Search

International audience; Growth-preserving spinal surgery suffer from high complications rate. A recent bipolar instrumentation using two anchoring points (thoracic and pelvic) showed lower rates, but its biomechanical behaviour has not been characterised yet. The aim of this work was to combine in vitro and in vivo data to improve and validate a finite element model (FEM) of the spine, and to apply it to compare bipolar and classical all-screws implants.Spinal segments were tested in vitro to measure range of motion (ROM). Thoracic segments were also tested with bipolar instrumentation to measure ROM and rod strain using a strain gage.A subject-specific FEM of the spine, pelvis and ribcage of an in vivo asymptomatic subject was built. Spinal segments were extracted from it to reproduce the in-vitro mechanical tests. Experimental and simulated ROM and rod strain were compared. Then, the full trunk FEM was used to compare bipolar and all-screws instrumentations.The FEM fell within 1° of the experimental corridors, and both in silico and in vitro instrumentation rods showed 0.01% maximal axial strain. Bipolar and all-screws constructs had similar maximal Von Mises stresses.This work represents a first step towards subject-specific simulation to evaluate spinal constructs for neuromuscular scoliosis in children.

The scapholunate joint is one of the keystones of the wrist kinematics, and its study is difficult due to the carpal bones size and the richness of surrounding ligaments. We propose a new method of quantitative assessment of scapholunate kinematics through bone motion tracking in order to investigate scapholunate ligament lesion as well as repair techniques. On 6 intact wrists, steel beads were inserted into the bones of interest to track their motions. Experimental set up allowed wrist flexion extension and radio-ulnar deviation motions. Low-dose bi-planar radiographs were performed each 10° of movement for different configurations: 1) intact wrist, 2) scapholunate ligament division, 3) repair by soft anchors at the posterior then 4) anterior part. Beads' 3D coordinates were computed at each position from biplanar X-Rays, allowing accurate registration of each wrist bone. The Monte Carlo sensitivity study showed accuracy between 0.2° and 1.6 ° for the scaphoid and the lunate in motions studied. The maximum flexion-extension range of motion of the scaphoid significantly decreased after anterior repair from 73° in injured wrist to 62.7°. The proposed protocol appears robust, and the tracking allowed to quantify the anchor's influence on the wrist kinematics. ZimmerBiomet, Biomecam Chair program on subject specific musculoskeletal modelling.

International audience; Cervical traumas are among the most common events leading to serious spinal cord injuries. While models are often used to better understand injury mechanisms, experimental data for their validation remain sparse, particularly regarding articular facets. The aim of this study was to assess the behavior of cervical FSUs under quasi-static flexion with a specific focus on facet tracking. 9 cadaveric cervical FSUs were imaged and loaded under a 10 Nm flexion moment, exerted incrementally, while biplanar X-rays were acquired at each load increment. The relative vertebral and facet rotations and displacements were assessed using radio-opaque markers implanted in each vertebra and CT-based reconstructions registered on the radiographs. The only failures obtained were due to specimen preparation, indicating a failure moment of cervical FSUs greater than 10 Nm in quasistatic flexion. Facet motions displayed a consistent anterior sliding and a variable pattern regarding their normal displacement. The present study offers insight on the behavior of cervical FSUs under quasi-static flexion beyond physiological thresholds with accurate facet tracking. The data provided should prove useful to further understand injury mechanisms and validate models.

Background The aim of the present study is to propose a subject-specific biomechanical control model for the estimation of active cervical spine muscle forces. Methods The proprioception-based regulation model developed by Pomero et al. (2004) for the lumbar spine was adapted to the cervical spine. The model assumption is that the control strategy drives muscular activation to maintain the spinal joint load below the physiological threshold, thus avoiding excessive intervertebral displacements. Model evaluation was based on the comparison with the results of two reference studies. The effect of the uncertainty on the main model input parameters on the predicted force pattern was assessed. The feasibility of building this subject-specific model was illustrated with a case study of one subject. Findings The model muscle force predictions, although independent from EMG recordings, were consistent with the available literature, with mean differences of 20%. Spinal loads generally remained below the physiological thresholds. Moreover, the model behavior was found robust against the uncertainty on the muscle orientation, with a maximum coefficient of variation (CV) of 10%. Interpretation After full validation, this model should offer a relevant and efficient tool for the biomechanical and clinical study of the cervical spine, which might improve the understanding of cervical spine disorders.

Background: Hip instability is frequent in patients with Down syndrome. Recent studies have suggested that skeletal hip alterations are responsible for this instability; however, there are currently no studies simultaneously assessing femoral and acetabular anatomy in subjects with Down syndrome in the standing position. The aim was to analyze the three-dimensional anatomy of the Down syndrome hip in standing position. Methods: Down syndrome subjects were age and sex-matched to asymptomatic controls. All subjects underwent full body biplanar X-rays with three-dimensional reconstructions of their pelvises and lower limbs. Parameter means and distributions were compared between the two groups. Findings: Forty-one Down syndrome and 41 control subjects were recruited. Acetabular abduction (mean=52° [SD=9°] vs. mean=56° [SD=8°]) and anteversion (mean=14° [SD=8°] vs. mean=17.5° [SD=5°]) as well as posterior acetabular sector angle (mean=91° [SD=7°] vs. mean=94° [SD=7°]) were significantly lower in Down syndrome subjects compared to controls (P < 0.01). Anterior acetabular sector angle (mean=62° [SD=10°] vs. mean=59° [SD=7°]; P < 0.01) was significantly higher in Down syndrome compared to controls. The distributions of acetabular anteversion (P=0.002;V=0.325), femoral anteversion (P=0.004;V=0.309) and the instability index (P < 0.001;V=0.383) were significantly different between the two groups, with subjects with Down syndrome having both increased anteversion and retroversion for each of these parameters. Interpretation: Subjects with Down syndrome were found to have a significantly altered and more heterogeneous anatomy of their proximal hips compared to controls. This heterogeneity suggests that treatment strategies of hip instability in Down syndrome should be subject-specific and should rely on the understanding of the underlying three-dimensional anatomy of each patient. This research was funded by the University of Saint-Joseph (grant# FM183). The authors did not receive any external funding for this study

International audience; Clinical problems of the human spine have a high prevalence, affecting more than 25.5 million people in 2012. Older adults, in particular, are susceptible to degenerative spine disorders such as deformities or osteoporosis. A basic requirement for proper management of various spinal disorders, effective injury prevention, and rehabilitation is a detailed knowledge of the fundamental biomechanics of the spine. Despite growing interest in biomechanical research on the spine during the last decades, however, many clinical problems remain largely unsolved, because of poor understanding of the underlying degeneration phenomena and the complexity of the spinal construct. In particular, diagnosis is challenging, because of the lack of tools to quantitatively assess soft tissue alteration, and because the most relevant clinical indices for diagnosis are not clearly established. Driven by ever-growing computer power and imaging devices, the development of FE models has become widespread, allowing scientists to overcome some of the existing shortcomings (invasiveness, complexity of the organization of the biological tissues, and complexity of establishing the loads present in the human spine, for example). These have emerged as powerful and reliable tools with considerable applications in surgery planning, in studying the etiology, progression, and effects of spinal deformities and intervertebral discs. These models have enhanced our understanding of the spine and will continue to do so. In our group, numerical work performed using FE modeling has highlighted the paramount influence of both geometric patient-specific modeling and in vivo personalization of tissue mechanical properties. Among the many exciting avenues for future research is the question of the validation of computational modeling and simulation with the perspective of supporting the development of medical devices.

Rotator cuff (RC) tears may be associated with increased glenohumeral instability; however, this instability is difficult to quantify using currently available diagnostic tools. Recently, the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and registration method of the scapula and humeral head, based on sequences of low-dose biplane X-ray images, has been proposed for glenohumeral displacement assessment. This research aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of this technique and to investigate its potential with a preliminary application comparing RC tear patients and asymptomatic volunteers. Accuracy was assessed using CT scan model registration on biplane X-ray images for five cadaveric shoulder specimens and showed differences ranging from 0.6 to 1.4 mm depending on the direction of interest. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was assessed through two operators who repeated the reconstruction of five subjects three times, allowing defining 95% confidence interval ranging from ±1.8 to ±3.6 mm. Intraclass correlation coefficient varied between 0.84 and 0.98. Comparison between RC tear patients and asymptomatic volunteers showed differences of glenohumeral displacements, especially in the superoinferior direction when shoulder was abducted at 20 and 45 . This study thus assessed the accuracy of the low-dose 3D biplane X-ray reconstruction technique for glenohumeral displacement assessment and showed potential in biomechanical and clinical research. Fondation Paris-Tech Programme BIOMECAM Chaire ParisTech Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité du Travail du Québec Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Fonds de Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies du Québec Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec, EOS Imaging, and French pôle de compétitivité MEDICEN (STEREOS + program).

Recent progress in 3D scanning technologies allows easy access to 3D human body envelope. To create personalized human models with an articulated linkage for realistic re-posturing and motion analyses, an accurate estimation of internal skeleton points, including joint centers, from the external envelope is required. For this research project, 3D reconstructions of both internal skeleton and external envelope from low dose biplanar X-rays of 40 male adults were obtained. Using principal component analysis technique (PCA), a low-dimensional dataset was used to predict internal points of the upper body from the trunk envelope. A least squares method was used to find PC scores that fit the PCA-based model to the envelope of a new subject. To validate the proposed approach, estimated internal points were evaluated using a leave-one-out (LOO) procedure, i.e. successively considering each individual from our dataset as an extra-subject. In addition, different methods were proposed to reduce the variability in data and improve the performance of the PCA-based prediction. The best method was considered as the one providing the smallest errors between estimated and reference internal points with an average error of 8.3 mm anterior?posteriorly, 6.7 mm laterally and 6.5 mm vertically. As the proposed approach relies on few or no bony landmarks, it could be easily applicable and generalizable to surface scans from any devices. Combined with automatic body scanning techniques, this study could potentially constitute a new step towards automatic generation of external/internal subject-specific manikins. The clinical data used in this study were provided by the LBM/ Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak,Arts et Métiers ParisTech,Paris.The authors thank theParisTechBiomecAM chair program on subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling, and in particular COVEA and Société Générale.

International audience; Body segment parameters (BSP) for each body's segment are needed for biomechanical analysis. To provide population-specific BSP, precise estimation of body's segments volume and density are needed. Widely used uniform densities, provided by cadavers' studies, did not consider the air present in the lungs when determining the thorax density. The purpose of this study was to propose a new uniform thorax density representative of the living population from 3D external body shape modeling. Bi-planar X-ray radiographies were acquired on 58 participants allowing 3D reconstructions of the spine, rib cage and human body shape. Three methods of computing the thorax mass were compared for 48 subjects: (1) the Dempster Uniform Density Method, currently in use for BSPs calculation, using Dempster density data, (2) the Personalized Method using full-description of the thorax based on 3D reconstruction of the rib cage and spine and (3) the Improved Uniform Density Method using a uniform thorax density resulting from the Personalized Method. For 10 participants, comparison was made between the body mass obtained from a force-plate and the body mass computed with each of the three methods. The Dempster Uniform Density Method presented a mean error of 4.8% in the total body mass compared to the force-plate vs 0.2% for the Personalized Method and 0.4% for the Improved Uniform Density Method. The adjusted thorax density found from the 3D reconstruction was 0.74 g/cm 3 for men and 0.73 g/cm for women instead of the one provided by Dempster (0.92 g/cm 3 ), leading to a better estimate of the thorax mass and body mass.

Accurate localisation of the hip joint centre is required to obtain accurate kinematics, kinetics and musculoskeletal modelling results. Literature data showed that conclusions drawn from synthetic data, adult normal subjects and cerebral palsy children may vary markedly. This study investigated the localisation accuracy of the hip joint centre against EOS. The EOS system allowed us to register the hip joint centres with respect to the skin markers on standing subjects. A comprehensive set of predictive and functional calibration techniques were tested. For the functional calibration techniques, our results showed that algorithm, range of motion and self-performance of the movement were factors significantly affecting the results. Best results were obtained for comfortable range and self-performance of the movement. The best method in this scenario was the functional geometrical sphere fitting method which localised the hips 1.1. cm from the EOS reference in average and 100% of the time within 3. cm. Worst results for functional calibration methods occurred when the movement was assisted with a reduced range of movement. The best method in this scenario was the Harrington et al. regression equations since it does not rely on a functional calibration movement. Harrington et al. equations put the hips 1.7. cm from the EOS reference in average and 97% of the time within 3. cm. We conclude that accurate localisation of the hip joint centre is possible in gait analysis providing that method to localise the hip joint centres are adapted to the population studied: functional geometrical sphere fitting when hip calibration movements are not a problem and Harrington et al. predictive equations otherwise. We are grateful to VICON® (Oxford, UK) for loaning us the full motion capture system used in this study.

Accurate localization of joint centers is essential in movement analysis. However, joint centers cannot be directly palpated and alternative methods must be used. To assess the relative merits of these methods, a medical image based reference should be used. The EOS1 system, a new low dose bi-planar X-rays imaging technique may be considered. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of hip joint center (HJC) localization using the EOS1 system. Seventeen healthy young adults participated in the study. Femoral heads and pelvic external markers were localized using the EOS1 system and the HJCs were expressed in the movement analysis coordinate system. Results showed that external marker localization was reliable within 0.15 mm for trained assessors. Mean accuracy for HJC localization was 2.9 mm (SD: 1.3, max: 6.2). The EOS based method therefore appeared reliable and may be used for femoral head localization or as a reference to assess the accuracy of other methods for HJC localization. The authors are grateful to VICON (OMG-UK) for the loan of a motion capture system necessary for the overall study.