1. Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes.
- Author
-
Tam PCK, Alexander BD, Lee MJ, Hardie RG, Reynolds JM, Haney JC, Waites KB, Perfect JR, and Baker AW
- Subjects
- Humans, Prospective Studies, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Prognosis, Adult, Risk Factors, Respiratory Tract Infections microbiology, Respiratory Tract Infections diagnosis, Respiratory Tract Infections etiology, Postoperative Complications microbiology, Postoperative Complications diagnosis, Donor Selection, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid microbiology, Lung Transplantation adverse effects, Ureaplasma Infections diagnosis, Ureaplasma Infections microbiology, Mycoplasma Infections diagnosis, Mycoplasma Infections microbiology, Tissue Donors, Ureaplasma isolation & purification, Transplant Recipients
- Abstract
Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species are urogenital mollicutes that can cause serious donor-derived infections in lung transplant recipients. Best practices for mollicute screening remain unknown. We conducted a single-center prospective study analyzing lung transplants performed from October 5, 2020, to September 25, 2021, whereby donor and recipient bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples obtained at time of transplant underwent mollicute screening via culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 115 total lung transplants performed, 99 (86%) donors underwent combined mollicute BAL culture and PCR testing. The study cohort included these 99 donors and their matched recipients. In total, 18 (18%) of 99 donors screened positive via culture or PCR. Among recipients, 92 (93%) of 99 had perioperative BAL screening performed, and only 3 (3%) had positive results. After transplant, 9 (9%) recipients developed mollicute infection. Sensitivity of donor screening in predicting recipient mollicute infection was 67% (6/9) via culture and 56% (5/9) via PCR. Positive predictive value for donor culture was 75% (6/8), compared with 33% (5/15) for PCR. Donor screening via culture predicted all serious recipient mollicute infections and had better positive predictive value than PCR; however, neither screening test predicted all mollicute infections. Independent of screening results, clinicians should remain suspicious for posttransplant mollicute infection., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF