Search

Purpose: Anatomical front and back (ANAFAB) reconstruction addresses the critical volar and dorsal ligaments associated with scapholunate dissociation. We hypothesized that patients with symptomatic, chronic, late-stage scapholunate dissociation would demonstrate improvements in all radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after ANAFAB reconstruction., Methods: From 2018 to 2021, 21 ANAFAB reconstructions performed by a single surgeon were followed prospectively, with 20 patients having a minimum follow-up of 12 months. In total, 17 men and four women were included, with an average age of 49 years. Three patients had modified Garcia-Elias stage 3 disease, eight stage 4, seven stage 5, and three stage 7. ANAFAB reconstruction of intrinsic and extrinsic ligament stabilizers was performed using a hybrid synthetic tape/tendon graft in a transosseous reconstruction. Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters, grip, pinch strength, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, PROMIS Upper Extremity Function, and PROMIS Pain Interference outcome measures were compared., Results: Mean follow-up was 17.9 months (range: 12-38). Radiographic parameters were improved at follow-up, including the following: scapholunate angle (mean 75.3° preoperatively to 69.2°), scapholunate gap (5.9-4.2 mm), dorsal scaphoid translation (1.2-0.2 mm), and radiolunate angle (13.5° to 1.8°). Mean Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores for pain and function decreased from 40.6 before surgery to 10.4. We were unable to detect a significant difference in grip or pinch strength or radioscaphoid angle with the numbers tested. There were two minor complications, and two complications required re-operations, one patient who was converted to a proximal row carpectomy for failure of fixation, and one who required tenolysis/arthrolysis for arthrofibrosis., Conclusions: At 17.9-month average follow-up, radiographic and patient-reported outcome parameters improved after reconstruction of the critical dorsal and volar ligament stabilizers of the proximal carpal row with the ANAFAB technique., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are devastating, time-sensitive conditions that often require definitive treatment at academic tertiary care centers. Delays to presentation and surgery have been associated with inferior outcomes. In this study, we evaluate referral patterns associated with delayed presentation and late surgery in traumatic BPI patients., Methods: Patients diagnosed with a traumatic BPI at our institution from 2000 to 2020 were identified. Medical charts were reviewed for demographic characteristics, prereferral work-up, and referring provider characteristics. Delayed presentation was defined as greater than 3 months from date of injury to initial evaluation by our brachial plexus specialists. Late surgery was defined as greater than 6 months from date of injury. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with delayed presentation or surgery., Results: A total of 99 patients were included, 71 of whom underwent surgery. Sixty-two patients presented delayed (62.6%), with 26 receiving late surgery (36.6%). There were similar rates of delayed presentation or late surgery by referring provider specialty. Patients whose initial diagnostic EMG was ordered by the referring provider prior to initial presentation at our institution were more likely to have a delayed presentation (76.2% vs 31.3%) and undergo late surgery (44.9% vs 10.0%)., Conclusions: Delayed presentation and late surgery in traumatic BPI patients were associated with initial diagnostic EMG ordered by the referring provider., Clinical Relevance: Delayed presentation and surgery have been associated with inferior outcomes in traumatic BPI patients. We recommend that providers direct patients with clinical concern of traumatic BPI directly to a brachial plexus center without further work-up before referral and encourage referral centers to accept these patients., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adult tethered cord syndrome is a rare neurologic disorder that classically presents with back or leg pain, weakness, and urinary dysfunction. Spinal cord tethering has been associated with acquired Chiari malformations. Whereas the effects of tethered cord release on Chiari malformation symptoms have been described previously, we report an unusual case of acquired tethered cord syndrome following Chiari decompression., Case Description: We report a 68-year-old man with a history of distant T12-level spinal cord injury and 2 weeks of progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness. The patient underwent a T12-L1 laminectomy in 1977, complicated by arachnoiditis and syringomyelia, with eventual placement of a syringopleural shunt. He remained neurologically stable until 2012, when he underwent a suboccipital craniectomy for Chiari decompression for new-onset headache and dysphagia. Ten days later, the patient noted progressive leg weakness and radiographic evidence of spinal cord tethering at the T11-T12 level. A T10-L1 laminectomy and medical facetectomy was undertaken for detethering with postoperative recovery of ambulatory function with assistance., Conclusions: Our patient exhibited an unusual acquisition of tethered cord syndrome. The tethering of the spinal cord may have been triggered by arachnoid adhesions from initial lumbar surgery 35 years before presentation and subsequently exacerbated by alterations of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics after Chiari decompression. Given the potentially devastating sequelae of tethered cord syndrome, investigation of cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics may be beneficial before operative intervention in patients with risk factors for a tethered cord who exhibit adult-onset Chiari malformation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Jeff Chandler was one of Hollywood's top leading men in the 1950s and 1960s. In 1961, at the peak of his career, Chandler died of complications following an aortic-iliac injury during a routine lumbar diskectomy. The subsequent public outcry and malpractice suit resulted in an unprecedented settlement award., Case: Chandler's lawsuit marked a pivotal time in the evolution of medical malpractice and monetary awards. Before 1960, malpractice legal claims were rare, with little impact on the practice of medicine. Chandler's award, however, dwarfed the average malpractice verdict for its time and would influence the relationship between medicine and the legal world. This case helped issue a radical increase in total expenditure on medical liability insurance, frequency of successful claims, average numbers of neurosurgical malpractice suits, and financial award sizes. The trend ensuing from this time has continued to the contemporary era. To link Chandler's case to the current malpractice climate, we highlight the relationship of the case with 3 factors comprising the legal argument for the perpetuation of medical malpractice: 1) contingency fees, 2) citizen juries, and 3) the nature of tort law., Conclusion: This case illustrates an inflection point in American medical malpractice expenditure increases beginning in the 1960s to a current estimated $55.6 billion. As we investigate ways to provide value in health care, it is important to consider the historical factors that have influenced the status quo when seeking strategies to reform the malpractice system on both sides of the value equation: quality and cost., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)