Search

Summary: Deep learning-based neuroimaging pipelines for acute stroke typically rely on image registration, which not only increases computation but also introduces a point of failure. In this paper, we propose a general-purpose contrastive self-supervised learning method that converts a convolutional deep neural network designed for registered images to work on a different input domain, i.e., with unregistered images. This is accomplished by using a self-supervised strategy that does not rely on labels, where the original model acts as a teacher and a new network as a student. Large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection experiments using computed tomographic angiography (CTA) data from 402 CTA patients show the student model achieving competitive LVO detection performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.88 vs. AUC = 0.81) compared to the teacher model, even with unregistered images. The student model trained directly on unregistered images using standard supervised learning achieves an AUC = 0.63, highlighting the proposed method’s efficacy in adapting models to different pipelines and domains.

Summary: Automated tools to detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke patients using brain computed tomography angiography (CTA) have been shown to reduce the time for treatment, leading to better clinical outcomes. There is a lot of information in a single CTA and deep learning models do not have an obvious way of being conditioned on areas most relevant for LVO detection, i.e., the vasculature structure. In this work, we compare and contrast strategies to make convolutional neural networks focus on the vasculature without discarding context information of the brain parenchyma and propose an attention-inspired strategy to encourage this. We use brain CTAs from which we obtain 3D vasculature images. Then, we compare ways of combining the vasculature and the CTA images using a general-purpose network trained to detect LVO. The results show that the proposed strategies allow to improve LVO detection and could potentially help to learn other cerebrovascular-related tasks.

Background and Aims: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a fibroinflammatory syndrome of the pancreas associated with pain and poor quality of life. It has toxic and genetic risk factors but can also be idiopathic. The natural history of idiopathic CP (ICP) is not well-known. Therefore, we studied clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients followed in our Pancreas Center. Methods: Review of CP patients between January 1, 2016, and April 30, 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on diagnosis, ICP vs non-ICP. CP patients with a smoking history were placed in the non-ICP group. Statistical analysis was performed to identify differences in demographics, comorbidities, complications, controlled medications, and resource utilization. Results: Out of 450 patients, 101 (22%) were diagnosed with ICP and 349 (78%) were non-ICP. ICP patients were mainly female (59.4% vs 40.5%; P = .005), had less comorbid anxiety (10.5% vs 22.1%; P = .002), depression (24.2% vs 35.8%; P < .001), disability (13% vs 16.3%; P = .021), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (45.3% vs 62.6%; P = .004), splanchnic vein thrombosis (1.04% vs 14.9%; P < .001), pseudocysts (16.7% vs 41.6%; P < .001), and biliary obstruction (3.12% vs 19.2%; P < .001). They underwent less abdominal imaging (2.63 vs 3.42; P = .048) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (0.88 vs 1.32; P = .030). They also had less opioid use (29.6% vs 54.4%; P < .001), gabapentinoid use (34% vs 52.3%; P = .002), and celiac blocks (7.22% vs 16.1%; P < .041). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the clinical course of ICP is less morbid compared to non-ICP. This study specifically removes smoking, a significant risk factor for CP, to study a truly idiopathic cohort.

Acute ischemic stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the world. Treatment decisions, especially around emergent revascularization procedures, rely heavily on size and location of the infarct core. Currently, accurate assessment of this measure is challenging. While MRI-DWI is considered the gold standard, its availability is limited for most patients suffering from stroke. Another well-studied imaging modality is CT-Perfusion (CTP) which is much more common than MRI-DWI in acute stroke care, but not as precise as MRI-DWI, and it is still unavailable in many stroke hospitals. A method to determine infarct core using CT-Angiography (CTA), a much more available imaging modality albeit with significantly less contrast in stroke core area than CTP or MRI-DWI, would enable significantly better treatment decisions for stroke patients throughout the world.Existing deep-learning-based approaches for stroke core estimation have to face the trade-off between voxel-level segmentation / image-level labels and the difficulty of obtaining large enough samples of high-quality DWI images. The former occurs when algorithms can either output voxel-level labeling which is more informative but requires a significant effort by annotators, or image-level labels that allow for much simpler labeling of the images but results in less informative and interpretable output; the latter is a common issue that forces training either on small training sets using DWI as the target or larger, but noisier, dataset using CT-Perfusion (CTP) as the target.In this work, we present a deep learning approach including a new weighted gradient-based approach to obtain stroke core segmentation with image-level labeling, specifically the size of the acute stroke core volume. Additionally, this strategy allows us to train using labels derived from CTP estimations.We find that the proposed approach outperforms segmentation approaches trained on voxel-level data and the CTP estimation themselves.

In stroke care, the extent of irreversible brain injury, termed infarct core, plays a key role in determining eligibility for acute treatments, such as intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies. Many of the pivotal randomized clinical trials testing those therapies used MRI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) or CT Perfusion (CTP) to define infarct core. Unfortunately, these modalities are not available 24/7 outside of large stroke centers. As such, there is a need for accurate infarct core determination using faster and more widely available imaging modalities including Non-Contrast CT (NCCT) and CT Angiography (CTA).Prior studies have suggested that CTA provides improved predictions of infarct core relative to NCCT; however, this assertion has never been numerically quantified by automatic medical image computing pipelines using acquisition protocols not confounded by different scanner manufacturers, or other protocol settings such as exposure times, kilovoltage peak, or imprecision due to contrast bolus delays. In addition, single-phase CTA protocols are at present designed to optimize contrast opacification in the arterial phase. This approach works well to maximize the sensitivity to detect vessel occlusions, however, it may not be the ideal timing to enhance the ischemic infarct core signal (ICS).In this work, we propose an image analysis pipeline on CT-based images of 88 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients drawn from a single dynamic acquisition protocol acquired at the acute ischemic phase. We use the first scan at the time of the dynamic acquisition as a proxy for NCCT, and the rest of the scans as a proxy for CTA scans, with bolus imaged at different brain enhancement phases. Thus, we use the terms “NCCT” and “CTA” to refer to them. This pipeline enables us to answer the questions “Does the injection of bolus enhance the infarct core signal?” and “What is the ideal bolus timing to enhance the infarct core signal?” without being influenced by aforementioned factors such as scanner model, acquisition settings, contrast bolus delay, and human reader errors. We use reference MRI DWI images acquired after successful recanalization acting as our gold standard for infarct core.The ICS is quantified by calculating the difference in intensity distribution between the infarct core region and its symmetrical healthy counterpart on the contralateral hemisphere of the brain using a metric derived from information theory, the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KL divergence). We compare the ICS provided by NCCT and CTA and retrieve the optimal timing of CTA bolus to maximize the ICS.In our experiments, we numerically confirm that CTAs provide greater ICS compared to NCCT. Then, we find that, on average, the ideal CTA acquisition time to maximize the ICS is not the current target of standard CTA protocols, i.e., during the peak of arterial enhancement, but a few seconds afterward (median of 3 s; 95% CI [1.5, 3.0]). While there are other studies comparing the prediction potential of ischemic infarct core from NCCT and CTA images, to the best of our knowledge, this analysis is the first to perform a quantitative comparison of the ICS among CT based scans, with and without bolus injection, acquired using the same scanning sequence and a precise characterization of the bolus uptake, hence, reducing potential confounding factors.