Search

Forest management is an important tool for GHG mitigation by representing three carbon pools: living biomass, forest soil, and wood-based products. Additionally, increasing attention has been given to the potential for wood products to substitute fossil-intensive products as a climate mitigation strategy. The goal of this paper is to analyse the theoretical GHG effects of fully replacing four common non-wood products with wood-based products of 'low' and 'high' technology options that have a similar functionality: (1) Spruce particle board substituting polyurethane (PU) foam insulation board; (2) spruce cross-laminated timber beam (CLT) substituting steel beam; (3) birch energy wood substituting electric heating; and (4) birch plywood substituting plaster board. The analysis was based on forestry in Western Norway as a case study, where forests typically consist of naturally generated birch and expanding areas of planted Norway spruce. In this study we compare wood products derived from paired stands of Norway spruce and downy birch. The analysis showed that spruce gave a higher theoretical substitution effect relative to birch for the selected pairs of woody and non-woody products. CLT substituting steel beam gave the highest substitution effect, approximately 15% higher than particle board substituting PU foam board. The theoretical substitution effect in mass units of carbon per kg wood product for the two spruce wood products was approximately 17 times higher relative to substituting Norwegian hydro energy-based electric heating, whereas plywood substituting plaster board may in fact increase GHG emissions. As the gross emissions were relatively similar for the birch plywood and the spruce particle board, the major substitution effect was related to the avoided emission of the non-woody product rather than to the tree species per se. The paper concludes that the choice of product to be substituted was the key factor that determined the final substitution effects. Furthermore, the study showed that transportation was the single most important factor that affected the emissions between planting and delivery of the timber at production gate. The analysis enables informed decisions related to CO 2 -emissions at the various steps from tree planting to wood conversion, and underline the importance of informed decision related to the choice of substitution products. • We compared the theoretical substitution effect of four wood products (spruce particle board, spruce cross-laminated timber beam, birch energy wood, and birch plywood) for the case of Western Norway. • The spruce products gave a better substitution effect relative to birch, and cross laminated beam from spruce substituting steel beam had the highest substitution effect amongst the four selected alternatives. • Avoided emission was the major determining factor for the calculated substitution effect, thus, the estimated substitution factors were mainly related to the selected product to be substituted rather than to the tree species used as raw material. • Emissions related to transportation was the single most important emission factor of all forestry activities, amounting to approximately 48% of the estimated emissions. Export by boat suggested a potential increase in the transport emissions of 62%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]