Search

Gastric variceal bleeding (GVB), compared to esophageal varices, is rare but often massive and associated with high mortality. Endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection (ECGI) is the first-line treatment for GVB. Hence, we conducted this study to assess the clinical outcomes and the determinants of ECGI for gastric variceal bleeding. This was a prospective observational study of patients with ECGI for GVB between June 2019 and February 2023. The demographic characteristics, etiology and severity of cirrhosis, size, type of gastric varices, volume of cyanoacrylate used, number of sessions required, technical success, rebleeding rate, and survival at three months were studied. A total of 135 patients underwent ECGI for GVB. Their mean (SD) age was 44.9 (13.6) years, with a male preponderance (n = 23, 68.1 %). Eighty-two patients (60.7 %) had cirrhosis. Their mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 14.3 (7.3). Gastric varices were gastroesophageal varices (GOV)1 in 42 (31.1 %), GOV2 in 73 (54.1 %), and isolated gastric varices (IGV)1 in 20 (14.8 %) patients. Varices were large in 35 (25.9 %) and had F1 morphology in 89 (65.9 %) patients. The success rate of initial hemostasis was 98.5 %. The median sessions required were 1 (1–2), and the median volume of cyanoacrylate per session was 2 (1–2) ml. The procedure was associated with minor complications like transient abdominal pain in 11 (8.1 %) and fever in 2 (2.7 %) patients. Rebleeding was observed in 23 (17 %) patients. GOV2, F1 morphology, and a high MELD score were significantly associated with rebleeding. Five (3.7 %) patients died during the study; 2 (1.5 %) were due to failure to control bleeding. In conclusion, our study demonstrated ECGI to be very safe and effective for GVB. The technical success was high and could be achieved in fewer sessions with a smaller volume of cyanoacrylate during each session. Factors associated with rebleeding from gastric varices. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To analyze the outcomes of balloon occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) as salvage therapy in cirrhotic patients with gastric variceal bleed (GVB) after failed endotherapy or very early rebleeds. We assessed for technical/clinical success of BRTO and transplantation-free survival. Patients with GVB who underwent BRTO as salvage therapy (between 2011 and 2017) were analyzed. Rebleed rate, Child Pugh score (CTP), Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) values were calculated at 1,6,12, and 24 months follow-up. Fifty-two patients who underwent BRTO as salvage therapy were assessed for rebleed rate and transplantation-free survival. Technical success was 100% with rebleed rate being 1.9% (n = 1) and clinical success rate of 92.3% (n = 48) at 12-months follow-up and transplantation-free one-year survival of 90.4% (n = 47). Five patients (9.6%) failed to achieve one-year transplantation-free survival. Four patients died within 30 days; one rebleed, 3 (all Child C) progressive liver and multiorgan failure and one required liver transplantation (day 88) after BRTO. Thus, a total of 4 of 9 (44.4%) Child C patients failed to achieve one-year transplantation-free survival. Improvement in liver functions was noted in the rest with improved CTP, MELD scores, and albumin levels in the 12-month follow-up. Six of 52 (11.5%) developed new onset medically manageable ascites, whereas 7 of 52 (13.5%) had progression of esophageal varices at 12-months follow-up requiring prophylactic band ligation in follow-up. Salvage BRTO is a safe and effective procedure for patients with acute GVB with failure to control bleed with endotherapy or very early rebleed after endotherapy. Salvage BRTO has good short/long-term outcomes with lower rebleed, higher survival, and improved liver disease severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims Although endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection (ECGI) is recommended as first-line treatment for bleeding gastric varices (GV) there is still limited experience with this method in the US. Our aim was to analyze our 10-year experience of ECGI for treatment and prophylaxis of gastric variceal bleeding. Methods Records of patients undergoing ECGI of GV at our US tertiary care center between 6/2005 and 5/2015 were reviewed. Assessed outcomes were primary hemostasis, early rebleeding during hospitalization, recurrent bleeding during follow-up, eradication and recurrence of GV. Results Prophylactic ECGI was performed in 16 patients with large GV. Eradication was achieved in 15 (94%). During the median follow-up of 27 (IQR 7–47) months, 4 patients (26.6%) had variceal bleeding; all were treated successfully with ECGI. Fifty-seven patients underwent ECGI for GV bleeding. Primary hemostasis was achieved in all. Early rebleeding occurred in 2 (3.5%) and durable hemostasis could not be achieved. Follow-up beyond initial hospitalization was available in 41 patients. Bleeding recurred in 8 (19.5%) patients during a median follow-up of 12 (IQR, 3–51) months. Eradication of GV was achieved in 92% of patients but recurrent varices were found in 44% during a median follow up period of 33 months. Conclusion ECGI is effective in achieving hemostasis of bleeding GV and their eradication. Recurrent bleeding and recurrence of varices after complete obliteration however are not infrequent and continued surveillance is advisable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Gastric varices (GV) are found in patients with portal hypertension. Incidence of bleeding from GV is relatively low, but is severe, and associated with higher mortality. Aims and objectives To compare the types of GV in cirrhosis vs. extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) and the results of endoscopic N -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBC, glue) injection. Methods Four hundred and fifty-four patients undergone glue injection of GV for primary prophylaxis or control of bleeding for first episode of bleeding from GV between August 2010 and August 2015 were analyzed. Results Of 454 patients, 64% ( n = 292) were cirrhotics and 36% ( n = 162) had EHPVO. Types of GV were GOV1 in 16.4% ( n = 48) of cirrhotics vs. 7.4% ( n = 12) of EHPVO, GOV2 in 76.7% ( n = 224) of cirrhotics vs. 53.1% ( n = 86) of EHPVO, Isolated gastric Varices (IGV1) in 39.5% ( n = 64) of patients with EHPVO vs. 6.8% ( n = 20) cirrhotics. The patients were treated with NBC injections. The mean volume of glue injected was 2.89 ± 1.59 ml over a median of 1 session (range: 1–7). The total volume of glue required was lower in cirrhotics (2.44 ± 1.17 ml vs. 3.69 ± 1.91 ml, P < 0.05) than in EHPVO patients. One hundred and seventeen (40.1%) of cirrhotics required >1 sessions of glue injection as compared to 102 (63%) of EHPVO patients. Over mean follow up of 14.7 ± 6.46 months, rebleeding (10% vs. 13%) was similar in patients with cirrhosis and EHPVO and mortality (15.4% vs. 2.5%) was higher in cirrhotics than EHPVO. Conclusion In patients with bleeding from GV, GOV2 are more common in cirrhotics and IGV1 in patients with EHPVO. Patients with EHPVO required higher total volume of glue and more glue sessions for GV obturation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]