Search

Abstract: In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), higher revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) scores at transplant are associated with worse transplant outcome and, thus, lowering IPSS-R scores by therapeutic intervention before transplantation may seem beneficial. However, there is no evidence, to date, to support this approach. In a retrospective analysis, a total of 1482 patients with MDS with sufficient data to calculate IPSS-R score at diagnosis and at time of transplantation were selected from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation transplant registry and analyzed for transplant outcome in a multivariable Cox model including IPSS-R score at diagnosis, treatment intervention, change in IPSS-R score before transplant, and several patient and transplant variables. Transplant outcome was unaffected by IPSS-R score change in untreated patients and moderately superior in patients treated with chemotherapy with improved IPSS-R score at transplant. Improved IPSS-R score after hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or other therapies showed no beneficial effect. However, when IPSS-R score progressed after chemotherapy, HMAs, or other therapies, transplant outcome was worse than without any prior treatment. Similar results were found when reduction or increase in bone marrow (BM) blasts between diagnosis and transplantation was considered. The results show a limited benefit of IPSS-R score downstaging or reduction of BM blasts after chemotherapy and no benefit for HMAs or other treatments and thus question the role of prior therapy in patients with MDS scheduled for transplantation. The model-based survival estimates should help inform decision-making for both doctors and patients., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Cell and gene therapy poses evolving challenges. The current article summarizes the discussions held by European Regional Committee of the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) on the current challenges in this field, focusing on the European setting. This article emphasizes the imperative assessment of real-world cell and gene therapy activity, advocating for expanded registries beyond hematopoietic transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy. Accreditation's role in ensuring standardized procedures, as exemplified by JACIE (The Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT-Europe and EBMT), is crucial for safety. Access to commercial products and reimbursement variations among countries underscore the need for uniform access to advanced therapy medical products (ATMPs). Academic product development and point-of-care manufacturing face barriers to patient access. Hospital Exemption's potential, demonstrated by some initial experiences, may increase patient accessibility in individual situations. Regulatory challenges, including the ongoing European ATMPs legislation review, necessitate standardized criteria for Hospital Exemption and mandatory reporting within registries. Efforts to combat unproven therapies and fraud involve collaboration between scientific societies, regulatory bodies and patient groups. Finally, is important to highlight the vital role of education and workforce development in meeting the escalating demand for specialized professionals in the ATMP field. Collaboration among scientific societies, academic institutions, industry, regulatory bodies and patient groups is crucial for overcoming all these challenges to increase gene and cell therapy activity in Europe., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest FSG, JV, DF, JJZ and MG are members of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT-EU) Executive Committee. AR, CC, SC, HD, NG, CH, JHEK, BN, TR, ISG, JAS and AS are members of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) executive committee or working groups representatives. FSG has received research support from Novartis, Gilead. Honoraria from Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, BMS-Celgene and Pierre-Fabré. CC has received honoraria (personal and institutional) and travel support from Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite / Gilead, Novartis and Sanofi SA as a compensation for speaker's bureau and advisory boards. JK was shareholder of Gadeta and is inventor on multiple patents dealing with engineered immune cells, and has received research support from Novartis, Milteny Biotech and Gadeta. JAS has received consultancy honoraria from Kiadis, Medac, Vertex and Jazz. AS has received research support from Takeda and honoraria from Takeda, BMS/Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Gilead Kite, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, Janssen and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was developed more than 65 years ago to treat malignant blood disorders and irreversible bone marrow failures, with the aim of replacing a diseased hematopoietic system with a healthy one (allogeneic HCT). Decades later, the procedure was adapted to apply maximal chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which would result in bone marrow failure, but could be remedied by an infusion of a patient's own cryopreserved bone marrow (autologous HCT). Both treatments are high-risk and complex, especially during the initial phases. However, concerted efforts, vision, and collaboration between physicians and centers worldwide have resulted in HCT becoming a standard of care for many hematological disorders with progressive improvements in outcomes. Registries and the collaboration of societies worldwide have enabled the delivery of this curative therapy to many patients with fatal hematological diseases. More than 1.5 million HCT were performed between 1957 and 2019, and activity is continuously increasing worldwide., Competing Interests: Declaration of cometing interest NH reports advisory board honoraria from Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, Abbvie, Roche, Astellas and Bigene. YA reports consulting fees from JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma KK, AbbVie GK, and honorarium from Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. MI is affiliated with the Department of Promotion for Blood and Marrow Transplantation at the Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, and the department is endowed by AIR WATER INC., Clinigen K.K., and JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. CF reports support for attending meetings from Casa Bollar and support for attending meetings and travel from Diaz Gill Lab and Prosalud. LG reports consulting fees from Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, and GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals and support for attending meetings and travel from Pfizer and Sanofi. KK reports honoraria from Pierre Fabre, Medac, and Novartis. J Snowden reports consulting fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Medac Pharma, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and participation in a Data Safety Monitoring Board in Kiadis Pharma. NW reports consulting and speakers fees from BMS Celgene, Kite Gilead, Miltenyi BioTec, Novartis, Piere Fabre and Therakos Mallinckrodt. The other authors report no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a therapeutic procedure for autoimmune diseases which suppresses inflammation and resets the immune system, thereby halting disease activity and disability progression in treatment-resistant patients. This chapter reviews existing guidelines and health economic evaluations of AHSCT for multiple sclerosis (MS) and presents a cost-utility analysis from the UK NHS and personal social services perspective comparing AHSCT with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with highly active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) based on the only published randomized controlled trial, "MIST," in this population. Over a 5-year time horizon, AHSCT was dominant (more effective and less costly) over the DMTs in MIST. At a threshold of £20,000 per QALY, there was a 100% probability that AHSCT was cost-effective. This result is explained by the high ongoing costs of DMTs compared with the up-front cost of AHSCT, combined with the high effectiveness of AHSCT. When compared with natalizumab, the result did not change; AHSCT remained dominant. These results support current guideline recommendations regarding AHSCT for highly active RRMS. The cost-effectiveness of AHSCT in progressive and aggressive MS and other immune-mediated neurologic diseases remains uncertain due to a lack of health economic analyses, reflecting the limited clinical evidence base., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) may be effective in carefully selected pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). aHSCT for pediatric MS (same as for adults) is performed to eradicate inflammatory autoreactive cells with lympho-ablative regimens and restore immune tolerance. Its therapeutic effect in MS relies on various mechanisms: (1) the immunosuppressive conditioning regimen prior to aHSCT was able to eradicate the autoreactive cells and (2) the regeneration/renewal of the immune system to reset the aberrant immune response against self-antigens. The aHSCT procedure includes the following different steps, as described in this chapter: patient selection through careful pretransplant screening, "wash-out" period from previous treatments, mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), conditioning regimen, HSC infusion, and posttransplant monitoring for early and late complications. Moreover, specific aspects of pediatric population undergoing aHSCT are described. According to the available evidence, aHSCT appears to be safe in pediatric MS, obtaining disease control for a prolonged time after the procedure. A reasonable approach in this setting includes the application of less toxic treatments while reserving aHSCT procedure for patients with severe/refractory forms of the disease. The EBMT considers MS, NMO, and CIDP in pediatric patients within the category of the clinical option (CO), where candidates for aHSCT can be selected on the basis of careful consideration of individual case history in the multidisciplinary setting., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Hematological toxicity is the most common adverse event after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Cytopenias can be profound and long-lasting and can predispose for severe infectious complications. In a recent worldwide survey, we demonstrated that there remains considerable heterogeneity in regard to current practice patterns. Here, we sought to build consensus on the grading and management of immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT) after CAR T-cell therapy. For this purpose, a joint effort between the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the European Hematology Association (EHA) involved an international panel of 36 CAR T-cell experts who met in a series of virtual conferences, culminating in a 2-day meeting in Lille, France. On the basis of these deliberations, best practice recommendations were developed. For the grading of ICAHT, a classification system based on depth and duration of neutropenia was developed for early (day 0-30) and late (after day +30) cytopenia. Detailed recommendations on risk factors, available preinfusion scoring systems (eg, CAR-HEMATOTOX score), and diagnostic workup are provided. A further section focuses on identifying hemophagocytosis in the context of severe hematotoxicity. Finally, we review current evidence and provide consensus recommendations for the management of ICAHT, including growth factor support, anti-infectious prophylaxis, transfusions, autologous hematopoietic stem cell boost, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. In conclusion, we propose ICAHT as a novel toxicity category after immune effector cell therapy, provide a framework for its grading, review literature on risk factors, and outline expert recommendations for the diagnostic workup and short- and long-term management., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Several commercial and academic autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products targeting CD19 have been approved in Europe for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Products for other diseases such as multiple myeloma and follicular lymphoma are likely to be approved by the European Medicines Agency in the near future., Design: The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association collaborated to draft best practice recommendations based on the current literature to support health care professionals in delivering consistent, high-quality care in this rapidly moving field., Results: Thirty-six CAR-T experts (medical, nursing, pharmacy/laboratory) assembled to draft recommendations to cover all aspects of CAR-T patient care and supply chain management, from patient selection to long-term follow-up, post-authorisation safety surveillance and regulatory issues., Conclusions: We provide practical, clinically relevant recommendations on the use of these high-cost, logistically complex therapies for haematologists/oncologists, nurses and other stakeholders including pharmacists and health sector administrators involved in the delivery of CAR-T in the clinic., Competing Interests: Disclosure PJH—Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, Celgene, Alnylam. CR—Novartis, Gilead, BMS. PB—Neovii, Riemser, Medac, Novartis, Gilead, Celgene BMS, Miltenyi, Jazz, Riemser, Amgen, Servier. GWB—Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/BMS and FamicordTx. HB—Novartis and Celgene. CB—Intellia Therapeutics, TxCell, Novartis, GSK, Molmed, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi, Kiadis, QuellTx, Janssen, Allogene. CC—Sanofi SA, Miltenyi Biotech, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Novartis, Celgene, Terumo BCT, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Janssen. RE—Kite Gilead, BMS Celgene, Janssen. FSG—Novartis, Kite/Gilead, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Incyte, Amgen, Takeda, and Roche. UJ—Novartis, Janssen, Gilead, BMS, Miltenyi. MH—T-CURX GmbH. MJK—BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Roche. UK—AstraZeneca, Affimed, Glycostem, GammaDelta, Zelluna. JK—Novartis, Miltenyi Biotech, Gadeta, Gilead/BMS. SM—Celgene/BMS, Novartis, DNA Prime SA, Gilead/KITE, Miltenyi, Immunicum. MM—Sanofi, Jazz, Amgen, Takeda, Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Astellas, Pfizer, Stemline, GSK, outside the submitted work. JM—Kite/Gilead, Jazz, Janssen, and Mallinckrodt. CR—Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/BMS, Janssen. RS—Novartis, Gilead, Janssen. JAS—Gilead, Jazz, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Medac. JS—MSD, Gilead, Pfizer, Kite, Novartis, TEVA. MS—Amgen, Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Morphosys, Roche, Seattle Genetics, BMS, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Novartis. CT—BMS/Celgene, Abbvie, Takeda, Roche, Novartis, Gilead/Kyte, Incyte, Novartis, Cellectis, Amgen, Sanofi, Janssen, AstraZeneca, ADC Therapeutics. MT—Gilead/KITE, Regeneron, Roche, Novartis, Janssen, Celgene/BMS. JGG—Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Morphosys, Novartis, Takeda. NK—AOP Phama, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Neovii, JAZZ, Gilead/Kite, Celgene, Riemser. HE—Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Amgen, Sanofi, GSK, Novartis, Takeda. IY-A—Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/BMS and Janssen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is considerable heterogeneity in processing of stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation across Europe. The Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT)-Joint Accreditation Committee International Society for Cellular Therapy and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) (JACIE) standards provide minimum guidelines that, however, leave room for significant variations in practices at the individual transplantation center (TC)., Methods: To better understand the extent of heterogeneity in storage conditions, quality controls (QCs), graft processing and disposal, a questionnaire was developed, reviewed by the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party (CTIWP) and sent to all EBMT TCs., Results: In this study, 288 TCs from 46 countries (32 European, 14 associated) responded to the survey. Long-term storage is performed mainly either in liquid nitrogen or in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; 58% of centers). In case of microbiological contamination, most TCs make a case-by-case decision in collaboration with the clinicians. CD34+ counts are performed routinely either before and/or after thawing. Some centers perform additional QCs. DMSO is generally not removed (83%) and the graft is thawed at the bedside (68%) in a water bath (78%). There is heterogeneity between the centers regarding duration of storage and graft disposal., Discussion: Overall, this survey demonstrates that the majority of responding TCs uses standardized procedures (intracenter standardization). However, significant intercenter variations persist, which warrant further standardization and investigations on clinical and financial consequences. Additionally, efforts should be undertaken to provide more specific international guidelines on storage duration and graft disposal, which may also have an important impact on health care services worldwide., (Copyright © 2017 International Society for Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is increasingly used for severe autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, but the mechanisms involved have yet to be elucidated. In this issue of Blood, Delemarre et al report their findings in both animal and human models which provide insights into restoration of functionality and diversity within the regulatory T-cell (Treg) compartment following HSCT.

Context: The cumulative impact of disease and treatment-related factors on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in long-term survivors of multiple myeloma is poorly characterized., Objectives: To characterize HRQoL and symptom burden in advanced, intensively treated myeloma., Methods: We performed detailed assessments in patients who had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and subsequent treatment for at least one episode of progressive disease. To exclude the impact of active disease and acute toxicity of treatment, patients were in a stable plateau phase. Patients were assessed for HRQoL (Short Form-12, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, and Multiple Myeloma Module), pain (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form), peripheral neuropathy (self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs), and concerns (adapted from Profile of Concerns). Serum interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were measured., Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 55 years at diagnosis and 60 years at assessment. After a median 5.5 years from diagnosis and three lines of treatment, physical functioning was significantly compromised (P<0.001) and associated with progressive work disability and concerns regarding loss of independence. Fatigue and pain were the predominant symptoms, impacting negatively on physical functioning (P<0.001). Pain was predominantly neuropathic in half the patients. Serum interleukin-6 levels positively correlated with pain (P=0.03), pain interference (P=0.003), insomnia (P=0.02), and appetite loss (P=0.02), and inversely correlated with physical functioning (P=0.03)., Conclusion: Despite disease control and supportive care, intensively treated long-term myeloma survivors have significantly compromised HRQoL related to symptom burden. Systematic assessment is routinely indicated in advanced phase myeloma, even when disease activity is stable. Further studies should investigate the utility of interventional strategies and the relationship of cytokines with symptoms., (Copyright © 2013 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). However, there is currently little information on the predictors of outcome for patients whose disease recurs after ASCT., Methods: Five hundred and eleven adult patients with relapsed HL after ASCT from EBMT-GITMO databases were reviewed., Results: Treatments administered following ASCT failure included conventional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in 294 (64%) patients, second ASCT in 35 (8%), and alloSCT in 133 (29%). After a median follow-up of 49 months, overall survival (OS) was 32% at 5 years. Independent risk factors for OS were early relapse (<6 months) after ASCT, stage IV, bulky disease, poor performance status (PS), and age ≥50 years at relapse. For patients with no risk factors OS at 5 years was 62% compared with 37% and 12% for those having 1 and ≥2 factors, respectively. This score was also predictive for outcome in each group of rescue treatment after ASCT failure., Conclusion(s): Early relapse, stage IV, bulky disease, poor PS, and age ≥50 years at ASCT failure are relevant factors for outcome that may help to understand the results of different therapeutic approaches.

Strategies that augment a GVL effect without increasing the risk of GVHD are required to improve the outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Azacitidine (AZA) up-regulates the expression of tumor Ags on leukemic blasts in vitro and expands the numbers of immunomodulatory T regulatory cells (Tregs) in animal models. Reasoning that AZA might selectively augment a GVL effect, we studied the immunologic sequelae of AZA administration after allogeneic SCT. Twenty-seven patients who had undergone a reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia were treated with monthly courses of AZA, and CD8(+) T-cell responses to candidate tumor Ags and circulating Tregs were measured. AZA after transplantation was well tolerated, and its administration was associated with a low incidence of GVHD. Administration of AZA increased the number of Tregs within the first 3 months after transplantation compared with a control population (P = .0127). AZA administration also induced a cytotoxic CD8(+) T-cell response to several tumor Ags, including melanoma-associated Ag 1, B melanoma antigen 1, and Wilm tumor Ag 1. These data support the further examination of AZA after transplantation as a mechanism of augmenting a GVL effect without a concomitant increase in GVHD.