Search

Purpose: To report the clinical outcomes achieved in refractory cases of neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) through the utilization of insulin eye drops alone or in conjunction with a drug-depository contact lens (DDCL). Observations: This multicentric prospective open-label uncontrolled case series included consecutive patients with NK refractory to conventional treatment. Insulin eye drops (1 unit/mL) were prescribed 4 times/day in all cases, and a Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ soft contact lens (EyeYon Medical, Ness Ziona, Israel), designed to act as a drug reservoir, was applied in selected patients. Data about stage and duration of NK, corneal sensitivity, previous treatments, rate and speed of healing, changes of NK area over time were collected. Nine eyes of 8 patients (mean age 52.50 ± 12.03 years [95 % CI, 44.13–60.87]) affected by NK refractory to conventional medical therapy were included. All patients received topical insulin, while DDCL was also applied in 3 cases. At T0, the mean area of the corneal epithelial defect was 21.84 ± 18.35 mm2 [95 % CI, 9.86–33.84]. Complete corneal re-epithelialization occurred in all cases, after a mean time interval of 25.78 ± 8.39 days [95 % CI, 20.30–31.26]. Mean reduction rate of epithelial defect areas was −0.81 ± 0.44 mm2/day [95 % CI, −1.16 to −0.46] for patients treated with insulin eye drops, and −0.63 ± 0.30 mm2/day [95 % CI, −0.96 to −0.29] for those treated with insulin eye drops plus DDCL (p = 0.71). Neither adverse events nor episodes of NK recurrence were reported. Conclusions and importance: Topical insulin, used alone or in combination with DDCL, is an accessible, inexpensive, and effective treatment for refractory NK.

Purpose: To describe the long-term outcome of the use of a specialized scleral lens known as a prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) device to support the ocular surface in patients with a Boston Keratoprosthesis (KPro) Type I. All patients in this series were unable to pursue continuous wear of a bandage soft contact lens (BSCL) – a critical aspect of post KPro implantation management intended to protect the corneal carrier tissue from desiccation and stromal melting. Observations: Four eyes of four patients with a Boston KPro Type I were included. All four had failed BSCL wear and were instead treated with PROSE device wear. All four patients had underlying diagnoses associated with a diseased ocular surface (Stevens-Johnson Syndrome [one patient], prior failed penetrating keratoplasty associated with herpes zoster-related neurotrophic keratopathy [one patient], and prior failed penetrating keratoplasty associated with severe dry eye disease [two patients]). Causes of failure of BSCL wear included poor retention, discomfort, and poor vision. PROSE device wear was initiated on average seven and a half (range four to 14) months post-KPro implantation. The wear schedule varied and ranged from waking-hour wear only to 24-h wear. The average duration of device wear was 59.3 (range 28–103) months. Two patients exhibited persistent corneal epithelial defect formation with waking-hour wear, which resolved within 10 days with 24-h device wear. All patients exhibited improvement in vision with PROSE compared to baseline, averaging six and a half (range six to eight) lines of improvement in Snellen acuity, and all patients reported increased comfort. There was no incidence of microbial keratitis, KPro device instability, or other complication throughout the duration of device wear. Conclusions and Importance: This report offers a novel alternate approach to long-term support of the ocular surface in patients with a Boston KPro who fail standard continuous BSCL wear.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of topical autologous serum and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with severe dry eye and persistent epithelial defects., Methods: Sixty-seven eyes of 42 patients including 12 Sjogren, 11 meibomian gland dysfunction, 8 post penetrating keratoplasty, 5 acne rosacea, 5 chemical burn and 3 neurotophic keratopathy were analyzed. Best corrected visual acuity, Schirmer, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear break-up time, Oxford staining scores were measured before the treatment and 1 month. One month scores of two groups were compared., Results: Thirty three eyes received autologous serum and 34 received PRP. There was no statistically significant differences between two groups in ocular surface parameters at baseline. Statistically significant improvements were achieved in both groups in all parameters at 1 month (p < 0.05). Schirmer score improved from 7.9 ± 7.6 to 10.6 ± 8.4 mm in autologous serum (p < 0.001) and from 10.9 ± 9.5 to 13.3 ± 10.1 in PRP (p < 0.001); BUT from 4.3 ± 2.7 to 6.7 ± 3.4 s (p < 0.001) and 4.5 ± 3.0 to 6.0 ± 3.6 (p < 0.001); OSDI from 47.7 ± 14.7 to 25.7 ± 11.0 (p < 0.001) and from 54.1 ± 17.3 to 26.8 ± 11.0 (p < 0.001); Oxford score from 4.0 ± 1.0 to 1.3 ± 1.1 in (p < 0.001) and 3.9 ± 0.9 to 1.6 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001) respectively. Significant visual improvement was achieved with PRP from 0.81 ± 0.73 LogMAR to 0.72 ± 0.63 (p = 0.025), whereas insignificant with serum from 0.60 ± 0.65 to 0.57 ± 0.67 (p = 0.147). Mean epithelial healing time was 6.7 ± 4.7 (2-14) days in serum and 3.6 ± 1.9 (2-7) in PRP (p = 0.195)., Conclusions: Both treatments are equally effective in severe dry eye and persistent epithelial defects. Although, visual gain is higher in PRP, autologous serum may be preferable due to low cost., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: To report a case of recurrent corneal ulcer caused by an oropharyngeal cavity pathogen. Observations: A patient presented with recurrent corneal ulcers with hypopyon. Leptotrichia species was eventually isolated from the corneal ulcer on bacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after many negative bacterial culture attempts. Due to correct identification of the pathogen, it was discovered that the patient was exposing her eye to saliva. Modification of patient behavior and initiation of the appropriate antibacterial treatment resulted in resolution of recurrent episodes of active infection. Conclusions: Although Leptotrichia species are not typically ocular pathogens, they can become pathogenic in the cornea with direct transmission from the oral cavity to the eye.