Search

Objectives: Placement of a standard paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) requires a laminotomy for positioning of the lead within the epidural space. During initial placement, an additional laminotomy or laminectomy, termed a "skip" laminotomy, may be necessary at a higher level to pass the lead to the appropriate midline position. Patient and radiographic factors that predict the need for a skip laminotomy have yet to be identified., Materials and Methods: Participants who underwent SCS paddle placement at Albany Medical Center between 2016 and 2017 were identified. Operative reports were reviewed to identify the paddle type, level of initial laminotomy, target level, and skip laminotomy level. Preoperative thoracic magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were reviewed, and spinal canal diameter, interpedicular distance, and dorsal cerebral spinal fluid thickness were measured for each participant when available., Results: A total of 106 participants underwent thoracic SCS placement. Of these, 97 had thoracic MRIs available for review. Thirty-eight participants required a skip laminotomy for placement of the paddle compared with 68 participants who did not. There was no significant difference in demographic features including age, sex, body mass index, and surgical history. Univariate analyses that suggested trends were selected for further analysis using binary logistic regression. Level of initial laminotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, p = 0.028), spinal canal diameter (OR = 0.71, p = 0.015), and dorsal cerebrospinal fluid thickness (OR = 0.61, p = 0.011) were correlated with skip laminotomy. Target level (OR = 1.27, p = 0.138) and time from trial (1.01, p = 0.117) suggested potential association. The multivariate regression was statistically significant, X 2 (10) = 28.02, p = 0.002. The model explained 38.3% of the variance (Nagelkerke R 2 ) and predicted skip laminectomy correctly in 73.3% of cases. However, for the multivariate regression, only a decrease in spinal canal diameter (OR = 0.59, p = 0.041) was associated with a greater odds of skip laminotomy., Conclusions: This study aims to characterize the patient and radiographic factors that may predict the need to perform a skip laminotomy during the initial placement of SCS paddles. Here, we show that radiographic and anatomic variables, primarily spinal canal diameter, play an important role in predicting the need for a skip laminotomy. Furthermore, we suggest that target level for placement and level of initial laminotomy also may contribute. Further investigation of the predictive factors for performing a skip laminotomy would help optimize surgical planning and preoperative patient selection and counseling., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Julie G. Pilitsis is a consultant for Medtronic and Saluda and receives grant support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2R01CA166379-06, 3U54EB 015408-09, and NIH U44NS115111. She is the medical advisor for Aim Medical Robotics and has stock equity. The remaining authors reported no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment modality for chronic pain conditions for which other treatment modalities have failed to provide relief. Ample prospective studies exist supporting its indications for use and overall efficacy. However, less is known about how SCS is used at the population level. Our objective is to understand the demographics, clinical characteristics, and utilization patterns of open and percutaneous SCS procedures., Materials and Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample data base of 2016-2019 was queried for cases of percutaneous or open placement (through laminotomy/laminectomy) of SCS (excluding SCS trials) using International Classification of Disease (ICD), 10th revision, procedure coding system. Baseline demographic characteristics, complications, ICD-Clinical Modification, Diagnosis Related Group, length of stay (LOS), and yearly implementation data were collected. Complications and outcomes were evaluated in total and between the open and percutaneous SCS groups., Results: A total of 2455 inpatients had an SCS placed, of whom 1970 (80.2%) received SCS through open placement. Placement of open SCS was associated with Caucasian race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.671, p < 0.001), private insurance (OR = 1.332, p = 0.02), and age more than 65 years (OR = 1.25, p = 0.034). The most common diagnosis was failed back surgery syndrome (23.8%). Patients with percutaneous SCS were more likely to have a hospital stay of < 1 day (OR = 2.318; 95% CI, 1.586-3.387; p < 0.001). Implant complications during the inpatient stay were positively associated with open SCS placement and reported in 9.4% of these cases (OR = 3.247, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Patients who underwent open SCS placement were more likely to be older, Caucasian, and privately insured. Open SCS placement showed greater LOS and implant-related complications during their hospital stay. These findings highlight both potential socioeconomic disparities in health care access for chronic pain relief and the importance of increasing age and medical comorbidities as important factors that can influence SCS implants in the inpatient setting., (Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Some patients with chronic pain and implanted spinal cord stimulators or intrathecal (IT) pumps fail to obtain significant pain relief. The use of dual modality treatment with both therapies is understudied. This study evaluated comprehensive outcomes in this patient population and reported outcomes primarily using IT ziconotide., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients with chronic pain treated with both spinal cord stimulation and IT therapy. When a primary treatment failed to achieve significant pain relief, a secondary device was trialed and implanted. Pain severity (measured by a numeric rating scale) was assessed by the change from baseline to after the first and second intervention. In a subset of patients (n = 6), quality-of-life metrics were also assessed. Outcome measures were analyzed closest to the 1-year follow-up date after implantation of the first modality and then at the most recent follow-up after implantation of the second modality., Results: Spinal cord stimulation leads were percutaneous (n = 2) or paddles (n = 9) and commonly covered T8-10. IT medication included ziconotide (n = 8), baclofen (n = 1), hydromorphone (n = 1), and morphine/clonidine (n = 1). There was a mean of 19.64 ± 3.17 months between primary and secondary intervention. There was a significant improvement in pain severity from baseline to implantation of the second modality (P = 0.032) at a mean follow-up of 50.18 ± 11.83 months., Conclusions: Dual modality therapy is a potential treatment option in patients who have lost efficacy with a single neuromodulation modality. Further study is required to identify potential responders and nonresponders., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)