Search

Abstract: Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) seems to be a rising star from amongst a number of metaheuristics with relatively competitive performances. It is reported that it outperforms some of the well-known metaheuristics regarding constrained benchmark functions, constrained mechanical design, and continuous non-linear numerical optimization problems. Such a breakthrough has steered us towards investigating the secrets of TLBO’s dominance. This paper reports our findings on TLBO qualitatively and quantitatively through code-reviews and experiments, respectively. Our findings have revealed three important mistakes regarding TLBO: (1) at least one unreported but important step; (2) incorrect formulae on a number of fitness function evaluations; and (3) misconceptions about parameter-less control. Additionally, unfair experimental settings/conditions were used to conduct experimental comparisons (e.g., different stopping criteria). The experimental results for constrained and unconstrained benchmark functions under fairly equal conditions failed to validate its performance supremacy. The ultimate goal of this paper is to provide reminders for metaheuristics’ researchers and practitioners in order to avoid similar mistakes regarding both the qualitative and quantitative aspects, and to allow fair comparisons of the TLBO algorithm to be made with other metaheuristic algorithms. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract This paper develops a novel algorithm to solve real-world constrained optimization problems, which hybridizes multiobjective optimization techniques with an ϵ-constrained method. First, a constrained optimization problem at hand is transformed into a bi-objective optimization problem. By the transformation, the advantage of multiobjective optimization techniques can be utilized in the constrained optimization area to balance population diversity and convergence. Meanwhile, the ϵ-constrained method is applied, which keeps the population evolving toward feasible region of the constrained optimization problem. In our proposed algorithm, the differential evolution is employed as a search engine to create offspring at each generation. Further, different combinations of mutation operators have been developed to improve the search ability and the population convergence at different stages. The performance of our approach is evaluated on 64 benchmark test functions from three popular test suits. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach is capable of obtaining high-quality solutions on the majority of benchmark test functions, when compared with some other state-of-the-art constrained optimization algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]