Search

• Relative VE of high dose to standard dose influenza vaccine was measured in an observational study. • High dose and standard dose recipients differed on several demographic and clinical factors. • Both high and standard dose vaccines were effective against influenza compared to no vaccination. • High dose vaccine provided better protection against influenza A requiring outpatient care. New influenza vaccine formulations are designed to improve vaccine effectiveness and protect those most vulnerable to infection. High dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV3), licensed for ages ≥65 years, produces greater antibody responses and efficacy in clinical trials, but post-licensure vaccine effectiveness (VE) compared to standard dose (SD-IIV3/4) vaccine remains an open question. Using a test-negative, case control design and propensity analyses to adjust for confounding, US Influenza VE Network data from the 2015–2016 through 2018–2019 seasons were analyzed to determine relative VE (rVE) between HD-IIV3 and SD-IIV3/4 among outpatients ≥65 years old presenting with acute respiratory illness. Influenza vaccination status was derived from electronic medical records and immunization registries. Among 3861 enrollees, 2993 (78%) were vaccinated; 1573 (53%) received HD-IIV3 and 1420 (47%) received SD-IIV3/4. HD-IIV3 recipients differed from SD-IIV3/4 recipients by race, previous vaccination, number of outpatient visits in the previous year and timing of vaccination, and were balanced in the propensity model except the timing of vaccination. Compared with no vaccination, significant protection against any influenza A was observed from both HD-IIV3 (VE = 29%; 95%CI = 10%, 44%) and SD-IIV3/4 (VE = 24%; 95%CI = 5%, 39%); rVE = 18% (95%CI = 0%, 33%, SD as referent). When stratified by virus type, against A/H1N1, HD-IIV3 VE was 30% (95%CI = −7%, 54%), SD-IIV3/4 VE was 40% (95%CI = 10%, 61%), and rVE = −32%; (95%CI = −94%, 11%); Against A/H3N2, HD-IIV3 VE was 31% (95%CI = 9%, 47%), SD-IIV3/4 VE was 19% (95%CI = −5%, 37%), and rVE = 27%; (95% CI = 9%, 42%). Among adults ≥65 years of age, recipients of standard and high dose influenza vaccines differed significantly in their characteristics. After adjusting for these differences, high dose vaccine offered more protection against A/H3N2 and borderline significant protection against all influenza A requiring outpatient care during the 2015–2018 influenza seasons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Sofia™ Influenza A + B FIA demonstrated 74.0% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity for influenza A in patients with influenza-like illness in 2012–2013 season. It yielded higher sensitivity than SD Bioline Influenza Ag A/B/A(H1N1/2009) (54.1%) for influenza A ( P < 0.01). The Sofia™ Influenza A + B FIA might be useful for rapid diagnosis of influenza. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The effectiveness of repeated influenza vaccination was investigated. • Repeated vaccination was not effective during consecutive flu A/H3N2 epidemics. • About 80% of Korean elderly people receive influenza vaccination annually. • Poor influenza vaccine effectiveness was pronounced among the elderly population. Annually, about 80% of the Korean elderly aged ≥65 years receive influenza vaccination. Repeated annual vaccination has been suggested as an important factor of poor influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE), though reported conflicting results. During the consecutive A/H3N2-dominant influenza seasons between 2012 and 2015, we comparatively evaluated the VE (repeated vs. current season only) against laboratory-confirmed influenza, pneumonia and hospitalization in the elderly aged ≥65 years with influenza-like illness (ILI). Clinical and demographic data were collected prospectively, and vaccination status of prior and current seasons was verified using the immunization registry data of Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. During the first A/H3N2-dominant season in 2012–2013, influenza vaccine showed statistically significant effectiveness against influenza A infection only and when vaccinated in the current season only (VE 53%, 95% CI 15–77). In the latter two seasons (2013–2015 years), the adjusted VE for influenza A was indistinguishable between repeated vaccination and vaccination in the current season only. During consecutive influenza A/H3N2 epidemics, poor influenza vaccine effectiveness may be more pronounced among the elderly population with a high annual vaccine uptake rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cell culture-derived influenza vaccines (CCIVs) have several important advantages over egg-based influenza vaccines, including shorter production time, better preservation of wild-type virus antigenicity and large-scale production capacity. Methods A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial was undertaken to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a novel cell culture-derived inactivated, subunit, trivalent influenza vaccine (NBP607, SK Chemicals, Seongnam, Korea) compared to the control vaccine (Agrippal ® S1, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Srl, Siena, Italy) among healthy adults aged 19 years or older (Clinical trial Number— NCT02344134 ). Immunogenicity was determined at pre-vaccination, 1 month and 6 month post-vaccination by the hemagglutination inhibition assay. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were assessed after vaccination. Results A total of 1156 healthy subjects were recruited. NBP607 met all of the criteria of Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) at 21 days post-vaccination. Contrary to NBP607, the control vaccine did not satisfy the seroconversion criteria for influenza B irrespective of age. Although the geometric mean titer for each influenza subtype declined gradually, seroprotection rate still remained ≥80% for all subtypes up to six month after NBP607 administration. NBP607 recipients met the seroprotection criteria for all three influenza subtypes up to 6 month post-vaccination. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events between the NBP607 and control groups. Conclusion NBP607, a novel CCIV, showed excellent immunogenicity that lasted ≥6 months after vaccination and had tolerable safety profiles. In particular, NBP607 was more immunogenic against influenza B compared to the control, an egg-based subunit vaccine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The 2009 influenza pandemic was caused by a novel triple-reassortant influenza A/H1N1 virus that was further recombined with a Eurasian pig flu virus. Vaccination is a key countermeasure for disease; however, little data assessing vaccine effectiveness (VE) against the pandemic H1N1 virus are available. We conducted a matched case–control study to assess effectiveness of the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 monovalent vaccine against laboratory-confirmed, medically attended influenza patients. Subjects included in the study were ≥10 years of age and were treated at five university hospitals in the Republic of Korea (ROK) from December 2009 through March 2010. For subjects visiting outpatient clinics with influenza-like illness (ILI), real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was used to diagnose 2009 H1N1 influenza virus infection. Subjects with positive rRT-PCR were classified as cases, while those testing negative were controls. A valid vaccination corresponded to ≥14 days between receiving a dose of vaccine and symptom onset. Overall, 416 ILI subjects were analyzed, and 60 (14.4%) were vaccinated with the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 monovalent vaccine. The overall VE against pandemic 2009 A/H1N1 virus illness after adjustment for age group and presence of chronic medical conditions was 73.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=49.1–86.1%). Both vaccine formulations (unadjuvanted and MF-59 adjuvanted) showed a statistically significant VE. In conclusion, the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 monovalent vaccine was substantially protective against pandemic influenza in the ROK during the 2009–2010 season. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In a pandemic, the development of an effective influenza vaccine is the most important subject from the view of public health. This study was performed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated, monovalent H1N1 2009 vaccine (Green Cross Corporation, Yongin, Korea) among healthy adults aged 19–64 years (Group 1) and the elderly aged ≥65 years (Group 2) in a two-dose regimen, 21 days apart. At baseline, 28 of 454 participants (6.1%) had hemagglutination-inhibition titers of ≥1:40 with no significant difference between age groups (p =0.27). There was an apparent dose-dependent antibody response; participants receiving the dose of 30μg hemagglutinin (HA) showed higher geometric mean titers (GMTs) than the 15μg HA group in both age groups. Despite the rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were significantly higher with 30μg HA formulation than 15μg HA formula in Group 2, there was no definite difference in Group 1 irrespective of vaccine formula. Significant GMT elevation after the second dose was not noted in either age group, regardless vaccine formulations. No deaths, vaccine-related serious adverse events, or immediate unsolicited adverse reactions occurred during the study periods. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The elderly have been considered as the priority group for influenza vaccination, but their influenza vaccine-induced antibody was believed to decline more rapidly. Long-term immunogenicity of the influenza vaccine among the elderly was evaluated as compared to young adults. Serum hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) titers were determined at pre- and post-vaccination periods (at 1, 6, and 12 months after vaccination). Of the 1018 subjects, 716 (70.3%) were followed up during a 12-month period. Seroprotection rates at 1 month post-vaccination ranged from 70.1% to 90.3% depending on the age group and influenza vaccine virus strain. At 6 months post-vaccination, seroprotection rates for all three strains had declined significantly in adults ≥65 years (P <0.01), but still met the EMEA criteria. Low pre-vaccination HI titer (<1:40) and advanced age were associated with early decline of HI titers, falling below seroprotective levels around 6 months after vaccination. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Baloxavir marboxil (BXM) treatment-emergent polymerase acid (PA) I38X amino acid substitution (AAS) in the resistant variants of influenza viruses raise concerns regarding their emergence and spread. This study investigated the impact of 1 or 5 mg/kg BXM and 25 mg/kg oseltamivir phosphate (OS) (single or combination therapy) on the occurrence of resistance-related substitutions during the sequential lung-to-lung passages of AH1N1)pdm09 virus in mice. Deep sequencing analysis revealed that 67% (n = 4/6) of the population treated with BXM single therapy (1 or 5 mg/kg) possessed the treatment-emergent PA-I38X AAS variants (I38T, I38S, and I38V). Notably, BXM-OS combination therapy impeded PA-I38X AAS emergence. Although the doses utilized in the mouse model may not be directly translated into the clinically equivalent doses of each drugs, these findings offer insights toward alternative therapies to mitigate the emergence of influenza antiviral resistance. • Baloxavir marboxil single treatment increases the rate of selection of PA-I38X resistant variants in a mouse model. • The treatment-emergent viral populations with resistant variants acquired reduced susceptibility to BXM. • BXM-OS combination therapy impeded the occurrence of PA-I38X resistant variants in in vivo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]