Search

Background: Inotropic support is widely used in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). Existing data on the incidence and significance of arrhythmic events in patients with CS on inotropic support is at high risk of bias., Methods: The Dobutamine Compared to Milrinone (DOREMI) trial randomized patients to receive dobutamine or milrinone in a double-blind fashion. Patients with and without arrhythmic events (defined as arrhythmias requiring intervention or sustained ventricular arrhythmias) were compared to identify factors associated with their occurrence, and to examine their association with in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes., Results: Ninety-two patients (47.9%) had arrhythmic events, occurring equally with dobutamine and milrinone (P = 0.563). The need for vasopressor support at initiation of the inotrope and a history of atrial fibrillation were positively associated with arrhythmic events, whereas predominant right ventricular dysfunction, previous myocardial infarction, and increasing left ventricular ejection fraction were negatively associated with them. Supraventricular arrhythmic events were not associated with mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.40; P = 0.879) but were positively associated with resuscitated cardiac arrests and hospital length of stay. Ventricular arrhythmic events were positively associated with mortality (RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.13-2.43; P = 0.026) and resuscitated cardiac arrests. Arrhythmic events were most often treated with amiodarone (97%) and electrical cardioversion (27%), which were not associated with mortality., Conclusions: Clinically relevant arrhythmic events occur in approximately one-half of patients with CS treated with dobutamine or milrinone and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Five factors may help to identify patients most at risk of arrhythmic events., (Copyright © 2022 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Data indicates there are 4 main pulmonary sarcoidosis duration/treatment phenotypes: asymptomatic, acute (disease duration <1-2 years), chronic and advanced. There are no data about disease duration/treatment phenotypes of cardiac sarcoidosis patients. Our study had 2 main aims (i) to assess the response to corticosteroids and (ii) to assess the incidence of relapse after a one-year course of corticosteroids (thereby classifying patients as acute or chronic treatment phenotype)., Methods: Consecutive, treatment naive patients with CS were prospectively recruited and treated with 0.5 mg/kg prednisone, to a maximum dose of 40 mg/day. Patients had a follow-up PET after 3-6 months of therapy (PET 2). In the responders (PET definition of response) the prednisone was then weaned and stopped after 12 months. Three months after stopping, the PET was repeated to look for disease relapse (PET 3)., Results: Twenty-one consecutive patients were included, and all patients showed a reduction in cardiac FDG uptake after 3-6 months and 19/21 (90.5 %) met the PET definition of response. Of these, 12/19 (63.1 %) relapsed after prednisone was stopped. There were no serious adverse effects during the trial of therapy cessation and there were no later relapses in the 7 non-relapsers during over 4 years of subsequent follow-up., Conclusion: The initial response rate to prednisone was high with all patients showing a reduction in FDG uptake and 19/21 meeting a PET definition of >25 % response. Secondly, a trial of therapy discontinuation was able to classify 7/19 patients as acute treatment phenotype and 12/19 as chronic., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: There are no known conflicts of interest associated with the principal or co-investigators of this research study or any member of their immediate family. RSB is or has been a consultant for- and receives grant funding from GE Healthcare, Lantheus Medical Imaging, and Jubilant DraxImage. The other members of this research team have nothing to disclose., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) suffer high rates of in-hospital mortality, with little evidence guiding management. The impact of valvular heart disease in patients with CS remains unclear. We therefore conducted a post hoc analysis of the randomized Dobutamine Compared to Milrinone (DOREMI) trial to determine the impact of valvular disease on outcomes in patients with CS., Methods: We defined significant valvular disease as moderate to severe or greater valvular stenosis or regurgitation and divided participants into a group of those with significant valvular disease and those without. Our primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included resuscitated cardiac arrest; cardiac transplantation or mechanical circulatory support; nonfatal myocardial infarction; stroke; initiation of renal replacement therapy; as well as changes in renal function, perfusion, and hemodynamics over time., Results: One hundred eighty-nine (98.4%) participants from the DOREMI trial were included in our analysis, and 74 (39.2%) had significant valvular dysfunction. Thirty-six (48.7%) patients with valvular disease died in hospital, compared with 37 (32.2%) in the comparator group (relative risk, 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.15; P = 0.02). Patients with aortic stenosis (2.42, 1.56-3.75; P < 0.01) and patients with mitral regurgitation (1.63, 1.1-2.43; P = 0.02) also had increased incidence of in-hospital mortality. There was no significant difference in any secondary outcomes among groups, apart from variances in mean arterial pressure observed in patients with valvular disease (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Significant valvular dysfunction is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with CS. Randomized clinical trial data are needed to further elucidate the role of transcatheter valvular interventions as a therapeutic target in this population., (Copyright © 2022 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)