Search

Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), in combination with aromatase inhibitors, are United States Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2 - ) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The effectiveness of continuing them beyond first disease progression (PD) is currently unknown. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of the continuation of CDK4/6i beyond first PD in HR + /HER2 - MBC using real-world experience., Patients and Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of patients with HR + MBC who received CDK4/6is from 2015 to 2018 and where CDK4/6is were continued beyond first PD. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) after initial PD on CDK4/6i therapy., Results: Thirty women with HR + /HER2 - MBC met eligibility criteria. Patients were identified from a prospective database of patients at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation who were prescribed CDK4/6is. The median age and follow-up duration were 47.5 years and 27 months, respectively. Most patients received palbociclib (PA)/letrozole as initial therapy (67%), followed by PA/fulvestrant (23%), and PA/other aromatase inhibitor (20%), and abemaciclib with either fulvestrant or letrozole (6%). As of January 31, 2019, 25 (83.3%) patients were still alive, and 19 (63%) patients had progressed. The estimated median PFS for continued CDK4/6i use beyond the first PD was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.34-13.13 months)., Conclusions: Among a small cohort of patients with HR + MBC in a non-clinical trial setting, continuation of CDK4/6i-endocrine treatment post initial PD was associated with a median PFS of about 12 months. Formal randomized clinical trials evaluating the continuation of CDK4/6is beyond the first PD are currently ongoing and will provide more answers to this important clinical question., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recently published clinical trial data have produced compelling evidence for increased survival when Herceptin is administered to patients whose tumors are HER2 amplified. Therefore, the accuracy of HER2 status is essential to determine which patients should or should not receive Herceptin. Although HER2 results obtained by FISH and IHC are often in agreement, there is a persistent group of cases in which results are discordant, particularly among tumors with intermediate results. A multivariable analysis was undertaken to determine relative significance of various clinical and pathologic findings for patients diagnosed with infiltrating ductal carcinoma, and a data model was produced that predicts which patients are most likely to have HER2 amplified tumors. Correlates of HER2 amplification were higher Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade, younger age at diagnosis, and a comedo ductal carcinoma in situ component.