Search

Liming is a common practice to alleviate soil acidification in agricultural systems worldwide. Because liming affects soil microbial activity and soil carbon (C) input rates, it can affect soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well. However, little is known about the effect of liming on GHG emissions from rice agriculture, one of the main sources of anthropogenic methane (CH 4 ). Here, we report on the first experiment to measure the effect of liming on GHG emissions from rice paddy fields. We studied a double rice cropping system in an acid paddy for two years and measured the impacts of liming on GHG emissions and rice growth with or without straw incorporation. We found that liming reduced CH 4 emissions in the early rice season, but it did not affect nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. Over the two-year study, lime application reduced total CH 4 emissions by 12.5% and 15.4% in plots without and with straw incorporation, respectively. Lime application significantly enhanced rice aboveground biomass, while reducing the area- and yield-scaled global warming potential of CH 4 and N 2 O emissions. Lime application stimulated soil respiration during the fallow season and reduced the abundance of methanogens during the early rice growing season. Together, these results suggest that liming reduces CH 4 emissions by promoting the decomposition of organic matter during the fallow season, thereby reducing C availability for methanogens. We conclude that in the short term, liming is an effective practice to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from acidic paddy soils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many efforts have been made to learn the fertilization effects on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the current crop season of multiple cropping systems, however, residual effects on the succeeding crop season are not clear. Based on a thirty-year fertilization experiment, we investigated the impacts of wheat fertilization on GHG emissions in the succeeding soybean season. There were five fertilization regimes for the wheat-soybean cropping system, including sole organic manure (M), balanced chemical NPK fertilizer (NPK), chemical NPK plus manure (NPKM), chemical NP plus wheat straw (NPS), and no fertilizer application (CK). Fertilization significantly affected GHG emissions not only in the current fertilizing season of winter wheat but also in the non-fertilizing season of summer soybean. Compared to the NPK treatment, the M and NPKM treatments stimulated annual soil CO 2 and N 2 O emissions, and reduced CH 4 emissions. The M and NPKM treatments also significantly increased soil organic C and total N contents, soil microbial biomass C and N, and NH 4 N and NO 3 N concentrations, especially in the soybean season. Although fertilizers were only applied in wheat season, the emissions of CO 2 and N 2 O were higher in the soybean season. At the cropping system scale, the treatments of M and NPKM significantly increased annual global warming potential (GWP) by 75.5% and 38.3%, respectively, compared to the NPK. Sole manure application (M) significantly increased greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) in comparison with the NPK, while there was no significant increment in the GHGI caused by the treatments of chemical fertilizer plus manure (NPKM) and crop straw (NPS). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atmospheric CO 2 concentrations and water management practices both affect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rice paddies, but interactive effects between these two factors are still unknown. Here, we show the first study to compare the impact of elevated atmospheric CO 2 (eCO 2) on GHG emissions under continuously flooded irrigation (CF) and under intermittently flooded (IF) conditions. Elevated CO 2 stimulated CH 4 emissions under CF by 50% in a field experiment and by 46% in a pot experiment, but it had no effect under IF in both experiments. Elevated CO 2 had no effect on N 2 O emissions in either the field or pot experiment. Rice root biomass, aboveground biomass and grain yield increased with eCO 2 , but were not affected by water management. Elevated CO 2 only stimulated the abundance of methanogens under CF, suggesting that increased soil O 2 availability with IF limited methanogenic activity under eCO 2. Our findings suggest that estimates of CH 4 emissions from global rice agriculture with eCO 2 need to account for recent changes in water management. • The first study to compare the effect of elevated CO 2 on GHG emissions under CF and IF. • Elevated CO 2 stimulated CH 4 emissions under CF, but had no effect under IF. • Elevated CO 2 did not affect N 2 O emissions under CF and IF. • Elevated CO 2 increased the abundance of methanogens under CF only. • Current estimates of CO 2 effects on CH 4 emissions from rice paddies may be too high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]