Search

Highlights • The study shows the transferability of regionalization methods with changing climate. • The study compares the uncertainty from climate models and regionalization methods. • The difference between the regionalization methods tends to increase in the future. • In larger precipitation regions, climate models dominate the uncertainty. • Physical similarity method with parameter option produced the most robust result. Abstract Regionalization methods have been extensively discussed as the solution for runoff predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), especially during the PUB decade (2003–2012). At the same time, research topics relevant to climate change appear to be an essential and attractive field for hydrologists in recent decades, because the availability and quality of water resources are strongly affected by climate change. However, it is still unknown whether regionalization methods can be used to predict hydrological impacts of climate change for ungauged catchments or how much uncertainty of future predictions may result from the use of regionalization methods. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the transferability of regionalization methods (i.e. spatial proximity and physical similarity methods, regression method) under changing climate conditions and compare the uncertainty resulting from regionalization methods with that from using climate models. The investigation is based on 108 catchments in Norway, with large variability in climate conditions and geographic characteristics. The study applies a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model (WASMOD) with simple structure and six model parameters. Our result shows that (a) the differences in the predictions by the regionalization methods tend to increase in the future, (b) the physical similarity method with parameter option (i.e. the model parameters from the physically-similar donor catchments are first averaged and then used to run the model for the target catchment) shows higher transferability than other methods, (c) the uncertainty contributions from climate models and regionalization methods to future runoff prediction are basin dependent, and (d) the uncertainty of future runoff prediction due to regionalization methods can be higher than that from climate models in low precipitation areas. This study provides insight to the choice of regionalization methods under changing climate conditions and the role of regionalization methods to the uncertainty contributions in future runoff predictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • A cascade model chain suitable for the risk of future DWAA events is proposed. • Evolution characteristics of DWAA in the future period of YRB are revealed. • Severity of DWAA events in far-future is greater than that in the near-future. • Extreme precipitation events have strong synchronization with DWAA events. At present, many studies have investigated the evolution characteristics, frequency estimation techniques, and prediction of droughts and floods, but a comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal evolution law and joint risk of these two composite extreme events is still lacking. The synergistic effect of dry and wet abrupt alternation (DWAA) events has more significant consequences than a single drought and flood event, and these events have a considerable impact on agriculture, ecology, and economy. Furthermore, owing to the intensification of global warming and climate change, the potential synchronisation between DWAA events and extreme precipitation in the future requires special attention. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a reliable framework to analyse the evolution characteristics and risks of composite extreme events (DWAA). In this study, a cascade modelling chain comprising climate model downscaling, non-uniform bias-correction technique, and model integration was developed to study the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and combined risk impact of DWAA events. The proposed methodology was applied to the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in the historical period (1960–2014, Hist) and the future period (2021–2060, FUT1; and 2061–2100, FUT2) under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 3–7.0 and 5–8.5 scenarios. The results show that: (1) The constructed cascade modelling chain has high simulation accuracy for precipitation, and can be used to analyse future DWAA events. (2) Considering the precipitation characteristics under SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, the precipitation increases slightly in the near future FUT1 (about 5–10%), and increases significantly in the far future FUT2 (about 10–70%). (3) Following either scenario, the frequency of DWAA events is expected to decrease in the future compared to that in the Hist, but the average intensity is expected to increase compared to that in the Hist. (4) The joint risk of the impact area and intensity of future DWAA events of FUT2 is greater than that of FUT1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uncertainty estimation of climate change impacts on hydrology has received much attention in the research community. The choice of a global climate model (GCM) is usually considered as the largest contributor to the uncertainty of climate change impacts. The temporal variation of GCM uncertainty needs to be investigated for making long-term decisions to deal with climate change. Accordingly, this study investigated the temporal variation (mainly long-term) of uncertainty related to the choice of a GCM in predicting climate change impacts on hydrology by using multi-GCMs over multiple continuous future periods. Specifically, twenty CMIP5 GCMs under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios were adapted to adequately represent this uncertainty envelope, fifty-one 30-year future periods moving from 2021 to 2100 with 1-year interval were produced to express the temporal variation. Future climatic and hydrological regimes over all future periods were compared to those in the reference period (1971–2000) using a set of metrics, including mean and extremes. The periodicity of climatic and hydrological changes and their uncertainty were analyzed using wavelet analysis, while the trend was analyzed using Mann-Kendall trend test and regression analysis. The results showed that both future climate change (precipitation and temperature) and hydrological response predicted by the twenty GCMs were highly uncertain, and the uncertainty increased significantly over time. For example, the change of mean annual precipitation increased from 1.4% in 2021–2050 to 6.5% in 2071–2100 for RCP4.5 in terms of the median value of multi-models, but the projected uncertainty reached 21.7% in 2021–2050 and 25.1% in 2071–2100 for RCP4.5. The uncertainty under a high emission scenario (RCP8.5) was much larger than that under a relatively low emission scenario (RCP4.5). Almost all climatic and hydrological regimes and their uncertainty did not show significant periodicity at the P = .05 significance level, but their temporal variation could be well modeled by using the fourth-order polynomial. Overall, this study further emphasized the importance of using multiple GCMs for studying climate change impacts on hydrology. Furthermore, the temporal variation of uncertainty sourced from GCMs should be given more attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hydrological impact assessments are increasingly performed at fine spatial and temporal resolutions in order to resolve local-scale changes under a future climate. Apart from the uncertainty represented by different climate models, emission scenarios and post-processing methods, the local-scale internal variability of the climate can be a major source of uncertainty for hydrological projections. To assess the latter at the catchment scale, this paper presents a methodology which is particularly suitable for spatially distributed hydrological models. An ensemble of daily precipitation and daily mean temperature realizations on a high-resolution grid is simulated from stochastic weather generators (WGs) trained on historical data and equipped with climate change information obtained from a regional climate model. Based on the resulting simulated daily runoff data, the significance of changes in the runoff regime is assessed using a statistical hypothesis test, and the variability contributed by the two input variables is quantified using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). As a proof of concept, simulations on a 1-km grid over a period of 19 years are carried out for nine catchments in central Norway. Significant changes in runoff regimes are found, indicating that the trends introduced in the WGs are not overwhelmed by the local-scale internal variability. Variability in the runoff simulations varies substantially throughout the year; it is highest in periods with potential snowmelt and lowest during winter. Temperature is the dominant source of variability in the colder months (November–March) due to its influence on rainfall and snowmelt. High variability in May–June is contributed comparably by both temperature and precipitation. In summer and early autumn the runoff variability is precipitation dominated. The results are in line with findings in the literature where the runoff variability is driven by the large-scale internal climate variability. This indicates that ignoring the local-scale internal variability may yield an underestimation of the overall variability in runoff projections and projected changes. • Gridded climate input data simulated using stochastic weather generators. • Significance of changes in runoff regime assessed using a statistical test. • Runoff variability due to input variables quantified using ANOVA. • Results in line with findings based on large-scale internal climate variability. • Runoff projections need to consider local-scale internal variability of climate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• All GCMs except MIROC-ESM simulate a higher mean temperature in Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA) period than Little Ice Age (LIA) period, while simulated annual precipitation varies a lot in different GCMs and catchments. • No significant change of flood characteristics during the last millennium from ensemble-mean results. • In future, we will have an extraordinary shift in flood seasonality and generating processes, and flood frequency increase in most of the study catchments in Norway. • Climate projections represent the largest contribution to overall uncertainty in the projected changes in hydrological extremes for most of the catchments. With the recent warming trend over Europe and the Arctic, the Nordic regions have experienced more frequent and damaging extreme hydrological events which are anticipated to increase towards the end of the 21st century. Despite explicit trends, large variations have been observed across basins and regions when it comes to precipitation and floods hinting at a strong natural hydroclimatic variability that further complicates any assessment of potential future changes. In this study, we aim to better understand how climate variability links with the current extremes and future projections of floods in Norway in the context of the last millennium and the future. Specifically, we simulate over 1000 years (850–2099) daily discharge and floods at 34 catchments over five regions of Norway from the last millennium (including a warm period and a cold period; 850–1849) to the end of the 21st century by an ensemble model-chain method including four global climate models (GCMs), two bias-correction methods and two hydrological models. The modelling results show (i) all GCMs except MIROC-ESM simulate a higher mean temperature in Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA) period than Little Ice Age (LIA) period, while simulated annual precipitation varies a lot in different GCMs and catchments, (ii) no significant change of flood characteristics during the last millennium from ensemble-mean results, (iii) in future, we will have an extraordinary shift in flood seasonality and generating processes, and flood frequency increase in most of the study catchments in Norway, and (iv) climate projections represent the largest contribution to overall uncertainty in the projected changes in hydrological extremes for most of the catchments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]