Search

Objective: There are limited studies on uveal melanoma and patient quality of life. However, the burden of implementing a patient-reported outcome measure to collect this information in a clinical setting is unknown. The objectives of this study were (i) to understand the issues of quality of life that are most important to patients undergoing treatment for uveal melanoma, (ii) to explore patient views on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's (EORTC) ophthalmic oncology quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-OPT30), and (iii) to assess patient willingness to complete questionnaires measuring quality of life on an ongoing basis., Design: This was a qualitative study., Participants: The study included 10 patients treated for uveal melanoma with brachytherapy at the Alberta Ocular Brachytherapy Program, with a mean follow-up period of 16.3 months (range 5-33 months) after diagnosis., Methods: The participants completed a qualitative interview over the phone with a trained interviewer between November 2014 and January 2015. Participants completed the QLQ-OPT30 according to their current symptoms and then elaborated on their responses. The participants then completed a semistructured interview to provide more information about the symptoms or issues that had the most impact on quality of life., Results: The participants expressed positive feelings about the QLQ-OPT30; however, the participants' responses revealed that several themes, including mental health, impact of diagnosis and treatment on family, travel and financial burdens of treatment, and impact on work and home life, were missing in the questionnaire., Conclusions: The QLQ-OPT30 performed well, but some missing constructs were identified. Furthermore, participants took 23 minutes to complete the QLQ-OPT30 with a trained interviewer, and this could present logistical challenges when using it at the point of care., (Copyright © 2017 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients undergoing enucleation for uveal melanoma need to be informed of the possibility of phantom eye syndrome (PES). The number with uveal melanoma in PES studies has been small. Aims were to: (1) determine the prevalence, symptoms, and characteristics of PES and to test associations of PES symptoms with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; (2) examine the interrelatedness of PES symptoms; and (3) explore the emotional valence of PES and the relationship to anxiety and depression., Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire., Participants: Patients (n = 179) with uveal melanoma enucleated 4 to 52 months previously., Methods: Questionnaire on PES. Responses to a routine audit of mood obtained from clinical records., Main Outcome Measures: Patients were asked about 3 symptoms: pain, visual sensations, and a feeling of seeing through the removed eye. Mood was assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale., Results: Of 179 respondents, 108 (60.3%) experienced symptoms: 86 reported (48%) visual sensations, 50 reported (28%) seeing, and 42 reported (23%) pain; 14 (7.8%) reported all 3 symptoms. At the time of the questionnaire, 31 (17%) experienced 1 or more symptoms daily. Women were more likely to report pain (odds ratio [OR], 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-4.40). Younger patients at enucleation were more likely to report pain (t = 4.13; degrees of freedom (df), 177; P < 0.001) and visual sensations (t = 2.11; df, 177; P < 0.05). Patients studied sooner after enucleation were more likely to report seeing (Mann-Whitney U, 2343; P < 0.05). Pain and seeing were intercorrelated (chi-square, 5.47; Φ = 0.18; df, 1; P < 0.05), pain with visual sensations (chi-square, 3.91; Φ = 0.15; df, 1; P < 0.05) and seeing with visual sensations (chi-square, 34.22; Φ = 0.45; df, 1; P < 0.001). Twenty of 108 patients (18.5%) found symptoms disturbing, and 21 of 108 (19.4%) pleasurable. Patients reporting pain were more anxious (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.38-9.03) and depressed (OR, 13.26; 95% CI, 3.87-46.21)., Conclusions: Patients should be informed of PES symptoms. Pain may indicate anxiety or depression; this needs research to determine cause and effect., (Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We describe the psychological reactions after diagnosis and treatment of the malignant intraocular tumors: uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma. The chapter on uveal melanoma includes general consideration on the treatment of these tumors, the psychological effects on the patients, the professional and social problems, the follow-up after treatment and the results of recent studies on quality of life. For retinoblastoma we describe the treatments and results with the risk of second cancer, the follow-up of the patients, the psychological problems for parents and children and the specificity of the familial cases.