Search

Melanomas frequently harbour somatic mutations in BRAF (40%) or NRAS (20%). Impact of NRAS mutations on the therapeutic outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remains controversial. Potential correlation of the NRAS mutational status and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in melanoma is unknown. Advanced, non-resectable melanoma patients with known NRAS mutation status treated with first-line ICI between 06/2014 and 05/2020 in the prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOREG were included. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to NRAS status were analysed. A multivariate Cox model was used to analyse factors associated with PFS and OS; survival was analysed using the Kaplan–Meier approach. Among 637 BRAF wild-type patients, 310 (49%) had an NRAS mutation with Q61R (41%) and Q61K (32%). NRAS -mutated (NRAS mut) melanomas were significantly more often located on the lower extremities and trunk (p = 0.001); nodular melanoma was the most common subtype (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found for PFS and OS for anti-PD1 monotherapy (2-year PFS 39%, [95% confidence interval (CI), 33–47] in NRAS mut patients and 41% [95% CI, 35–48] in NRAS -wild type (NRAS wt) patients; 2-year OS was 54% [95% CI, 48–61] in NRAS mut patients and 57% [95% CI, 50–64] in NRAS wt patients) and anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 therapy between both cohorts (2-year PFS was 54% [95% CI, 44–66] in NRAS mut patients and 53% [95% CI, 41–67] in NRAS wt patients; 2-year OS was 58% [95% CI, 49–70] in NRAS mut patients and 62% [95% CI, 51–75] in NRA Swt patients). The ORR to anti-PD1 was 35% for NRAS wt patients and 26% for NRAS mut patients and 34% compared to 32% for combinational therapy. Data on PD-L1 expression was available in 82 patients (13%). PD-L1 expression (> 5%) was not correlated to NRAS mutational status. In multivariate analysis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 1, and brain metastases were significantly associated with a higher risk of death in all patients. The PFS and OS were not affected by NRAS mutational status in patients treated with anti-PD1-based ICI. Similar ORR was seen in NRAS wt and NRAS mut patients. Tumour PD-L1 expression did not correlate with NRAS mutational status. • PFS and OS were not affected by NRAS mutational status in patients treated with anti-PD1-based ICI. • Similar response rates to anti-PD1-based ICI were seen for NRAS mut and NRAS wt patients. • There was no correlation between NRAS mutation status and programmed cell death ligand-1 expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of reliable biomarkers for the prediction of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains an unresolved challenge. Conventional ICI biomarkers typically focus on tumor-related factors such as PD-L1 expression. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the predictive value of serum electrolyte levels, a so far widely unexplored area, is still pending. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of baseline sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium and calcium levels in two independent phase 3 clinical trials: IMvigor211 for mUC comparing atezolizumab to chemotherapy, and IMmotion151 for mRCC comparing atezolizumab+bevacizumab to sunitinib. This analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of these electrolyte levels in these clinical settings. A total of 1787 patients (IMvigor211 n = 901; IMmotion151 n = 886) were analyzed. We found a linear correlation of baseline serum sodium and chloride with prognosis across both trials, which was not found for potassium, magnesium and calcium. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic capacity of sodium was limited to patients receiving ICI as compared to the control group. Interestingly, in both studies, the chance of achieving an objective response was highest in the patient subgroup with high baseline serum sodium levels of > 140 mmol/L (IMmotion151: Complete response in 17.9% versus 2.0% in patients with mRCC with baseline sodium < 135 mmol/L). Serum sodium outperformed tumor PD-L1 expression as a predictor for immunotherapy efficacy. Patients exhibiting elevated serum sodium levels derive the greatest benefit from immunotherapy, suggesting that baseline serum concentration could serve as a valuable and cost-effective predictive biomarker for immunotherapy across entities. • Sodium exhibits a linear correlation with survival in immunotherapy-treated patients • This correlation is not present for other serum electrolytes • The effect is significant in immunotherapy-treated patients only • High sodium identifies patients who profit from immunotherapy [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with chemotherapy-eligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently assessed in this setting. This review aimed to assess the role of ICIs alone or in combination as first-line treatment in chemotherapy-eligible patients with mUC. Multiple databases were searched for articles published until November 2020. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), complete response rates (CRRs), durations of response (DORs) and adverse events (AEs) in chemotherapy-eligible patients with mUC. Three studies met our eligibility criteria. ICI combination therapy was associated with significantly better OS and PFS, higher CRR and longer DOR than chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76–0.94, P = 0.002; HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71–0.90, P = 0.0002; odds ratio [OR]: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.12–1.96, P = 0.006; and mean difference: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.31–2.46, P = 0.01, respectively). ICI-chemotherapy combination therapy was also associated with significantly better OS and PFS, higher ORR and CRR and longer DOR than chemotherapy alone. Although OS and PFS benefits of ICI combination therapy were larger in patients with high expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), PD-L1 low expression patients also had a benefit; HR for OS (high PD-L1: HR 0.79 versus low PD-L1: HR 0.89) and PFS (high PD-L1: HR 0.74 versus low PD-L1: HR 0.82). ICI monotherapy was not associated with better oncological outcomes but was associated with better safety outcomes than chemotherapy alone. Our analysis indicates a superior oncologic benefit to first-line ICI combination therapies in patients with chemotherapy-eligible mUC over standard chemotherapy. In contrast, ICI monotherapy was associated with favorable safety outcomes compared with chemotherapy but failed to show its superiority over chemotherapy in oncological benefits. PD-L1 status alone cannot help guide treatment decision-making. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting the conclusions drawn from this study, given that there is the heterogeneity of the population of interest, risk of bias and the nature of the studies evaluated whose data remain immature or unpublished. • ICIs are currently assessed for patients with chemotherapy-eligible mUC. • ICIs used in combination are superior to chemotherapy in oncological benefits. • ICI monotherapy efficacy is not superior to that of chemotherapy alone. • PD-L1 alone is not a sufficiently robust, reliable and reproducible biomarker. • The analyses include the heterogeneity of the population and risk of bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

About 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases (BMs) throughout the disease, and the occurrence of BMs is considered to have a fairly high mortality rate. Therefore, the management of brain metastases in NSCLC patients is a clinical challenge. Currently, multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment methods are often used to achieve effective control of intracranial disease and prolong survival. Immunotherapy (IT) is one of the core therapies for NSCLC. Single or combined IT represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) of programmed death-1(PD-1)/ programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.ICIs has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with BMs, although patients with BMs are mostly underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we summarized the mechanism of ICIs in the treatment of BMs, and the clinical research and treatment progress of ICIs and their combination with other therapies in patients with BMs s from NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The combination of ICIs and chemotherapy may provide better efficacy for patients with mUC. • For patients who are not suitable for platinum-based chemotherapy or fail after platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy may be an appropriate treatment. • Hitherto, there are no effective markers to predict the efficacy of ICIs. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a very common malignant tumor. In the past few decades, platinum-based chemotherapy has been regarded as the standard recommended regimen for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who can receive either cisplatin or carboplatin. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) brought some hope for possible treatments for mUC patients who were unfit for platinum therapy. ICIs drugs have emerged as new potential weapons to overcome UC in our lifetime. ICIs block the binding of programmed death-1 (PD-1) to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), leading to enhancement of the immune function of antitumor T cells. In the treatment of UC, ICIs show an apparent ascendancy and effectively enhance survival rates. With good tolerability and remarkable effects, ICIs have given thousands of patients hope. This article mainly shows the application of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in mUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: For cisplatin-ineligible patients, approval of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy relies on the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression assay employed, namely, the combined positive score (CPS) or immune cell (IC) score. This study compares PD-L1 diagnostic scores and positivity in primary and matched metastatic bladder cancer tissue.Methods: A total of 108 patients undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder cancer and lymphatic spread (pN+) were included. PD-L1 expression was compared by immunohistochemistry (IHC) between the primary bladder tumor and associated lymph node metastases using Ventana SP263 anti-PD-L1 antibody. In a subset of cases further IHC was performed with Ventana SP142 and Dako 22C3 antibodies. Second, the PD-L1 scoring algorithms for the CPS and IC score were compared. Correlation of PD-L1 positivity with clinical parameters and tumor stage was assessed. Intra- and intertissue analyses were performed with Pearson's chi square test, McNemar test and Spearman correlation employing IBM SPSS 25.Results: PD-L1 expression did not correlate with clinicopathological parameters. The CPS (43.5% vs. 35.6%; P=0.006) and the IC score (28.7% vs. 21.2%; P=0.002) yielded PD-L1 positivity significantly more often in primary BC than in matched lymph node metastasis. Both the CPS (r=0.775; P<0.001) and the IC score (r=0.711; P<0.001) correlated between primary and metastatic bladder cancer tissue. Employing CPS vs. IC led to significantly more PD-L1-positive classified cases in primary BC (CPS vs. IC; 43.5% vs. 28.7%; P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (CPS vs. IC; 35.6% vs. 21.2%, P<0.001).Conclusion: Compared to lymph node analysis, bladder tissue yields more PD-L1 positivity assessed with the CPS and IC scores. This is particularly evident when employing the CPS. The findings highlight that employing both PD-L1 assays may maximize eligibility for first-line checkpoint-inhibitors to treat bladder cancer patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]