Search

• Spread through air spaces is suggested to be invasion way of lung parenchyma. • Spread through air spaces has been described around lung neuroendocrine neoplasms. • Spread through air spaces may be made up by hyperplastic neuroendocrine cells. • Spread through air spaces is likely to be an ex vivo artifact due to tissue manipulation. Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a recently proposed invasion way of lung cancer, including neuroendocrine (NE) neoplasms. However, if this phenomenon is a real one or an artifact while manipulating lung specimens, it is still matter of debate. Three consecutive patients with newly diagnosed diffuse idiopathic pulmonary NE cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) were reviewed for STAS. In well-fixed lung specimens, DIPNECH was seen to coexist with atypical carcinoid, bifocal typical carcinoid and adenocarcinoma in the three patients, respectively. While STAS was not observed at the growing edges of tumors, a few freely-floating aggregates of hyperplastic NE cells within air spaces were noticed to emanate from foci of NE hyperplasia and tumorlets and in intimate association with normal bronchiolar cells and erythrocytes to denote artifactual derivation upon tissue manipulation. Traveling of hyperplastic NE cells through air spaces is likely to artifactually occur via knife, surgeon or other way, thus challenging invasion by STAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Genetic alterations for targeting therapy are largely unexplored issues in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC), a life-threatening tumor subset. Methods: EGFR, HER2, KRAS, p53, CTNNB1, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were assessed by direct sequencing, ALK, EGFR and HER2 gene status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and ALK protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 20 pleomorphic carcinomas (PLC), two pulmonary blastomas (PB) and one carcinosarcoma (CS). Surgical specimens and, in case of positivity, the corresponding preoperative biopsies were analyzed. Furthermore, 51 consecutive metastatic lung adenocarcinomas (MELAD) were used as controls for FISH and IHC assays of ALK gene. Results: While no rearrangements of ALK were detected in PSC, relevant amplification was identified 5/23 (22%) surgical specimens and paired biopsies (four PLC and one PB, two females and three males, four current and one never smoker, aged 30–83 years). Considering tumor heterogeneity, the percentage of ALK amplified tumor cells ranged from 11% to 43%, with a mean gene copy gain (GCG±SD) of 6.9±0.8 and no signal differences between the epithelial (6.5±0.9) and the sarcoma-like components (6.8±0.9) of tumors. In the remaining 18 non-amplified PSC, the relevant value was 2.9±0.5 in 1–80% tumor cells (p <0.001). ALK amplification was closely associated with chromosome 7 (EGFR) or 17 (HER2) polysomy (p <0.001). Out of 51 MELAD, 10 were ALK-rearranged (p =0.026) and only one amplified (p =0.009). No amplified tumors, either PSC or MELAD, expressed the relevant protein by IHC, while the 10 ALK-rearranged MELAD were strongly positive. TP53, KRAS and CTNNB1 mutations accounted for 30%, 22%, and 4% of cases, respectively, with no significant relationship with ALK amplification. No mutations for EGFR, HER2, BRAF or PIK3CA gene were observed. Conclusion: ALK gene amplification is a nonrandom and clonally related event in a subset of PSC, but its biologic rationale deserves further investigation. KRAS mutation could represent a novel tool for therapy of such so deadly tumors with MEK inhibitors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Detailed studies on the pathologic and molecular features of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-detected carcinomas and comparison with unscreened tumors are still lacking. We evaluated the histopathologic features of 89 LDCT-detected lung cancers resected between 2004 and 2006. These tumors occurred within a cohort of 5202 volunteers undergoing annual LDCT, aged ≥50 years, and with a minimum 20 pack-year index. In adenocarcinomas, central scar diameter, invasion foci size and K-ras mutations were also assessed. The results were compared with those of 89 consecutive lung carcinomas matched for confounding factors (sex, smoking habit), selected from group of 363 consecutive clinically worked-up lung cancer, surgically resected in the same period and at the same Institution. The tumors were diagnosed in 63 males and 26 females (range 50–79 years), 55 of which diagnosed at the baseline (1.05%) and 34 (including 10 repeat cancers) operated after work-up during the second year (0.72%). LDCT-detected tumors showed high resectability rate (89%), earlier stage (63%) and prevalence of adenocarcinoma nodules (72%), most often of the mixed subtype, in comparison with unscreened tumors. A similar prevalence of K-ras mutations was found in both screened and unscreened adenocarcinomas. Repeat cancers were found in 10 screened patients, and were predominantly stage I adenocarcinomas of mixed subtype exhibiting smaller dimension but greater central scar diameter and stromal invasion size in comparison with the other second-year, slower-growing adenocarcinomas. Multiple tumor nodules were identified in 10 patients exclusively at the baseline, were mostly mixed adenocarcinomas and differed in their K-ras mutation profile. Screening-detected lung cancers shared most of the histologic features of fully malignant tumors, in addition to a similar prevalence of K-ras mutations, despite their earlier detection and less advanced clinical stage. Repeat cancers are potentially aggressive tumors. K-ras mutation analysis supports the impression that multifocal tumors at baseline are separate synchronous primaries. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: The main challenge of screening a healthy population with low-dose computed tomography is to balance the excessive use of diagnostic procedures with the risk of delayed cancer detection. We evaluated the pitfalls, difficulties, and sources of mistakes in the management of lung nodules detected in volunteers in the Cosmos single-center screening trial. Methods: A total of 5201 asymptomatic high-risk volunteers underwent screening with multidetector low-dose computed tomography. Nodules detected at baseline or new nodules at annual screening received repeat low-dose computed tomography at 1 year if less than 5 mm, repeat low-dose computed tomography 3 to 6 months later if between 5 and 8 mm, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography if more than 8 mm. Growing nodules at the annual screening received low-dose computed tomography at 6 months and computed tomography-positron emission tomography or surgical biopsy according to doubling time, type, and size. Results: During the first year of screening, 106 patients underwent lung biopsy and 91 lung cancers were identified (70% were stage I). Diagnosis was delayed (false-negative) in 6 patients (stage IIB in 1 patient, stage IIIA in 3 patients, and stage IV in 2 patients), including 2 small cell cancers and 1 central lesion. Surgical biopsy revealed benign disease (false-positives) in 15 cases (14%). Positron emission tomography sensitivity was 88% for prevalent cancers and 70% for cancers diagnosed after first annual screening. No needle biopsy procedures were performed in this cohort of patients. Conclusion: Low-dose computed tomography screening is effective for the early detection of lung cancers, but nodule management remains a challenge. Computed tomography-positron emission tomography is useful at baseline, but its sensitivity decreases significantly the subsequent year. Multidisciplinary management and experience are crucial for minimizing misdiagnoses. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: High levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (S-CEA) are considered a negative prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while the prognostic value of tumour CEA (T-CEA) is unknown. We investigated the prognostic role of T-CEA in radically resected early stage NSCLC. We measured preoperative S-CEA levels and T-CEA in 146 patients with stage 1–2 NSCLC, and analysed their influence on survival. In patients positive for T-CEA, 3-year survival was 80%, compared to 65% in T-CEA-negative patients (p =0.03). After stratification by histology, T-CEA positivity was prognostic of better survival in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (p =0.024) but not in adenocarcinomas (ADK) (p =0.87). Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that T-CEA positivity was an independent predictor of better survival in patients with early stage NSCLC (p =0.02). In SCC patients, the magnitude of the hazard ratio was confirmed even if the precision of the estimate is decreased (p =0.06). In conclusion, T-CEA expression appears to be an important prognostic factor in early stage SSC of the lung. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Background: Indeterminate non-calcified lung nodules are frequent when low-dose spiral computed tomography (LD-CT) is used for lung cancer screening. We assessed the diagnostic utility of a non-invasive work-up protocol for nodules detected at baseline in volunteers enrolled in our single-centre screening trial, and followed for at least 1 year. Methods: 5201 high-risk volunteers, recruited over 1 year from October 2004, underwent baseline LD-CT; 4821 (93%) returned for the first repeat LD-CT. Nodules ≤5mm underwent repeat LD-CT at 1 year; nodules 5.1–8mm underwent LD-CT 3 months later; lesions >8mm received combined CT-positron emission tomography (CT-PET). A subset of nodules >8mm was studied by CT with contrast. Protocol failures were delayed diagnosis with disease progression beyond stage I, and negative surgical biopsy. Results: 2754 (53%) volunteers presented one or more non-calcified nodules. Ninety-two lung cancers were diagnosed: 55 at baseline and 37 at annual screening (66% stage I). Among the 37 incident cancers, 17 had a baseline nodule that remained stage I, 7 had a baseline nodule that progressed beyond stage I, and 13 presented a new malignant nodule. Baseline and annual cancers were 79 (1.5%) and 13 (0.2%), respectively. In 15 of 104 (14%) invasive diagnostic procedures, the lesion was benign. Sensitivity, and specificity were 91 and 99.7%, respectively, for the entire protocol; 88 and 93% for CT-PET; and 100 and 59% for CT with contrast. Conclusions: The protocol limits invasive diagnostic procedures while few patients have diagnosis delay, supporting the feasibility of lung cancer screening in high-risk subjects by LD-CT. Nevertheless further optimization of the clinical management of screening-detected nodules is necessary. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Objective: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung are considered aggressive. However, reported prognoses are heterogeneous and the optimum treatment remains undefined. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes in a series of patients with a pathological diagnosis of large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma, who underwent lung resection. We also assessed the utility of chemotherapy in a small subgroup. Patients and methods: The clinical records of 144 consecutive patients were reviewed in a multicenter study. Survival times, assessed from the day of surgery until death or most recent follow-up, were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and compared by the log rank test. Results: There were 117 men and 27 women of median age 63 years. Twelve wedge resections, 3 segmentectomies, 95 lobectomies, 7 bilobectomies and 24 pneumonectomies were performed. Induction chemotherapy was given in 21 and postoperative chemotherapy in 24. Pathologically, 73 (50%) were stage I, 29 (20%) stage II, 40 (28%) stage III and 2 stage IV. Postoperative mortality was 2.8% and morbidity 26%. Overall 5-year survival was 42.5%: 52% for stage I, 59% for stage II and 20% for stage III (p =0.001 log-rank test on Kaplan–Meier curves). A trend to better outcome was associated with preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy in stage I disease (p =0.077) compared to no chemotherapy. The response rate to induction chemotherapy was 80% in the 15 patients with data available. Conclusion: large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung are confirmed as aggressive but are also chemosensitive. Our experience suggests that chemotherapy may improve prognosis in stage I disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]