Search

As the penetration of renewable energy sources (RES) significantly increases, their inherent uncertainty has brought about a paradigm shift in distribution system planning and operation. The existing planning methodologies usually consider the uncertainty during the investment and day-ahead stages while neglecting the interactive power fluctuations during the intraday stage, resulting in planning schemes with a risk of inadequate regional stability. In light of this, this paper proposes a novel adaptive robust distribution system planning approach that integrates local uncertainty management (LUM) to provide a comprehensive and refined consideration of uncertainty. First, we introduce the concept of LUM that can effectively address the deviations between predicted and actual power of RES and load. Second, we propose the adaptive robust planning model for the distribution system, in which the investment and day-ahead operation are considered in the first stage, while LUM is considered in the second stage to maintain the local stability of interactive power. The proposed model can actively manage uncertainties of RES and load demand, reaching the optimal balance between the investment cost, operational cost, and LUM cost. Finally, by employing the column-and-constraint generation (C&CG), the adaptive robust planning model is decoupled into a master min problem and a slaver max-min problem, after which the max-min problem is converted into a single mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem through the strong duality theory and big-M method. The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated using a real-world distribution system located in Fujian Province, China. The simulation results indicate that the proposed model achieves a quantitative decrease of approximately 10% in total cost compared to deterministic planning. Sensitivity analysis is also conducted to reveal the trade-off between economic cost and robustness level. • Local uncertainty management (LUM) is incorporated into distribution system planning. • A three-stage framework is developed for the planning problem incorporating LUM. • An adaptive robust distribution system planning model incorporating LUM is proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, an improved hybrid MADM method based on interval Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and interval regret theory are put forward to evaluate five renewable energy alternatives for Fujian province, China. Firstly, the volatility of the evaluation information and the subjectivity of experts or stakeholders are taken into account. Second, political factors are further considered based on existing research. Third, the influence of the subjective initiative of decision makers on the decision result has been paid attention to. Furthermore, the result of the analysis shows that the extended regret theory method should set different parameters to reflect the preferences of decision makers. The ranking results of renewable energy are different with different parameter settings. For example, when α = 0.1 , δ = 0.1 , the priority of clean energy in Fujian Province is hydropower, followed by wind energy, solar energy, geothermal energy, and biomass energy. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the model possesses good serviceability. Based on considering different parameter settings, the Fujian government should invest, in order of priority, in these renewable energy sources to obtain benefits. And the projects related to these renewable energy sources should be evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: As an important renewable energy, wind power has been paid more and more attentions in China recent years, in order to weaken the influence of climate change. We should know exactly the benefits wind power can produce, before government formulates relevant policies to accelerate its deployment. In this paper, we calculate the quantity of fossil energy saving and pollutant abatement in its life cycle, comparing with the baseline technology, i.e. 600MW coal-fired thermal power. Considering the damage cost of the pollutants, we can assess the benefits of development of wind power. By our model, we know that wind power can save 0.3839 kgce and avoid 0.203 yuan environmental cost when it generates 1 kWh electric quantity, comparing with coal-fired thermal power. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]