Search

Stress electrocardiography (sECG) or treadmill stress testing is a well validated noninvasive diagnostic modality available to clinicians at low cost yet providing valuable functional data for coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. With the advances in cardiac imaging in both functional and anatomic fronts and the existing limitations of sECG testing, this modality appears less favored worldwide as reflected in some recent guideline updates. We review the past present and future of sECG to provide a viewpoint on where it stands in CAD evaluation and if it will remain relevant as a diagnostic modality or be retired going forward. We also provide our perspectives on how sECG can co-exist with other modalities such as calcium scoring and discuss the role of such testing in the Indian population.

Stress electrocardiography (sECG) or treadmill stress testing is a well validated noninvasive diagnostic modality available to clinicians at low cost yet providing valuable functional data for coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. With the advances in cardiac imaging in both functional and anatomic fronts and the existing limitations of sECG testing, this modality appears less favored worldwide as reflected in some recent guideline updates. We review the past present and future of sECG to provide a viewpoint on where it stands in CAD evaluation and if it will remain relevant as a diagnostic modality or be retired going forward. We also provide our perspectives on how sECG can co-exist with other modalities such as calcium scoring and discuss the role of such testing in the Indian population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflicts of interest for any authors in this manuscript. There is no funding sources to declare for this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of Agatston scoring and potential for radiation dose reduction of a coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) CT protocol at 100 kV with tin filtration (Sn100kV) and kV-independent iterative reconstruction, compared to standard 120 kV acquisitions., Materials and Methods: With IRB approval and in HIPAA compliance, 114 patients (61.8 ± 9.6 years; 66 men) underwent CACS using a standard 120 kV protocol and an additional Sn100kV CACS scan. The two datasets were reconstructed using a medium sharp convolution algorithm and in addition the Sn100kV scans were reconstructed iteratively based on a kV-independent algorithm. Agatston scores and radiation dose values were compared between the Sn100kV and the standard 120 kV protocol., Results: Median Agatston scores derived from the Sn100kV protocol with the kV-independent algorithm and the standard 120 kV were 21.4 (IQR, 0-173.8) and 24.7 (IQR, 0-171.1) respectively, with no significant differences (p=0.18). Agatston scores derived from the two different protocols had an excellent correlation (r = 0.99). The dose-length-product was 11.5 ± 4.1 mGy × cm using Sn100kV and 50.4 ± 24.9 mGy × cm using the standard 120 kV protocol (p < 0.01), resulting in a significantly lower (77%) effective dose at Sn100kV (0.16 ± 0.06 mSv vs. 0.71 ± 0.35 mSv, p < 0.01). Additionally, 99% of the patients were classified into the same risk category (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, or >400) using the Sn100kV protocol., Conclusion: CACS at Sn100kV using the kV-independent iterative algorithm is feasible and provides high accuracy when compared to standard 120 kV scanning. Furthermore, radiation dose can be significantly reduced for this screening application in a priori healthy individuals., (Copyright © 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this NLA Roundtable four members of the writing committee join the Editor to discuss the process of developing the AHA/ACC/Multisociety Cholesterol Guidelines, which were unveiled in November 2018. They also provide personal insights on the finished product. Highlights include 1) the committee's decision to summarize 10 take-home messages providing rapid communication of key points, 2) emphasis on clinician -patient discussion, which may bring up issues specific to women or other population groups at risk, 3) personalizing risk with risk-enhancing factors such as LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dl, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, pre-eclampsia, premature menopause, high risk ethnicity, inflammatory diseases, hypertriglyceridemia and in selected cases, Lp(a), hs-CRP and apoB; 4) using coronary artery calcium scoring when a risk decision is uncertain in intermediate risk patients 5) monitoring for goals of moderate or intensive LDL cholesterol reduction, 6) thresholds for adding nonstatin LDL-lowering therapy in those at very high risk or for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and 7) cost value assessment for expensive treatment., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Computed tomographic (CT) coronary calcium scoring has been established by large prospective, population-based studies as the single best noninvasive predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk available today. The calcium score correlates highly with the total burden of coronary atherosclerosis demonstrated at autopsy. It adds significantly to traditional risk calculators such as the Framingham Risk Calculator or the Pooled Cohort Equations. The 2018 U.S. Cholesterol Guidelines endorse the use of CT coronary calcium scoring to refine risk estimates in the intermediate range of 7.5%-20% over 10 years. Most, but not all, adults with calcium scores of zero can reasonably elect to avoid or defer statin therapy, but repeating the calcium score should be considered in 5 to 10 years. Discussants at this roundtable urge that coronary calcium scoring be offered to many more adults than currently receiving this test, including those with borderline 10-year risk in the range of 5%-7.5%. CT coronary angiography is a procedure based on intravenous contrast injection, mostly used in low-risk patients with chest pain. In British guidelines, CT angiography is preferred over stress testing for initial assessment of suspected coronary symptoms. Carotid ultrasound evaluating both the carotid intima-media thickness and presence of plague is less predictive than coronary calcium scoring for overall atherosclerotic risk but more predictive for stroke risk., (Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is a marker of coronary vascular dysfunction with prognostic significance., Objectives: We aimed to investigate the relationship between epicardial fat volume (EFV) measured from noncontrast CT and impaired MFR derived from rest-stress Rb-82 positron emission tomography (PET)., Methods: We retrospectively studied 85 consecutive patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent rest-stress Rb-82 myocardial PET/CT and were subsequently referred for invasive coronary angiography. EFV was computed from noncontrast CT by validated software and indexed to body surface area (EFVi, cm3/m2). Global stress and rest MFR were automatically derived from PET. Patient age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, coronary calcium score (CCS), and EFVi were combined by boosted ensemble machine learning algorithm into a novel composite risk score, using 10-fold cross-validation, to predict impaired global MFR (MFR ≤2.0) by PET., Results: Patients with impaired MFR (44 of 85; 52%) were older (71 vs. 65 years; P = .03) and had higher frequency of CCS (≥400; P = .02) with significantly higher EFVi (63.1 ± 20.4 vs. 51.3 ± 14.1 cm3/m2; P = .003). On multivariate logistic regression (with age, sex, number of risk factors, CCS, and EFVi), EFVi was the only independent predictor of impaired MFR (odds ratio, 7.39; P = .02). The machine learning composite risk score significantly improved risk reclassification of impaired MFR compared to CCS or EFVi alone (integrated discrimination improvement = 0.19; P = .007 and IDI = 0.22; P = .002, respectively)., Conclusions: Increased EFVi and composite risk score combining EFVi and CCS significantly improve identification of impaired global MFR by PET., (Copyright © 2015 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complex biological networks of atherosclerosis are largely unknown., Objective: The main objective of the Genetic Loci and the Burden of Atherosclerotic Lesions study is to assemble comprehensive biological networks of atherosclerosis using advanced cardiovascular imaging for phenotyping, a panomic approach to identify underlying genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic underpinnings, analyzed by systems biology-driven bioinformatics., Methods: By design, this is a hypothesis-free unbiased discovery study collecting a large number of biologically related factors to examine biological associations between genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, lipidomic, and phenotypic factors of atherosclerosis. The Genetic Loci and the Burden of Atherosclerotic Lesions study (NCT01738828) is a prospective, multicenter, international observational study of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Approximately 7500 patients are enrolled and undergo non-contrast-enhanced coronary calcium scanning by CT for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium, as well as coronary artery CT angiography for the detection and quantification of plaque, stenosis, and overall coronary artery disease burden. In addition, patients undergo whole genome sequencing, DNA methylation, whole blood-based transcriptome sequencing, unbiased proteomics based on mass spectrometry, as well as metabolomics and lipidomics on a mass spectrometry platform. The study is analyzed in 3 subsequent phases, and each phase consists of a discovery cohort and an independent validation cohort. For the primary analysis, the primary phenotype will be the presence of any atherosclerotic plaque, as detected by cardiac CT. Additional phenotypic analyses will include per patient maximal luminal stenosis defined as 50% and 70% diameter stenosis. Single-omic and multi-omic associations will be examined for each phenotype; putative biomarkers will be assessed for association, calibration, discrimination, and reclassification., (Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)