Search

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.002 Byline: Shangyao Yan, Ching-Hui Tang Keywords: Stochastic programming; Gate assignment; Stochastic flight delay; Real-time gate assignment Abstract: To make good flight to gate assignments, not only do all the relevant constraints have to be considered, but stochastic flight delays that occur in actual operations also have to be taken into account. In past research, airport gate assignments and stochastic disturbances have often been handled in the planning and the real-time stages separately, meaning that the interrelationship between these stages, as affected by such delays, has been neglected. In this research, we develop a heuristic approach embedded in a framework designed to help the airport authorities make airport gate assignments that are sensitive to stochastic flight delays. The framework includes three components, a stochastic gate assignment model, a real-time assignment rule, and two penalty adjustment methods. The test results are based on data supplied by a Taiwan international airport, and show that the proposed framework performs better than the current manual assignment process and the traditional deterministic model. Author Affiliation: Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Chungli 32054, Taiwan Article History: Received 21 June 2005; Accepted 3 May 2006

Abstract: The airline-specific gate, which is exclusively used by a specific airline, has been utilized in many airports. Differing from the traditional gate assignment, allocating flights to airline-specific gates is based on the perspective of the airline rather than that of the airport authority. In this study, we propose a new objective that results from an airline's perspective. Numerical tests, based on the operations of a Taiwanese airline, are carried out to assess the performance of the proposed approach. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The passenger’s perception of the airport’s level of service (LOS) may have a significant impact on promoting or discouraging future tourism and business activities. In this study, we take a look at this problem, but unlike in traditional statistical analysis, we apply a new method, the dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA), to an airport service survey. A set of “if … then …” decision rules is used in the preference model. The passengers indicate their perception of airport LOS by rating a set of criteria/attributes. The proposed method provides practical information that should be of help to airport planners, designers, operators, and managers to develop LOS improvement strategies. The model was implemented using survey data from a large sample of customers from an international airport in Taiwan. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The purpose of this research is to consider the dispatching and scale problem of airline unit load devices (ULDs) with consideration of service levels and violation days. A service level is specified to control the number of days that the ULD safety stock requirement can be violated. The network model and solution algorithm are developed with parallel computing. We find that our solutions are an improvement over the current solutions employed by the studied carrier from 31.89% to 33.01% for different safety stock levels. We also conclude that the studied carrier should set the service level to 90% as the general standard for stations considering the tradeoff between the number of ULDs required and the violation days. • We develop a mathematical model for dispatching airline unit load devices (ULDs). • The service levels which control the number of days that the ULD safety stock can be violated is considered. • A time-space network technique and a chance-constrained technique are combined to develop the model. • The original network is decomposed into four subproblems and a repetitive solution algorithm developed to find solutions. • The managerial implications of the specification of different violation days and service levels are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]