Search

Human intestinal organoids (HIOs) have been reported to exert their functions in a way that mimics living organs, and HIOs-derived monolayers are expected to be applied to in vitro intestinal pharmacokinetic studies. However, HIOs are established from human tissue, which raises issues of availability and ethics. In the present study, to solve these problems, we have established intestinal organoids using commercially available cryopreserved human intestinal epithelial cells (C-IOs), and compared their functions with biopsy-derived human intestinal organoids (B-IOs) from a pharmacokinetic point of view. Both C-IOs and B-IOs reproduced the morphological features of the intestinal tract and were shown to be composed of epithelial cells. Monolayers generated from C-IOs and B-IOs (C-IO-2D, B-IO-2D, respectively) structurally mimic the small intestine. The C-IOs showed gene expression levels comparable to those of the B-IOs, which were close to those of adult human small intestine. Importantly, the C-IOs-2D showed levels of pharmacokinetics-related protein expression and activity-including cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and carboxylesterase 2 (CES2) enzymatic activities and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter activities -similar to those of B-IOs-2D. This study addresses the difficulties associated with B-IOs and provides fundamental characteristics for the application of C-IOs in pharmacokinetic studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2023 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rodent-derived intestinal tissues or human colon cancer-derived Caco-2 cells are widely used for in vitro pharmacokinetic tests. However, both entail problems such as species differences from humans and low expression levels of specific pharmacokinetic-related factors, respectively. To solve these problems, many groups, including ours, have been focusing on human biopsy-derived intestinal organoids (b-IOs) and human iPS cell-derived intestinal organoids (i-IOs). However, no reports directly compare the two. Therefore, we established both from a single individual and conducted a comparative study. b-IOs had a shorter doubling time than i-IOs: about 59 h vs 148 h. b-IOs also had higher gene expression levels of major drug transporters and drug-metabolizing enzymes than i-IOs. To evaluate their applicability to pharmacokinetics, both organoids were two-dimensionally cultured. Although the b-IO monolayer had a lower transepithelial electrical resistance than the i-IO monolayer, it had higher gene expression levels of many drug transporters and major drug-metabolizing enzymes than the i-IO monolayer. RNA-seq analysis showed that the i-IOs monolayer had a more complex structure than the b-IOs monolayer because the former contained neuronal and vascular endothelial cells. This study provides basic information for pharmacokinetic applications of human biopsy-derived and human iPS cell-derived intestinal organoids., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In the drug development process, it is important to assess the contributions of drug-metabolizing enzymes and/or drug transporters to the intestinal pharmacokinetics of candidate compounds. For such assessments, chemical inhibitors are often used in in vitro systems. However, this practice poses two problems: one is the low expression levels of pharmacokinetic-related genes in conventional in vitro systems, such as Caco-2 cells, and the other is the off-target and less-efficient effects of their inhibitors. Here, as a model, we have established human biopsy-derived enteroids deficient in MDR1, a key efflux transporter. The expression levels and activities of other pharmacokinetic-related genes, such as CYP3A4, in the MDR1-knockout (KO) enteroid-derived monolayers were maintained at levels as high as those in the WT enteroid-derived monolayers. The contribution of MDR1 to the cytotoxicity of vinblastine, which CYP3A4 metabolized, was accurately evaluated by using the MDR1-KO enteroid-derived monolayers. In contrast, it could not be evaluated in the WT enteroid-derived monolayers treated by verapamil, a widely used MDR1 inhibitor, due to the off-target effect of verapamil, which also inhibits CYP3A4. The combination of human enteroid-derived monolayers and genome editing technology would be a powerful tool to evaluate the contributions of specific pharmacokinetic-related molecules., (Copyright © 2022 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Human intestinal organoids are expected to be applied in pharmaceutical research. Various culture media for human intestinal organoids have been developed, but it remains unclear which media are preferable for pharmacokinetic studies. Here, we cultured human intestinal organoids with three major culture media that are already used widely around the world: the medium of Sato et al. (S-medium; reported in 2011), Fujii et al. (F-medium; 2018), and Miyoshi et al. (M-medium; 2013). The growth of human intestinal organoids cultured in S-medium was faster than that in F- or M-medium. The gene expression levels of most pharmacokinetic-related enzymes or transporters in human intestinal organoids cultured in M-medium were higher than those in S- or F-medium, and comparable to those in the adult human small intestine. The level of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 activity was also highest in human intestinal organoids cultured in M-medium. Collectively, the results underscored the importance of selection and optimization of culture medium for various applications using human intestinal organoids, including pharmacokinetic studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)