Search

Background/purpose: The extent of three-dimensional soft tissue changes in patients with varied facial skeletal patterns following mandibular setback surgery remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the postoperative changes in soft tissue chin thickness among mandibular prognathism patients, focusing on those presenting different divergence patterns, such as hyperdivergent and normodivergent patients. Materials and methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images were obtained from 56 skeletal Class III patients who underwent only mandibular setback. Based on vertical craniofacial skeletal relationship, patients were divided into normodivergent group (27°37°) group. The three-dimensional displacements of Infradentale (Id), B point (B), and Pogonion (Pog), the soft tissue thickness of Id-Li (Labrale inferius), B-B' (soft tissue B point), and Pog-Pog’ (soft tissue Pog point) were measured. Factors influencing the change in soft tissue thickness were investigated. Results: Preoperative B-B' and Pog-Pog’ thickness were significantly thinner in the hyperdivergent group than normodivergent group. Postoperative changes in B-B' and Pog-Pog’ thickness were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than normodivergent group. A significant correlation was found between soft tissue thickness change (B-B' and Pog-Pog’) and the preoperative soft tissue thickness and superior movement (B and Pog). Conclusion: Hyperdivergent patients with skeletal class III have thinner preoperative soft tissue thickness (B-B' and Pog-Pog’) than normodivergent patients in the preoperation. Postoperative changes in B-B' and Pog-Pog’ thickness were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than normodivergent group. Postoperative superior movement of B and Pog correlated with postoperative change of soft tissue thickness.

Background/Purpose: Postoperative skeletal relapse is the most important issue in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. This study aimed to investigate clinical skeletal relapse (≥2 mm) after mandibular setback surgery (intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: IVRO) using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) analysis. Methods: Serial cephalograms of 40 patients with mandibular prognathism were obtained at different time points: (1) before surgery (T1), (2) immediately after surgery (T2), and (3) at least with a 2-year follow-up postoperatively (T3). The menton (Me) was used as the landmark for measuring the amount of mandibular setback and postoperative skeletal relapse. Postoperative stability (T32) was divided into groups A and B by skeletal relapse ≥2 mm and

Correction of severe anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy, as described in this case of Extreme Skeletal Class III Malocclusion, can be challenging and fraught with difficulties. Conventional, single stage Bi-jaw Orthognathic surgery, with pre-and post-surgical orthodontics is associated with drawbacks such as risk of relapse and an unsatisfactory outcome, with persisting occlusal discrepancies and skeletal abnormalities, especially when the magnitude of skeletal correction is large. Excessive mandibular setback restricts tongue space, narrows the posterior airway and pharyngeal spaces, and is prone to relapse from the forward pterygomasseteric pull; while large maxillary advancements are accompanied by wound dehiscence, bone exposure and delayed union at the site of pterygomaxillary disjunction, and risk of relapse due to backward palatopharyngeal pull. Bi-jaw surgeries invariably involve considerable blood loss and prolonged operating time with its attendant anaesthetic risks.These drawbacks may be obviated by employing a two staged protocol of Bi-jaw surgeries allowing a minimum time period of 3 months to elapse between them, which allows the oral and maxillofacial musculature to adapt itself to the new jaw position following the first surgery, thus creating a better and more stable environment for the succeeding one. This reduces the chance of relapse thereafter, and produces more effective and stable long term results. The intervening time period also allows for observation of the repositioned jaw and arch relations achieved, and scrutiny for any positional changes in this post-surgical phase, which thereby allows modifications in the planned surgery of the next jaw, thereby achieving the most ideal final outcome.

This study aimed at comparing the transverse and sagittal angulations of proximal segment after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO), and examining their influences on the stability of distal segment. Methods: Patients who received SSRO (n = 21) or IVRO (n = 11) for mandibular setback were included. Lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms taken within 1 month before surgery (T1), within 1 week after surgery (T2), and at least 6 months after surgery (T3) were analyzed. The angulation of each proximal segment relative to the upper orbital margin line was measured on posteroanterior cephalogram and the sum of both angles (total ramus angle, TRA) was obtained. On lateral radiograph, ramus inclination angle (RIA) relative to a horizontal reference line 7° to the sella–nasion was assessed and B-point position was measured. Results: From T1 to T2, more increases in TRA and RIA were noted after IVRO than after SSRO. From T2 to T3, TRA and RIA significantly decreased in IVRO group but remained relatively stable in SSRO group. ΔTRAT1–T2 positively related to upward rotation of distal segment for SSRO and downward rotation for IVRO from T2 to T3. For SSRO only, ΔRIAT1–T2 significantly related to forward movement of distal segment during remodeling. Conclusion: TRA and RIA increase significantly after IVRO and then regress, whereas they increase mildly after SSRO and remain stable. Increase in TRA significantly relates to distal segment rotation during remodeling for both surgeries, but increase in RIA relates to forward relapse of the distal segment only for SSRO. The reasons underlying the correlations are not certain and deserve future investigations.

Background: Maxillary retrognathia is a well-known consequence of abnormal facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate. Orthognathic surgery improves facial appearance and occlusion but may induce velopharyngeal insufficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of orthognathic surgery on velopharyngeal function by using speech analysis and lateral cephalometric radiographs., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 47 patients who underwent maxillary advancement ± mandibular setback between 2006 and 2016. Preoperative and 1 year postoperative audio recordings were blinded for scoring by three trained speech therapists. Preoperative and 1 year postoperative lateral cephalometric radiographs were used to obtain information about skeletal movement and its relationship with the velopharyngeal area. Correlations between speech outcomes and cephalometric radiographs were determined., Results: Hyponasality improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.05), whereas hypernasality deteriorated significantly only in patients who underwent maxillary advancement alone (p < 0.05). No difference in speech parameters was found between patients with hypernasality or patients who had a pharyngoplasty preoperatively and the rest of the group. No correlation was found between the amount of maxillary advancement and hypernasality. A significant correlation (r < -0.49, p < 0.05) was found between the preoperative velar length and hypernasality postoperatively., Conclusions: Maxillary advancement has a negative impact on velopharyngeal function, whereas bimaxillary surgery seems to protect from deterioration. No difference was found in the amount of maxillary advancement or in velopharyngeal measurements between the Le Fort I group and the bimaxillary group. A short soft palate is a predictor of hypernasality after orthognathic surgery., (Copyright © 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Accurate prediction of hard and soft tissue changes is essential in orthognathic surgery. The aim of the present study was to systematically investigate the relation between soft and hard tissue relocation after mandibular setback surgery. A systematic search was performed, correlation coefficients and ratios were retrieved from the eligible studies, and the risk of bias was assessed. The random effects method was used to combine data. The five eligible studies showed that sagittal changes in pogonion, point B, and incision inferius incisalis are highly correlated with respective soft tissue movements and exhibit ratios ranging from 0.915 to 1.051. Only two studies were classified as having a moderate risk of bias. Although the characteristics of the included data limit the formation of definite conclusions, the soft to hard tissue movement ratios produced constitute initial clinically relevant guidance. Further long-term standardized and well-conducted trials are needed., (Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mandibular setback used to be the traditional treatment of choice for correcting mandibular prognathism. Nowadays, bimaxillary surgery is preferred. Several authors have asserted that mandibular setback causes a relative narrowing of the upper airway (UA) that could trigger obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA); however, its potential role in OSA development is still much debated. Another controversial subject is whether changes in airway space caused by the procedure are permanent., Objectives: To ascertain the consequences for UA size and shape of mandibular setback surgery in comparison with bimaxillary surgery (maxillary advancement with Le Fort I and mandibular setback), and to analyse the changes in oximetric indices and their relationship with OSA., Search Methods: A systematic review was made of the bibliography in 4 databases: Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane., Selection Criteria: Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials and cohort and case-control studies of adults published in the past 15 years were included., Data Collection and Analysis: The initial search yielded 668 articles, of which 498 were eliminated because of duplication and 123 on the basis of their titles and abstracts or summaries. The remaining 47 papers were read in their entirety, and 14 were included in the final selection., Results: According to our observations, the nasopharyngeal space does not undergo significant changes after either of the two surgical procedures. In the oropharynx and hypopharynx, none of the measurements changed significantly with maxillary advancement; however, persistent and significant decreases in the area, horizontal linear dimensions, and volume of these spaces are encountered after mandibular setback alone. No long-term changes in oximetric indices were found., Conclusions: Morphological changes are more pronounced following exclusively mandibular surgery. A decrease in the UA does take place but appears not to affect the patient's sleep quality. This study found no evidence to confirm that bimaxillary or mandibular orthognathic surgery predisposes to obstructive sleep apnoea development., (Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aims of this study were to analyze possible contributing factors to intraoperative clockwise rotation (CWR) of the proximal segment (PS), which is known to be a primary factor for relapse after mandibular setback with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and to evaluate the correlation between the CWR of the PS and relapse tendency. The sample was comprised of 47 patients who underwent SSRO for mandibular setback. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed. The vertical difference between the inferior borders of the PS and the distal segment at the vertical osteotomy line for SSRO after setback of the distal segment (vertical bony step, VBS) was the most predictable factor for CWR of the PS (p < 0.001), and it correlated significantly with the gonial angle, the surgical change in SNB, and the downward movement of the maxilla (p < 0.05). Patients with large CWR of the PS showed a greater tendency in horizontal relapse than patients with small CWR of the PS (p < 0.05). Such relapse patterns could be prevented with adequate surgical planning designed to reduce the VBS, such as maxillary posterior impaction or the intentional guidance of the PS to maintain the original position of the PS without CWR., (Copyright © 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)