr hearts are associated with increased one-year mortality, driven by complex transplant operations. Recipients who received undersized PHMr hearts from non-complex transplant operations had a similar hemodynamic profile and survival as those who received matched and oversized hearts. Small PHMr hearts may be selectively safe for transplantation., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Recovery of hearts from donation after circulatory death donors has been performed either with direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) using the TransMedics Organ Care System or with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) with subsequent cold storage. It remains unclear which of these 2 strategies yields optimal posttransplant outcomes., Methods: All heart transplant recipients from donors after circulatory death donors at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN) were reviewed (February 2020 to January 2023). Recipients were stratified into an NRP or DPP cohort. All DPP recoveries were performed using the TransMedics Organ Care System. The key outcome was severe primary graft dysfunction at 24 hours, defined by the need for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation., Results: A total of 118 hearts were transplanted (NRP, 87; DPP, 31). Donors recovered using NRP were younger (25 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 21-31 years] vs 31 years [IQR, 24-37 years]; P = .008) and had shorter distance traveled (292 miles [158-516 miles] vs 449 miles [IQR, 248-635 miles]; P = .02). Recipient preoperative risk factors were similar between the groups. There was no difference in the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction at 24 hours (NRP, 5.8%; and DPP, 12.9%; P = .24). However, ejection fraction at 7 days after transplantation was higher in the NRP group (65% [IQR, 60%-65%] vs 60% [IQR, 60%-68%]; P = .005). There was no difference in inotrope scores at 24 hours (P = 1.00) or 72 hours (P = .87) or in 30-day (NRP, 95% vs DPP, 97%; P = .75) and 1-year (NRP, 94% vs DPP, 86%; P = .19) survival., Conclusions: NRP and DPP strategies for recovery of cardiac allografts yield comparable early allograft outcomes. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings in larger prospective cohorts., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support, including veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) has increased significantly under the revised United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) donor heart allocation system. The revised heart allocation system aimed to lower waitlist times and mortality for the most critically ill patients requiring biventricular, nondischargeable, mechanical circulatory support. While previous reports have shown improved 1-year post-HT survival in the current era, 3-year survival and factors associated with mortality among bridge-to-transplant (BTT) extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients are not well described., Methods: We queried the UNOS database for all adult (age ≥ 18 years) heart-only transplants performed between 2010 and 2019. Patients were stratified as either pre- (January 2010-September 2018; era 1) or post-allocation change (November 2018-December 2019; era 2) cohort based on their HT date. Baseline recipient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes were compared. A Cox regression analysis was performed to explore risk factors for 3-year mortality among BTT-ECMO patients in era 2. For each era, 3-year mortality was also compared between BTT ECMO patients and those transplanted without ECMO support., Results: During the study period, 116 patients were BTT ECMO during era 1 and 154 patients during era 2. Baseline recipient characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 48 (36-58 interquartile range (IQR)) years in era 2, while it was 51 (27-58 IQR) years in era 1. The majority of BTT-ECMO patients were males in both era 2 and era 1 (77.7% vs 71.5%, p = 0.28). Median ECMO run times while listed for HT were significantly shorter (4 days vs 7 days, p < 0.001) in era 2. Waitlist mortality among BTT ECMO patients was also significantly lower in era 2 (6.3% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001). Post-HT survival at 6 months (94.2% vs 75.9%, p < 0.001), 1 year (90.3% vs 74.2%, p < 0.001), and 3 years (87% vs 66.4%, p < 0.001) was significantly improved in era 2 as compared to era 1. Graft failure at 1 year (10.3% vs 25.8%, p = 0.0006) and 3 years (13.6% vs 33.6%, p = 0.0001) was also significantly lower in era 2 compared to era 1. Three-year survival among BTT ECMO patients in era 2 was similar to that of patients transplanted in era 2 without ECMO support (87% vs 85.7%, p = 0.75). In multivariable analysis of BTT-ECMO patients in era 2, every 1 kg/m 2 increase in body mass index was associated with higher mortality at 3 years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, p = 0.006). Similarly, both post-HT stroke (HR 5.58, 95% CI 2.57-12.14, p < 0.001) and post-HT renal failure requiring hemodialysis (HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.43-7.82, p < 0.001) were also associated with 3-year mortality., Conclusions: Three years post-HT survival in patients bridged with ECMO has significantly improved under the revised donor heart allocation system compared to prior system. BTT ECMO recipients under the revised system have significantly shorter ECMO waitlist run times, lower waitlist mortality and 3-year survival similar to those not bridged with ECMO. Overall, the revised allocation system has allowed more rapid transplantation of the sickest patients without a higher post-HT mortality., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: As utilization of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) in treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) continues to expand, clinical variables that guide clinicians in early recognition of myocardial recovery and therefore, improved survival, after VA-ECLS are critical. There remains a paucity of literature on early postinitiation blood pressure measurements that predict improved outcomes., Objectives: The objective of this study is to help identify early blood pressure variables associated with improved outcomes in VA-ECLS., Methods: The authors queried the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) registry for cardiogenic shock patients treated with VA-ECLS or venovenous arterial ECLS between 2009 and 2020. Their inclusion criteria included treatment with VA-ECLS or venovenous arterial ECLS; absence of pre-existing durable right, left, or biventricular assist devices; no pre-ECLS cardiac arrest; and no surgical or percutaneously placed left ventricular venting devices during their ECLS runs. Their primary outcome of interest was the survival to discharge during index hospitalization., Results: A total of 2,400 CS patients met the authors' inclusion criteria and had complete documentation of blood pressures. Actual mortality during index hospitalization in their cohort was 49.5% and survivors were younger and more likely to be Caucasian, intubated for >30 hours pre-ECLS initiation, and had a favorable baseline SAVE (Survival After Veno-arterial ECMO) score (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariable regression analyses adjusting for SAVE score, age, ECLS flow at 4 hours, and race showed that every 10-mm Hg increase in baseline systolic blood pressure (HR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.89-0.95]; P < 0.001), and baseline pulse pressure (HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84-0.91]; P < 0.001) at 24 hours was associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality., Conclusions: Early (within 24 hours) improvements in pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure from baseline are associated with improved survival to discharge among CS patients treated with VA-ECLS., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Little is known about socioeconomic differences in postoperative outcomes after neurosurgery. We assessed the relation between insurance status and postoperative complication risk, neurosurgical intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay after neurosurgery., Methods: We collected data on 918 consecutive craniotomy or spine-related neurosurgical cases in patients at least 18 years of age at the University of Michigan Hospitals after April 2006. Bivariate χ(2) tests and analysis of variance were used to assess bivariate relations, and multivariable logistic regression models and analysis of covariance were used to adjust for potential confounders., Results: A total of 11.2% of privately insured patients, 23.6% of Medicare patients, 25.8% of Medicaid patients, and 27.3% of uninsured patients suffered complications within 30 days of surgery (P < 0.001). In adjusted models, odds of postoperative complications among Medicare (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-3.3), Medicaid (OR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.1), and uninsured patients (OR = 3.6. 95% CI 1.3-10.3) were higher than among privately insured patients. By analysis of covariance, only Medicaid patients had significantly longer intensive care unit (P = 0.040) and hospital stays (P = 0.028) than privately insured patients., Conclusions: Our findings suggest important socioeconomic disparities in outcomes after neurosurgical intervention. Access to postoperative outpatient care may mediate our findings., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)