1. Half-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulation Versus Standard Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.
- Author
-
Della Rocca DG, Magnocavallo M, Di Biase L, Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Tarantino N, Gianni C, Lavalle C, Van Niekerk CJ, Romero J, Briceño DF, Bassiouny M, Al-Ahmad A, Burkhardt JD, Natale VN, Gallinghouse GJ, Del Prete A, Forleo GB, Sanchez J, Lakkireddy D, Horton RP, Gibson DN, and Natale A
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants adverse effects, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents adverse effects, Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Atrial Appendage diagnostic imaging, Atrial Fibrillation complications, Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis, Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy, Stroke diagnosis, Stroke etiology, Stroke prevention & control
- Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the long-term efficacy of a standard antithrombotic strategy versus half-dose direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) after Watchman implantation., Background: No consensus currently exists on the selection of the most effective antithrombotic strategy to prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT) in patients undergoing endocardial left atrial appendage closure., Methods: After successful left atrial appendage closure, consecutive patients were prescribed a standard antithrombotic strategy (SAT) or long-term half-dose DOAC (hdDOAC). The primary composite endpoint was DRT and thromboembolic (TE) and bleeding events., Results: Overall, 555 patients (mean age 75 ± 8 years, 63% male; median CHA
2 DS2 -VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category] score 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-6]; median HAS-BLED [hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol] score 3 [IQR: 2-4]) were included. Patients were categorized into 2 groups (SAT: n = 357 vs hdDOAC: n = 198). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. The median follow-up duration was 13 months (IQR: 12-15 months). DRT occurred in 12 (2.1%) patients, all in the SAT group (3.4% vs 0.0%; log-rank P = 0.009). The risk of nonprocedural major bleeding was significantly more favorable in the hdDOAC group (0.5% vs. 3.9%; log-rank P = 0.018). The rate of the primary composite endpoint of DRT and TE and major bleeding events was 9.5% in SAT patients and 1.0% in hdDOAC patients (HR: 9.8; 95% CI: 2.3-40.7; P = 0.002)., Conclusions: After successful Watchman implantation, long-term half-dose DOAC significantly reduced the risk of the composite endpoint of DRT and TE and major bleeding events compared with a standard, antiplatelet-based, antithrombotic therapy., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Di Biase has served as a consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Stereotaxis, and St. Jude Medical; and has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic, Atricure, EPiEP, and Biotronik. Dr Burkhardt has served as a consultant for Biosense Webster and Stereotaxis. Dr Gibson has served as a consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr Natale has received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, St. Jude Medical, Biotronik, and Medtronic; and has served as a consultant for Biosense Webster, St. Jude Medical, and Janssen. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF