Search

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the patterns of association between dual-tasking, cognition, ambulation disability, fatigue, and self-efficacy and their pathways in predicting social participation in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: Adults with MS (n = 1162) completed an online survey. Social participation was assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders. The Dual-task Impact on Daily-Living Activities Questionnaire, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12v2, and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale measured dual-tasking, ambulation, and fatigue, respectively. Fall Efficacy Scale-International and Self-Efficacy for Community Mobility were assessed and modeled as a latent variable for efficacy., Results: The correlation matrix showed significant associations of social participation with dual-tasking, cognition, ambulation, efficacy, and fatigue (all p < 0.001) and interrelationships among the independent variables (p < 0.05). The final model showed excellent global model fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.96), with all variables significantly predicting social participation either directly or indirectly. Efficacy significantly mediated the effects of dual-tasking (β=-0.32, p < 0.001) and ambulation disability (β=-0.42, p < 0.001) on social participation., Conclusion: This study indicated that dual-tasking, ambulation disability, fatigue, and efficacy play important roles in social participation in persons with MS. The findings can help provide insight into factors that may underpin social participation and offer targets for interventions in persons with MS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Decreased gait speed is common in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and has been associated with elevated fall risk. The walking speed reserve (WSR) indicates the ability to increase gait speed on demand and has previously been examined in PwMS. Backward walking is a sensitive measure of fall risk in PwMS; however, no studies have reported on the utility of backward walking speed reserve (BW-WSR) as a clinical assessment tool of functional mobility or fall risk in PwMS, nor have they associated this measure with cognition., Methods: 23 PwMS completed walking trials at their preferred walking speed (PWS) and maximal walking speed (MWS). Participants performed these walking trials in both the forward (FW) and backward direction (BW). The forward walking speed reserve (FW-WSR) was calculated as the difference between MWS and PWS in the forward direction, while the backward walking speed reserve (BW-WSR) was calculated as the difference between MWS and PWS in the back backward direction. Correlation analyses examined the relationship between the FW- and BW-WSR with clinical assessments of functional mobility (the timed up-and-go) as well as cognitive functioning (the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, the California Verbal Learning Test, and the Trail Making Test A and B). Correlations also examined the relationship between FW- and BW-WSR with prospective falls., Results: A lower BW-WSR was associated with disease severity and poorer performance on clinical walking and balance assessment, as well as with decreased information processing speed and attentional performance. Interestingly, FW-WSR showed similar relations. Neither FW- or BW-WSR were associated with prospective risk in this small sample of PwMS., Conclusion: The BW-WSR did not offer a distinct advantage over other measures, such as the FW-WSR, PWS, or MWS, in the forward or backward direction. The selection of the most sensitive clinical measures of functional mobility and fall risk is crucial; our study holds valuable clinical implications for PwMS by providing novel insights into functional mobility assessments in PwMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No author has any financial or personal relationship that would inappropriately bias or influence their work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mobility challenges and cognitive impairments prominent in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) significantly increase the risk of falling. Examining perceptions of how the simultaneous performance of completing motor and cognitive tasks impacts fall risk may have clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to identify the most significant self-reported predictors of falling including perceived dual-tasking., Methods: Participants included 79 individuals with MS were surveyed and reported their fall history over the previous 3 months and completed the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale -12 (MSWS-12), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), and two Dual-Task Questionnaires (DTQ), a previously published original one and a newly expanded version., Results: Of the sample, 63 were classified as non-fallers and 16 as fallers. Backward stepwise regression analysis revealed that perceived ambulation disability and dual-tasking best predicted fall status (sensitivity of 57.7%, specificity of 90.6%, area under the receiving operating curve of 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.92)., Conclusion: The inclusion of self-reported dual-tasking perceptions has utility in predicting fall risk. Effective assessment toward this end offers the potential for early detection and intervention., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)