Search

Establishing the prevalence and determinants of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) in nursing homes. Cross-sectional, observational study. Patients 18-65 years old with ABI in special care units in Dutch nursing homes. Nursing homes were recruited through the national expertise network for patients with severe ABI, regional brain injury teams, and by searching the Internet. Patient characteristics were collected through digital questionnaires. NPS were assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), cognition with the Mini-Mental State Examination, and activities of daily living with the Disability Rating Scale. Psychotropic drug use (PDU) was retrieved from the electronic prescription system. Individual NPS were clustered. Associations between determinants and NPS were examined using multilevel multivariate linear regression models. In a population of 118 patients from 12 nursing homes, 73.7% had 1 or more clinically relevant NPS and 81.3% 1 or more agitated behaviors. The most common NPS were agitation, in particular aberrant motor behavior (24.6%), repetitious sentences/questions (35.5%), and constant requests for attention (34.6%), verbal (33.6%) and physical (50.5%) aggression, and irritability (28.0%). Male patients were more likely to display hyperactivity. Being married was associated with less verbally agitated behavior and pain was associated with a higher CMAI total score. PDU increased the likelihood of a higher NPI-NH total score. NPS are common in patients with ABI ≤65 years of age residing in nursing homes. This is a first step to fill in the knowledge gap concerning NPS in this population. An increasing number of patients with severe ABI may survive the acute phase and will reside many years in nursing homes. It is important to shed more light on these NPS, with regard to course, magnitude, and severity, to ultimately develop appropriate care for this vulnerable group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To prevent and control COVID-19 infections, nursing homes across the world have taken very restrictive measures, including a ban for visitors. These restrictive measures have an enormous impact on residents' well-being and pose dilemmas for staff, although primary data are lacking. A Dutch guideline was developed to cautiously open nursing homes for visitors during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports the first findings on how the guideline was applied in the local context; the compliance to local protocols; and the impact on well-being of residents, their family caregivers, and staff. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted. In total, 26 nursing homes were permitted to enlarge their possibilities for allowing visitors in their facility. These nursing homes were proportionally representative of the Netherlands as they were selected by their local Area Health Authority for participation. At each nursing home, a contact person was selected for participation in the current study. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted, consisting of questionnaire, telephone interviews, analyses of documentation (ie, local visiting protocols), and a WhatsApp group. Variation in local protocols was observed, for example, related to the use of personal protective equipment, location, and supervision of visits. In general, experiences were very positive. All nursing homes recognized the added value of real and personal contact between residents and their loved ones and indicated a positive impact on well-being. Compliance with local guidelines was sufficient to good. No new COVID-19 infections were reported during this time. These results indicate the value of family visitation in nursing homes and positive impact of visits. Based on these results, the Dutch government has decided to allow all nursing homes in the Netherlands to cautiously open their homes using the guidelines. More research is needed on impact and long-term compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the relationship between different neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and the level of distress experienced by nurses caring for residents with young-onset dementia (YOD) and (2) to compare these findings with those for nurses caring for residents with late-onset dementia (LOD). Design/Setting This is a retrospective study conducted in Dutch long-term care facilities. Data were used from the Behavior and Evolution of Young-ONset Dementia studies (BEYOND) Parts I and II and the WAAL Behavior in Dementia-II (Waalbed-II) study. Participants A total of 382 nursing home residents with YOD and 261 nursing home residents with LOD were included. Measurements The Neuropsychiatric Inventory, nursing home version, was used to assess nursing staff distress and the frequency (F) and severity (S) of NPS. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationships between nursing staff distress related to NPS and YOD and LOD care units, the F × S score per symptom, gender, dementia subtype, and dementia severity. Results Nurses working in YOD care units rated sleep and nighttime behavior disorders, delusions, and agitation/aggression most often as highly distressing and euphoria most often as not distressing. Multivariate analyses indicated that the frequency and severity of NPS were significantly associated with staff distress in all symptoms, except for apathy. Comparison of the 2 groups of nurses demonstrated that the odds for distress related to sleep and nighttime behavior disorders were higher for nurses in YOD care units than for nurses in LOD units. For both the YOD and LOD nurses, irritability in male residents had higher impact than similar behavior in female residents. Conclusion This study provides important insight into distress related to individual NPS and the interaction with residents' characteristics. All NPS result in distress. The frequency and severity of the behavior is an important predictor. Sleep and nighttime behavior disorders are more likely to result in distress in YOD nurses than in LOD nurses. The amount of distress related to NPS emphasizes the urgent need for adequate management of NPS and the support of professional caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article reports the findings of a survey on end-of-life (EOL) care in nursing homes of 18 long-term care experts across 15 countries. The experts were chosen as a convenience-based sample of known experts in each country. The survey was administered in 2016 and included both open-ended responses for defining hospice care, palliative care, and “end of life,” and a series of questions related to the following areas—attitudes toward EOL care, current practice and EOL interventions, structure of care, and routine barriers. Overall experts strongly agreed that hospice and palliative care should be available in long-term care facilities and that both are defined by holistic, interdisciplinary approaches using measures of comfort across domains. However, it appears the experts felt that in most countries the reality fell short of what they believed would be ideal care. As a result, experts call for increased training, communication, and access to specialized EOL services within the nursing home. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: A gold standard or validated tool for monitoring the level of discomfort during continuous palliative sedation (CPS) is lacking. Therefore, little is known about the course of discomfort in sedated patients, the efficacy of CPS, and the determinants of discomfort during CPS.Objectives: To identify the course of discomfort in patients receiving CPS.Methods: A prospective observational multicenter study in nine hospices and palliative care units was performed. The Discomfort Scale-Dementia of Alzheimer Type (DS-DAT) was independently assessed for monitoring of patient discomfort during CPS. The DS-DAT scores range from 0 (no observed discomfort) to a maximum of 27 (high level of observed discomfort). Using a mixed model, the mean group score of discomfort between four predefined time frames of CPS was compared, correcting for confounding patient characteristics.Results: A total of 130 patients were sedated, and the DS-DAT was completed in 106 patients at least once. The median duration of the sedation in these 106 patients was 25.5 hours (range 2-161). The mean score of the DS-DAT in the phase before sedation was 12.16 (95% CI 9.83-14.50) and decreased significantly to 8.06 (95% CI 5.53-10.58) in the titration phase of sedation. The mean score of the DS-DAT in the final phase of sedation was 7.42 (95% CI 4.90-9.94).Conclusion: This study shows that CPS is associated with a decrease in the level of discomfort within an acceptable time frame, although in some sedated patients higher levels of discomfort in the last hours of life occurred. Although the DS-DAT seems to be of value for monitoring the level of discomfort during CPS, the results of this study should be interpreted within the constraints of the limitations, and further research on the psychometric properties of this tool is needed before the DS-DAT can be used in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Young-onset dementia (YOD) is defined as dementia that develops before the age of 65. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) have important clinical consequences for patients and their family members. To date, knowledge about the prevalence and correlates of NPS in YOD is limited, but essential to establish specific tailored care for patients with YOD. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and correlates of NPS in nursing home residents with YOD. Design/Setting Cross-sectional cohort study in Dutch long-term care facilities providing specialized care for YOD. Participants Participants included 230 institutionalized patients with YOD. Measurements NPS were assessed using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH). The influence of gender, dementia severity, type of dementia, and disease awareness on clusters of relevant NPS was investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and subsequently corrected for the possible confounders of age, duration of institutionalization, and psychoactive medication use. Results Ninety percent of the nursing home residents with YOD showed 1 or more neuropsychiatric symptoms, 88% showed significant agitation, and 56% showed relevant apathy. No gender differences were found. Although physically aggressive behavior, non–physically aggressive behavior, and apathy were more common in patients with (very) severe cognitive decline (Global Deterioration Scale [GDS] stage 6–7), verbally agitated behavior was common in patients in all except the most severe stages of dementia (GDS 2–6). Apathy was more prevalent in alcohol-related dementia. Low levels of awareness were associated with more physically aggressive behavior and aberrant motor behavior. Conclusion The prevalence of NPS was high and was associated with the severity and type of dementia and disease awareness. Agitation and apathy are the most important symptoms to focus on in YOD. The high prevalence of NPS supports the idea of care delivery in special care units. Further research is needed on potentially influencing environmental correlates of NPS in YOD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Knowledge of determinants that are associated with the administration of continuous palliative sedation (CPS) helps physicians identify patients who are at risk of developing refractory symptoms, thereby enabling proactive care planning.Objectives: This study aims to explore which patient-related factors at admission are associated with receiving CPS later in the terminal phase of life.Methods: A prospective multicenter observational study was performed in six Dutch hospices and three nursing home-based palliative care units. The association between patient-related variables at admission (age, gender, diagnosis, use of opioids or psycholeptics, number of medications, Karnofsky Performance Status scale score, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System distress score, and Glasgow Coma Scale score) and the administration of CPS at the end of life was analyzed.Results: A total of 467 patients died during the study period, of whom 130 received CPS. In univariate analysis, statistically significant differences were noted between the sedated and nonsedated patients with respect to younger age (P = 0.009), malignancy as a diagnosis (P = 0.05), higher Karnofsky Performance Status score (P = 0.03), the use of opioids (P < 0.001), the use of psycholeptics (P = 0.003), and higher Edmonton Symptom Assessment System distress score (P = 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only the use of opioids at admission (odds ratio 1.90; 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.05) was significantly associated with the administration of CPS.Conclusion: Physicians should be aware that patients who use opioids at admission have an increased risk for the administration of CPS at the end of life. In this group of patients, a comprehensive personalized care plan starting at admission is mandatory to try to prevent the development of refractory symptoms. Further research is recommended, to identify other determinants of the administration of CPS and to investigate which early interventions will be effective to prevent the need for CPS in patients at high risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To describe observations of suffering in patients with dementia from the diagnosis of pneumonia until cure or death. Design Prospective observational study between January 2012 and May 2014. Setting Dutch nursing homes (32). Participants Nursing home patients with dementia and pneumonia (n = 193). Measurements Independent observers performed observations of patients with dementia scheduled 13 times within the 15 days following diagnosis of pneumonia; twice daily in the first 2 days– to observe discomfort (Discomfort Scale–Dementia of Alzheimer Type; range 0–27), comfort (End Of Life in Dementia-Comfort Assessment in Dying; range 14–42), pain (Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia; range 0–10), and dyspnea (Respiratory Distress Observation Scale; range 0–16). Results Observational data were obtained for 208 cases of pneumonia in 193 patients. In 71.2% of cases, patients received 1 or more treatments to relieve symptoms such as antipyretics, opioids, or oxygen; 89.4% received antibiotics. Discomfort was highest 1 day after diagnosis [mean Discomfort Scale-Dementia of Alzheimer Type score 8.1 (standard deviation, SD 5.8)], then declined, and stabilized around day 10 [mean 4.5 (SD 4.1)], or increased in the days preceding death. Observed pain and dyspnea followed a comparable pattern. Discomfort patterns did not differ much between cases treated with and without antibiotics. Conclusions Pneumonia in patients with dementia involved elevated levels of suffering during 10 days following diagnosis and in the days preceding death. Overall observed discomfort was low compared with prior Dutch studies, and the number of treatments to relieve symptoms was higher. Future studies should examine whether symptoms of pneumonia can be relieved even more, and what treatments are the most effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim of this study was to develop an index derived from the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) items that is suited for clinical studies evaluating appropriateness of psychotropic drug use (PDU) for neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with dementia in nursing homes and to test its reliability and validity. Study Design and Setting An expert panel reviewed the MAI items to develop items for appropriateness of PDU; a second, independent, expert panel determined content validity of the items. An interrater reliability study was conducted (N = 54), and a summated index score, based on weighted item scores, was developed to enhance the use in clinical studies. Construct validity was explored using a representative sample of 560 medical records. Results Five existing MAI items were used, the MAI item "indication" was adjusted, a new item "evaluation" was added, and scoring rules were based on guideline recommendations, to create the Appropriate Psychotropic drugs use In Dementia (APID) index. The second expert panel concluded that all items contributed to the construct "appropriateness." All items and the summated index score had moderate to almost perfect interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient for agreement, 0.577-1). The summated index score showed promising construct validity, for example, no multicollinearity issues were found. Conclusion The results of this study show that the APID index is reliable and valid for measuring appropriateness of PDU for NPS in dementia in nursing homes in clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is much ambiguity regarding the term “nursing home” in the international literature. The definition of a nursing home and the type of assistance provided in a nursing home is quite varied by country. The International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics and AMDA foundation developed a survey to assist with an international consensus on the definition of “nursing home.” [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The objective of this study is to explore factors that elucidate reasons for psychotropic drug (PD) prescription for neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. Design A qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. Setting Twelve NHs in The Netherlands. Participants Fifteen physicians and 14 nurses. Measurements Individual, face-to-face, in-depth semistructured interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed using Atlas.ti. Results The qualitative analysis revealed 4 emerging themes with factors either or both enhancing or limiting PD prescription, which we used to develop a conceptual framework. First, the mindset of physicians and nurses toward NPS and PDs appeared to contribute. Second, inadequate knowledge of and experience with NPS and limited people skills of nurses may induce PD prescription. Also, knowledge of effectiveness and side effects of PDs from education, literature, and guidelines, and previous personal experiences was considered relevant. Third, effective communication and cooperation between professionals and with family may improve the appropriateness of PD prescription. Fourth, external factors including staffing issues, nursing home setting, access to consultants, national and local policies, and zeitgeist were considered to affect PD prescription. Conclusion We have developed a conceptual framework explaining how different factors influence PD prescription. This provides opportunities for improving PD prescription in NH residents with dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex and disabling disorder. Ultimately, 20% to 40% of patients are admitted to a nursing home, and neurologists often lose track of these patients. Care and treatment of these institutionalized patients have not been addressed comprehensively, but anecdotal reports suggest it is suboptimal. We conducted a qualitative study to analyze the quality of PD care in Dutch nursing homes from the perspective of residents, caregivers, and health care workers. Methods Experiences and (unmet) needs of 15 nursing home residents with PD and parkinsonism (90% Hoehn and Yahr stage 4 and 5) and 15 informal caregivers were assessed using semistructured interviews. Furthermore, 5 focus group discussions were organized with 13 nurses and 22 other health care professionals to explore the experiences and barriers of PD care. Results Three core unmet needs were identified: (1) unsatisfactory empathy and emotional support, according to residents and informal caregivers; (2) insufficient staff knowledge on PD-related issues, such as motor fluctuations, leading to poorly timed administration of levodopa; (3) suboptimal organization of care with limited access to neurologists and specialized PD nurses. Conclusions PD care in Dutch nursing homes is suboptimal according to residents, informal caregivers, and health care workers. Three core areas for improvement were identified, including greater attention for psychosocial problems, improved PD-specific knowledge among nursing home staff, and better collaboration with hospital staff trained in movement disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This article reports the findings of a policy survey designed to establish research priorities to inform future research strategy and advance nursing home practice. The survey was administered in 2 rounds during 2013, and involved a combination of open questions and ranking exercises to move toward consensus on the research priorities. A key finding was the prioritization of research to underpin the care of people with cognitive impairment/dementia and of the management of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia within the nursing home. Other important areas were end-of-life care, nutrition, polypharmacy, and developing new approaches to putting evidence-based practices into routine practice in nursing homes. It explores possible innovative educational approaches, reasons why best practices are difficult to implement, and challenges faced in developing high-quality nursing home research. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Parkinson disease (PD) is common in long term care (LTC) facilities. The number of institutionalized patients with PD will rise sharply in the coming decades because of 2 concurrent phenomena: aging of the population leads to an increased PD prevalence and improved quality of care has led to a prolonged survival in advanced disease stages. Only a few studies have investigated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with PD in LTC facilities. Even fewer studies have addressed the treatment strategies used to support these institutionalized patients, who are mostly in advanced stages of the disease. The available evidence suggests that current management of patients with PD in LTC facilities is less than optimal. In the Netherlands, and we suspect in many other countries, there are no formal guidelines for treating patients with PD who have been admitted to a LTC facility. In this review, we describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and clinical management of patients with PD in LTC settings. We also address potentially modifiable elements of care and provide several recommendations to improve the management of PD in these facilities. We conclude by suggesting a possible guide for future research in this area. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Patient care guidelines are usually implemented one at a time, yet patients are at risk for multiple, often preventable, adverse events simultaneously. Objective: The SAFE or SORRY? programme targeted three adverse events (pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls) and was successful in reducing the incidence of these events. This article explores the process of change and describes the effect on the preventive care given. Design: Separate data on preventive care were collected along the cluster randomised trial, which was conducted between September 2006 and November 2008. Settings: Ten hospital wards and ten nursing home wards. Participants: We monitored nursing care given to adult patients with an expected length of stay of at least five days. Methods: The SAFE or SORRY? programme consisted of the essential recommendations of guidelines for pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls. A multifaceted implementation strategy was used to implement this multiple guidelines programme. Data on preventive care given to patients were collected in line with these guidelines and the difference between the intervention and the usual care group at follow-up was analysed. Results: The study showed no overall difference in preventive pressure ulcer measures between the intervention and the usual care group in hospitals (estimate=6%, CI: −7–19) and nursing homes (estimate=4%, CI: −5–13). For urinary tract infections, even statistically significantly fewer hospital patients at risk received preventive care (estimate=19%, CI: 17–21). For falls in hospitals and nursing homes, no more patients at risk received preventive care. Conclusion: Though the SAFE OR SORRY? programme effectively reduced the number of adverse events, an increase in preventive care given to patients at risk was not demonstrated. These results seem to emphasise the difficulties in measuring the compliance to guidelines. More research is needed to explore the possibilities for measuring the implementation of multiple guidelines using process indicators. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Patient care guidelines are usually implemented one at a time, yet patients are at risk for multiple, often preventable, adverse events simultaneously. Objective: This study aimed to test the effect of the SAFE or SORRY? programme on the incidence of three adverse events (pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls). This paper describes Part I of the study: the effect on the incidence of adverse events. Design: A cluster randomised trial was conducted between September 2006 and November 2008. After a three-month baseline period the intervention was implemented followed by a nine-month follow-up period. Settings: Ten wards from four hospitals and ten wards from six nursing homes were stratified for institute and ward type and then randomised to intervention or usual care group. Participants: During baseline and follow-up, patients (≥18 years) with an expected length of stay of at least five days, were asked to participate. Methods: The SAFE or SORRY? programme consisted of the essential recommendations of guidelines for the three adverse events. A multifaceted implementation strategy was used for the implementation: education, patient involvement and feedback on process and outcome indicators. The usual care group continued care as usual. Data were collected on the incidence of adverse events and a Poisson regression model was used to estimate the rate ratio of the adverse events between the intervention and the usual care group at follow-up. Results: At follow-up, 2201 hospital patients with 3358 patient weeks and 392 nursing home patients with 5799 patient weeks were observed. Poisson regression analyses showed a rate ratio for the development of an adverse event in favour of the intervention group of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.34–0.95) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.48–0.99) for hospital patients and nursing home patients respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that implementing multiple guidelines simultaneously is possible, which is promising. Patients in the intervention groups developed 43% and 33% fewer adverse events compared to the usual care groups in hospitals and nursing homes respectively. Even so, more research is necessary to underline these results. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00365430. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Patients in hospitals and nursing homes are at risk for the development of often preventable adverse events. Guidelines for the prevention of many types of adverse events are available, however compliance with these guidelines appears to be lacking. As a result many patients do not receive appropriate care. We developed a patient safety program that allows organisations to implement multiple guidelines simultaneously and therefore facilitates guideline use to improve patient safety. This program was developed for three frequently occurring nursing care related adverse events: pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls. For the implementation of this program we developed educational activities for nurses as a main implementation strategy. Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe the effect of interactive and tailored education on the knowledge levels of nurses. Design: A cluster randomised trial was conducted between September 2006 and July 2008. Settings: Ten hospital wards and ten nursing home wards participated in this study. Prior to baseline, randomisation of the wards to an intervention or control group was stratified for centre and type of ward. Participants: All nurses from participating wards. Methods: A knowledge test measured nurses’ knowledge on the prevention of pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections and falls, during baseline en follow-up. The results were analysed for hospitals and nursing homes separately. Results: After correction for baseline, the mean difference between the intervention and the control group on hospital nurses’ knowledge on the prevention of the three adverse events was 0.19 points on a zero to ten scale (95% CI: −0.03 to 0.42), in favour of the intervention group. There was a statistically significant effect on knowledge of pressure ulcers, with an improved mean mark of 0.45 points (95% CI: 0.10–0.81). For the other two topics there was no statistically significant effect. Nursing home nurses’ knowledge did neither improve (0 points, CI: −0.35 to 0.35) overall, nor for the separate subjects. Conclusion: The educational intervention improved hospital nurses’ knowledge on the prevention of pressure ulcers only. More research on long term improvement of knowledge is needed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID [NCT00365430]. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives To assess the provision and need of dermatologic care among Dutch nursing home patients and to obtain recommendations for improvement. Design Cross-sectional nationwide survey. Setting All 173 nursing home organizations in the Netherlands. Participants Physicians working in nursing homes. Measurements Web-based questionnaire concerning the burden of skin diseases in nursing home patients, diagnostic procedures and therapy, collaboration with dermatologists, physicians' level of education, and suggestions for improvement. Results A total of 126 (72.8%) nursing home organizations, with 1133 associated physicians participated in our study and received the questionnaire. A total of 347 physicians (30.6%) completed the questionnaire. Almost all respondents (99.4%) were recently confronted with skin diseases, mostly (pressure) ulcers, eczema, and fungal infections. Diagnostic and treatment options were limited because of a lack of availability and experience of the physicians. More live consultation of dermatologists was suggested as being important to improve dermatologic care. Other suggestions were better education, more usage of telemedicine applications, and better availability of diagnostic and/or treatment procedures like cryotherapy. Conclusion Physicians in nursing homes are frequently confronted with skin diseases. Several changes in organization of care and education are expected to improve dermatologic care in nursing home patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Patients in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) open their eyes spontaneously, but show only reflexive behavior. Although VS/UWS is one of the worst possible outcomes of acquired brain injury, its prevalence is largely unknown. This study's objective was to map the total population of hospitalized and institutionalized patients in VS/UWS in the Netherlands: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment limitations. Methods Nationwide point prevalence study on patients in VS/UWS at least 1 month after acute brain injury in hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, institutions for people with intellectual disability, and hospices; diagnosis verification by a researcher using the Coma Recovery Scale-revised (CRS-r); gathering of demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment limitations. Results We identified 33 patients in VS/UWS, 24 of whose diagnoses could be verified. Patients were on average 51 years old with a mean duration of VS/UWS of 5 years. The main etiology was hypoxia sustained during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. More than 50% of patients had not received rehabilitation services. Most were given life-sustaining treatment beyond internationally accepted prognostic boundaries regarding recovery of consciousness. Seventeen (39%) of 41 patients presumed to be in VS/UWS were found to be at least minimally conscious. Conclusions Results translate to a prevalence of 0.1 to 0.2 hospitalized and institutionalized VS/UWS patients per 100,000 members of the general population. This small figure may be related to the legal option to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration. On the other hand, this study shows that in certain cases, physicians continue life-prolonging treatment for up to 25 years. Patients have poor access to rehabilitation and are at substantial risk for misdiagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To compare the Neuropsychiatric Inventory apathy subscale (NPIa) with the abbreviated Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-10) on discriminant validity and on their performance to distinguish residents as apathetic or nonapathetic. Design: Cross-sectional design. Setting: Nursing home. Participants: 100 residents of 4 dementia special care units (n = 58) and 3 somatic units (n = 42). Measurements: Primary professional caregivers were interviewed to score the AES-10 and NPIa. The elderly care physician and the psychologist of each unit examined residents for clinical apathy using diagnostic criteria. Results: The AES-10 and NPIa correlated moderately with each other (rs  = 0.62, P < .0001). The AES-10 correlated weakly (rs  = 0.27, P = .024) and the NPIa moderately (rs  = 0.46, P = .001) with the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (P < .01) for AES-10 and 0.67 (P < .05) for NPIa. The AES-10 produced higher sums of sensitivity and negative predictive value than the NPIa. Explorative analyses revealed that both instruments produced higher scores in dementia independently of having an apathy diagnosis, whereas AUCs were significant in nondementia (AES-10: AUC = 0.88, P < .001; NPIa: AUC = 0.77, P = .023), but not in dementia. Conclusion: Both the AES-10 and NPIa may be used to distinguish apathetic from nonapathetic residents in a heterogeneous sample with and without dementia, or in residents without dementia. The AES-10 may be preferable to the NPIa apathy subscale when ruling out or screening for apathy. The performance of the scales against diagnostic criteria of apathy in dementia need to be further examined. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]